Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

McCain Picks Up a Tiny Point in Both Gallup & Rasmussen

Gallup: 47-44 Obama.

Rasmussen has tied at 48-48, with McCain inching up from 47%.

Obviously, these changes are statisitically insignificant. Although in Gallup's case, it represents a... um, still statistically insignificant two point increase for McCain over the past week.

More significant, sadly, is Gallup's finding that the Democrats have regained a double-digit lead in party affiliation-- 49% (?) to 39% (?).

Rasmussen finds a narrower gap as it re-sets its target weighting to 39.0 D/33.5 R. That represents a .3 % gain for Democrats and .1% loss for Republicans.


Posted by: Ace at 04:52 PM



Comments

1 This no talent assclown is that close to a war hero?

Posted by: Wilhelm Klink at September 23, 2008 04:55 PM (8D00g)

2 The poll's new motto:  I know nothing, I hear nothing, I see nothing..

Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2008 04:59 PM (aVGmX)

3

The RCP average graph:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html

Looks like Obama is leveling off and McCain is rising again.

Polls go up, polls go down.

It won't mean much until early-to-mid next week, because there's a debate on Friday and weekend polls favor Democrats.

 

Posted by: Cobra Commander at September 23, 2008 05:01 PM (lPxkl)

4 Who the hell are the morons who, seemingly on a daily basis, keep switching their party affiliation? This week I'm a Republican, next week a Democrat? Gimme a break! Just get with the program and make up your minds, sheesh.

Posted by: changer1701 at September 23, 2008 05:02 PM (xEHEN)

5 On the party ID question, it would be interesting to ask the same 1000 people or so week to week.  Do people really switch their party ID back and forth?

Posted by: Echo at September 23, 2008 05:05 PM (9zzk+)

6 I tend to think we've seen Barry's highwater mark in the polls.

The financial crisis has made it painfully obvious he couldn't find his ass with both hands, even if you spotted him one cheek, and McCain should be able to emphasize that on Friday in the debates.

Watch for the erosion over the next few days.

Posted by: DelD at September 23, 2008 05:07 PM (fIHir)

7 My Poll has stayed up since I saw Sarah in Dayton, thank you very much.
I really don't get how one can sway between," gee whiz the free market seems like a good idea, but look at how wildly successful socialism has been historically."

Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2008 05:07 PM (GGeqy)

8 Ace,

The RCP maps look bad for McCain today.

Yes, I know, the polls go up, they go down, and yet, even if McCain wins PA/FL, he loses the election if VA/IN/OH go to Obama, that leaves them with 263 (as per the map looks right now) with WI/MN/CO/NH/NV in play.

WI/MN/CO/NH/NV and only 7 to win.

Despite Joe Biden trying to lose and Obama secretly trying to lose, or so we're told, they seem to be holding fast to winning.


Posted by: MeTooThen at September 23, 2008 05:07 PM (/47Mt)

9 i know nothing

Posted by: Sgt Shultz at September 23, 2008 05:08 PM (+7oCm)

10 Ever seen a flock of geese on the ground?

They clump together and rush from one side of the enclosure to the other at the drop of a hat, screeching and honking in total panic and hostility.

The electorate, Wall Street, Congress--all geese.

Is there such a thing as a goose herder?

A gooseherd?

That's what we need now.

Posted by: Tom W. at September 23, 2008 05:08 PM (Hz8Wq)

11

If Obama's head suddenly split open and a giant lizard thing popped out and ate Katie Couric's face, he would only win by a point. Polls, schmolls.

Okay, a point and a half.

Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at September 23, 2008 05:08 PM (T4mIr)

12 The only polls poles should we pay attention to are the ones that girls named "Cinnamon" and "Angel" gyrate about.

Posted by: rockhead at September 23, 2008 05:09 PM (DvaIL)

13 Gallup's results are for registered voters.  Frankly, for the GOP to be within three on that basis is not too bad.

Posted by: Stinky Esposito at September 23, 2008 05:09 PM (MMC8r)

14 Ace, if you are going to try and be as pessimistic as Allah, who really need to go whole hog and commit yourself.





Of course, I don't know how I would get out of bed in the morning if I was as pessimistic as Allah.

Posted by: JAFKIAC at September 23, 2008 05:10 PM (LcpIn)

15

Oh, I forgot to mention- the national polls are interesting, but irrelevant except for trends (which is why I like the RCP average graph:  graphs are nice).  You have to look state-by-state to really get a feel.  But that involves more work.

Though arbitrarily assigning states to either side to play with the numbers is kind of fun.   (See what numbers you get when you make everything west of the Mississippi red and the rest blue!  Hahahha I'm so bored.)

Posted by: Cobra Commander at September 23, 2008 05:11 PM (lPxkl)

16

  Newsweek releases their polls around 1 or 2PM on Saturdays, and they get a lot of MSM love, given that their work is usually the last one out before the Sunday shows.

I have a hunch they will be doing a lot of Friday night and Saturday AM polling, which will (suspiciously) be favorable to The Messiah.

Posted by: eddiebear at September 23, 2008 05:12 PM (wnU1W)

17

MeTooThen

 

the state polls are lagging indicators.  the follow the national avg.  If Obama has peaked then it follows that the state polls will reflect that in the next week.  It is not so much that voters in states make up there mind later it is the polls are taken everyday. 

 

also taking the avg of polls from weeks ago is not a good way to get trends.  the only time an avg is helpful is if there are two or more polls taken the same day. 

Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2008 05:12 PM (aVGmX)

18 If anyone reads Wizbang (Rush cited it today) they have done a great job analyzing the weighting of these polls.  Even by historical standards of the past 10 years, party ID cannot be greater the 3 points difference.  Considering Ras is using about 5 points and Gallup seems to be using 7-9, McCain is probably up by about 3-5 points if you adjust the weighting to a realistic number.  These polls are used for new services to drive news, they do not reflect what is actually happening.

Posted by: BTM at September 23, 2008 05:13 PM (v0dke)

19 They're not changing back & forth just the media cooking polls again, NOTHING NEW THERE

Posted by: PaREP> at September 23, 2008 05:13 PM (dWdDN)

20 How do they measure this party affiliation that they use to "standardize" all their polls?

Is it based on new voter registrations?  Like the ones submitted in the thousands with names like "Lima Bean" by ACORN?

Qwinn

Posted by: Qwinn at September 23, 2008 05:14 PM (3FVXC)

21

So do these people go down to the clerk of court or wherever and actually change their party affiliation?  Or do they just say, "I'm a Democrat this week, but I'm tilting Independent." 

Down here is sunny Florida, there are many people who are registered to vote here where their winter home is as well as their main residence location (usually up in the liberal North).  I suppose they can be both Republicans and Democrats.  It's a seasonal thing. 

Posted by: SlaveDog at September 23, 2008 05:14 PM (H6Jyg)

22 Hey, Qwinn, where's the love?  My kids Pinto, Kidney, and Pork N' want to know if you're mad at them, too.

Posted by: Lima Bean at September 23, 2008 05:17 PM (MMC8r)

23 Yes, I know, the polls go up, they go down, and yet, even if McCain wins PA/FL, he loses the election if VA/IN/OH go to Obama, that leaves them with 263 (as per the map looks right now) with WI/MN/CO/NH/NV in play.

VA/IN/OH go to Obama ?????????????????????????????????????????

They are in McCain/Palin's Back pocket, Obama is flooding IN with ads, McCain/Palin hasn't run any ads & they're ahead in every poll

VA Obama is outspending McCain/Palin 5 to 1 & the best he can do is be within a Point or 2

OH is not going for Obama He lost in the Primary & will lose in the General. NEXT !!!!!

Posted by: PaREP> at September 23, 2008 05:18 PM (dWdDN)

24

 BTM at September 23, 2008 05:13 PM

And then you have the Bradley effect.  should be worth at least 2-5% in PA, OH, MI and VA.   the more Obama talks about racism the more the Bradley effect will come into play.  If whites think they will be called racists to their faces they will tell pollsters that they are voting for Obama.  I think the Obama campiagn is making a big mistake talking about race.  It will drive those that are racists underground and those that are borderline racists will not talk to the pollsters so a correct reading will not be able to occur. 

Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2008 05:21 PM (aVGmX)

25

First of all, RCP is invaluable.

Second of all, disregard the polls that use 'registered voters' and only look at those of 'likely voters.' The 'registered voter' polls are more often than not outliers that can't be trusted.

Third, look at roughly what the averages would be with only 'likely voter' polls used.

It ain't all sunshine and rainbows for McCain, but it sure is close enough where he is in a position to win it with good showings in the debates. (Or bad showings by Obama, which is quite likely.)

Posted by: Lee at September 23, 2008 05:21 PM (TxTIh)

26 If Obama was actually winning, he'd be at least eight points ahead in most of these polls by now.

Still, it is too damn close!

I smell a rat.  In the polling.

I want to see the internal polls - the ones none of us know about.

Posted by: newton at September 23, 2008 05:23 PM (Owu9u)

27 "This no talent assclown is that close to a war hero?

Posted by: Wilhelm Klink at September 23, 2008 04:55 PM"


That's exactly what I'm thinking!  A POW with strategic military training, losing to a Communist street agitator?!?  Something's wrong here!

Posted by: newton at September 23, 2008 05:25 PM (Owu9u)

28 "It ain't all sunshine and rainbows for McCain, but it sure is close enough where he is in a position to win it with good showings in the debates." . Or, if the "Straight Talk Express" would start actually talking straight. Case in point: when you're grilled on Fiorina and her golden parachute, how about clearly saying, "Hewlett-Packard WASN'T bailed out by the Federal Govt. You're comparing apples and oranges. Next question."

Posted by: X_LA_Native at September 23, 2008 05:27 PM (wh7CA)

29 David Horowitz and Frontpagemag is predicting 331-203 electoral votes for McCain/Palin.

Don't really know how he figures it, but I need a little cockeyed optimism with all the "ferkokter" polls.

Anyone concur?

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2008 05:28 PM (zpaDL)

30 Virginia might go to Obama.
Ohio will not.

The history of the union movement sheds some light on this sad fact. Unions were often used to exclude blacks from profitable industries. And union members have some seriously negative views on race issues. It's just a fact. And lots of those union members are otherwise Democrat voters.

Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 23, 2008 05:29 PM (nOQ1R)

31

14:

Nobody can out pessimist or out defeatism Allah.

Posted by: eddiebear at September 23, 2008 05:30 PM (wnU1W)

32

JJ,

That doesn't make a lick of sense.

Posted by: Judd at September 23, 2008 05:31 PM (BXHeE)

33

Just wait until McCain mops the floor with O'messiah in the debates, and Caribou Barbie has Biden crying in her debate with him.  The polls are destined to change substantially, in McCain/MILF's direction.

 

Posted by: Sharkman at September 23, 2008 05:34 PM (UioS4)

34

Party affiliation does not flip from R to D or D to R.

 

It flips from Unaffiliated-but-leans-R to R, and back again, and the same for Democrats.

In a good week for R's, the unaffiliated-but-lean-R flip out of the independent column and to the R's, and the unaffiliated-but-lean-D voters flip from D's to independents.

Etc.

Yes, it really does happen.

I know a guy who is of the unaffiliated-but-leans-R sort.  He hates Republicans.  But he hates Democrats more.  For the first time in his life a couple of weeks ago (when the media was  in full-tilt Smear Sarah Palin mode) he announced he thought he might be a Republican.

It does happen.

 

 

 

Posted by: ace at September 23, 2008 05:36 PM (1WR4H)

35

After the debates Friday, "the one" will be toast.

He will look like the empty suit he is and his condensenting smirk will turn off millions.

More Obama without the teleprompter, please!

Popcorn, store it up for Friday!

Posted by: kempermanx at September 23, 2008 05:37 PM (2+9Yx)

36

David Horowitz and Frontpagemag is predicting 331-203 electoral votes for McCain/Palin.

Don't really know how he figures it, but I need a little cockeyed optimism with all the "ferkokter" polls.

Anyone concur?

I predict between 0 and 538 electoral votes for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 23, 2008 05:41 PM (rf03a)

37

No one with half a brain talks to pollsters. Anyone with a life, or a half-life hangs up on them.

These dimwits are the ones whose responses resulted in predicted wins for Dukakis and Kerry.

Posted by: Joe Mama at September 23, 2008 05:54 PM (QA8jC)

38

35:

 

sadly, as long as he doesn't shit his pants on stage, he'll be declared the winner by the Deciders.

Posted by: eddiebear at September 23, 2008 05:54 PM (wnU1W)

39 McCain is sure to get the States Bush got in '04. There rest is frosting.

Posted by: eman at September 23, 2008 05:54 PM (TE1SV)

40 Wasn't there some Iowa futures market that was fairly accurate? WHere are they now?

Posted by: eddiebear at September 23, 2008 05:55 PM (wnU1W)

41 pork bellys

Posted by: word to the wise at September 23, 2008 06:00 PM (daF/K)

42 Actually, I Flipped from D to R about 9 years ago. So it does happen. VDH is actually a registered Dem. Reagan was a Dem as well.
Its like that night in the village when you realized you were in a gay bar at 3am and ran out without paying. or did that only happen to me?

Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2008 06:08 PM (GGeqy)

43 29 David Horowitz and Frontpagemag is predicting 331-203 electoral votes for McCain/Palin.

Don't really know how he figures it, but I need a little cockeyed optimism with all the "ferkokter" polls.

Anyone concur?

here's the column http://tinyurl.com/3bgfdr

Posted by: PaREP> at September 23, 2008 06:08 PM (dWdDN)

44 As many are noting, the polls have no idea how many republicans and democrats there are out there.

they ask what you are, and then ask which cnadidate you support, and you go into a bin of people who are in your category to be weighted.

No one knows how many dems are going to show up.  Puma, black candidate, racist dems.  It's a huge question mark, which is why the dem # shoots up and down like a yo-yo in likely voter polls.  That they can't even get the number correct for registered voters is also pretty hilarious.

Posted by: Shill at September 23, 2008 06:17 PM (8jYMc)

45 The hopelessly naive child die-hard democrat that works across the hall from me, was wearing my ass out today about how none of these polls can possibly be accurate because the majority of 18-35 year olds no longer have land lines. I just nodded and went back to looking incredibly disinterested. I no longer engage him cause he's not gonna change my mind and I'm not gonna change his. We work in the same building but live in different universes. Oh yeah........he's a fucking Scandi-Yankee transplant.

Posted by: pendejo grande at September 23, 2008 06:24 PM (DOy0m)

46 Does this country really look at these two candidates and, collectively, decide "Eh. It's a coin flip."?

I'm not sure what that really says. Perhaps it's an indictment of our political system that we can look at the "top" two choices and effectively decide it just doesn't matter. They are of the same messed up government we've grown to hate. The problem is that one side is presumably pro-government and the other is presumably anti-government. Terribly simplistic, of course, but approximating a 50-50 split? I don't buy it. Of course, I could be in denial.

Furthermore, I'm not buying the polls either. Besides being generally weighted to boost the Left, what I think drives every institution is money and the capacity to earn more of it - the polling outlets included. A tight race draws interest. If it was a landslide, people's emotions couldn't be so readily stirred; and news thrives on emotionalism. I suspect these high profile races are also tweaked all sorts of ways to nudge them closer to parity thus ensuring yet another poll (more money) and more interest (more eyeballs which are attached to consumers).

On balance media-purchased polls lean Left due to the nature of the institution footing the bill, but more money flows more freely when attention is high. How exciting and profitable it must be to be a media organization that covers a long, drawn out, heavyweight bout where the battle is a see-saw from round-to-round. So what if you manipulate the reportage to elevate or detract from certain actors from time to time. You're just keeping it exciting... and, more importantly, profitable.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 23, 2008 06:25 PM (sI5Ho)

47

Eh, again Team McCain's Palin pick allowed them to tie Obama in the polls.  Long way to go.

Take a look here for all ploted tracking poll data split out by blue red neutral states.  Nice detail.

It is a sub-blog of Pollster.com

Posted by: ArandomPerson at September 23, 2008 06:38 PM (2PwTK)

48 I like this poll:
58 percent for BO among Hillary supporters three months ago …
58 percent for BO among Hillary supporters now!

Gotta love those Clinton Supporters aka PUMA!

Posted by: kimberly at September 23, 2008 06:42 PM (Rpam5)

49

Some good news. A new poll has McCain up by three in Michigan.

Michigan!

Posted by: Lee at September 23, 2008 06:54 PM (TxTIh)

50 I think the only polls that are important now are the internal polls that each candidate commissions.  You can usually tell how they are running by the actions of the candidates.  Obama's internals must be telling him bad stories right now, cuz he appears to be having nightmares during the day. 

I think it is a landslide for McCain....racist Dems, especially Southern Dems, will either stay home or pull the lever for McCain.

Game.

Set.

Match.

Posted by: rls at September 23, 2008 06:58 PM (glLuS)

51 Pollsters to McCain Supporters: We're ready to demoralize you!

Posted by: Lincoln at September 23, 2008 07:03 PM (gLNLT)

52 Posted by: PaREP> at September 23, 2008 06:08 PM (dWdDN)

Wow, whatever Horowitz's smoking there, I want me some too.

Posted by: Lincoln at September 23, 2008 07:07 PM (gLNLT)

53

#50

I think it is a landslide for McCain....racist Dems, especially Southern Dems, will either stay home or pull the lever for McCain.

=

Crock-of-shit. 

Has it occurred to you that maybe, just maybe those "racist Southern Dems" will vote against Obama not because they are racist, but because he is a racist.

Maybe, just like us rightwing whackos, they are tired of being called a racist everytime they express reservations over voting for Teleprompter Jesus.

And I get hammered for using codewords to parody real racists.  FFS.

Posted by: Red stain on the wall at AoSHQ at September 23, 2008 07:08 PM (wgLRl)

54 Crock-of-shit.

I don't care what you think.  Citing poll out yesterday from AP where  a third of Dems stated they would not vote for a black person.  O'reilly had a segment on it.  My black girlfriend and I have had this discussion since Obaby got in the race.  Whether you want to face the fact that there is latent racism that will affect this election or not is your choice.  I'm saying that I see it every day and it does not surprise me that a large portion of Democrats that would otherwise vote for the candidate of their party will not vote for Obaby, based strictly on race.

Posted by: rls at September 23, 2008 07:15 PM (glLuS)

55 Don't watch the polls, because any system where you can post a tie and a +20 percent margin like they are in North Carolina is untrustworthy to put it mildly. And sites that average those numbers together are sillier yet. Watch where the candidates are going instead. Obama is pulling resources out of red states he thought to contend in and is defending his own turf in PA/WI. McCain is attacking those same states.

Even voter fraud, the great Democratic equalizer, doesn't help if you aren't close to start with.

Posted by: Oldcat at September 23, 2008 08:06 PM (z1N6a)

56

Wizbang did a good job with the gallup polls weighting, which is the major problem in all polls.   State polls of course are theoretically the more reliable indicator, but I spent some time last night looking through the internals on a lot of them and they're simply junk in many cases. 

For example, Obama is up 10 points in Colorado according to one, but the only way I could make that work was to weight their ethnic break down at near the 2000 state population breakdown (ie, hispanics at 16% of the vote) and not at actual turnout (hispanics were 7% in 2000 and 8% in 2004 and for good reason).  Another one, I think Virginia but I looked at too many to remember, had McCain up 50 amongst blacks.  The one with New Mexico which had Obama up 11 was 52% dem (41% in 2004).  The Campaign Spot over at National review has a similar look at a Pennsylvania poll with Obama up, again massive ahistorical weighting for the dems in it. 

So state polls should be a more reliable look at the race but given how few of them there are per state, how much they're spaced so apart, and how bad or opaque most are (I generally ignore any non-Rasmussen/Gallup poll without weightings or breakdowns), they aren't the best indicator at the moment.

Posted by: jarod at September 23, 2008 08:16 PM (jKvSW)

57

The only true indicators are the betting odds where people are prepared to risk hard earned dollars-

At the moment all the online bet shops show an O win.

Posted by: Tuggin' Terry at September 23, 2008 08:31 PM (U+VcC)

58 At the moment all the online bet shops show an O win.

And they all had the Patriots over the Giants in the Super Bowl.

Posted by: rls at September 23, 2008 08:56 PM (glLuS)

59 This race is either going to be a down-to-the-wire squeaker or a healthy drubbing by one party over the other. My gut says that McCain won't get drubbed, but he might lose in a squeaker. If enough Americans pay attention between now and 11/4, McCain will thoroughly tromp that Teleprompter Jesus Guy and restore my faith in them.

On other words, I think it highly unlikely McCain can flip Michigan or Pennsylvania to red and win a 'squeaker', that would be part of a blow-out (which I'd dearly like to see).

Similarly, if McCain loses either Virginia or Ohio, he's toast because there are no electoral votes to replace them with. Both are without doubt must-win states for him (like Michigan and Pennsylvania are for Obamuh).

If you start with a pretty traditional red-blue breakdown of the Bush-Kerry race in '04, there are only a few states that could realistically be different in a close race (as opposed to a blow-out):

Iowa - that will go from red to blue. The trend in the polls has clearly been that way for some time. Think ethanol and Iowa primaries and you'll see know why they don't want McCain. Now they could surprise me and keep it red, but that would be part of an easy McCain win.

Take out NM and CO for now and that puts the electoral count at 265 red and 259 blue. Obama has to win both to win this close election, McCain needs one. NM has been pretty consistently for Obama and may stay that way. Colorado has been more ambiguous.

In a squeaker, this thing really could come down to a tight race in Colorado of all places.

Now what SHOULD happen is that Americans shake off that hopey-changey spell many of them have fallen under, pull their heads out of their asses and do the right thing. I can realistically get the electoral count for McCain as high as 311 in that scenario.

In summary, if you can do something to support Colorado going red - do it!

Posted by: ConcernedCitizen at September 23, 2008 09:03 PM (hmDr/)

60 but there was no South Park Republican category.

Posted by: I Got Polled at September 23, 2008 09:13 PM (xU01p)

61 I got poled too!

Posted by: Glutes R Us at September 23, 2008 09:14 PM (xU01p)

62 Sadly, I still figure McCain is gonna get shithammered.  Yeah, I'm fairly pessimistic by nature, but even still, I just don't think McCain can overtake Obama.  If it were a straight-up race with a neutral media, maybe - even probably.  With the media and every leftist group out there going all in in a total ends-justify-the-means effort?  Long, long odds.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at September 23, 2008 09:16 PM (hCSTJ)

63 "With the media and every leftist group out there going all in in a total ends-justify-the-means effort?  Long, long odds."

I also think they're going to win by total crook.  Their hate is too strong, and their willingness to do evil, too.  How can anyone win against such?

Posted by: newton at September 23, 2008 11:11 PM (Owu9u)

64 All I can tell you right now about Michigan is last night several of my very Lefty colleagues had their panties all in a knot about Obama's chances.  They see all the polls and believe he needs to be up by 10 or so in the polls to really be winning.  One guy who has lived here forever pointed out that over the past few elections Dems have consistently performed at least 2-3 points under even what the best polls predict, and that was with white candidates.  He's fretting that Obama will get blown out and return the Michigan legislature to total Republican control.

Granholm is no longer very popular <30% approval, Kilpatrick's got every Dem disgruntled and white suburbanites grumpy.  He thinks only Levin is a sure thing.

Posted by: JorgXMcKie at September 24, 2008 01:15 AM (1Sf5X)

65 YouTube Video Converter helps you download YouTube video to your computer and convert YouTube Video to MP4, 3GP and other videos, such as convert YouTube to avi, DivX, XviD, rm, rmvb, MOV, MPEG, MPEG4 AVC, H.264 and WMV, VOB; VCD, SVCD and DVD Format .mpg; And the independent player of the YouTube Converter will amuse you by playing your favorite videos.M2TS Converter is a powerful m2ts conversion software that can convert M2TS files to other video and audio formats. Convert m2ts, ts, trp hd video files is so fast and perfect.For e.g. With the M2TS Converter you can convert m2ts to AVI, convert M2ts to MPG, convert m2ts to iPod, convert m2ts to WAV, etc. The software support a series of output formats like, WMV, AVI, ASF, MPEG, MP4, MOV, 3GP, VOB, FLV, WMA, MP3, AAC, WAV, etc. It can aslo supprt convert m2ts files to iPod, iPhone, Apple TV, Zune, PSP, PS3, Creative Zen, Archos, MP3, and other Video and audio players. The Transfer iPod to Computer is premium iPod transfer software for iPod music, video and photo transferring. It can transfer iPod to computer and backup iPod to computer quickly and smoothly. It's also a computer to iPod transfer tool which can transfer iPod music, videos and photos from computer to iPod.iPod to Mac Transferis perfect and powerful iPod transfer for Mac software. It offers iPod to Mac transfer of music, photo, video, movie, podcast and TV program. Moreover, iPod to iTunes, and Mac to iPod transfer are also supported.DVD to iPod for Mac is specially designed for Mac Intel and Mac Power PC users to convert DVD movies to iPod video format on Mac OS X (including Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard). Supports playback on iPod touch, iPod classic, iPod nano and other portable video players.

Posted by: coco at December 08, 2008 04:05 AM (nWyuK)

Posted by: rtyrytyuyu at February 25, 2009 08:53 PM (avLo8)

Posted by: sohbet at March 21, 2009 02:30 PM (nwTi1)

Posted by: saasdas at March 26, 2009 04:07 AM (SlQNX)

69 cet

Posted by: cet at August 30, 2009 01:41 PM (07qkx)

Posted by: FDSAFDS at October 18, 2009 01:26 PM (GQ3Y4)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 11:38 PM (MtGwJ)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 06:10 PM (8kvkz)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 07:50 PM (LHCCE)

74 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:02 PM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 08:43 AM (IeIJx)

76 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:02 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:51 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:50 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:15 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 08:11 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 12:24 PM (bNNim)

82 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 10:49 AM (xUZwC)

83 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 11:39 PM (OKj2x)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 12:30 PM (/3s/N)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 15, 2009 06:13 AM (x7rNt)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 07:06 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: replica watches at December 18, 2009 09:56 PM (1dySH)

88 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 10, 2010 04:14 AM (tWrEP)

89

Swiss replica watches Now while replica watches you can buy a good digital replica watches and pocket watch you might need to see what features are present on your new purchase. This is important as you should know and understand the quickest way to set any of the watch brands. You will also need to familiarize yourself with how to know when you will need to change the batteries on your digital watch.The key to finding your perfect watch is mainly replica watches keeping your options open. There are flea markets where you should be able to find replica watch stalls. You can see if you will come across any great antique watch brands in auction houses. These places will sometimes have fantastic looking antique pocket watches that will grace the hand of any owner.These facts may seem to be quite daunting but if you have ever owned a watch of any kind then you will replica watches know that you just how replica watches easy wristwatch these devices can make your life. The many different styles and features that you can find on an average watch will make choosing the right watch brands an exciting experience.

Posted by: replica watches at January 29, 2010 05:23 AM (HLxlB)

90 louis vuitton replica handbags replica handbags Buy cheap replica Louis Vuitton Handbags Louis Vuitton Bags from HandbagsAir We have the most LV Bags Louis Vuitton Gucci Chanel wholesale handbags Miu Miu styles louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton

Posted by: replica watch at February 02, 2010 12:39 PM (CPNio)

91 Replica Handbags have provide replica omega watches replica omega watches the high quality Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET all brand handbags We have the especial price a especial production including coach handbags omega watches replica cartier Replica tag heuer

Posted by: replica rolex at February 03, 2010 01:08 PM (CPNio)

92 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 12:14 AM (TUJDt)

93 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 08, 2010 01:55 AM (TUJDt)






Processing 0.04, elapsed 0.0513 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.014 seconds, 102 records returned.
Page size 102 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat