Ha, Ha, Ha: Obama's Campaign and the Media (But I Repeat Myself) Claims McCain Cheated

They're claiming John McCain was so well-prepared and forceful in his answers that he must have heard Warren's questions for Obama first, thus giving him a head's up and time to prepare.

While that's not altogether ridiculous, it does seem ridiculous to postulate that John McCain needed to "cheat" to know a question about Osama bin Ladin might be asked:

(Videotape)
SEN. JOHN McCAIN (R-AZ): Defeat it. Couple of points. One, if I'm president of the United States, my friends, if I have to follow him to the gates of hell, I will get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice. I will do that and I know how to do it. I will get that done.
(End videotape)
MR. GREGORY: Andrea Mitchell, that's a pretty clear contrast.
MS. ANDREA MITCHELL: Oh, absolutely. And, you know, there was the crisp, immediate, forceful response by John McCain, clearly in a comfort zone because he was with his base. And Barack Obama, taking a risk in going there but seeing an opportunity. And a much more nuanced approach. The Obama people must feel that he didn't do quite as well as they might have wanted to in that context, because that -- what they're putting out privately is that McCain may not have been in the cone of silence and may have had some ability to overhear what the questions were to Obama.
MR. GREGORY: Right.
MS. MITCHELL: He seemed so well prepared.

Andrea Mitchell again, note. Andrea Mitchell is claiming that the fact that Mr. Military John McCain had a forceful answer about getting Osama bin Ladin is evidence he must have "cheated" and gotten advance notice that such an obscure, out-of-left-field question would be asked.

And Andrea Mitchell isn't merely repeating the Obama camp's whining, which in itself would be unobjectionable; she's endorsing this "interesting theory," and attempting to show it as something other than ludicrous, by emphasizing McCain "seemed so well-prepared."

For a question about Osama bin Ladin. Did I mention that?

And how about this for additional evidence of skullduggery?

Barack Obama Fails to Shine Alongside John McCain
...
As a regular church-goer comfortable talking about his faith, Mr Obama is ostensibly better placed than most recent Democratic candidates to win over evangelicals.
But his support of abortion, a non-negotiable issue for many conservative Christians, remains a considerable obstacle, and he drew disapproving noises from the 2,800 audience at Saddleback in Lake Forest, California when he gave an evasive response to the question of when human rights begin for a baby.
"Whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade," said Mr Obama.
Mr McCain, who has always been against abortion, in contrast gave a swift response: "At the moment of conception", drawing a loud round of applause.

I can't wait to hear Andrea Mitchell suggest that McCain obviously must have been listening in to Obama's interview -- after all, how would he have possibly known a question about abortion and the moment of conception would come up at an evangelical leader's faith-based joint appearance?

You know who really has to worry about Obama stealing their precious supply of White Women? Andrea Mitchell's husband, Alan Greenspan.

For my money, I'm actually pleased John McCain answered these questions so crisply, forcefully, and, um, well-prepardishly. I don't think he was eavesdropping, so this leaves only one other possibility -- He must be a psychic.

And you want your Commander in Chief to be a Scanner.*

Via Hot Air.

Was Obama Cheating? To hear CNN's spinmeisters tell the tale, Obama had a hell of a night. His evasive, rambling, insensible answers were "thoughtful" in their expert estimation.

So -- it seems, per CNN, Obama must have been cheating to consistently offer up such "thoughtful" meanderings and nonsensities. How else could Captain Bullshit have been so "well-prepared" with such rhetorical Cool-Whip?

I wonder if we'll hear Andrea Mitchell suggesting that possibility.

* They're remaking Scanners for a 2009 release -- too late to help McCain, by advertising his amazing mindpowers.

I question the timing.

Posted by: Ace at 04:16 PM

Comments

1 Does any member of this sect ever react to anything with a level of maturity above that of a high-school kid?

Posted by: Mike James at August 17, 2008 04:21 PM (aZIV9)

2 "You know who really has to worry about Obama and White Women? Andrea Mitchell's husband, Alan Greenspan."

That's why you're (conservative) blogger of the year. But at Alan's age, I don't think he worries anymore.

Posted by: notropis at August 17, 2008 04:23 PM (6c5om)

3 I mean, do they ever watch their man-god botch a play and say something like "Well, that's an 'aw-shit' on us"?

Posted by: Mike James at August 17, 2008 04:24 PM (aZIV9)

4 1) Glad to see the rev ask some real questions.

2)RedEye is now being posted on hulu.com. they have the first episode of season 2 up now.

Posted by: greg s at August 17, 2008 04:29 PM (8PQ7R)

5 Reminds me of the allegation that photos captured a "wire" underneath GW's suit jacket during one of his debates - or that microphones picked up "secret" earphone emissions suggesting the right answer for Romney during one of the primary debates. You see, Republicans cannot possibly give good answers to debate questions without cheating.

Posted by: angler at August 17, 2008 04:30 PM (kSuu1)

Wasn't Bush wearing a mike in his ear during a debate? Or was that Cheney? I forget. But I know they cheated, or else they wouldn't have won.

Sorry. Cheney was wearing an earpiece in his codpiece.

Posted by: Attila (Pillage Idiot) at August 17, 2008 04:32 PM (ZaM5Y)

7 Can't Touch This.

Posted by: The Railsplitter at August 17, 2008 04:33 PM (mTbdr)

8 The Faithful of The One must have really taken a jolt after St. Barry O'Guiltwhite's performance at Saddleback, otherwise their mainstream media High Priests wouldn't being running around, looking for excuses. And John McCain's dog ate Obastard's homework.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 17, 2008 04:35 PM (oY+xK)

9 "wouldn't be running around." Frickin' typos. I blame the Rethuglican typo machine.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 17, 2008 04:36 PM (oY+xK)

10 I don't think he was eavedropping, so this leaves only one other possibility -- He must be a psychic.

Comedy Gold! Yes, the left accused Booosh of using his bullet proof vest as a means to cheat when he debated Kerry.

Posted by: joeindc44 at August 17, 2008 04:38 PM (QxSug)

11 Keep your hands off me, Sir.

Posted by: Mrs. Strangelove; Secretary, The Loyal Party at August 17, 2008 04:41 PM (mTbdr)

12 I mean, do they ever watch their man-god botch a play and say something like "Well, that's an 'aw-shit' on us"?

No. That would imply that Obama was human and capable of folly.
Can God create a question (through Mr. Warren) that He cannot answer?

_{^{(The moronic head tilt and constant, distracting 'er, ah, um' stuttering bullshit is just a cover for his Divinity.)}}

Posted by: lauraw at August 17, 2008 04:43 PM (DbybK)

13 Obama will hunt down Osama, too, but just to get his autograph.

Posted by: Wilhelm Klink at August 17, 2008 04:44 PM (GGhvX)

14 Andrea said "nuanced ." Andrea said "nuanced ." Obana is naturally, knowingly, nicely nuanced.

Posted by: Brad at August 17, 2008 04:46 PM (CpIbd)

15 Andrea, Andrea, Andrea. Now you know it's not nice to make up stories.

Tell John you're sorry and promise to be good from now on.

Posted by: eman at August 17, 2008 04:46 PM (3LTO3)

16 So does this mean when one doesn't answer questions well, they are unprepared?

As far as I can tell, there is no cheat sheet for all the possible things that can occur in the world, with nice little answers written along side.

Posted by: Mark at August 17, 2008 04:47 PM (4hUuD)

17 That's funny as heck! Andrea Mitchell is an embarrassing shill, and ain't doing any favours for the Obama campaign despite her best efforts.

Ace, you have a typo in the title: It should be "Campaigning".

Posted by: Christoph and John McCain at August 17, 2008 04:48 PM (hawOV)

18
; color: rgb(255, 165, 0);">McCain: Cheater! Racist! ... WINNAH!

Posted by: The Chewbacca Defense at August 17, 2008 04:54 PM (kKO7A)

19 The thing I really get a kick out of on this is I didn't think (at least originally) that Obama did that badly, just that McCain did much better. In fact (given what I was expecting), when his hour was up and McCain hadn't started yet, I actually thought he had turned in a good performance and was worried -- but the left is absolutely devastated.

In the course of the day, I've seen comments like this:

Pappy McSame knows nothing but war. Totally 1984.
He will take the youth of our nation and send them to die in a new cold war which only exists in paranoid neocon minds.
Last night was a lynching by well dressed men, women, children, and CNN. In the name of God no less. Shame on them all.
“Separation of church and state”-period!

Comment by Abbydaddy — 8/17/2008 @ 6:34 am
www.patterico.com

God knows what they're going to say when Obama actually gets follow up questions.

Posted by: AD at August 17, 2008 04:56 PM (8mGNb)

20 Last night was a lynching by well dressed men, women, children, and CNN. In the name of God no less. Shame on them all.
“Separation of church and state”-period!

Holy crap! You mean CNN is working for us diabolical neocons now? What a relief. It's fine nuanced thought like this that gives the Left its well-deserved reputation.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 17, 2008 05:00 PM (oY+xK)

21 You mean CNN stands for Cheney News Network?!

Posted by: eman at August 17, 2008 05:06 PM (3LTO3)

22 "Cheater = someone who out-does a liberal" is the new "Racist = someone who's winning an argument with a liberal."

Posted by: Merovign at August 17, 2008 05:07 PM (UXoQt)

23 I forgot to mention the delicious subtext - that "being prepared" is tantamount to cheating. Kind of says it all.

Posted by: Merovign at August 17, 2008 05:07 PM (UXoQt)

24 When Republicans do well in debates, it is defacto evidence he cheated.

Posted by: Dirk at August 17, 2008 05:16 PM (WCbIr)

25 The funny and scary thing is is that this is just practice for the real debates when Captain Uhm will be trounced on a national stage. Get ready for charges that McCain cheated, was racist, drugged Obama, etc.

It's amazing, it's not like they asked these guys anything other than core beliefs and key background issues. It's not like they asked McCain to discuss page 232 of his campaign finance law and how it applies to Kentucky voter with an income of $23000 to $23343. Or Obama on how many minutes/hours/days his bills to kill born babies would allow.

But that's cool. I would hope that for the many Americans that don't follow this stuff closely, the bullshit meter is still capable of going off as they watch the press desperately spin for the Ear King.

Posted by: joeindc44 at August 17, 2008 05:19 PM (QxSug)

Barack Obama has shown no ability to think quickly in a debate format.

If McCain does his homework he can win this but he will have to pose the tough questions himself, since the Obama debate cheer squad (MSM) will be there to prop him up.

Posted by: jjshaka at August 17, 2008 05:21 PM (UJPJ9)

27 Yes, who knew they would ask such off the wall questions on subjects like the WoT, abortion, etc.?

I also heard a commentator on NPR complain that because McCain's answers were so short, as opposed to Obama's more well thought out ones, McCain was asked additional questions. Jeesh. Obama always has problems with questions that should be no brainers, eg., Senator, do you love this country? Hint: It's a yes or no question.

Posted by: grc at August 17, 2008 05:24 PM (Rfu4W)

28 Why, oh why do even conservative writers still insist on calling St. Barry O'Guiltwhite "brilliant" and "highly intelligent?" Can anyone think of a worse, more mealy-mouthed and obtuse answer to the question of conception than "it's above my pay grade?" Hey, Barry, little man, I could have given you a perfect liberal answer that would have raised no eyebrows. "Frankly Warren, as President I do not think it is my place to render an opinion on that, since it is a moral question upon which many disagree. However, as a Constitutional scholar I support Roe vs. Wade, and I do believe the government has a say in the legality of abortion."

Now, that would make him still full of ripe shit, but sweet Christ on a jet pack, this assclown said, in essence, he's too stupid to answer the question.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 17, 2008 05:28 PM (oY+xK)

As much as I dislike having McCain as the standard-bearer for conservatism (as if there is one this time around), I was darned impressed with his performance at this interview (I won't qualify it as a debate). He was crisp, concise, and sharply-on-topic.

I especially liked the way that, when he had answered a question adequately with a short-response -- he simply shut-up and stopped-talking. Almost Fred-Thompson-esque (I said "ALMOST").

Obama, on the other hand, was an incoherent, bloviatory retard. PRICELESS!

Posted by: deMontjoie at August 17, 2008 05:30 PM (8NiWI)

30 It is a good sign that they are having to come up with ridiculous spin. It means the obvious is becoming--well, more obvious.

Posted by: DCox at August 17, 2008 05:31 PM (2pT9a)

31 The Cone of Silence really?
I guess McCain doesn't get Ben Stein's money then.

Posted by: Rocks at August 17, 2008 05:33 PM (7rbe9)

32 As far as the Osama question proving anything, isn't that the same damn answer McCain has been giving for a year?

Posted by: Rocks at August 17, 2008 05:34 PM (7rbe9)

33 Man, this is Olberman-grade stupid and nuts.

I see Mac getting well over 300 Electoral votes, and I see I should wear rain gear on Election Night so the gore from exploding heads doesn't wreck my clothes.

Posted by: eman at August 17, 2008 05:35 PM (3LTO3)

34 Well, I've heard lots of people describe Senator Um-ahh-ma as such a great speaker, if McCain managed to reply without the awkward pauses that a truly great speaker puts in there, obviously he must've been cheating.

Posted by: dorkafork at August 17, 2008 05:44 PM (kErJj)

35 I wonder how this latest match-up between McCain and Barry affects Hillary's thinking. She has to be working the phones, engineering a coup.

Posted by: eman at August 17, 2008 05:44 PM (3LTO3)

36 That his answer about OBL was nuanced is pretty frightening. What's so nuanced about find'em and kill'em?

Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 17, 2008 05:44 PM (6L459)

37 I swear I thought this would be an unrevealing dog and pony show at Saddleback, with little potential for any real impact. But even with a nonthreatening effete interview format, Obastard still manages to sound like the moron we were told was Bush. Honestly, for all his malapropisms and poor delivery, Bush sounds three times the intellect of an Obastard. And Obastard does, admittedly, sound like three times the used car salesman that Cal Worthington was.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 17, 2008 05:50 PM (oY+xK)

38 Barack Obama Fails to Shine Alongside John McCain

Raaaaacisssstttt!!!!111!!

Posted by: Andy at August 17, 2008 05:56 PM (iIvIk)

So, is the Obama campaign now accusing the people at the Saddledome of lying when they said McCain was in the Cone of Silence? I see a new pattern emerging...

Posted by: Synner_man at August 17, 2008 05:56 PM (NQWmS)

40 The things Barry O'Guiltwhite has said have become so absurd, so thoughtless and stupid, so nearly mythical in their blockheadedness, I think Barry really, truly is living out the life of Chauncey Gardner. He actually is a dope who stumbled into and out of Harvard, magna cum laude, in and out of the Illinois State Senate, into the US Senate, into sweet land deals, into preening solipsistic celebrity as an author, into the machine church of a racist... all because of nothing he did, but because he really is an empty vessel drawing forth the projections of his surroundings. Obastard himself said he is a blank screen for others.

It's 99% about two inextricably linked things: White Guilt and Liberalism.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 17, 2008 06:05 PM (oY+xK)

41 Andrea Mitchell must have gotten some pretty harsh punishment from Obama's spirit squad after her infamous "fake interviews" criticism of O's world tour. She's learned her lesson. Don't let the truth slip out if you still want to sit with the cool kids in the cafeteria.

Posted by: nightwitch at August 17, 2008 06:05 PM (dfTf5)

42 Answering #28, I would say that if we reject the Catholic definition of Birth for the official USG interpretation called Roe v Wade as we kinda actually did, it means not only that the USG has the right and power to say "out of luck, Honey" to a woman who dawdled two full trimesters, but also that when a child (if we are to use that term for a third-trimester foetus) is physically born into the physical universe it is by definition a Person under the Law, and moreover that the USG has a strong interest in ensuring that that child gets to be a baby.

That's really truly why the RCC hates Roe v Wade.

To me it's a brilliant clarification of the matters truly at play in the dispute that is set by government, not by belief-based assertions pretending to be facts.

Posted by: Mrs. Strangelove; mtcmtauth= at August 17, 2008 06:07 PM (mTbdr)

43 So, should we top this Andrea Mitchell dame, Chief? She knows too much.

Posted by: Agent 86 at August 17, 2008 06:11 PM (OuMcZ)

44 What? What?

Posted by: The Chief at August 17, 2008 06:12 PM (OuMcZ)

45 What? I can't hear you under the Cone of Silence, Chief.

Posted by: Agent 86 at August 17, 2008 06:13 PM (OuMcZ)

46 before a game there is always a prayer in the locker room, i think the O needed this last night

http://www.ladyofthecake.com/mel/saddles/sounds/jerking.wav

Posted by: billypaintbrush at August 17, 2008 06:15 PM (z6gyg)

47 I see Mac getting well over 300 Electoral votes, and I see I should wear rain gear on Election Night so the gore from exploding heads doesn't wreck my clothes.

More like a flak jacket so the flying bullets don't wreck your clothes. I'm going to have to be in some scary neighborhoods after dark on election night, and win or lose for Barry O, I'm worried about the reaction.

I'm considering investing in an outfit like the wanna-be Che in the post above this one as election night cammo, as well as carrying my Glock that night, even though I could lose my job if my employer found out.

Posted by: nightwitch at August 17, 2008 06:32 PM (dfTf5)

Ms. Mitchell, did you ever stop to consider that perhaps there is a perfectly logical reason that Obama has avoided any one-on-one debates with McCain, one that does not involve McCain cheating or having psychic powers?

William of Ockham knows the simple answer. And so do you Andrea, you lying shill.

Posted by: sherlock at August 17, 2008 06:35 PM (ojW85)

49 Watch it, Hillary will make the "I'm far more electable" ploy in Denver.

Best Primary EVAR!

Posted by: Techie at August 17, 2008 06:36 PM (xallF)

50 I see Mac getting well over 300 Electoral votes, and I see I should wear rain gear on Election Night so the gore from exploding heads doesn't wreck my clothes.

Seconding nightwitch, I personally plan to hide in my basement, bitterly clinging to my bible and my guns.

All while cackling madly at the irony of needing to defend myself from "pacifists".

Posted by: leoncaruthers at August 17, 2008 06:37 PM (JSO4h)

51 I hear zebras.

Posted by: andrea mitchell at August 17, 2008 06:39 PM (OuMcZ)

52 Anyone know a good investment play in antidepressants? Because if we are very, very lucky and The Boy Savior loses in November, World Citizens everywhere will be eating bags of Prozac like they were M&Ms.

Posted by: George Orwell at August 17, 2008 06:44 PM (oY+xK)

53 ..."what they're putting out privately is that McCain may not have been in the cone of silence and may have had some ability to overhear what the questions were to Obama."

Q.: How is it "private" if they've sent you out to say it publicly, Andrea?

And isn't accusing McCain of cheating with no evidence a form of cheating itself--trying to win the debate without having won it?

I'll say it again; the other real loser was the Powder-Puff Press, whose biased practices stand in sharp contrast to Rick Warren's meticulously even-handed format.

Andrea: "He seemed so well prepared."

Oh, honey, he was--by a lifetime of experience!

Posted by: Noel at August 17, 2008 06:45 PM (4gHqM)

54 Nice reference, orwell.

When Andrea hears hoofbeats, she thinks Thompson's Gazelle.

Posted by: Techie at August 17, 2008 06:55 PM (xallF)

55 What a delightful mix. Andrea Mitchell, CNN and bullshit. One of the things Andrea Mitchell is noted for is bullshit. But then, bullshit and CNN are synonomous.

Posted by: GarandFan at August 17, 2008 07:25 PM (eJ32B)

56 We call those "court heels"

Posted by: Mrs. Strangelove; mtcmtauth= at August 17, 2008 07:26 PM (mTbdr)

There's a very simple explanation for McCain's thumping of the Messiah........

The Joooos!!!

Posted by: Old Dad at August 17, 2008 07:34 PM (JQwWt)

58 He seemed so well prepared.

Wait, isn't that kind of an insult to Senator Obama? You looked like an unprepared clod!

And isn't being prepared and capable with answers considered a good thing? Well spoken, intelligent, ready? I mean, Senator McCain has been at this for decades, shouldn't he be ready to answer questions about his politics?

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 17, 2008 08:22 PM (0+Ggj)

59 Now we have all the justification we need to give Obama the questions before the next debate. That's how we can prove we're not racists.

Posted by: The MSM at August 17, 2008 08:35 PM (ZHsEK)

60 pesky darn Jooooooozzz

Posted by: bob hussein dole at August 17, 2008 08:47 PM (4GS1g)

61 Now we'll have "McCain Truthers". Sheesh...stop it, I want off!.

Posted by: torabora at August 17, 2008 09:53 PM (JWr19)

62 William of Ockham??
He never supported a holiday for MLK Jr.
He never supported the abolition of slavery in the US.
He never objected to any of Hitler's domestic or foreign policies.

QED

Ockham is a racist.

Posted by: Potosi Joel at August 17, 2008 10:35 PM (TPRbZ)

You know who really has to worry about Obama stealing their precious supply of White Women? Andrea Mitchell's husband, Alan Greenspan.

Dude, respect. Somebody had to say it. The person who really has to be scared though is Chris Mathews husband. Just saying.

But seriously, the logic goes "Obama sucked but McCain was good so obviously McCain cheated and OBTW we have no proof of that". Good enough for MSM work apparently. Run with it.

Posted by: Big E at August 17, 2008 10:42 PM (RWzXM)

Does anyone honestly think that McCain, who was surrounded by jet noise for half his life, not to mention the very loud explosions he was exposed to, could here a rock band, much less a pin drop?

Posted by: George Turner at August 18, 2008 03:37 AM (/lbk1)

65 My lib buddy claims that Obama will wipe the floor with McCain in "the debates" because he is such a good public speaker. I had to break the news that there weren't going to be many debates because Obama doesn't want them.

I'll give my buddy the benefit of the doubt - he probably is not following the race very closely. But I bet a whole lot of people really think that teleprompter Obama will do just as well live without the teleprompter...we will see.

Posted by: Harun at August 18, 2008 04:06 AM (fgID0)

66 Dear Obama cultists reporters:

FOAD.

Sincerely,
Everyone

Posted by: MIke at August 18, 2008 10:02 AM (iKnbo)

Experienced people always seem to be better prepared. I wonder why that is.

When asked a simple question, the answer should always be right at the tip of your tongue; unless of course you have to stop and think about how you answered that same question last week.

Posted by: Lemmiwinks at August 18, 2008 02:50 PM (E6GUg)

68 To hell with <i>Scanners</i>, they need to remake <i>Videodrome</i>...

Posted by: mojo at August 18, 2008 03:50 PM (g1cNf)

69 They need to remake Looker. Very appropriate given the prevalence of CGI in movies. Updated, they could make a George Lucas-like director be the bad guy.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 18, 2008 04:55 PM (0+Ggj)

70 Debatesd, problem for OBAMA is that there will ahve to a set amount of debates on the Big 4 networks in the months leading up to the election. Debates that Obama cannot avoid at all. RATINGS demand it.

Posted by: GTB at August 19, 2008 02:23 PM (iInYK)

71 The "Obama for President" campaign has a new motto: "It's above my pay grade."

Posted by: Merovign at August 19, 2008 11:24 PM (UXoQt)

72 wedding dresses wedding gowns bridal gowns lace front wigs wedding invitations bridal shower invitations baby shower invitations custom wedding invitation

Posted by: jojo at September 02, 2008 03:29 AM (P/kOD)

73 不動産投資インプラント

Posted by: ケ mtcmtmail= at January 16, 2009 01:38 AM (HMhC8)

74 静岡　新築

Posted by: 結婚相談所東京 at January 16, 2009 01:41 AM (HMhC8)

75 矯正歯科名古屋

Posted by: 平野区　賃貸　 at January 16, 2009 01:49 AM (HMhC8)

76 comment1,

Posted by: dmwklnnw at March 04, 2009 02:41 AM (+X8qN)

77 The night of the fight, you may feel a slight sting. That's pride f*cking with you. F*ck pride. Pride only hurts, it never helps. 5431f1461976b765c8bf602defa0c1ab

Posted by: Maximo at April 23, 2009 07:55 AM (d+LhW)

cheap wedding gowns discount bridal gowns China wedding dresses China wedding online store discount designer wedding dresses plus size wedding dresses cheap informal wedding dresses junior bridesmaid dresses maternity bridesmaid dresses

discount flower girl gowns cheap prom dresses party dresses evening dresses mother of the bride dresses special occasion dresses cheap quinceanera dresses hot red wedding dresses

Posted by: China wedding online store at May 03, 2009 06:53 AM (Y6a74)

79 gucci shoes Louis Vuitton Handbags Gucci Shoes Louis Vuitton

Posted by: tu at May 07, 2009 04:55 AM (gMBkx)

80 Wedding Dresses

Posted by: Wedding Dresses at August 20, 2009 11:22 PM (syU91)

81 very interesting to read.I enjoyed well while reading.I will recommend my friends to read this one for sure.

Posted by: sexy lingerie at September 07, 2009 11:14 PM (t50sK)

82 We supply all kinds of ladies fashion replica designer handbags,provide you the best quality,selection and price you can only find in the top specialty stores,Keeping you abreast of the lastest trends and providing the convenience of shopping from home bally replica handbags , balenciaga replica handbags , replica bottega handbags , replica burberry handbags , replica cartier handbags , replica chloe handbags , replica dior handbags , louboutin replica handbags , replica coach handbags , replica chanel handbags , replica dolce gabbana handbags , fendi replica handbags , givenchy replica handbags , replica gucci handbags , replica handbags , replica hermes handbags , replica jimmy choo handbags , replica juicy couture handbags , replica kooba handbags ,

Posted by: Replica handbag at September 23, 2009 02:05 PM (mSdqk)

83 Air force 1 shoes
Nike air force one
Nike air force
Air force 1 mens
Air force one
UGG Boots
UGG Australia
UGG Shoes
UGG Sale
Lebron Shoes
Cheap UGG
UGG Boots
UGG Shoes
Discount UGG
UGG Australia
UGG Sale
UGG Online

Posted by: FDSAFDS at October 18, 2009 12:49 PM (GQ3Y4)

84 discounthair straighteners
ghd hair
chi hair straightener
ghd straighteners
chi straighteners
chi hair
chi hair iron
hair straighteners ghd
ghd hair straighteners
free shipping!

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 09:39 PM (MtGwJ)

85 Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 05:05 PM (8kvkz)

86 buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefrom usa

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 03, 2009 10:11 AM (LHCCE)

87 discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefree shipping

Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 06:02 AM (XxrVz)

88 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 01:20 PM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 07:51 AM (IeIJx)

90 Hi! gqlzOts

Posted by: RPdMtr at November 12, 2009 02:52 PM (K/kdc)

91 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 09:19 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 04:59 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:31 AM (xpuiO)

94 ugg classic cardy
ugg bailey button
ugg classic tall
ugg classic mini
ugg rainier
ugg 5819
ugg knightsbridge
ugg 5815
ugg 5825
ugg sundance
ugg ultra tall

Posted by: reviewups at November 18, 2009 12:26 AM (Cdn3U)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 05:50 AM (C/zDM)

Processing 0.04, elapsed 0.0446 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.009 seconds, 104 records returned.
Page size 92 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.