Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Two GOP Sources Say It's Romney Now?

Eh. Who can keep up.

This is like the world's longest, lamest mystery novel.

I don't buy it. I concede there's an outside chance that Romney could help in Michigan, but... Romney is considered to be an unacceptable cultist by many religious cons, so no help there, and he's considered now by many squishy centrists to be a religious con, so no help there.

I don't know. I like the guy (like not love), but he has the misfortune of being a feathered fish, a fish that will neither swim nor fly.

I suppose he could help with Northeastern socially-moderate fiscal cons... but does McCain need help with them?

Answer: Commenters inform me that Romney firms up Colorado and Nevada (looking shaky at best in most polls) due to their large Mormon populations.

Posted by: Ace at 11:34 PM



Comments

1 If so then I'm happy.  Romney brings Colorado back into the GOP fold, makes MI competitive, brings economic bona fides, and will be a badass hatchet man as the Veep axe-swinger.

Posted by: Jeff B. at August 21, 2008 11:38 PM (BWTSB)

2 It could have been worse, much worse.  Hell, it's McCain, it still can be worse.

Posted by: DrewM. at August 21, 2008 11:40 PM (hlYel)

3 I always thought the pro-choice line was a load of crap meant to placate us from whoever Mccain was going to really pick.  I think Rush made a big deal out of it in order to help.

If it's Romney, this makes a lot more sense, because of who is the most relieved Mccain didn't go pro-choice.

Romney is a flipper, but he's certainly a strong enough candidate.

I was reading Democratic Underground, and some there want Obama to pick Ron Paul as the veep.  Man, if only life was that good.

Posted by: ghy at August 21, 2008 11:41 PM (8jYMc)

4 It's gonna be Pawlenty.

Posted by: runninrebel at August 21, 2008 11:42 PM (qAMnO)

5 >>>Romney brings Colorado back into the GOP fold

He does?  Why is that?  I'm not disputing you, I'm asking because I don't know.

Posted by: ace at August 21, 2008 11:43 PM (1WR4H)

6 Tomorrow there will be three GOP sources that claim it'll be the ghost of Spiro Agnew.

Posted by: lowandslow at August 21, 2008 11:46 PM (3lXty)

7 He does?  Why is that?  I'm not disputing you, I'm asking because I don't know.

9th largest Mormon population in the country, apparently. It borders with Utah.

Posted by: Benson at August 21, 2008 11:47 PM (qzcNU)

8 NRO said earlier that Colorado has lots of Mormons.

Hey, what's a good slur for 'Mormon'? I was going to use one there, and realized I don't know any. (Not that I have a problem with Mormons, I just enjoy casually slurring people because I'm a meanspirited conservative. You know how it is.)

6 comments in, and I'm the first one to point out who this would benefit? Are we not doing that gag anymore?

Posted by: bgates at August 21, 2008 11:48 PM (CFjXn)

9
SCOOP!

One moron on a message board says it's Palin.  Palin!  And she will be accepting the VP ticket from a pool of key-lime jello.  Got it?

Carry on rumor mongers. 

Posted by: The Chewbacca Defense at August 21, 2008 11:48 PM (nuuDA)

10 He'd be a good pick. Puts Michigan into it. Nevada and Colorado go red. Mormons.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 21, 2008 11:48 PM (1Ug6U)

11 >>>Hey, what's a good slur for 'Mormon'?

Let's not talk about them, let's just ignore them.

Posted by: Michael Palin at August 21, 2008 11:50 PM (1WR4H)

12 haha, you're right bgates.  Advantage: Mitt Romney.

I know of no real mormon slurs.

Posted by: ghy at August 21, 2008 11:50 PM (8jYMc)

13 Ah.  Learn a lot of stuff hangin' out in these blog comments.


Posted by: ace at August 21, 2008 11:50 PM (1WR4H)

14 I know of no real mormon slurs.

There will be plenty if he gets it.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 21, 2008 11:52 PM (6L459)

15 Why is Romney's religious cult any more unacceptable than Christians' religious cults?

"I know of no real mormon slurs."

I know a few mormon sluts, but I don't know any Mormon slurs.

Posted by: Christoph at August 21, 2008 11:52 PM (hawOV)

16 "Hey, what's a good slur for 'Mormon'? "

Just point out Harry Reid is one of 'em.

Posted by: sulla at August 21, 2008 11:53 PM (Y4/VY)

17 As you may have recalled I once thought that Huckabee would have been a good choice. Of course that was before he demonstrated that he was pretty much from the shallow end of the pool and long before the 'ONE' tm began his long journey into night.

Now I think Romney can help and is the only logical choice.

A. Already a known quantity.
B. Can arguably help in Michigan,new Hampshire, Colorado,Nevada.
C. Can operate as an attack dog if needed. Just point and click.
D. Can bring cash to the party.
E. Good on the economic issues which will be VERY IMPORTANT in 2008.
F. Is a completely viable President from day 1 should something happen to Johnny Mac. Not because he is 72 but just because things sometimes happen in this life.
E. The 'Mormon' thingy has now been completely trumped by Obama's 'above my pay grade' thingy. Evangelicals(some) may  not care for a Mormon but they care a whole lot less for a man who won't stand firm on the 'life' issues.

In short --- All up for McCain here --- virtually no down.

He would IMAO be stupid not to chose Mitt, and frankly he has surprised me in 2008. He is NOT running a stupid campaign. Under the circumstances he is running a damn fine campaign. Can't see him throwing it all away now.

Posted by: dougf at August 21, 2008 11:55 PM (16GPT)

18 You know who this benefits? That's right...Mitt Romney.

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt-I'm Back! at August 21, 2008 11:55 PM (hlYel)

19 ("Mormon" IS the slur, actually.  Whether it's benign or toxic depends on who's saying it, and how.)

Posted by: sulla at August 21, 2008 11:55 PM (Y4/VY)

20 While I agree he's running a pretty good campaign, dougf, I must respectfully disagree with your new analysis that it would be "stupid" to have anyone other than Romney as McCain's VP. I'd rate the quality of this opinion as highly as I would your initial opinion about Huckabee.

Posted by: Christoph at August 21, 2008 11:58 PM (hawOV)

21 "If so then I'm happy."

Then you're retarded.  Forget '08 -- this means we'll have an unelectable loser as our standard-bearer in the next election.

Posted by: someone at August 21, 2008 11:58 PM (2z2WN)

22

Puts Virginia in play because his father once cruised through the state in a crimson red Ford Thunderbird in the early sixties.

What?  What's with the 'Romney puts Michigan in play' thing?  Romney's ties to Michigan are as solid as my ties to Nevada, where I once lived and graduated from high school.  Ancient history.

I'll be glad when this whole 'it's in the bag/reliable sources' crap ends.  As I recall, none of these 'reliable sources' saw the Cheney thing coming.  Nor the Gore/Lieberman thing.  Nor the Kerry/idontremember thing coming.  Who the heck ran with that douchebag, anyway?  I honestly don't remember.

Posted by: pistolero at August 21, 2008 11:59 PM (hBUN7)

23 Actually willing to bet part of the leaking and contradictory rumors are on purpose.

It keeps the candidate in the news and, for instance with Obama, stories about picking the VP were able to crowd out storied about his debate performance Saturday.

Posted by: AD at August 21, 2008 11:59 PM (8mGNb)

24 crowd out stories...

Posted by: AD at August 21, 2008 11:59 PM (8mGNb)

25 I know a few mormon sluts

You wouldn't be so kind as to part with their phone numbers would you?

Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 22, 2008 12:02 AM (6L459)

26 Cristoph, about Mormon sluts, I am very thankful for that well known phenomenon.  My first was a gorgeous mormon girl who was absolutely insane sexually.  Her parents were absolutely insane about controller her life... they had a locking mechanism on their telephone and tv, bought via their church.

Her only way to strike back was in the back of their van (oh, and dating girls with vans is a Good Thing).

She's an athiest now, according to myspace.  Was a very smart gal, but her folks had an iron fist.

I don't think this is just a mormon issue, but it was for me.

Posted by: ghy at August 22, 2008 12:05 AM (8jYMc)

27 pistolero, in case you aren't kidding, John Edwards ran with Kerry.

Posted by: ghy at August 22, 2008 12:08 AM (8jYMc)

28 I can easily live with Romney.

Fred! in 2012

Posted by: Techie at August 22, 2008 12:10 AM (xallF)

29 they had a locking mechanism on their telephone and tv, bought via their church

Really?  I've never seen those in the catalogs.

I've always been of the opinion that overly-controlling parents are asking for trouble.  I had a few Mormon girls throw themselves at me in my younger/cuter days, but I was a good Mormon boy and didn't take advantage.

Not that I didn't WANT to.  But my parents weren't controlling, so I wasn't that rebellious.

Posted by: sulla at August 22, 2008 12:12 AM (Y4/VY)

30 "This is like the world's longest, lamest mystery novel."
Spot-on.  Best description of this VP pick, evah.


Posted by: Andy at August 22, 2008 12:16 AM (4Wq+J)

31 world's longest, lamest mystery novel

Commander McCain.

In the smoke-filled room.

With the crowbar.

Posted by: sulla at August 22, 2008 12:18 AM (Y4/VY)

32 As one of AoS's resident Mormons, I'm just not too excited about Romney, and I'm fairly sure it is the best way, at this point, for McCain to lose the campaign.

Sure, Romney could shore up some weaker-looking states, but he would lose plenty of others.

I am a Mormon and was raised in the south. The plain and simple fact of the matter is that a lot of the Republican base hates Mormons with a passion and go so far as to teach kids as young as 4 and 5 to do the same. Maps I've seen show McCain with a tenuous hold on some southern states - putting a Mormon on the ballot could well tip the scales.

Yeah, it kinda pisses me off, but Mormons whining about it pisses me off much more. I can't stand someone who wants to be a victim - if you want folks to like you, prove them wrong, don't just sit there and piss and moan about it.

Posted by: Guy in Utah at August 22, 2008 12:27 AM (V3WTz)

33 sulla, indeed I doubt most Mormons lock their TVs.  But those products were via her church... no kidding.

Not sure if it was just the leaders buying in bulk and selling them like Methodists sell brownies, or some kind of nationwide catalog as you assumed I meant.

No worries, though, most Mormons I know had happy families, and my neighbor Mormons are excellent people that I would rely on if I needed help.

But there are tons of Mormon sluts (like there are tons of Preacher's daughter sluts).  Rebellion just works that way.  Hell, I bet there are tons of Athiest commie kids who join the military.  Can you say Casey Sheehan?

Posted by: ghy at August 22, 2008 12:27 AM (8jYMc)

34 Guy in Utah -

Pray tell, what southern states is McCain in any danger of losing?  The only one I can think of is Virginia, and the voters McCain is relying on to come out for him are military guys who aren't going to give a shit about whether or not a Mormon is on the undercard.  (Similarly, the bluish NoVA region won't be swayed either.)  Other than that, there's no chance that McCain loses ANY other southern state, whether NC or LA or AR or you name it. 

I suppose my bias is that, while I think Mormonism is a bit weird, I concede that they're overwhelmingly decent human beings wherever I've met them, and that a superhot rebellious Mormon chick once made me a very VERY happy college partygoer.

Posted by: Jeff B. at August 22, 2008 12:33 AM (BWTSB)

35 Guy in Utah, these folks were saying the same thing about Mccain.  They wanted Huckabee.  I have in-laws who love Huckabee.  They are braindead as all hell, and given that Huckabee has turned into Suckabee-on-Mccain's-cock-to-rehab-himself, I'm sure he'll endorse Romney loudly.

Obama has gone off the rails when it comes to abortion.  If this becomes a problem (it probably won't), all it will take is an ad where Obama talks about how he doesn't want his daughters saddled with a mistake, and how discussing fetal life is 'above his pay grade', and Obama supports full-birth-breathing-baby-abortion.  And Mccain has made a lot of headway with evangelicals in a natural way when he talks about being a POW.  It's almost 'born again'. 

Perhaps I'm wrong on this, and I wouldn't pick Romney, but I think he's an understandable choice.

Posted by: ghy at August 22, 2008 12:34 AM (8jYMc)

36 ghy

I'm born and raised Mormon and a BYU man myself... I can't say I've ever heard of the church itself selling such devices. Now, numerous companies that sell "LDS themed products" may very well sell such devices. I can't think of a specific company that does, but I do seem to recall some similar devices.

Personally, I think I'd like a difficult-to-remove timer for my own TV, maybe even my cable modem. I spend way too much time being sedentary and writing stupid responses to blog posts.

Wait a second...

Posted by: Guy in Utah at August 22, 2008 12:34 AM (V3WTz)

37 But those products were via her church... no kidding.

Dang.  Glad I didn't live in that area.

their next step might have been chastity belts with strategically-placed guillotines.

Posted by: sulla at August 22, 2008 12:37 AM (Y4/VY)

38 My other bias is that I've always believed that Romney was the most objectively qualified guy for the presidency running in either party.  He was totally unelectable for all sorts of reasons as a Presidential candidate (Mormonism, flip-flopping, rich-dudeness, etc.), but his economic (Bain) and crisis management (2002 Olympics) chops are knock-you-to-the-floor impressive.  The idea of having him as a second-in-command is actually rather reassuring to me.

Posted by: Jeff B. at August 22, 2008 12:37 AM (BWTSB)

39 There's all sorts of Mormon-themed products.

Even Mormon pr0n.

No sex, all guilt.

(rimshot)

Posted by: sulla at August 22, 2008 12:45 AM (Y4/VY)

40 ghy, I've known a few... cough, cough... well.

One I knew platonically had the following experience.

To start with, her dad was very devout. I would visit her, we would pray at dinner, etc.

She was 16, with an older boyfriend.

They were in her room having sex doggy style... when her dad walked in.

Ouch. Well, it wasn't anal, so maybe not ouch, ouch, but you get the idea.

I don't know why I've always found that story hilarious.

What was less than funny is her family kicked her out of her home.

Posted by: Christoph at August 22, 2008 12:46 AM (hawOV)

41 "You wouldn't be so kind as to part with their phone numbers would you?"

Do you want me to make the introductions?

Posted by: Christoph at August 22, 2008 12:49 AM (hawOV)

42 On a serious note, I was a Mormon convert for a brief period of time; sex with a hot girl brought me to my senses.

I firmly believe the Mormon church is untrue for other reasons, but I have a great Mormon friend and wonderful Mormon-girl memories. Oh wait, this was supposed to be serious.

Seriously most were good people, some not, just like anywhere. But DO NOT fall in love with the Mormon girl who'll screw your brains out, but will never marry you because she wants a man who is temple worthy.

Because she's serious and years of trying to persuade her in the bedroom and out will not change her mind.

Posted by: Christoph at August 22, 2008 12:54 AM (hawOV)

43 If it's Romney, I'll support the McAsshole ticket. If its one of these bitch slap the Base choices, I'll slap back.

Posted by: bolton's stache wax, extra firm at August 22, 2008 12:54 AM (iot9F)

44 Cristoph, that's too bad for the girl to get kicked out.  Tough love works when the parents care enough to pay attention and spend time with the kid.  It doesn't work when tough love is code for abandoning the problem. 

Kids have sex.  Not always, and I won't want mine to, but if it happens you have to deal with it.  In fact, by kicking her out, they probably made her dependent on that dude... which can be disastrous.

Though I can not imagine that mormon pops walking in on his kid going doggy-style.  Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh fuck.  Probably took his brain a while to figure out what's going on.

You know, my family wasn't mormon, and we were way more screwed up than the most scrweed up mormon family I know if, so I'm not trying to be a hater, but those ideal mormon families always seem somewhat uniform.  How do they deal with a kid that is just.. different?  I think that's where we get these sex and drug fiends.

Posted by: ghy at August 22, 2008 12:59 AM (8jYMc)

45 Fred was first, but Romney gained a lot of points when I heard him defending business.  I think the GOP ate one of their own.

He has heaps of experience as an executive and I would love to see him as VP.  The addition to his experience would be fantastic and I think he could beat the Mormon stigma which, frankly, escapes me.

Romney spent a lot of money and effort defending against cannibalism in the early campaign.  He's still fairly young and I think grooming him for the presidency would be wise.

Posted by: Justin at August 22, 2008 01:03 AM (iH1PP)

46

>large Mormon populations

?

McCain will still have to win over the Front Range cities (Ft Collins, Denver, Colorado Springs, Pueblo) where liberal crazy is well-entrenched.

Posted by: Jones at August 22, 2008 01:04 AM (KOkrW)

47 While I can live with Romney and hope he won't kill overal turnout, Xmas/Hannukah/Kwanzaa/Non-denominational Winter Solstice Festivus would come early this year if The One would pick Biden for VP. Please, Barry, go for Mr. Neil McHairplugs. Entertainment is your best value.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 22, 2008 01:05 AM (AZGON)

48 Furthermore, if anyone has noticed the deplorable tendency of the Messiah's campaign to indulge in projection, get ready for a triple dose if it's Romney. Remember how Obabble and his minions have done the passive-aggressive thing and made race an issue by saying "The Republicans will scare you by pointing out I'm black?" When they play the bigotry card against Mormons, it will be very, very ugly.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 22, 2008 01:10 AM (AZGON)

49

You people need to get past that Romney's a Mormon, and remind yourselves he's a fairly solid conservative.

The Constitution says there is no religious test for public office. I realize this has no binding affect on blog commentary, but try it on for size. Just sayin'.

And no, I'm not a Mormon.

Posted by: Jones at August 22, 2008 01:10 AM (KOkrW)

50 Yeah, Jones, Romney's fairly "solidly" conservative.

Posted by: Christoph at August 22, 2008 01:19 AM (hawOV)

51 When they play the bigotry card against Mormons, it will be very, very ugly.

I'm concerned about that too.  But his dad George Romney was pretty famous for his civil rights support, and Mitt has shown no racist tendencies whatsoever.

And if it comes to it, McCain can point to his own mom and say "she gave me hell for my choice, too, but...country comes first."

Posted by: sulla at August 22, 2008 01:24 AM (Y4/VY)

52 You know who this benefits? That's right...Mitt Romney.
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt

For this very reason alone I hope it's not Romney. 

Posted by: Lincoln at August 22, 2008 01:24 AM (ExJZV)

53 45 Romney[...]'s still fairly young and I think grooming him for the presidency would be wise.

And by grooming you mean surgically grafting a personality on to him, right?

Posted by: adamthemad at August 22, 2008 01:36 AM (CRTzd)

54 Jones, what the hell are you talking about?  Us people need to get over what Mormon bigotry?

Please specify how anyone here thinks Romney's being a mormon makes him a lesser able leader.  A few are noting that there may be some backlash from other bigots, and many like me are finding it doubtful.

One guy notes that the dems will try to be hateful towards Romney, but Republicans fight back harder against racism than any other force in the history of all civilization.  We're the party of Lincoln and Martin Luther King and nothing would unite us with Romney more than Democrats fucking with the man's religion.

A lot of the whining about bigotry is what we're annoyed about.  Romney didn't lose because he's a mormon, that much is clear.  he lost because he's freaky haired, has bizarre kids, and flips a lot.  He insulted Ronald Reagan.    Romney ran the Olympics; one of the most notorious den of bastards the world has ever known is the IOC, and anyone associated with the Olympics has a bit of tarnish on them.  It's like running the UN.  He was governor of Massachusetts; those people are assholes.  And yet, when Romney miraculously doesn't win, it's because we need to get over our bigotry?  Bullshit.  He ran a company well, though he didn't start out unwealthy so he only gets moderate kudos.

I can accept, in spite of these issues, Romney as VP or even President, those who have a problem with it are not unreasonable.  He seems like a good guy that played politics to get elected in a fucked up place, and did a good job there.  I think he's likable and interesting.  He's not Graham or Huckabee or Leibermann, so life is good.

Posted by: ghy at August 22, 2008 01:38 AM (8jYMc)

55 I remember when you were railing at me for being a flaming lib, ghy.

Posted by: Christoph at August 22, 2008 01:38 AM (hawOV)

56 Sulla, I have no doubts about Romney's bona fides with respect to race, nor his father's. But my point is that this noxious Obama candidacy will set back thirty years relations on race, religion, and culture in this nation... solely on account of the nature of identity politics. And if they are handed a target the size of Mormonism, they will have precisely zero compunction against doing everything they can to paint Mormons as antisocial racist freaks. This is not to say Romney shouldn't run if asked, but that the Left will find this an opportunity to run rampant.

I am disgusted to admit that in my circle of acquaintances in Southern Callifornia, Mormon-bashing is quite hip and au courant. The prevailing attitude seems to be that they make good neighbors for being freaks who want to have their men marry a bunch of teenage girls, and then molest the kids. I kid you not. And the telling thing is, the people who I hear saying this garbage are universally "moderate liberals."

Posted by: George Orwell at August 22, 2008 01:39 AM (AZGON)

57 "He was governor of Massachusetts; those people are assholes."

Hear, hear!

Posted by: Christoph at August 22, 2008 01:39 AM (hawOV)

58 Christoph, I recall that too.  Can't remember why though.  It's kinda confusing.  I do hit my head a lot.

Posted by: ghy at August 22, 2008 01:43 AM (8jYMc)

59 Romney is the Republican Barry Obama. His positions change in order to improve his electoral chances.

Thanks, and have a nice day.

Posted by: Casey at August 22, 2008 02:09 AM (RJSy/)

60 BTw, dougf, the Huckster would be very nearly the only choice worse than the country-club establishment Romney.

Me, I want Fred, but I'll settle for Sarah.

Posted by: Casey at August 22, 2008 02:12 AM (RJSy/)

61 Orwell,

Oh, no doubt.  The Obama team managed to paint Bill friggin Clinton, our "first black president" as a race-baiter.  I know my church's history, and I know it's too juicy a target to pass up.

My HOPE is that Obama will overplay the card, like he's been flubbing so many other things.  By the time Obambi finishes tripping over himself, Mike Huckabee might be defending Mitt. (oh, what I wouldn't pay to see that. )

It's a definite risk, if McCain decides to go for Romney.

FWIW, I don't think Mitt lost because of bigotry, though I've encountered my share of indisputable bigots online...but even then, only a handful.  I never treat them as representative of a larger movement, just as lone crackpots. I don't even think Huckabee's problem with Romney has much at all to do with religion; I think he just hates the Max Headroom hair, the trust fund, the fancy education, the pretty and loving wife, the non-felonious children. I've chided other Mormons who did throw the B word around too freely.  It's not the 19th century; nobody's driving us out of town with torches; they just make crappy movies about us. ("Orgazmo"?)

In the primaries I rooted for Romney because of his business background, but shook my head at a lot of his gaffes.  I was leaning toward Fred, but that didn't pan out.  I was worried about Mitt running because of the religion thing - I know if I was suddenly thrust into the national limelight, my past with its basements full of dead hobos  and closets with lesbian goat porn would sink me in about fifteen minutes. And if that didn't do it, my Star Trek fan site would.  I try to be a decent guy but I'm hardly the poster boy for Mormon living, and I don't envy anyone who finds themselves put on the poster.  It's a chalk pedestel over a tank full of piranhas.

Posted by: sulla at August 22, 2008 02:36 AM (tlFbX)

62 Sulla, I hear you. No one is lynching Mormons nowadays, but the same goes for blacks. In fact a black man is mere steps away from the Presidency, with widespread braindead support from all ethnicities. Romney had enough flaws as a candidate, mainly his ideological authenticity. A very blue Republican in some ways... But it appalls me that Mormons are in that class of "acceptable" pariahs in a PC world. The salesmen of identity politics constantly overplay their victimhood, be it on account of non-white skin, or sexual organs, or what have you. Nevertheless the ease with which some liberal acquaintances slip into, shall we say, old habits, gives the lie to the "tolerance" of the liberal. With some of the stuff I've heard, if you could substitute the word "darkie" for "Mormon" you would think you had fallen out of the twilight zone into Jim Crow, 1925.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 22, 2008 03:05 AM (AZGON)

63 "I can easily live with Romney.

Fred! in 2012"

"He was totally unelectable for all sorts of reasons as a Presidential candidate"

Both of you have completely forgotten how the Republican party works.

*Of course* Romney is unelectable.  But that won't stop the party from nominating the sitting VP in 2012/2016 -- he'll be "next", and that's enough.  Republicans are too conservative (in the dumb way) *not* to go for whose turn it is, just as Dems are too radical not to keep falling for the newest flavor.

Posted by: someone at August 22, 2008 03:21 AM (2z2WN)

64 George:  yeah, it's sad. 

Funny thing is, the attacks on Mormons from the Right tends to be pretty straightforward - it's about the religious differences, they see us  worshiping The Wrong Jesus and, however well meaning we are, we're gonna burn in hell for picking Door #2.  Odd as it may sound, that type doesn't bother me so much; I can understand feeling deeply about religion.

The leftist brand of intolerance is more political - to them us Wingnut Mormons are indistinguishable from the other cousin-humping red state Jeebus Freeks who want to stop them from enacting their Progressive Utopia of EasyFlush™ wombs and health care for Al Qaeda.  To them, Harry Reid's Mormonism is acceptable because it doesn't interfere with his blue state world view, whereas Romney is a Stepford Mussolini with Big Boy hair.

If Mitt's on the ticket, the march to November is gonna be interesting.  Probably a few steps shy of Ragnarok.  But only because Mitt doesn't have top billing.

Posted by: sulla at August 22, 2008 03:44 AM (tlFbX)

65 Oh, no, religious bigotry is alive and well. Having Mormon friends, it really pisses me off.

Posted by: grc at August 22, 2008 04:43 AM (YleVG)

66 I still believe Huckabee ran for one purpose, to keep the evil Mormon from getting the nod.

Posted by: mark c at August 22, 2008 05:02 AM (EVmYn)

67 Hey, what's a good slur for 'Mormon'?

My parents call Mormons "momos"... Kind of a slur I guess.

Posted by: DoDoGuRu at August 22, 2008 06:26 AM (xBkZj)

68 While it may be true that some people are so prejudiced against Mormons that they won't vote for a McCain/Romney ticket, it's a generalization as insulting as supposed that blacks will only vote for Obama.

People in groups may be dumb, but I have more faith in an individual person in a voting booth.

Posted by: goddessoftheclassroom at August 22, 2008 07:00 AM (xTuFr)

69 However many Mormons Romney brings in in Colorado and Nevada, I can't see how the Mormons he does bring in wouldn't be offset in the bigger picture by whomever his religion turns off ... like the evangelicals that he just made some headway with at Saddleback. For him to pick Romney (or Lieberman for that matter) now would be like the hot chick at the bar who's been flirting with you leaning in and whispering in your ear that she's got crabs, and does that bother you?

And to the dude who doesn't like the so-called religious bigotry from fundamentalists, aren't you cheering the Romney pick on because Mormons will vote for him because he's a Mormon? How do you feel about black Republicans supporting Obama? Can't have it both ways, buddy.

Personally speaking, McCain-Romney would be a huge buzz kill. I didn't like McCain from the beginning, and was finally warming to him. Give Romney a position in the administration -- fine. But not the VP spot.

Posted by: Mister Tan at August 22, 2008 07:28 AM (OSrHN)

70 I'm friends with a couple who were transferred from the oilfields of west Texas (where o/s of the FLDS compound at Eldorado, there are near zero Mormons) to the gasfields of southwestern Wyoming. I visited them a couple of years ago on my way to take my family to Yellowstone, and was shocked at the level of their anti-Mormon rhetoric. These people lived in a community in Texas that had transformed from 95% White and Protestant to 60% Mexican and Catholic within a single generation and I never heard a peep from them about the takeover. But after having lived in Wyoming for less than 5 years, there was an element of fear when speaking of the encroachment of the Mormons in to their new home community that I found a little un-nerving. I didn't ask, but I got the very strong feeling from some of the comments that were made that a lot of this anti-Mormonism was preached from the pulpit at their church. I have no idea how widespread these feelings are, as I live in a zero-Mormon area. I also have no idea who this benefits.

Posted by: pendejo grande at August 22, 2008 08:15 AM (qN0f5)

71

In short --- All up for McCain here --- virtually no down.

That's a joke, right? I know a fair number of people who can't be bothered to choose which assault weapons ban they'd prefer to have imposed upon them. McQueeg is bad enough in that regard; Slick Mitty is an order of magnitude worse (on top of being yet another entitled Tory legacy drone).

III

Posted by: Oldsmoblogger at August 22, 2008 09:17 AM (arEOF)

72

Romney is the Republican Barry Obama. His positions change in order to improve his electoral chances.

This the same problem McCain has, when in New Hampshire he campaigns like an Al Gore Global Greenie fraud then when he is inside a church in sunny California he tries to sound like Ronald Reagan.

Get use to the changyness, this is how Centrist politicans campaign in order to please the muddied moderate, independent, middle-of-the-roader voter.

Blame the moderate voter for this crap, they're the one who never know what the fuck they want.

 

 

 



Posted by: syn at August 22, 2008 09:26 AM (U/PTC)

73

If Barry picks Joe "I'm not making this up!" Biden then McCain could pick wonderdog as his running mate.

Obama/Biden '08

Dumb and Dumber

Posted by: Murph at August 22, 2008 09:34 AM (Dw2sU)

74 it's a generalization as insulting as supposed that blacks will only vote for Obama.

Not to quibble with your main point about individuals, but blacks will only vote for the Democratic candidate, 9+ to 1, black or white.  Its a generalization with predictive value.

Stereotype are stereotypes for a reason.

Posted by: toby hussein 928 at August 22, 2008 09:58 AM (evdj2)

75 If Romney is the pick for VP you can be sure Christine Amanapour will be cutting God Warrior's 4: Those Fucking Mormons. Followed by a new episode of CNN's Black in America: Those Fucking Racist Mormons.

Posted by: turtle at August 22, 2008 11:07 AM (ZiZaA)

76 Jerkoph, I thought you were one of those god-hating fags.

You telling me that you like girls?

Posted by: Bart at August 22, 2008 12:27 PM (LLT2j)

77 You assholes still pining for Fred are, well, assholes.

Forget that Fred fell asleep during the primaries and was the worst candidate ever, putting that old, lethargic coot on the ticket with McCain would be the stupidest move in GOP history.


Posted by: Bart at August 22, 2008 12:31 PM (LLT2j)

78 btw, just to show how big of a buch of shitheads you people are, there was less objection to Joe Lieberman than Mitt Romney for Veep on this blog. Incidentally, during the early primaries, some of you, and you know who are you, fell for Obama's bullshit and said you'd vote for him over McCain.

None of you have any political acumen. Shut up and learn yourself some fucking knowledge.

Posted by: Bart at August 22, 2008 12:37 PM (LLT2j)

79 Slumming on the old site now, bart?  Are you not getting enough abuse on the not-ready-for-primetime site, dickbreath?

Posted by: toby hussein 928 at August 22, 2008 12:41 PM (evdj2)

80 If we were to suddenly find out, (in this brave new world of identity politics), that Mitt was a closeted D&D playa, well, that would be fucking IT, pal!

Posted by: Capt. Obtuse at August 22, 2008 03:07 PM (zAvxs)

Posted by: saa at September 02, 2008 10:07 PM (a8fCR)

Posted by: aaabs at January 05, 2009 09:59 PM (gItVS)

83 http://www.bestprog.com
http://www.interbd.com
http://www.zappeduster.com
http://www.grupopenelope.com
http://www.42plus.com
http://www.brv-inc.com
http://www.meditacija.net
http://www.aec-dk.com/
http://www.mb-friends.net/
http://seo-mobi.net/jk/
http://www.hmt-ag.com/
http://www.biotechcgi.com/
http://www.hi-tech-reno.com/
http://www.mb-deai.net/
http://www.littlediablo.net/
http://www.ccc-p.com/
http://www.sit-n-shop.com/
http://www.mtdcases.com/
http://www.louisville-realtor.com/
http://www.heartminders.com/
http://www.targetvehiclerental.com/
http://www.mail24x7.com/00/idkb0022.html
http://www.kessel-diamonds.com
http://sincerely-love.com/00
http://www.cambridgeins.com/
http://www.lots-ins.com/
http://www.chihuahuaelpub.com/
http://www.aec-dk.com/merutomo/
http://www.andritz-na.com/merutomo/
http://www.hi-tech-reno.com/merutomo/
http://www.sugudeai.com/

Posted by: 出会い系 at January 09, 2009 11:16 AM (WzcNG)

Posted by: セフレ at January 23, 2009 03:47 AM (8rkA6)

Posted by: wedding dresses at February 08, 2009 11:46 PM (vi7D3)

Posted by: sohbet at March 28, 2009 10:49 AM (zpNjJ)

Posted by: kissmymelinda at April 10, 2009 01:50 AM (o2Fr4)

Posted by: yb at May 12, 2009 02:58 AM (gCp/y)

89 Find information about tiffany ,gucci ,chanel and other jewelry online shopping at <a href=http://www.pinfou.com/> online shopping </a>,
jewelry,craft,antique,daily news online collection at <a href=http://www.teamay.com/> Online Collector </a>,Tiffany Jewelry including Tiffany Necklaces,Tiffany Rings, and tiffany bracelets
<a href=http://www.hookol.com/> Guide To Buy Discount Products </a> ,   <a href=http://www.all4kid.com/>fashion jewelry </a> provide,Tiffany,Oxette,Swarovski,CHANEL Jewelry Information
Find the discount <a href=http://www.ggfou.com/>gucci shoes </a>

Posted by: sxdasd at June 16, 2009 10:52 PM (qS7OY)

90 Hello everyone. Life is a great big canvas; throw all the paint on it you can. Help me! Can not find sites on the: Find cheap cialis. I found only this - how quickly does Cialis work. Order ed drugs from most trusted online pharmacies that sell generic viagra, sildenafil citrate, seyagra, cialis, tadalafil, seyalis, levitra, vardenafil. Buy cialis no prescription, order cialis no prescription. Best regards :-), Cecilia from Republic.

Posted by: Cecilia at June 25, 2009 03:46 PM (fHXWw)

91 Hello. I love my past. I love my present. I'm not ashamed of what I've had, and I'm not sad because I have it no longer.
I am from Tuvalu and now study English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Of mecca bingo and other leeds attractions at igougo.How many cards you buy and how often are entirely up to you."

Regards Narmada.

Posted by: Juliet at August 01, 2009 12:54 PM (O7ANZ)

92 thank you for sharing and information

chat sohbet sohbet sitesi video izle gzel szler

Posted by: sohbet ekle at September 07, 2009 01:09 PM (dCf7K)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 10:10 PM (MtGwJ)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 05:22 PM (8kvkz)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 03, 2009 10:51 AM (LHCCE)

96 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 01:31 PM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 08:04 AM (IeIJx)

98 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 09:29 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 04:57 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:41 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:22 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 05:57 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 11:40 AM (bNNim)

104 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 09:52 AM (xUZwC)

105 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 11:24 PM (OKj2x)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 09:08 AM (bsW/x)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 10:49 AM (/3s/N)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 12:52 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 09:20 AM (1dySH)

110 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de frィェo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades autィョnomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 10, 2010 01:33 AM (tWrEP)

111

Swiss replica watches Now while replica watches you can buy a good digital replica watches and pocket watch you might need to see what features are present on your new purchase. This is important as you should know and understand the quickest way to set any of the watch brands. You will also need to familiarize yourself with how to know when you will need to change the batteries on your digital watch.The key to finding your perfect watch is mainly replica watches keeping your options open. There are flea markets where you should be able to find replica watch stalls. You can see if you will come across any great antique watch brands in auction houses. These places will sometimes have fantastic looking antique pocket watches that will grace the hand of any owner.These facts may seem to be quite daunting but if you have ever owned a watch of any kind then you will replica watches know that you just how replica watches easy wristwatch these devices can make your life. The many different styles and features that you can find on an average watch will make choosing the right watch brands an exciting experience.

Posted by: replica watches at January 29, 2010 02:15 AM (2/7bE)

112 Replica Watches have become trendy Replica Watches accessories to men and women apart from just being used to indicate time. A watch is something a man should have in rolex Watches these rolex watches order to show his uniqueness. A man wearing a men's watch is just like a woman who can do a good appearance make up with her fancy clothing and shoes. Especially a famous watch, it means a lot to a man.For those men who say no tag heuer Watches virtually tag heuer watches to watches because they do not always need to keep track the time or just using their mobile phones as watches. But they may need to think twice. Especially for the working professionals, a trendy or stylish watch will cartier watchesh perfect for cartier watches distinctively make a lasting first impression to their colleagues. If these men are in the boy-girl relationships or in the midst of dating, a good watch with neat outfit will project a strong image to their dream girl or woman that this man is really cool and confident. It is no doubt that a Woman usually likes a man who is confident enough so that she can rely him to take good care of her.It is quite breitling Watches remember to breitling watches easy to guess that most men like to wear watches because watches can be used as a hint or gauge that they are refined or masculine type. There are many types of watches for different age group. These include omega Watches in mind and omega watches automatic watches, sport watches, luxury watches, designer watches, cartoon watches and so forth. In today's fashion world, the trend is going back to chronograph watches. Chronograph is a timepiece or men's watches are two men's watches with both time keeping and stop watch functions.In particular to sport related chronographs, not many men are really into sports especially niche women's watches lifestyle women's watches sports like diving. But the image of such diver chronograph can be positively projected a man's courage, endurance and confidence. Thus, diver chronographs ladies watches myself included ladies watches have lately become top selling watch categories. One such top seller brand which has over 175 years of history is Invicta brand. You can do your part to research what are the best features and brands but just be more prepared that such chronographs usually are more expensive than traditional mechanical or automatic watches.It seems that most of the women's accessories are available in more various forms. To affluent women, they may collect different watches for use in different occasions. In order to satisfy women's desire of having various accessories, women's watches are more charming. Women do not really care how powerful or complex the watch is. They will focus more on design, colors and styles, i.e. the aesthetical beauty of a watch.

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 03:19 PM (5grrG)

113 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 08:11 PM (CPNio)

Posted by: airmax at February 04, 2010 10:08 PM (Eu9Vs)

115 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 09:42 PM (TUJDt)






Processing 0.07, elapsed 0.0806 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0104 seconds, 124 records returned.
Page size 127 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat