Gallup: house up for grabs! Obama "coat tails" == anchors?
...If these numbers are sustained through Election Day -- a big if -- Republicans could be expected to regain control of the U.S. House of Representatives...I'll be in my bunk.
Comments
Posted by: leoncaruthers at September 12, 2008 09:35 AM (JSO4h)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 12, 2008 09:36 AM (epqk/)
No wonder you can smell the fear on the dim side these days. Their internal polls must be scaring the shit out of them.
Yeah you go ahead and keep attacking Palin. It's really working out well for you huh?
K
Posted by: Kestrel♠ at September 12, 2008 09:38 AM (EoiC7)
Posted by: GarandFan at September 12, 2008 09:39 AM (HLrE4)
Posted by: Kestrel♠ at September 12, 2008 09:39 AM (EoiC7)
Posted by: Kestrel♠ at September 12, 2008 09:41 AM (EoiC7)
Posted by: CUS at September 12, 2008 09:42 AM (Thqto)
This is probably the Lazio Effect™ writ large, so I'm certainly hoping they continue the deranged attacks and maybe double down picking up the pace in desperation.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 12, 2008 09:43 AM (6L459)
Posted by: Harry Callahan at September 12, 2008 09:44 AM (fagDq)
Posted by: Cluebat from Exodar at September 12, 2008 09:46 AM (WGcw3)
Posted by: Fox Mulder at September 12, 2008 09:47 AM (xFNQx)
Posted by: me at September 12, 2008 09:47 AM (c3H+i)
Posted by: God at September 12, 2008 09:48 AM (xFNQx)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 12, 2008 09:48 AM (6L459)
Hmmm. Bill Clinton saw these numbers and raised the bar with his "easy win" talk. I wonder if Billy has an epic fail in mind here for his "friend" Obama.
Posted by: Shrug at September 12, 2008 09:49 AM (+ZT5h)
My advice is to hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
Posted by: Monty at September 12, 2008 09:49 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Sarah Palin at September 12, 2008 09:49 AM (wgLRl)
Posted by: Cromagnum at September 12, 2008 09:52 AM (9DDHF)
Posted by: Cromagnum at September 12, 2008 09:54 AM (9DDHF)
Posted by: Matt Damon TA:WP at September 12, 2008 09:54 AM (PonvG)
Hmm, I am not sure this is good news. Lots of independents and moderate Dems might be swayed to vote for McPalin if they believe a Democrat Congress would keep the more radical Republicans in check, but if they believe that the GOP could capture Congress AND the White House they might start thinking the other way.
I’m just sayin . . .
Posted by: TRO at September 12, 2008 09:59 AM (q4WFG)
Posted by: Boobenfloppinschtoppin at September 12, 2008 09:59 AM (EnHNG)
TRO,
Maybe, but momentum has a compelling effect. There are some seats with no viable GOP contender, so our potential gains, barring absolute Democrat collapse, are limited.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at September 12, 2008 10:00 AM (wgLRl)
Posted by: USAFDave at September 12, 2008 10:01 AM (Gr4ZC)
The Dem takeover in 2006, as well as their gains over the past two years, were in part due to a "perfect storm" of safe Republican seats going Dem for reasons other than the normal issues of the time. Three that stick in my mind are Tom Delay's seat in Texas, Mark Foley's seat in Florida, and the seat Richard Baker vacated due to retirement earlier this year in Louisiana.
In Delay's case, the Dems blocked the Republicans from putting another name on the ballot once Delay dropped out after winning the Republican primary. That meant that the challenger's name had to be written in on the ballot.
In Foley's case, a slam-dunk win disappeared overnight when the story broke about his prediliction for male campaign staffers and got national air-time every day until Election Day. Since the Republicans couldn't Torrecelli him off the ballot in favor of a viable candidate, the seat was lost.
In Baker's case, a special election following his resignation (for retirement, not due to scandal) gave that seat to Dems for the first time since the 1970s because of poor candidate selection by the Republicans. (Woody Jenkins, the Republican candidate in that race, is hated by many people around here on both sides of the aisle. Him becoming the Republican candidate depressed turnout and allowed his Dem opponent to win.)
I'm sure there's probably another 6-8 seats that were lost in this manner as well, which could be regained in this cycle with proper candidate selection and so forth.
Combine those seats with the "Blue Dog" seats in areas such as North Carolina that may be in re-election trouble due to their association with the national Dems and/or their own scandals (Heath Schuler, I'm looking at *you*), and there may be enough to flip the house back to the Republicans.
Posted by: BrandonInBatonRouge at September 12, 2008 10:01 AM (GFvRV)
I'm still hoping for the Congressional Republicans to come out of their defensive crouch and go on offense.
In 2006 you fired us and put the opposition Democrats in power. Since then, gas prices have doubled, inflation has run wild and housing values have crashed. Are you better off than you were two years ago?
We're the Republicans, Give us another look.
Posted by: toby928 at September 12, 2008 10:03 AM (evdj2)
Not to be a downer, but I'll be ecsatatic if we pick up 3 seats in the House. And lose less than 5 in the Senate.
Hell, do we even WANT to take the House back over (at this time)? Nancy P is the best thing that ever happened to Republicans. If we can get the numbers close there are enough moderate and/or terrified Dems in the House (mostly the latter) so that we can stop the really bad stuff. And we couldn't accomplish shit even if we were in charge.
Posted by: buzz at September 12, 2008 10:08 AM (Uldz5)
Posted by: Jones in CO at September 12, 2008 10:22 AM (VkNlv)
Posted by: Andy at September 12, 2008 10:24 AM (C3mTI)
Yes, we do.
While it could be debated whether or not Pelosi is "good for Republicans", she's a disaster for the United States of America. And that's what counts.
Posted by: Dead Career Sketch at September 12, 2008 10:33 AM (UjwY0)
I love the smell of naplam in the morning,
IT THE SMELL OF VICTORY!!
( for you dumb fucks the flight of the valkyrles, was played while they flew over nam, and this quote comes from)
Posted by: Kempermanx at September 12, 2008 10:42 AM (qvT/A)
Posted by: Fred Zeppelin at September 12, 2008 10:46 AM (Qs2v/)
And it will be Bush's fault because he didn't build a thousand mile levee from Texas and all the way around Florida. Which has nothing to do with the immigration debate, by the way. Of course Bush should've built a wall that could hold back the fucking -ocean- in it's wildest fury across a thousand miles, but not one that can stop a single immigrant from crossing.
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at September 12, 2008 10:49 AM (3FVXC)
Posted by: bob T at September 12, 2008 10:50 AM (gAeLV)
WAR PORN!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHjWDCX1Bdw
It's long, but you get the music AND the quote!
Kemp
Posted by: Kempermanx at September 12, 2008 10:55 AM (qvT/A)
That's my point too. You cannot discount the effect of the MSM pounding negativity into the average voter day after day after day.
Not everyone reads political blogs all day like us morons.
And, not everyone dips their balls in polls results - and likes it. But I digress....
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 12, 2008 10:55 AM (epqk/)
Posted by: DelD at September 12, 2008 11:00 AM (I2D2x)
Posted by: Teh Fat Lady at September 12, 2008 11:00 AM (FsbnY)
#22 As usual, Mark Steyn is great.
Tis true. I would hate to earn his notice for something unpleasant.
Posted by: Blue hen at September 12, 2008 11:03 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 12, 2008 11:03 AM (epqk/)
Doesn't revert presume that they stopped in the first place? Because I'm thinking not so much.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 12, 2008 11:08 AM (SHHaV)
Does anyone think Obama can do better than a draw in one of the 3 debates?
Plus those same pols see Obama's campaign pulling up stakes in their states.
Obama made a huge strategic blunder wasting money in states he won't win trying to generate stories of his inevitability and trick McCain into wasting money. Now the locals pols have to cover for the wagons leaving town like losers. It would have been better if they were never there. It hurts local volunteer efforts badly as many were there only for Obama.
Posted by: Rocks at September 12, 2008 11:09 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: OregonMuse at September 12, 2008 11:10 AM (FO+YO)
That would be great news. He's 0-7 isn't he?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 12, 2008 11:13 AM (epqk/)
Let me explain why the election seems to be going the wrong way.
Remember in high school when the football player dragged you into the girls restroom and shoved your head into a toilet while the cheerleaders laughed at you? Remember how you swore you would make all those people pay, by sending them to reeducation camps for what they did to you?
Well that football player didn't do that to you because you were little, weak and helpless; he did that because you were a douchebag.
Of course being a bunch of lifelong douchebags the netroots naturally supported the biggest douchebag in the primaries. As long as he was running against Democrats who couldn't point out that Obama was a douchebag everything was OK and the netroot strategy prevailed.
However in the general election as soon as the public saw that "Obama got beaten up by a girl" the fact that he was a douchebag became obvious to everyone but you guys. Here is a clue: when somebody says in public "I won't be bullied!" all he is doing is identifying himself as the King of the Douchebags to all the people who actually can't be bullied; since they would never make a pathetic douchebag statement like that.
When Thomas Friedman - who is hardly what most people would identify as a pillar of male strength - has to give editorial advice to Obama to "Man up!" the election is already over.
Vladimer Putin was head of the KGB in the former Soviet Union, which president would he laugh at, the douchebag who "Won't be bullied" or the former POW who wouldn't go home early when given the chance?
See, life really is like high school; no douchebag ever gets to date the home coming queen.
You guys thought you were Darth Vader - turns out all you really were was Darph Bobo.
Posted by: Veteran330 at September 12, 2008 11:13 AM (cXPJ3)
Posted by: Horowitz at September 12, 2008 11:15 AM (9v34C)
Damn, Veteran, that was a long way to go for that reward.
It's much easier to explain:
IT'S GEORGE BUSH'S COATTAIL EFFECT.
Give credit where credit isn't due. Just for the fun of it.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 12, 2008 11:19 AM (CrSOk)
Posted by: cv at September 12, 2008 11:24 AM (GmamD)
Helmet, horned - check!
Spear, sharpened - check!
Bra, brass, shined-up - check!
Let's roll, Pubbies!! I feel a song in my heart!!
Posted by: Teh Fat Lady at September 12, 2008 11:25 AM (FsbnY)
Posted by: Howard Kurtz at September 12, 2008 11:25 AM (VFTrh)
Posted by: Ray at September 12, 2008 11:28 AM (ix3FU)
My new favorite Brit, Gerard Baker, has another good column, if only for it's "red meat for red states" factor. Enjoy, as I throw another meaty slab on the fire for your consumption:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/gerard_baker/article4735295.ece
Posted by: Jay in Ames at September 12, 2008 11:29 AM (UEEex)
Posted by: Tomosexual at September 12, 2008 11:33 AM (aRRWd)
If the guessed-at ID switch holds for the long term (i.e., the next six weeks), look for M/P's margin to grow and grow as the math catches up.
Posted by: mr.frakypants at September 12, 2008 11:34 AM (PonvG)
I have it on good authority (from a Kos moontard) that Diebold has quietly hired hundreds of chimps to work 24/7 from now to Election Day resetting their machines at "Undetectable Fraud".
It worked in 2004!!!
Posted by: fulldroolcup at September 12, 2008 11:36 AM (fH1BE)
Posted by: mr.frakypants at September 12, 2008 11:37 AM (PonvG)
RCP Average: McCain +2.8
Posted by: yeah, I'll be that guy at September 12, 2008 11:37 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Neo at September 12, 2008 11:39 AM (Yozw9)
I think the Big Question here is: Why is it that while Bush's poll numbers are low, Harry and Nancy's are three times lower?
I have my own ideas, but discuss. Mine are:
1. Both parties are utterly out of touch on the immigration issue, but Harry and Nancy are even worse.
2. Both parties have their corruption and scandal issues, but for now, those of Harry and Nancy's gang are even worse.
3. Both parties have their earmarks, but for now, Harry and Nancy's gang have even more of them.
Any other ideas?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 12, 2008 11:40 AM (ujg0T)
I hope so! I'm not part of the VRWC for no reason. Incompetence will not be tolerated.
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 12, 2008 11:41 AM (fE4SP)
From Memorial Day to Labor Day, 123 shot dead, an est. 247 shot and wounded. The death rate in Chicago is double the death rate of our soldiers in Iraq. Also, the murders are concentrated in the southside, the district Obama represented 12 years as a state senator. Boy, did he leave the place in great shape. Good job, Barry!
Posted by: Boobenfloppinschtoppin at September 12, 2008 11:41 AM (EnHNG)
I think it's more that democrats promised change in 2006. Lower gas prices, etc. And gas prices have risen, greatly. They promised to reform government and it got worse.
If McCain wins and does not do what he promises, it'll kill the republican party.
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 12, 2008 11:42 AM (fE4SP)
Posted by: joe at September 12, 2008 11:46 AM (TOly9)
Posted by: Bubba Thudd at September 12, 2008 11:49 AM (70HCY)
I think it's more that democrats promised change in 2006. Lower gas prices, etc. And gas prices have risen, greatly. They promised to reform government and it got worse.
Oh yes, I forgot (4) gasoline. As for government reform, see (2) and (3).
If McCain wins and does not do what he promises, it'll kill the republican party.
Amnesty? Climate Fraud? Some of what he once promised should go away quietly...
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 12, 2008 11:51 AM (ujg0T)
Say what you want about Bill Clinton (really!) but he is a crafty politician. He knew his hideous wife would appeal to the general electorate more than Capt. Bullshit does, and that's why he was so purple-faced and losing it during primary season.
Posted by: joe at September 12, 2008 11:54 AM (TOly9)
I'm not as gung-ho on immigration as most conservatives are. But, if McCain puts forward legistlation that builds the fence and more to proteect the borders (1), separate of anything else. Then, later, goes forward with some sort of path to legalization separately (2). As long (1) happens, I could go along with (2).
I think climate fraud is working itself out. Farmers Almanac claims that global cooling is happening. Hardly any sunspots last month (bad news) and, I believe, the past 3 years have been cooler. The stupidity of the climate movement (carbon credits, etc) may continue, but it was never really about the climate. We all know that.
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 12, 2008 11:55 AM (fE4SP)
Hmmm. Bill Clinton saw these numbers and raised the bar with his "easy win" talk. I wonder if Billy has an epic fail in mind here for his "friend" Obama.
Very good point. I wondered why an astute pol like Clinton would say such a thing. I think you've nailed it.
Posted by: sauropod at September 12, 2008 11:56 AM (J9J4M)
1. Both parties are utterly out of touch on the immigration issue, but Harry and Nancy are even worse.
2. Both parties have their corruption and scandal issues, but for now, those of Harry and Nancy's gang are even worse.
3. Both parties have their earmarks, but for now, Harry and Nancy's gang have even more of them.
Good God that's depressing. Kind of like remembering that when McCain wins, that means McCain is the President. I mean it's way better than the alternative, but still.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 12, 2008 12:00 PM (SHHaV)
has anyone here been accosted by a religeous zealot snatching away their liberties or telling them how to live in the past 7 yrs? at the same time, how many religeous people have you met that were warm, caring and voluntarily involved in something designed to help the less fortunate? Now, ask the same question about leftists you've encountered.
Posted by: mark c at September 12, 2008 12:05 PM (EVmYn)
However very few people are aware that there is a Yin and Yang complement of the Big Lie; The Big Truth. The Big Truth is a statements which is absolutely true but is so horrifying in its implications that upon hearing it the vast majority of people will reject it: "That can't possibly be true." Thus Big Truths are circulated only among those few who are capable of handling their implications.
I will give an example of a Big Truth. On July 18, 1983 the Government of Vietnam awarded John Kerry as a "Hero of Communist Victory" for his actions on behalf of the communist cause in the Vietnam war. No other member of the protest movement in the United States was so awarded. It is evident that the Government of Vietnam believes that John Kerry - above and beyond anyone else - was responsible for US defeat and Communist victory in the Vietnam War. The horrifying implication of that Big Truth is that the people of the United States almost elected a certified Communist Traitor as President of the United States.
In this year's election there is another Big Truth which most people reject out of hand if they hear about it. Barack Obama has authored "The bill to end global poverty". Certainly that doesn't sound very bad - who wouldn't be in favor of ending global poverty? It is what the bill does that makes it a Big Truth. The bill authorizes the United Nations to directly tax individual Americans, the bill renounces the U.S. veto in the Security Council, the bill turns over world wide regulation of small arms to the U.N., and most importantly the bill authorizes the United Nations to use the tax money to raise a standing army to enforce its decisions on the helpless people of the world. In other words, the bill establishes a World wide Dictatorship by the U.N. The bill has passed both the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives, it (as of the time of this writing) in committee to work out differences between the two versions.
Posted by: Veteran330 at September 12, 2008 12:17 PM (cXPJ3)
Good God that's depressing. Kind of like remembering that when McCain wins, that means McCain is the President. I mean it's way better than the alternative, but still.
Alexthechick: I guess that means I have a bit of Allahpundit's point of view in me. For example: immigration. I keep hoping McCain really gets it on a border wall first this time, but then he goes and talks to the "La Raza" creeps.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 12, 2008 12:22 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: mr.frakypants at September 12, 2008 12:31 PM (PonvG)
Republicans could be expected to regain control of the U.S. House of Representatives
If this happens (wish upon a star) they better grow a pair and get shit done this time. No reaching across the aisle. Freaking drill AND put windmills in Kennedy's backyard just for shits and giggles.
Posted by: pajama momma at September 12, 2008 12:32 PM (f3xJa)
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at September 12, 2008 12:36 PM (3FVXC)
Posted by: Veteran330 at September 12, 2008 12:36 PM (cXPJ3)
Instead of the talking point being "Jesus was a community organizer" they should change it to "beware of false prophets".
Posted by: David at September 12, 2008 12:37 PM (HAdov)
Posted by: Veteran330 at September 12, 2008 12:40 PM (cXPJ3)
"valkyrles????
Valkyries, dammit!! That would be my cue, dears...."
Well, it looked like a damn i when I typed it!
Kemp
Posted by: kempermanx at September 12, 2008 12:40 PM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Veteran330 at September 12, 2008 12:53 PM (cXPJ3)
Sarah needs a hat, but she has a posse of dirty scandi's ready to go!
Posted by: kempermanx at September 12, 2008 12:57 PM (2+9Yx)
Hmmm. Bill Clinton saw these numbers and raised the bar with his "easy win" talk. I wonder if Billy has an epic fail in mind here for his "friend" Obama.
Very good point. I wondered why an astute pol like Clinton would say such a thing. I think you've nailed it.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at September 12, 2008 01:01 PM (Ds4I5)
Full text is here, and very short. A five minute read:
THOMAS text here.
Nowhere in that bill do I see the abrogation of taxing authority to the U.N., or any of the other shenanigans carped about in the aim.org link. It basically tells the President: "You have to look into trying to do this," which, good luck with that. I was unaware that Congress can pass legislation that basically orders the President to engage in certain foreign policy actions, then report back to Congress like a good widdle soldier. The President has no taxing authority, and therefore cannot "give" the U.N. any more money than the U.S. government is already collecting. Personally, I'd be kind of shocked if we weren't already giving away that much $ in aid to begin with.
Posted by: mr.frakypants at September 12, 2008 01:06 PM (PonvG)
Kerry and Obama are absurd clowns, in precisely the sense that John Gacy was a clown.
http://crime.about.com/od/serial/p/gacy.htm
Posted by: Veteran330 at September 12, 2008 01:16 PM (cXPJ3)
Never underestimate the resolve of a well organized community.
Posted by: Obama lin Biden at September 12, 2008 01:24 PM (Thqto)
That is the U.N. resolution which requires that the developed nations contribute 7% of their GNP to the UN and has references to gun control. By the way, 7% of the GNP is roughly all of the profits of all of the businesses in the U.S.
Posted by: Veteran330 at September 12, 2008 01:37 PM (cXPJ3)
Posted by: Oldcat at September 12, 2008 01:49 PM (z1N6a)
OK, where to start. Dudes intonation sucks, he's really flat. WalMarts are not known for their "great acoustics". He wimped out from the upper register, probably because he is not drunk enough.
On the plus side, if you take the outer slide housing off the slide, you have a GREAT blow dart gun to hunt hobos with.
Just sayin......
Not that I've ever done that.
Much.
Posted by: rudytbone at September 12, 2008 01:49 PM (zeb4E)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at September 13, 2008 01:18 AM (wgyYI)
I actually welcome massive fraud efforts by the Obama campaign. It can't be hidden as well this time due to technological advances. The more fraud, the more the general public will distrust the hard left democrats.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 13, 2008 11:33 AM (6L459)
Posted by: Leonel at April 27, 2009 06:17 PM (8LBwM)
Posted by: Wedding Dresses at August 20, 2009 11:24 PM (syU91)
Posted by: cellphonelookup at August 23, 2009 08:11 PM (vyfGD)
lingerie wholesale | wholesale lingerie | sexy lingerie | Halloween Costume Wholesale | Wholesale Corsets | Wholesale fancy dress | Wholesale Christmas Lingerie |
Posted by: sexy lingerie at September 07, 2009 11:02 PM (t50sK)
Posted by: hihandbag at October 10, 2009 05:10 AM (yDJbh)
ugg shoes
ugg classic
cheap ugg
UGG UK
bape shoes
bape shoes sale
cheap bape shoes
UGG UK
UGG boots sale
UGG Classic
discount UGG
UGG Bailey Button
UGG Amelie Suede
UGG Bailey Button
UGG Classic Cardy
cheap UGG Cardy
UGG Classic Crochet
UGG Classic Mini
UGG Classic Short
UGG Classic Tall
UGG Coquette Casual
UGG Gypsy Sandal
UGG Halendi Sandal
UGG Hammond Slipper
UGG Infant's Erin Baby
UGG KnightsBridge
UGG Layback Slipper
UGG Lo Pro Button
UGG Matala Sandal
UGG Napoule Sandal
UGG New Arrival 5389
UGG New Short Boots
Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 01:46 PM (zFgZJ)
ghd hair
chi hair straightener
ghd straighteners
chi straighteners
chi hair
chi hair iron
hair straighteners ghd
ghd hair straighteners
free shipping!
Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 11:12 PM (MtGwJ)
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 05:55 PM (8kvkz)
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefrom usa
Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 03, 2009 12:25 PM (LHCCE)
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefree shipping
Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 06:32 AM (XxrVz)
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.
Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 01:53 PM (QhfLM)
cheap ugg shoes
cheap ugg
ugg rainier
buy ugg
ugg usa
discount ugg boots
ugg 5825
ugg shoes sale
ugg sundance
ugg shoes
cheap ugg boots
ugg 5815
ugg sale
ugg uk
ugg knightsbridge
womens ugg boots
ugg boots
ugg australia
ugg 5819free shipping
Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 08:32 AM (IeIJx)
Posted by: sEdOyt at November 12, 2009 03:34 PM (K/kdc)
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa
Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 09:53 AM (s7MB5)
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 05:50 AM (xpuiO)
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:38 PM (xpuiO)
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:32 PM (xpuiO)
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 07:18 AM (C/zDM)
Processing 0.05, elapsed 0.0418 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0073 seconds, 117 records returned.
Page size 93 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.
Dale's ECB
Election Projection
Federal Review
Real Clear Politics
Rasmussen Reports
Gallup
Zogby
FoxNews Polls
Sabato/Crystal Ball
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement
Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band
AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection
AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings)
George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer
Democratic Forays into Erotica
New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network
Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes
Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse
Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party"
Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad
Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up
Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry
NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom
Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?"
Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind
All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd
Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran
Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore
Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery
Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile
Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance
Collective Names for Groups of People
John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets
Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle
Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy
Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive"
Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments
John Edwards Campaign Excuses
John Kerry Pick-Up Lines
Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney
Torments in Dog-Hell
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)