Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

For the First Time Ever: An Entire Post Swiped From Hot Air

Since you guys don't believe me. Believe the focus group. Please watch the clip below the fold.

Let me quote: "This tested the highest ever of any negative ad in this entire campaign."


Surprise: Negative ad that hits Obama on Fannie and Freddie proves highly effective

How long has the righty blogosphere been screaming at the RNC to go nuclear on this? No ad we’ve posted this year got as much grassroots buzz as that “What Just Happened?” dynamo that leveled the Dems on this same subject. Why McCain’s made Ayers the centerpiece of the attacks instead, I’ll never know, especially with Democratic voters reacting almost as well to this spot as Republicans did. Presumably, Team Maverick’s own focus groups are populated with nuts like these, who acknowledge The One will be a terrible president but long nonetheless for the golden days of Reagan in which, er … the government took over Wall Street? No wonder communists are stoked.

I was going to post McCain’s newest ad here too — it’s okay, albeit no world-beater — but reposting the “What Just Happened?” spot is probably a more productive use of our bandwidth so let’s do that instead.


An entire post simply stolen from Hot Air. Complete plagiarism.

I'm doing this so you understand:

1) This issue is killer

2) Yes, indeed, it can be easily explained in 60 seconds

and

3) Hell yeah, the public cares. It moves votes.

Want to know what the previous most effective ad Luntz had tested was?

It was an Obama ad blaming McCain for the crisis, linking him to it via his advisers.


Frank Luntz focus-grouped it. It tested through the roof. One woman -- a McCain leaner -- shook her head during it. When the ad was over, she didn't just say "that was a good ad." She declared she'd become an Obama voter on the spot.

The top two ads this whole campaign have assigned blame for the crisis.

Obama does it six times a debate, claiming that the "failed policies of George Bush and John McCain are responsible."

This is not a merely one "good" issue among many. McCain actually introduced and fought for a bill to avert this crisis. Barack Obama refused to vote for cloture -- "voting present," in a way -- thus killing the bill without an actual vote on its merits.

This is not some arcane secondary issue.

The public is enraged by this.

Whoever is blamed for this will lose the election. Very badly.

And McCain won't fight back.

As the engineer in Apollo 13 said: "I am not just making this stuff up."

Posted by: Ace at 02:10 AM



Comments

1 And the top ad isn't even "perfect." It has the issues outlined, but we have plenty of newspaper headlines and very short snippets that confirm or reinforce the point.

(Franklin Raines going on about "Freddie is so secure, it shouldn't be required to hold a 4% reserve, maybe 2%" is the quote that boggles me.) But there's a long list of irritating ones. Mix and match.

Posted by: Al at October 16, 2008 02:14 AM (Lk931)

2 Yup.  It's not even a great ad. 

But it makes its points.  And it tests the best of any ad.

A better ad would do even better.


Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:16 AM (1WR4H)

3 dude u just stole from Allah, bad mojo and fatwas are coming ur way... although this issue does need to be pounded down the throats of the american people...perhaps i would donate more to mccains campaign if i could donate to specific issues and ads  i wish he would do more of instead of just donating to john mccain overall

Posted by: dixon at October 16, 2008 02:17 AM (I1IDZ)

4

OK ace, you want to wallow in your suffering, fine.

I just read the debate transcript, and McCain did a super job presenting a staunch conservative vision of government spending and the pro-life position.

He slammed Obama for ACORN and Ayers, had a couple shout-outs to Hillary supporters, and had a great answer on energy.  He brought a damn fine performance tonight, but all you can do is obsess over a stupid allahpundit/Politico thing that is designed to make conservatives crap all over John McCain.

At this point, I think you and allahpundit are basically creating a reason to oppose McCain out of thin air.  It makes you look delusional and extremely immature. 

Posted by: funky chicken at October 16, 2008 02:18 AM (xyyHG)

5

The public is enraged by this.

Whoever is blamed for this will lose the election.

And McCain won't fight back.

We're fucked, aren't we?

Posted by: David in San Diego at October 16, 2008 02:19 AM (TPWTR)

6 Ace.

Look for an email from me. I promise it won't waste your time.

Posted by: topsecretk9 at October 16, 2008 02:19 AM (1cqur)

7 Ace.

Look for an email from me. I promise it won't waste your time.

Posted by: topsecretk9 at October 16, 2008 02:19 AM (1cqur)

Girls are always leading guys on that way, topsecretk9.

Also, Ace, it's a copyright violation, not plagiarism.

Finally, as I said here:

"I can't believe you guys are just dismissing the economy as an election-turning issue."

Ace you are stuck on stupid tonight, so let me educate you.

No one here is dismissing the economy as an issue.* The problem is that the GOP nominated a candidate with strong foreign policy credentials, command history, and legislative experience as opposed to a candidate who's well-versed on the economy, like Romney or even Giuliani.

McCain really isn't great on this issue. He's not being willfully obtuse. It's not his forte.

He's smart enough on it to get good advisors, better advisors than Barack Obama would have on this issue. But he's not well versed enough to defeat a better debater on the issue because, frankly, he's a bit squishy on this issue.

However, his past votes in the Senate and attempts to reform Freddie and Fannie suggest he and his senatorial staff are better on the issue. Obama's a Marxist.

McCain is going to attack Obama with what he's* strongest at even if you or I would attack him (metaphorically) using other tools.

The question is: center-right Republican administration or Marxist-Democrat administration, including on the economy? Which do you prefer?

Then get with the fucking program.


*We're acknowledging there's more than one issue, with the economy a huge one.

Posted by: Christoph at October 16, 2008 02:23 AM (hawOV)

8 I thought McCain did very well on all of the secondary issues of this campaign.

If you're still mystified as to why McCain is losing despite winnng, superficially, three debates, I'm telling you the reason:  Because Obama is winning on by far the primary issue and McCain won't fight back on it.

If you have some other explanation, let me know.

What part of "tested the best of any negative ad this entire campaign' do you not understand?


Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:24 AM (1WR4H)

9

yeah, and it was frank luntz's group. So, good. It is about time Republican 527 groups crawled out from underneath a rock and chipped in to fight the fight.

This is my point. You guys have all asked and lobbyed for mac to attack Obama from 10 different angles at once. Let McCain do him. He won when all of you thought he would lose the primarys.

Next week McCain will be within the margin of error. the fact that mac is within 2-5 depending on the poll says he is going to win. Obama will not get the turnout they think. They need an enormous turnout of unheard of proportions among youngsters and Blacks. He will get a good one. Not enough to offset the loss of dems and indys to McCain.

Posted by: ppp at October 16, 2008 02:24 AM (zzms8)

10 funky chicken,

Do you not get that the vast majority of people watching these debates aren't hyper-partisan Republicans?  You really need to step back and consider how these things look from an average voters perspective.

When McCain went after Ayers and ACORN, we all cheered but I bet a lot of people went, 'who?', 'what?'.

This they get. They get it effects them and they damn well want someone to pay for it.  McCain is the good guy here. He actually did the thing everyone claims they wished someone had done and he won't talk about it. Not only that, he lets the guy who did all the wrong things blame him for the mess! It's freaking bizzaro world.

That doesn't bother you?

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 02:26 AM (hlYel)

11 >>>You guys have all asked and lobbyed for mac to attack Obama from 10 different angles at once.

Um, actually, me personally?  I've been on this hobby horse and only this hobby horse for three or four weeks. 

i don't write mccain about ayers or wright or whatever.

I only write about this issue.  this and only this.


Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:26 AM (1WR4H)

12 Damn, this site has now lost the only issue for which I came here...Ace's ability to make it look like he wasn't just stealing all this shit from other sites.
Blogging is now over. Ace is just a thieving Hobo now.

Posted by: Rocks at October 16, 2008 02:26 AM (7rbe9)

13 another thing, sure mccain is known for his temper and wants to keep it under control but when he says the american  people are pissed cant he get that sympathetic look out  of his eyes and get the  fire  in his eyes like he is pissed too,

 i mean he is sitting across the table from one of the people who caused this thing and he doesnt look the least bit pissed but says the american people are angry? 

heres a hint to mccain if ur representing us pissed off americans then perhaps u should have some fire under ur ass. i dont want someone to say they feel my pain or my anger then move on, i really want u to feel my fucking anger  at the dems and express it

Posted by: dixon at October 16, 2008 02:27 AM (I1IDZ)

14 >>>amn, this site has now lost the only issue for which I came here...Ace's ability to make it look like he wasn't just stealing all this shit from other sites.
Blogging is now over. Ace is just a thieving Hobo now.

come on, who was I fooling anyway?

Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:28 AM (1WR4H)

15 "When McCain went after Ayers and ACORN, we all cheered but I bet a lot of people went, 'who?', 'what?'."

That. Was! The. Point.

The media will be forced to cover it somewhat and people will now tune in a bit more when they see the ads or media coverage.

Posted by: Christoph at October 16, 2008 02:29 AM (hawOV)

16 Uhm....Why don't we just get a bunch of 527s to run this thing 24/7?  Problem solved.

Posted by: kal at October 16, 2008 02:30 AM (lcmoR)

17 It's okay to steal from Allahpundit. He's gone to the dark side.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:31 AM (MKM35)

18 I'm sorry -- can you guys offer a compelling reason not to push THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE, upon which  McCain was prescient and Obama cowardly and partisan, in a debate?

You're talking about how well he did on secondary issues.  Well, BULLY for him.

Can you offer a good reason why he should not have hit obama on this?

Anyone?

Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:32 AM (1WR4H)

19 Yeah, this is it. Scott Rasmussen has pointed out a couple of times (maybe more that i missed) that this is what's driving the polls. McCain needs to concentrate on this and drop the "wall street greed" line, it just comes off as pandering and there's no need for it when he's got the facts about this on his side.

Posted by: koopy at October 16, 2008 02:33 AM (bL4cA)

20 By the way, for those of you who have said I have given up let me say for the record I gave money to both of these organizations today.

Posted by: Editor at October 16, 2008 02:34 AM (p4YSL)

21

Ace, you could do something positive instead of coming off like a toddler throwing a tantrum.  You could put RightChange's ads in a main post.  Link the videos, link the donation button, say you do wish the McCain campaign had ads this good, but hey, at least we can send donations to support exactly what we want to see....

instead you choose to post the same pouty nonsense for the 3rd time today

please trust me....you are making a fool of yourself, and stabbing the McCain campaign in the back after they have been kind to you

 

Posted by: funky chicken at October 16, 2008 02:34 AM (xyyHG)

22 he can keep the wall street greed.  The pubic wants as many heads as possible, and it sounds like it makes him "Maverick."

But he has to hit THIS much harder, every day.


Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:34 AM (1WR4H)

23 The media will be forced to cover it somewhat and people will now tune in a bit more when they see the ads or media coverage.

Right because all a Republican has to do is mention something harmful about a Democrat and the MSM immediately moves that issue to the top of their pile.

If the media were doing it's job this would have all come out already. Besides, Ayers isn't going to win this election. People want to know where their quarterly 401(K) statements were in the shiter and what you are going to do about it. They will make a deal with the Devil if they think he will put things back in order. McCain needs people to understand Obama isn't going to fix this because he and his allies created it.


Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 02:35 AM (hlYel)

24 You really need to step back and consider how these things look from an average voters perspective.

She has. The average voter is not impressed when republicans constantly bash their own candidate repeatedly.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:36 AM (MKM35)

25 he should have hit him and hit him hard as to why he didnt, fuck if i know, either hes chicken shit, doesnt want to be called a racist meanie, lazy or doesnt want to  hear the soundbite of him saying that he doesnt know much about the economy played over and over all week,

im not mavericky enough to figure out why he wont land a punch thatll leave obama bruised

Posted by: dixon at October 16, 2008 02:37 AM (I1IDZ)

26 This ad is brilliant in getting people's attention, and could really help McCain in the swing states.  Do we know where and if these ads are still playing out there?

Need more air time stat!


Posted by: smartsy at October 16, 2008 02:38 AM (CzC2M)

27 It's not that I don't believe you, Ace.  I do believe you.  I'm just increasingly suspicious that the polls might be significantly wrong.  Maybe that's whistling past the graveyard, but Ann Coulter's new column covers some interesting poll history, and that zombietime article (which I don't want to link because, if it's true, would rather not draw too much attention towards until after the election) is pretty riveting stuff, too.

I'm just not going to throw in the towel.  That's all.  I'm voting, volunteering, and will probably spend the last week working my butt off in a battleground state

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 02:38 AM (xFNQx)

28 "Right because all a Republican has to do is mention something harmful about a Democrat and the MSM immediately moves that issue to the top of their pile."

Republican, no, Presidential candidate during a major and last debate who mentions something shocking all of a sudden their viewers, readers, and listeners sit up and take note of, yes, they'll have to cover it.

Barack Obama's answers about this fraud (that word was used, by McCain, I think), "terrorist" (word used more than once by whomever, maybe both) will again enhance curiosity.

Posted by: Christoph at October 16, 2008 02:39 AM (hawOV)

29 So, what do you want, Ace? Do you just want to complain about it? Do you want to try alternative ways of getting the same message out? Do you want to vote Obama? What???

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:39 AM (MKM35)

30 guys, instead of knocking me for not "supporting the team," why don't YOU blitz the RNC and McCain phone lines and emails demanding this issue gets put front and center?

If I put up the digits, would you do it?


Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:39 AM (1WR4H)

31 dave,

You are a genius. You have discovered the issue the 'average voter' is impressed with...how often conservatives try and help their candidate.

It's not taxes, it's not the economy, it's not terrorism or war. No, you have finger on the pulse of the people and have decided that they are not impressed with intra-party debates!

So if we all just shut up and get in line....Victory will be our reward.

You sir, make Karl Rove look like a dunce.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 02:40 AM (hlYel)

32 guys, supporting the team is one thing, but the coach is calling the wrong plays.  Losing plays.

Support the team and you're guaranteed defeat. 

We need the coach to call different plays.

And you can doubt those polls all the way to defeat. 

Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:41 AM (1WR4H)

33 Right because all a Republican has to do is mention something harmful about a Democrat and the MSM immediately ...

...accuses of you of shouting "Kill him!"

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:41 AM (MKM35)

34 Just curious but for all the naysayers out there...which part of 60%+ approval of this ad by DEMOCRATS (while attacking Obama! For taking Fannie/Freddie money!) doesn't impress you?

Please explain it to me 'cause it looks damn impressive to me.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 02:41 AM (hlYel)

35 "I'm just increasingly suspicious that the polls might be significantly wrong."

It doesn't matter.  That possibility is STILL no excuse for passing up your best attack -- one which, by the way, helps everyone downticket too.

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 02:42 AM (2z2WN)

36 "Can you offer a good reason why he should not have hit obama on this?
Anyone?"

No, I can't, but it's not clear what you think we're supposed to do about it now.  I'm not giving up.

It's like Limbaugh says:  we're just going to have to drag McCain across the finish line ourselves.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 02:42 AM (xFNQx)

37 Ace, it's not that we don't all wish that McCain would hammer Obama on this. It's that you shouldn't be surprised that the guy who won't touch Rev. Wright and condemned the swift boat vets won't. He's spent decades defining himself in a way that doesn't allow him to make this his central issue and you can't change that. What you can do is convince too many people on our side that we've lost and it's not worth fighting for a McCain win even though he's stubborn centrist RINO ass. Please don't.

Posted by: phil at October 16, 2008 02:42 AM (fDO1N)

38 Face it, Ace has proved whoever owns this issue owns the election. Pwns it. Period. The issue occupies the forefront of voters' minds now and for the next few months, at least. Can anyone name an issue, of current note, that can sway uncertain minds with such ease? Not even terrorism can do that, here and now in mid-October.

A humble 527 produced that ad, and it is so straightforward in style. It's not nearly as complex an issue as Ayers, CAC, Rezko, even Wright... although when the cockroach Wright's exposure to sunlight didn't exterminate Obastard's chances, I concluded that Americans would swallow literally anything to assuage liberal white guilt. That's when I knew we were truly hosed.

Ace will be able to look back on this episode and say "I told you so," while we all swill our Obama Victory Gin from the Ingsoc canteens Big Barack will install in every Administrative District of the USSA.

Posted by: George Orwell at October 16, 2008 02:42 AM (AZGON)

39 By the way, how many of you out there who are pissed that we are bashing McCain happen to love Palin?  Raise your hand.

Yeah, - guess what .  She took a fucking ice pick to her party. 

Posted by: Editor at October 16, 2008 02:43 AM (p4YSL)

40 Well, Ace, people seldom do what we want them to do. Adapt or die.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:43 AM (MKM35)

41 "guys, supporting the team is one thing, but the coach is calling the wrong plays.  Losing plays."

Ace, is John McCain the guy who beat out a crowded field to win the GOP nomination or not?

Let's say your right and your coach isn't the best. You still do your part and play your position.

Posted by: Christoph at October 16, 2008 02:43 AM (hawOV)

42 Apparently this is the time when Ace is tempted to hoist the black flag and... mutiny against the captain.

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 02:43 AM (2z2WN)

43 "Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 02:42 AM (2z2WN)"

Okay, there's no excuse.  Now what?  What do you prescribe?  Continued kvetching?  I prefer dealing as best I can with what's on the table, because there's nothing else to do.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 02:44 AM (xFNQx)

44

ace, just because Frank Luntz says this issue is the #1 issue right now, um, no I'm not going to call the RNC and sound like a nutter.

I did donate to RightChange because I love their FM/FM ads.  They target democrats in general, and hit Obama, Dodd, Fwank, Johnson by name.  They will help in downticket races, which are very important.

Please consider helping to get their ads funded enough for constant air play.

Posted by: funky chicken at October 16, 2008 02:44 AM (xyyHG)

45 "I'm not giving up."

Neither is he -- this is about making McCain use his best weapon.

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 02:44 AM (2z2WN)

46 OFF TOPIC: I recommend that anyone in need of encouragement (and after McCain's performance in last night's debate, who couldn't use some good news?) read Ann Coulter's latest column. It made me feel somewhat better.

When the polls were wrong, which was often, they overestimated support for the Democrat, usually by about 6 to 10 points.

In 1976, Jimmy Carter narrowly beat Gerald Ford 50.1 percent to 48 percent. And yet, on Sept. 1, Carter led Ford by 15 points.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan beat Carter by nearly 10 points, 51 percent to 41 percent. In a Gallup Poll released days before the election on Oct. 27, it was Carter who led Reagan 45 percent to 42 percent.

In 1988, George H.W. Bush beat Michael Dukakis by a whopping 53.4 percent to 45.6 percent. A New York Times/CBS News Poll on Oct. 5 had Bush leading the Greek homunculus by a statistically insignificant 2 points -- 45 percent to 43 percent.

In 1996, Bill Clinton beat Bob Dole 49 percent to 40 percent. And yet on Oct. 22, 1996, The New York Times/CBS News Poll showed Clinton leading by a massive 22 points, 55 percent to 33 percent.

http://tinyurl.com/4k7qj9

Posted by: Frostee at October 16, 2008 02:45 AM (YhJZD)

47 Kensington:  30 guys, instead of knocking me for not "supporting the team," why don't YOU blitz the RNC and McCain phone lines and emails demanding this issue gets put front and center?

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 02:45 AM (2z2WN)

48 "Neither is he -- this is about making McCain use his best weapon."

Cindy McCain might get jealous, but if that's what it takes I say, "Go for it!"

McCain should use his friendship and mutual respect for Hillary Clinton, seduce her, and then get Bill on board his campaign in gratitude. Talk about an October surprise!

Posted by: Christoph at October 16, 2008 02:47 AM (hawOV)

49 we can send donations to support exactly what we want to see....

Yes we can!:

http://www.neverfindout.org/


Posted by: Maggie at October 16, 2008 02:47 AM (Lip4P)

50 The thing is, as I've said, if McCain doesn't want his own fingerprints on it, RNC can (and should) just run it themselves!  They have TONS of money.

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 02:48 AM (2z2WN)

51 Here is the KO punch that McCain needs to focus on to win this election.  And who would've thought it would come from a plumber in my home state?  Joe the Plumber is the next American Hero!!!  This interview made me cheer:

http://tinyurl.com/4pwlnc

Posted by: smartsy at October 16, 2008 02:50 AM (CzC2M)

52 DrewM. at October 16, 2008 02:40 AM (hlYel)

And you , sir, are an asshole and a liar who has posted many times that you are not voting for McCain, so stfu and stand back you duplicitous piece of crap.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:51 AM (MKM35)

53 If I put up the digits, would you do it?

Yes.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:52 AM (MKM35)

54 Now that sounds like a good call to action: convince the RNC to run this ad. Unfortunately most of the readership here isn't reading through to comment 50 of a 1 am post. They're seeing one of the most prominent and kick-ass conserative bloggers declare defeat at the end of the last presidential debate.

Posted by: phil at October 16, 2008 02:53 AM (fDO1N)

55 "If I put up the digits, would you do it?"

Okay, put up the digits.  Now tell them what, exactly?  Tell them about the ad?  It's a 527's, so we can't push them to run it, right, because it isn't theirs to run.  Is that correct?  So are we to encourage them to copy it and make their own or just get out there and keep pointing the finger at Obama?

I'll do it, whatever will help, but I'm going to need a little more specific moron-level guidance on how to approach this.

On top of all that, though, is this:  who, outside of Vietcong torturers, has ever "made" John McCain do anything he doesn't want to do?  Is that even possible?

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 02:53 AM (xFNQx)

56

McCain just doesn't have it in him, everybody needs to understand that.

He is the wrong guy at the wrong time. We, or Rush, or anyone else cannot win this for him.

Posted by: bmac at October 16, 2008 02:54 AM (wX0lH)

57 Drew: really asshole, people, the average voter and anyone who wants mccain to win, which doesn't include you, are sick of all the bashing and bickering. but since you won't vote for mccain I'm sure you want to see people to continue to promote negativity. Asshole.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:55 AM (MKM35)

58

CBS news just reported that Obama's trucking in lots of folks from CA to work here in NV for the next 3 weeks.  I guess my days of screwing around on the computer while the kiddies are in school and otherwise occupied are over for a while.

I'm going to help ?? whatever the local office assigns to me to try to offset whatever the traveling CA moonbats and their swarm for Obama attempts.

Again, please try to do something positive, like putting up a sticky post with the RightChange videos and a donation link.  And the AIP site.

Ourcountrydeservesbetter has redesigned their website...it's now super sharp.  you might consider featuring them.  Their "Obama's Wrong Values" ad rocks, IMHO.

 

Posted by: funky chicken at October 16, 2008 02:55 AM (xyyHG)

59 just because Frank Luntz says this issue is the #1 issue right now, um, no I'm not going to call the RNC and sound like a nutter. It's not just Luntz, Rasmussen has said this is the issue too. And i'll call and e-mail. Here's the contact page on the McCain-Palin site, it's also got a phone number. Yes we can!: http://www.neverfindout.org/ That's excellent, they should be playing non-stop.

Posted by: koopy at October 16, 2008 02:55 AM (bL4cA)

60 Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:51 AM (MKM35)

Do all your 'arguments' boil down to telling people to shut up? It's all very impressive and I'm sure it wins over a lot of people to your side.

Seriously, with a supporter of possessed of such gifts of persuasion, it's hard to imagine how McCain finds himself behind in this race.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 02:55 AM (hlYel)

61 okay, to be constructive, tomorrow I will put up the donation buttons for Let Freedom Ring, American Issues Project, and Our Country Deserves Better.

I will refresh the post frequently.

I will also put up the emails and phone numbers (if I can get the latter) for the RNC and McCain, asking readers to:

1)  Demand the RNC run ads on this issue, even at the expense of McCain and even against his wishes.

2) Demand McCain raise this issue, or else support will dry up.

3) Notifying them you've donated to one of the 527s in lieu of them because they refuse to speak about the issue that is most important to you.

Okay?

Seems like it's fairly constructive.  And good advice on my being constructive.

Hopefully you guys will dive in and do this.  Perhaps we can change something.


Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:56 AM (1WR4H)

62 He is the wrong guy at the wrong time. We, or Rush, or anyone else cannot win this for him.

What's your point? That we shouldn't try to get this ad shown that Ace has been trying so hard to have aired? Then fuck off. Go vote for obama. Clearly he is your guy.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 02:57 AM (MKM35)

63 Focus group? Damn, if you're determined to be miserable, nobody can stop you, but a focus group?

Posted by: Jim Treacher at October 16, 2008 02:57 AM (NV3P1)

64 RightChange too.

Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:57 AM (1WR4H)

65 "who, outside of Vietcong torturers, has ever "made" John McCain do anything he doesn't want to do?"

We did.  The bastard is at least now giving lip service to securing the borders.

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 02:58 AM (2z2WN)

66 McCain just doesn't have it in him, everybody needs to understand that.

Now what?

Posted by: Jim Treacher at October 16, 2008 02:59 AM (NV3P1)

67 jim... do you actually doubt this or are you just being argumentative over every postulate to be disagreeable?

Do you have any contrary information, or what? You just doubt this based on what, exactly?

Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 02:59 AM (1WR4H)

68 Do all your 'arguments' boil down to telling people to shut up?

That's right. Shut up. Sick of your whining. Anyone who suggests anything proactive and you attack them. Anyone who supports McCain you attack them. You are not voting for mccain. you want obama to win.

How many people have you won over by announcing you won't vote for McCain, asshole?

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 03:00 AM (MKM35)

69

Then fuck off. Go vote for obama. Clearly he is your guy.

 

Don't be a dick. That's the reality.

Posted by: bmac at October 16, 2008 03:02 AM (wX0lH)

70 And one more thing about this poll business.  I'm not talking about irrational refusal to acknowledge the possible (perhaps even likely -- who knows?) veracity of the polls.  I'm just talking about looking at some polling history (ala Coulter's column today) just to be open to the possibility that they are wrong, not because I want to encourage complacency.  Just because I want to discourage defeatism and panic.

And I understand that this may mean "doubt[ing] those polls all the way to defeat."  I'm not talking about doubting the polls as a substitute for working toward victory, however possible, just trying to find a sliver of sunshine along the way.

So post the digits, and let's not give into despair whilst dialing.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:02 AM (xFNQx)

71

Thank you ace.  We are not powerless....it just will cost us some money if we want to have the airwaves swamped with this information.

McCain is more like the team GM.  We can all kinda be player-coaches.

And Obama must lose.  The only way Obama can lose is if McCain wins.

I'm not sure if tying up the phone lines at the RNC and McCain campaigns with complaints is a great idea....I know petitions are corny, but..?

or perhaps if people go to the McCain-Palin Victory Fund donation place, give 5 bucks and then take advantage of the handy comments box, if there is one?  I know RightChange had one, and I said that I loved their FM/FM ads.

Posted by: funky chicken at October 16, 2008 03:04 AM (xyyHG)

72 dave,

Come on fess up, you are a parody of what a Kos Kid would sound like if he were a Republican, right?

I mean, it's great stuff. Really, it's spot on but you are getting close to overdoing it. Again, big fan of your work, I just don't want to see you ruin it by becoming to committed to the role.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:04 AM (hlYel)

73 "We, or Rush, or anyone else cannot win this for him."

Sure we can.  All enough of us have to do is vote for him.  That's all it would take.  Just one more vote than Obama gets.  And McCain doesn't even have to want it for it to happen.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:05 AM (xFNQx)

74 bmac: go fuck yourself. If you want obama to win, try DU. That's closer to your reality.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 03:06 AM (MKM35)

75 please stop picking on drew.  need I remind you guys that 90% of you have sworn to never vote for McCain at one point.  Multiple times.

Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 03:06 AM (1WR4H)

76

Still the kick-assest blogger out there ace. I really respect the way you listen to readers and follow through in the comments when there's an outcry against you. And I do wish like hell that we saw more of that from McCain - this issue being the perfect example.

But damn I hate to think of the damage you might do with "all is lost" posts during peak traffic with an already defeatest leaning readership about an already uninspiring, unpopular cantidate.

Posted by: phil at October 16, 2008 03:07 AM (fDO1N)

77 75 please stop picking on drew.  need I remind you guys that 90% of you have sworn to never vote for McCain at one point.  Multiple times.

Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 03:06 AM (1WR4H)

I'll admit to it... and then I gave the bastard money.  And now I'm apparently a defeatist, even though I keep giving money to other people who might actually want him to win more than he does.

Posted by: Editor at October 16, 2008 03:09 AM (p4YSL)

78 Drew: You fess up. You have posted more than once that you will not vote for McCain. Are you going to lie about it now? You won't vote for McCain and you try to discourage those who will from voting for him. And you have the nerve to call other people leftists? What the fuck do you think you are doing, you pos?

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 03:10 AM (MKM35)

79 jim... do you actually doubt this or are you just being argumentative over every postulate to be disagreeable?

Oh.  My.  Fucking...Ace, this is completely wrongheaded!  Treacher has been amazing this whole cycle.  When so many others (it seems) has gone off the deep end, he has been fearlessly, tirelessly constructive.  I can't even square your question above with the circle that has been Jim Treacher's blogging lately.

And lots could learn from his example.

And I know that probably reads like a big blow-job for Treacher, but I don't care.  Hell, if a blowjob will keep him going the next three weeks, I'll close my eyes and think of Scarlett Johanssen.  With a cock, I guess.  Whatever, I'll make it work.

Point is, that question above is a question for a troll, not Jim Treacher.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:11 AM (xFNQx)

80 please stop picking on drew. need I remind you guys that 90% of you have sworn to never vote for McCain at one point. Multiple times.

Why? Does the truth hurt? Has he changed his mind like everyone else has? Or is he still refusing to vote for McCain and trying to discourage others form voting for him? Try lecturing him.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 03:12 AM (MKM35)

81 come on, everyone chill with the fuck-yous and shit.

Need I remind you there is an important election at hand, featuring a Brown Person and a Vagina Person.


Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 03:12 AM (1WR4H)

82 And Ace, that goes for you, too, cupcake.  If you need one, I'll do it for the team.  Just don't tell anyone.  And don't look at me.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:13 AM (xFNQx)

83 No, Treacher has been doing a bang up job and keeping a sense of humor about it, too. We are lucky to have him.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 03:14 AM (MKM35)

84 I'm asking treacher if he doubts that ad is just as effective as Luntz says, or if he's just disagreeing for the sake of disagreement.

I don't hear many people arguing this is NOT a critical issue.   Or offering plausible reasons for McCain to duck it.

PS, I hear it's *racism.*  He's playing the race card on himself.

Posted by: ace at October 16, 2008 03:14 AM (1WR4H)

85 Why put the cart before the horse?

Is there a 527 that will run the ad?

Let's find out that, and then donate to them.  Let's work the "internets magic" like the fucking kossacks.

DOn't bring mohammed to the mountain, or the mountain to mohammed.  Put the fucking mountain on TV and let everyone see it.

Posted by: moronizer at October 16, 2008 03:14 AM (JxyMA)

86 No one is arguing that attacking Obama on the financial crisis (or anything for that matter) isn't the thing to do. Some if us are just saying "stop calling the results till the game's over" and trying to cheer you up so that you stop playing into the hands of the opposing team. That's all.

Posted by: Patrick Joubert Conlon at October 16, 2008 03:14 AM (5ycMj)

87 "Need I remind you there is an important election at hand, featuring a Brown Person and a Vagina Person"

Enough about Joe Biden!

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:15 AM (xFNQx)

88 ome on, everyone chill with the fuck-yous and shit. Need I remind you there is an important election at hand, featuring a Brown Person and a Vagina Person.

Tell it to Drew. He's not voting for McCain and encouraging others not to vote for him. And tell it to the people who just have to pop in and post for the millionith time that we are going to lose. Otherwise, this is just bullshit.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 03:16 AM (MKM35)

89 dave,

Dude, you must chill.

I live in a blue state that Obama is going to win by 20. I don't live within 500 miles of a battleground state. You have no idea about my donations and I'm not getting into that on a blog.

If my vote were to matter I would vote for McCain. The fact is, it doesn't.

I don't think I've ever put my voting plans in a front page post, nor do I think you can honestly say  anything but that the overwhelming majority of things I post are pro-McCain or at least anti-Obama. 

As for calling people like Obama a lefty, if you think voting for McCain i the sin qua non of being a conservative then I'd suggest you need to reconsider your position.

Again, yelling at people and calling them assholes is generally not an effective way to persuade people, but best of luck to you on that.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:16 AM (hlYel)

90

I'll admit I went to the RNC website today intending to give them a donation.  I was extremely underwhelmed with what I saw.  I like McCain's website a lot, but I've given them more than I can really afford anyway....so I went to AIP, but didn't like their ads as much as RightChange.

And I love ourcountrydeservesbetter.org's new website and their tour bus.

so they got my money.

John McCain isn't going to do everything I want him to do.  Hell, my husband doesn't do everything I want him to do all the time.  But he's a hell of a man, and since I want to stay married to him, I don't snipe at his failings. 

Posted by: funky chicken at October 16, 2008 03:17 AM (xyyHG)

91 No one is arguing that attacking Obama on the financial crisis (or anything for that matter) isn't the thing to do. Some if us are just saying "stop calling the results till the game's over" and trying to cheer you up so that you stop playing into the hands of the opposing team. That's all.

Hallelujah!

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 03:18 AM (MKM35)

92 BTW-

I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me why an ad that tests at over 60% with DEMOCRATS, while attacking Obama isn't something that McCain should be jumping on.

I've heard that people shouldn't question the Dear Leader but not make an argument about why this isn't something McCain should be all over.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:19 AM (hlYel)

93 Drew, you in Cali?  Cause NYC isn't far from PA.

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 03:19 AM (2z2WN)

94 "If my vote were to matter I would vote for McCain. The fact is, it doesn't."

For what it's worth, I wish you would reconsider.  I live in Brooklyn, so my votes disappearing into the wind, too, but if we both do it, then it's two instead of one.

And if someone else does it, then it's three...

And if enough do it, then it's...you get the picture.

I just think it's too weird a year to presume that any particular votes don't matter.  I think it's better to act as though each one does.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:19 AM (xFNQx)

95 I also think you're shitting the bed a tad early, ace.  I thought McCain did very well, and made Obama look sleazy without coming off as some obsessed angry whacko (not that anyone here is, either, I think your frustration is understandable---misguided, but understandable)

He threaded the needle well, and I had to laugh at teleprompter Jesus halting and sputtering after the first attack.  Other folks saw that too.  And saying "he's eloquent (but vapid)" was the cruelest cut of all.


Posted by: moronizer at October 16, 2008 03:19 AM (JxyMA)

96 Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 03:19 AM (2z2WN)

You know what, that's a fair point. My 3 am geography is off. I measured it to Ohio.

In fairness to me, even though I'm tired, I still know there are only 50 states. That's better than Obama does when he's beat.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:21 AM (hlYel)

97

My Friends, we shouldn't be pointing the finger at Democrats.  I say we should be reaching across the aisle to try and solve this crisis.  Because I have many friends on the other side of the aisle and in the media, and I want them to like me.  They are currently viewing me as some sort of evil, racist, unhinged  facist, or are at least doing all they can to spread this image of me, so I need to work especially hard to win them back.  Something which would be impossible to do if I started blaming the Democrats for the subprime morgage crisis.

Posted by: Johnny Mac at October 16, 2008 03:21 AM (X8Omj)

98 "I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me why an ad that tests at over 60% with DEMOCRATS, while attacking Obama isn't something that McCain should be jumping on."

Who is going to explain that?  He should.  Who is really suggesting he shouldn't.  I see some people, myself included, say that we can't just give up even if he point blank refuses.  That's all.

"I've heard that people shouldn't question the Dear Leader but not make an argument about why this isn't something McCain should be all over."

Really?  Can you cite any specific examples of this?  This doesn't sound like anything I've read in here tonight.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:22 AM (xFNQx)

99 Dude, you must chill.

Dude, you must stfu.

Don’t give me this b.s. that your vote doesn’t matter so you don’t have to vote for him. That is a pussy argument by a pussy. You attack me and then you whine when you are attacked for being the hypocrite that you are. Too bad. Yes, you want to see mccain win and you are doing so by not voting for him, telling people you are not voting for him, and whining not stop about him and insulting people who won't join in your whinefest.

Asshole.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 03:23 AM (MKM35)

100

bmac: go fuck yourself.

Nice unity there Dave.

Posted by: bmac at October 16, 2008 03:23 AM (wX0lH)

101 I'm asking treacher if he doubts that ad is just as effective as Luntz says, or if he's just disagreeing for the sake of disagreement.

Because what other possibility could there be?

Posted by: Jim Treacher at October 16, 2008 03:23 AM (NV3P1)

102

You know, dammit, youse morons coulda come to visit the chicken family, had fun down on the Strip, and registered at my house just like all the liberals have apparently done with their friends.

But nooooooo, you all wanna wallow in your blue state misery.  And you've missed the NV deadline now.  harumph

And the state authorities are all over ACORN, so I don't think even they could help us now.  Damned missed opportunity.

/this is a joke.  I'm not encouraging voter fraud or anything that would entitle me to a lovely visit from the FBI or NV state law enforcement agents.  it's a joke!

Posted by: funky chicken at October 16, 2008 03:23 AM (xyyHG)

103 Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:19 AM (xFNQx)

Dude, you're supposed to yell and call me names, not make an appeal to the better angels of my nature.

We'll see if I have the guts to follow through. I've voted Republican every election, even when it didn't count. Habits and tribal loyalty die hard.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:23 AM (hlYel)

104 Do you have any contrary information, or what?

Yeah: The evidence of my own eyes and ears.

Posted by: Jim Treacher at October 16, 2008 03:24 AM (NV3P1)

105 And I know that probably reads like a big blow-job for Treacher, but I don't care.  Hell, if a blowjob will keep him going the next three weeks, I'll close my eyes and think of Scarlett Johanssen.  With a cock, I guess.  Whatever, I'll make it work.

Given my prospects lately, you just signed yourself up for a world of trouble.

Posted by: Jim Treacher at October 16, 2008 03:26 AM (NV3P1)

106 "Dude, you're supposed to yell and call me names, not make an appeal to the better angels of my nature."

I'm trying to do what Reagan would have done.  I don't want to yell at you; I'd rather yell at Democrats!

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:27 AM (xFNQx)

107 Anybody notice that by the end of the night, Obama was a bit shiny? 

I think we saw flop sweat break out.

Strategy-wise hitting him hard in the last debate was brilliant.  Obama doesn't get to come back in front of the whole nation (unless you count his upcoming infomercial) and rebut old stuff.  He wiffed a few, and Mac got in some digs.  C'mon, I actually said I wouldn't vote for McCain on this very blog, but that was when it was Hillary as Satan.  Now we have a real commie devil, and I'll be damned if I'm letting that shit come to pass without a good electoral fight.

McCain did what he was comfortable with, and that's all we can expect.  We'll have to carry the water ourselves if we want something done differently.  I say shop the vid to friendly 527s and see who bites.


Posted by: moronizer at October 16, 2008 03:28 AM (JxyMA)

108 Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:22 AM (xFNQx)

Look at Dave's comment from the "Kill Him" thread (follow it up by reading the perfectly innocuous comment he was replying to).

Beyond that look at everyone of these threads. There's always comments about criticism not being welcome. People being told to shut up and get on board. Do you really not see comments going after anyone who speaks ill of McCain or offers alternatives to what he's doing?

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:29 AM (hlYel)

109 Drew:  split the difference -- don't vote for McAmnesty, but call a PA Victory Office tomorrow and volunteer for GOTV.

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 03:29 AM (2z2WN)

110 I am worried about this 30-minute infomercial thingee that one's going to do in a couple of weeks.  Can't McCain do that, too, or does he just not have enough money?

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:30 AM (xFNQx)

111 er, Victory Center, whatever

Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 03:30 AM (2z2WN)

112

105 And I know that probably reads like a big blow-job for Treacher, but I don't care.  Hell, if a blowjob will keep him going the next three weeks, I'll close my eyes and think of Scarlett Johanssen.  With a cock, I guess.  Whatever, I'll make it work.

Given my prospects lately, you just signed yourself up for a world of trouble.

Uhh, do you guys need a private thread cause I sensing a connection.

Posted by: Mætenloch at October 16, 2008 03:32 AM (O8Quh)

113 Posted by: someone at October 16, 2008 03:29 AM (2z2WN)

See that's the funny part, for a guy like Dave to say I'm trying to get people not to vote for McCain, I got the email from McCain's team looking for volunteers and put it up on the damn site.

I have no interest in being lecture to or cursed out by some fool for daring to disagree with him or McCain.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:33 AM (hlYel)

114 Uhh, do you guys need a private thread cause I sensing a connection.

A little too much information! Talk to the hand!

Posted by: Jim Treacher at October 16, 2008 03:33 AM (NV3P1)

115

Ace,

If you put up the digits to the RNC, I probably won't call.  If you put up a link to Let Freedom Ring and the other 527s hammering this issue, I'd probably give a donation.

Posted by: toetotoetotoe at October 16, 2008 03:33 AM (X8Omj)

116 "look at everyone of these threads. There's always comments about criticism not being welcome. People being told to shut up and get on board. Do you really not see comments going after anyone who speaks ill of McCain or offers alternatives to what he's doing?"

I guess I just would not characterize the comments as "don't question Dear Leader."  There's a lot of gray area in between criticizing "questions of John McCain strategy" and criticizing assertions that "we've lost."

For me, it's always about the nature of the criticism and it's potential for productivity.  I hope you'd admit that there's a remarkable amount of non-productive criticism (Kathleen Parker (who?) calling for Palin to step down, Noonan intimating that she'll vote for that one, etc.) in the mix, too.

Posted by: Kensington at October 16, 2008 03:37 AM (xFNQx)

117 It really doesn't matter that finance is a weak issue for McCain. He is documentably on the right side of history regarding the current crisis. More importantly, Obama and his cronies are not just on the wrong side of the issue, they're among the actual perpetrators of breaking the system.

Obama litigated for ACORN's demands for yet more loans to people incapable of paying them. Who and what ACORN is and Obama's history with them needs to be shouted as loud and long as possible. The financial crisis looms over everyone and most of America who wants a villain identified could be shown a genuine set of villains. This is the make or break issue of the election, far more than Ayersor Wright. (Aside from Ayers being part of Obama's connections to ACORN.)

Let this go, lose the election, and ten years from now if you ask a typical school student who was at fault for the financial crisis, he'll point to Republicans and conservatives because the likes of Ayers will have been given more power than ever to command the curriculum.

Too much of the electorate doesn't connect to the left/right division. They go by the stuff they think mattersto their lives rather thana general ideology. If the average American can be made to realize Obama is part of the gang that put their 401K in the toilet, that is a killer issue beyond anything else in the list. Everything else is just icing on the cake.

Posted by: epobirs at October 16, 2008 03:39 AM (+8t6W)

118 Kensington,

I agree. I think there's a difference between not loving McCain (where I am) and coming out in support of Obama (like Christopher Buckley, Heather MacDonald and Kathleen Parker).  I could never support Obama, though I admit to threatening it when there was talk of him running with Lieberman. But now? No.

As for 'thou shall not criticize' comments look up in this thread. Ace was accused of 'throwing a tantrum' for this post. Come on, that's not even remotely what this or his other posts have been about. But every time someone says something that isn't happy/supportive they get a bunch of that shit. I'm sorry but I don't think we need to go that route.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:43 AM (hlYel)

119 Mac also touched on the connection between Annenberg, Obama, Ayers, and ACORN.  Adding the Frank and the mortgage crisis would have closed that loop quite nicely.  Since everyone is criticizing like a motherfucker tonight, I figure I'd join in.  Shit, Mac connected 4/5 of teh dots for America tonight.  I just hope the ratings were high. 

Sack up, faggots. "Spread the wealth" had to have been said 5 times by Mac.  It's closer than you think, and Mac didn't need to look like Grandpa SImpson out there.

Posted by: moronizer at October 16, 2008 03:51 AM (JxyMA)

120

Drew M.,

You've got to admit throwing in the towel on politics and putting up LOLCats, even temporarily, as a half-joke, is unproductive and defeatist.  I understand Ace is human and gets frustrated, but defeatism has this nasty habit of being contagious so we need to call him on it.

Posted by: toetotoetotoe at October 16, 2008 03:55 AM (X8Omj)

121 Ladies and gentleman...chillz......we're in this together, strap your big boy pants on, its the 9th round and we're still standing, when in reality we should have been knocked out in the 4th. Put the 527 info up, and others. We'll follow your lead Ace, just make sure you give us a reach around for the effort....

Posted by: ChangeUCantBelieveIn at October 16, 2008 03:56 AM (bW4Qp)

122

We'll follow your lead Ace, just make sure you give us a reach around for the effort....

And I know that probably reads like a big blow-job for Treacher, but I don't care.  Hell, if a blowjob will keep him going the next three weeks, I'll close my eyes and think of Scarlett Johanssen.  With a cock, I guess.  Whatever, I'll make it work.

Clearly the Cinemax is influencing your blog posts.

Posted by: toetotoetotoe at October 16, 2008 03:59 AM (X8Omj)

123 None of this matters, since Amazonian catfish are going to eat all the children.  I just saw it on the history channel.

Posted by: moronizer at October 16, 2008 04:04 AM (JxyMA)

124 You've got to admit throwing in the towel on politics and putting up LOLCats, even temporarily, as a half-joke, is unproductive and defeatist.  I understand Ace is human and gets frustrated, but defeatism has this nasty habit of being contagious so we need to call him on it.

toetotoetotoe,

Everyone will react differently but I don't think it's fair to say those posts invovled throwing in the towel. Two were debate posts and one was debunking an Obama smear.

You may not agree with Ace's analysis of the debate but he's doing it in real time and honestly. That's what blogging is.

What I don't get is people saying Ace doesn't want McCain to win. There's simply no basis for that. He's using the tools he has at hand to help and people may not always like how he uses them but denying he is tying to use them is just wrong as a factual matter.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 04:06 AM (hlYel)

125

Worst Case Scenerio:  Undecideds bounce around like pinballs, depending on whatever ad they last saw.

Best Case Scenerio:  The FM FM ads stick.

Either way, our side can outspend Obama in the final month, right?

Posted by: Cincinnatus at October 16, 2008 06:21 AM (ZAlQ3)

126 I just cast my absentee ballot today. It's in the mail, on it's way to Washington State.
McCain/Palin was my pick for President of the United States.

Posted by: Mark at October 16, 2008 06:35 AM (lcisk)

127

Ummmm, how is this quote supportive of the add?

 

Frank Luntz focus-grouped it. It tested through the roof. One woman -- a McCain leaner -- shook her head during it. When the ad was over, she didn't just say "that was a good ad." She declared she'd become an Obama voter on the spot.

 

Are McCain and Obama switched?

Posted by: gern at October 16, 2008 06:41 AM (Tp7c0)

128 gern, Ace is referring to the Obama ad that blamed McCain for the financial crisis by linking it to him through his advisors.  Ace is just proving that this is the issue people care about most - no matter what angle they're coming from. 

Posted by: Redhead Infidel at October 16, 2008 08:39 AM (zlHbc)

129 ...and whoever makes the case that the financial crisis is the OTHER guys' fault is gonna WIN. 

Posted by: Redhead Infidel at October 16, 2008 08:40 AM (zlHbc)

130

"I'm not George Bush" should be the next ad.

Followed by "Obama is Jeremiah Wright"

Posted by: drjohn at October 16, 2008 09:17 AM (OoJy+)

131 See that's the funny part, for a guy like Dave to say I'm trying to get people not to vote for McCain, I got the email from McCain's team looking for volunteers and put it up on the damn site.

I have no interest in being lecture to or cursed out by some fool for daring to disagree with him or McCain.
Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 03:33 AM (hlYel)


Then let me lecture you again:

You have announced several times that voting for McCain is beneath you.

We're trying to encourage people to vote for McCain and all you do is whine and bash him -- repeatedly.

So, yes, you're trying to get people not to vote for McCain, you pussy.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 09:58 AM (MKM35)

132 bmac: go fuck yourself.

Nice unity there Dave.

Posted by: bmac at October 16, 2008 03:23 AM (wX0lH)


And you're constant whining that We're going to lose! We're going to lose! is?

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2008 09:59 AM (MKM35)

133

Someone get Dave a Thorazine cocktail with an Ativan chaser.  Send me the bill...

And call County.

Posted by: Lex Luthor at October 16, 2008 10:18 AM (YYanS)

134 Hey Dave let me put you some fucking knowledge (as the kids say),

If McCain loses it won't be because I'm insufficiently on board with the happy talk. It'll be because parties rarely get 3 straight terms in the best of times (hello, Al Gore!), because we are in a seriously rough economic patch, because Republicans haven't exactly done a bang up job while they have had all the big chairs and because McCain ain't exactly the greatest candidate evah.

You attempts to enforce some sort of orthodoxy of what is acceptable to say is one of things I loathe about the left. I have to say, I don't find it any more attractive coming from someone claiming to be on the right.

BTW- I don't know if you were around here this summer but a lot of McCain backers were telling us Mav didn't need the base all that much, that he was Mr. Super Independent/Democrat attractor. Now? The base better shut up and not just get in line but do it with enthusiasm and a smile.

Posted by: DrewM. at October 16, 2008 10:23 AM (hlYel)

Posted by: jahxg at October 23, 2008 06:54 AM (wN+zM)

Posted by: car wash at November 08, 2008 03:48 AM (9kr1d)

137 I like the UGG boot that makes me happy and warm winter.And I think women's ugg boot is a good choice this year.

Posted by: godugg at October 15, 2009 08:46 AM (ckefP)

Posted by: oip at October 15, 2009 11:15 PM (LgSA9)

Posted by: nike coo lshox at October 18, 2009 07:58 AM (+xhtv)

Posted by: FDSAFDS at October 18, 2009 01:52 PM (GQ3Y4)

141

Anti-shoes (sometimes called Antishoes) are a style of unisex sheepskin boots lined with wool on the inside and with a tanned outer surface. MBT M.Walk often have a synthetic sole, although this is not universal. Swissmasai have been considered a fashion trend since the early 2000s. The terms MBT Shoes, MBT Lami Brich have been used as generic terms for sheepskin boots in Australia since the 1970s, when they first appeared in advertising and other publications on mbt online .

Posted by: mbt online at October 20, 2009 07:59 AM (oTWIb)

142 The Classic Cardy UGG Boot has a light, flexible outer sole along with a protective suede heel guard giving UGG Australia fans the prospect of an all season UGG Boot .Women's Ugg Boots Classic Cardy Free shipping!High quality!

Posted by: henry at October 20, 2009 09:21 AM (F7aRx)

143 UGG Classic Cardy Boot makes me different form the other girls. The UGG Bailey Button Boot is a good choice for female. If you want to be more attractive this winter,the UGG boots will make your dream come true.

Posted by: uggs boots on sale at October 21, 2009 10:34 PM (m+5Ku)

144 UGG Classic Tall is one of our brand's heritage styles. The UGG Classic Tall features genuine twin-face sheepskin for refreshing comfort.UGG Classic Tall Sheepskin boots are the taller version of UGG Australia's signature luxury sheepskin boot.UGG Classic Tall is a classic article for autumn and winter seasons. It has become a new favorite for fashionable ladies.

Posted by: ugg classic tall at October 22, 2009 07:26 AM (Anvud)

145 ugg boots online store

Posted by: Ugg Bailey Boots on sale at October 22, 2009 08:11 AM (PWrHl)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 25, 2009 01:03 AM (MtGwJ)

147 AIR Jordan Sneakers within four generations in the use of a high-durability materials [urabuck], and in order to enhance the Cheap Jordans'permeability, in the upper just like materials used, together with significant patent Nike Sneakers, the [three-quarters of Jordan Sneakers ] a more evolutionary style. The most worth mentioning is to black as the main body of the design of Cheap Sneakers to Jordan Sneakers to change the design concept, while Air Jordan has been obtained for three consecutive years [scoring] awards, and most contribute to the team [IBM Award] award. Michael Jordan shoes signs of generations four transfer from the Jordan Shoesto the tongue on the market in 1988, Cheap Jordans republished in 1999 becurse the Jordan Sneakers are hot sale in the world.Air Jordan 9 issued in 1993. Jordan Sneakers Characterized by the sole use of different languages carve the " Cheap Jordans" logo and font. Air jordan 9 is also the first dual-Jordan did not wear Jordan Sneakers on the market have Nike Sneakers, but Nike also made a pair of Jordan shoes baseball version of the AJ 9 for the game when he was wearing Cheap Nike. Cheap Jordans 9 in 1993 was luanched when air Jordan first retired. This Jordan Shoes is very simple, but the lines prominent, and Cheap Jordans 9 is a very popular shoe. Soles on some non-English letters, the word is said to be Japanese.

Louis Vuitton born, in 1821. He opened his first Buy Handbags store in Paris in 1854; it was followed 31 years later by a Buy Handbags store in London. By 1977 these two Buy Handbags stores alone were making annual sales of around $10 million. After a slow start, more Women Bags stores quickly began to be opened. By 1989 there were 130 Women Bags stores worldwide.
Louis Vuitton first entered the fashion world with their luggage line, he started with Wholesale handbags travelling trunks, these were such a hit that he had to expand his Wholesale handbags factory within a few years. After Louis died in 1892, his son, Georges, took the Women Bags company to new heights, developing what is recognized as the first designer label on a product.
In 1998 Vuitton entered the world of high Buy Handbags with the designs of Marc Jacobs. Today Louis Vuitton Women Bags and purses are known and recognized throughout the world as items of extreme quality, respect, prestige and luxury. The brand now have over 300 Wholesale handbags stores throughout around the world, 47 Cheap Bags of which are in Japan.
The Louis Vuitton Cheap Bags usually called, the ¡° Women Bags ¡± has been seen on the arms of many celebrities.

Nike ShoesµÄÉè¼ÆÊ¦Ôì·ÃÎÒ¹úNike Sneakers£¬Å¼È»¼äÔÚÐÝÏÐЬĿ¶ÃÁË´«Í³Nike ShoesµÄ±àÖ¯¹ý³Ì£¬Á¢¿Ì±»ÕâÖÖÐÝÏÐЬµÄ¹¤ÒÕËùÎüÒý£¬¼¤·¢Á˽«Jordan SneakersÓëÔ˶¯Ð¬µÄÐ¬ÃæÖÆÔìÏà½áºÏµÄÁé¸Ð¡£Jordan Sneakers¾­¹ý²»¶ÏµÄ³¢ÊÔ£¬ÖÕÓÚÔÚ2000ÄêÉè¼Æ³öÁËÒÔÔ˶¯Ð¬ÎªÂôµãµÄÐÝÏÐЬ¡£ÎÞ¶ÀÓÐż£¬Nike SneakersÉè¼Æ×ܼàJordan ShoesҲǡºÃÔÚ´ËʱÓÚNike Shoes·¢ÏÖÁËÀàËÆµÄJordan Sneakers£¬²¢Ó¦ÓÃÓÚÐÝÏÐЬ×÷Ϊ¸¨Öú¡£ÓÉ´Ë£¬Nike SneakersÔÚ¹¦ÄÜÐÔÉϽØÈ»²»Í¬µÄÔ˶¯Ð¬È´ÎªJordan SneakersÈÕºóµÄNike SneakersÏÂÁ˼áʵµÄ»ù´¡¡£
ÏÔÑÛµÄJordan Sneakers£¬È«²¿ÒÔCheap Jordan Shoes¶ø³É£¬×ÔÈ»Ðγɾ®È»ÓÐÐòµÄNike Air Jordan Retro Shoes£¬Í¬Ê±³ÊÏÖ³öÒ»ÖÖÐÝÏÐЬµÄ¹ì¼£¡£¶øÔÚNike SneakersµÄÖе×Éè¼ÆÉÏ£¬ÈÔÈ»Òþ²ØÓи߿Ƽ¼Nike Shoes£¬¾ß±¸Î¹ʶøÖªÐµÄNike Sneakers¾«Éñ¡ª¡ªÕâ¾ÍÊǶÔNike Shoes×îºÃµÄ¸ÅÊö£¡

Posted by: cheap jordans at October 26, 2009 08:51 AM (Q152y)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:02 PM (8kvkz)

149 Our website htttp://www.widelybuy.com provide many kinds of UGG Boots.For example,the UGG Classic Tall,Ugg Classic Short,Ugg Ultra Short,Ugg Sundance and so on.In order to meet your demands as possible.We will give you the best service to satisfy your request.We also will give you the reasonable price on the basis of equality and mutual benefits.Free shipping fee and no tax 1 week to you door!

Posted by: xlzhengnan at October 29, 2009 10:41 PM (+SJA7)

150 i like the article!thank you!!

Posted by: classic cardy boots ugg at October 30, 2009 10:28 AM (xTjoi)

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 01, 2009 09:55 PM (zRI8u)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:10 PM (LHCCE)

153


My girlfriend received the <strong><a

href="http://www.mytobling.com/ugg-

sundance-boots-c-39.html">UGG Sundance

Boots</a></strong> I bought her for her 

birthday, she adores them. I was a

little worried the calf would be tight 

around her legs but it hasn’t been a

problem. I’ll be back before Christmas.
 

Posted by: cheap uggs onlinecheap u at November 04, 2009 02:42 AM (YYFAr)

Posted by: ugg boots cheap at November 04, 2009 09:50 AM (bg72W)

155 We sell Ugg mens Tasmina Braid Sandal,UGG Classic Cardy,Ugg mens Tasmina Braid Sandal and so on.We are welcome and trusted by our customers from all around the world.http://www.llikeonline.com

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 06, 2009 07:41 AM (Kg+zP)

Posted by: asd at November 08, 2009 03:45 AM (ZGh8a)

157 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:33 PM (QhfLM)

158 UGG Classic Tall is one of our brand's heritage styles. The UGG Classic Tall features genuine twin-face sheepskin for refreshing comfort.UGG boot Sheepskin boots are the taller version of UGG Australia's signature luxury sheepskin boot.UGG Classic Tall is a classic article for autumn and winter seasons. It has become a new favorite for fashionable ladies.

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 09, 2009 01:59 AM (06Lli)

159 I love Women's UGG Classic Cardy Boots 5819 very much.The Women's UGG classic tall boots makes me carzy this year.And aslo the new design UGG Bailey Button Boots is aslo a good choice in 2009.

Posted by: UGG Bailey Button Boots at November 12, 2009 07:05 AM (vcvB5)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:20 AM (IeIJx)

161 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:35 AM (s7MB5)

162 If you are looking for buying a quality pair of warm sheepskin boots you really need to try the ugg classic tall boots. The quality of the it means that they will last 4 or 5 times as long as the cheaper copies and the level of comfort they provide to the wearer is much higher.So when it comes to you finding a pair of ugg boots that will match up to any outfit in your wardrobe then it is worth considering investing money in a pair of Ugg classic tall this

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 16, 2009 06:41 AM (yMGAk)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:14 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:15 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 12:08 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 06:11 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 08:54 PM (C/zDM)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 01:08 PM (bNNim)

169 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 11:44 AM (xUZwC)

170

It is a great idea especially for relatively new blogs. I’d like to try this.

ugg bailey button Just got my ugg classic mini! They are absolutely beautiful, and the quality is just amazing. No wearing them in, no blisters just absolutely snug strait out of the box.

Everything dynamic and very positively!

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at November 28, 2009 01:49 AM (e/fuI)

171 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 11:54 PM (OKj2x)

172 Browse through our catalogue of hundreds of ed hardy clothing,Ed hardy Shirt,Ed hardy ... Buy Ed Hardy today for a gift, for a friend, or for yourself.

ED HARDY Online Shop,Ed Hardy Store by Christian Audigier,coach handbags,rolex watches.We supply cheapest Newest ed hardy discount 2009 Commodity New styles.

ed hardy sale at AJ Wright The popular French designer, Christian Audigier has.

Posted by: 45464645rhnjgjnygj at December 03, 2009 11:05 PM (38UOe)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 11:47 AM (bsW/x)

174

cheap ugg boots on sale

http://www.mytobling.com

Posted by: good ugg boots at December 05, 2009 07:24 AM (kltWp)

175 Christian Louboutin Sandals on sale

Posted by: Christian Louboutin Sandals on sale at December 07, 2009 01:39 AM (QN9Ge)

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at December 10, 2009 10:47 AM (M80fF)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 02:08 PM (/3s/N)

Posted by: buy ugg online at December 13, 2009 09:36 PM (UPAGD)

179 Good!

Posted by: ed hardy at December 16, 2009 03:48 AM (sT+FF)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 07:36 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 06:02 AM (1dySH)

182 Life lies in sports.The Air max wants to offer you great comfort while you doing sports.Cheap nike air max shoes is on sale now.The Air max 90 and Nike air max 95 is a good nike shoes for you.You can Buy nike max here,Discount air maxs and Cheap nike air max 2009 waiting for you.

Posted by: Air max at December 21, 2009 02:29 AM (GlhVb)

Posted by: Christian Louboutin Boot at December 21, 2009 09:03 AM (QN9Ge)

Posted by: Christian Louboutin on sale at December 29, 2009 03:21 PM (QN9Ge)

185 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 12:31 PM (nUnK8)

186 Buy low and sell high. There is a good source to help your business grow and profitable  to buy handbags at wholesale prices from our best China wholesale online stores offering wide range of wholesale products including cheap handbags, designer handbags, wholesale handbags, replica handbags, UGG boots and many more. Whatever style you choose, you would get a good price!

Posted by: handbags at January 04, 2010 09:43 PM (QutGb)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 09:58 AM (ndMAX)

188 replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.

Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 02:17 PM (TspGB)

189 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 10, 2010 06:46 AM (tWrEP)

190 Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.

Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 09:07 PM (OO9Jx)

Posted by: weight at January 19, 2010 09:50 PM (y4BrR)

Posted by: nike air force ones at January 21, 2010 09:44 AM (m41mN)

193 cheap replica watches and breitling watches,tag heuer He chose the name Edox,English rolex, being patek philippe the oldest brands omega watches in watch manufacturing.audemars piguet,with its montblanc watches The cartier watches name of this new watch is Edox Mens Class Royale Mechanical panerai watches Watch bvlgari watches of attraction.The case is armani watches rectangular on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at January 21, 2010 05:12 PM (fyHwu)

194 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica watches at January 23, 2010 07:40 PM (ioa0w)

195

Swiss replica watches Now while replica watches you can buy a good digital replica watches and pocket watch you might need to see what features are present on your new purchase. This is important as you should know and understand the quickest way to set any of the watch brands. You will also need to familiarize yourself with how to know when you will need to change the batteries on your digital watch.The key to finding your perfect watch is mainly replica watches keeping your options open. There are flea markets where you should be able to find replica watch stalls. You can see if you will come across any great antique watch brands in auction houses. These places will sometimes have fantastic looking antique pocket watches that will grace the hand of any owner.These facts may seem to be quite daunting but if you have ever owned a watch of any kind then you will replica watches know that you just how replica watches easy wristwatch these devices can make your life. The many different styles and features that you can find on an average watch will make choosing the right watch brands an exciting experience.

Posted by: replica watches at January 29, 2010 09:04 PM (ihruD)

196 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica rolex at January 30, 2010 09:42 AM (h+uyA)

197 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 04:11 AM (TUJDt)

198

ed hardy bags Shop for the latest Ed Hardy bags ed hardy shoes The official site of Don Ed Hardy Shoes ghd hair Latest ghd hair products & offers ghd straighteners GHD hair straighteners shop online with cheapest coach outlet Coach outlet stores are known for coach purses Coach purse is everyone's favorite coach outlet store online Online Coach Outlet is the place to go online wholesale designer handbags Wholesale products from cheap designer handbags cheap designer handbags We sell cheap Designer Handbags discount designer handbags We sell discount Designer Handbags of all top discount coach handbags Get discount Coach handbags, Cheap Coach designer inspired handbags We carry designer inspired handbags, replica purses and handbags buy purses and handbags with confidence wholesale coach handbags Buy wholesale coach handbags, cheap jordans ed hardy clothing Ed Hardy Clothing Shoes and Accessories On Sale Ed hardy shirts Ed Hardy Shirts On Sale - Free Shipping on cheap Ed hardy swim suit and other cheap ed hardy Discount Ed hardy T-shirts Shoppers Excited about Discount Ed Hardy T Shirts Cheap Ed hardy shoes Cheap Ed Hardy Mens Shoes on Sale Cheap Ed hardy hats Ed Hardy Caps, Cheap Ed Hardy Hats on Sale christian louboutin shoes Where to buy Cheap Christian Louboutin New york Yankees jerseys next sports adventure with New York Yankees Jerseys discount nfl jerseys Discount NFL Jerseys store,on sale wholesale mlb jerseys Wholesale MLB jersey, NBA jersey, NFL jersey mlb baseball jerseys Full selection of licensed custom MLB baseball jerseys discount mlb jerseys Discount MLB jerseys are what new era hats New era hats, Ray Ban, Online buy cheapest Wholesale nfl jerseys Wholesale nfl jerseys, wholesale jordans, cheap Mac cosmetics whole range of MAC Cosmetics makeup Mac brushes such as MAC brush and Bobbi Brown brush etc north face clearance The North Face clothing wholesale bags distributor and supplier of wholesale handbags true religion jeans True Religion Jeans on sale now

Posted by: coach at February 06, 2010 12:44 AM (HNYC+)

199 this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.

Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 03:00 PM (KbTNE)

200 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 08, 2010 04:39 AM (TUJDt)






Processing 0.13, elapsed 0.1832 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0745 seconds, 209 records returned.
Page size 191 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat