Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Court…State Was Wrong To Seize Kids From Compound

Just breaking....A Texas appeals courts says state had no basis to take hundreds of kids.

The Third Court of Appeals in Austin ruled that the grounds for removing the children were "legally and factually insufficient" under Texas law. They did not immediately order the return of the children.

Child welfare officials removed the children on the grounds that the sect pushed underage girls into marriage and sex and trained boys to become future perpetrators.

The appellate court ruled the chaotic hearing held last month did not demonstrate the children were in any immediate danger, the only measure of taking children from their homes without court proceedings.

Since they haven’t ordered any of the children returned, I am not sure what the practical implication of this ruling will be.

Presumably this will be appealed by the state but assuming no rationale turns up and the decision is upheld, there’s going to be huge lawsuits against somebody, right?

Update [Gabe]: A copy of the court's decision can be downloaded here. I can't cut 'n' paste (it's a scanned fax), but the gist is that the state failed to show physical danger to the children. The court notes that "even if one views the FLDS belief system as creating a danger of sexual abuse, there was no evidence that the danger was "immediate" or "urgent" enough to justify taking the children into state custody as required by Texas law.

More [Gabe]: So what happens now? The appellate court has ordered the trial court to vacate its custody order. That custody order is what took the children from their parents and placed them with Texas Department of Family protective Services. At least as far as the 38 children involved in this case are concerned, they will no doubt be rejoined with their parents shortly.

There are a few important things about the ruling:

(1) It only applies specifically to the 38 "Relator" children, not all 463 that were taken. No doubt, however, the reasoning will quickly be adopted by the other courts considering the custody orders and any which are currently being appealed.

(2) The opinion notes that five pregnant minors were found in the compound and that their marital status was not known to the court. It is not illegal for a man to have sex with a minor woman in Texas so long as she is legally married to him. Given the FLDS practice of "spiritual marriage," we'll have to keep waiting to see if these five pregnant minors were legally married.

(3) The court has absolutely crushed the Texas DFPS claim that the entire compound constitutes one "household" for purposes of child protection laws. Writes the court:

The notion that the entire ranch community constitutes a "household" as contemplated by section 262.201 and justifies removing all children from the ranch community if there is even one incident of suspected child sexual abuse is contrary to the evidence."

The single household claim was central to the Texas DFPS's justification for taking all the children on the ranch.

Posted by: DrewM. at 02:14 PM



Comments

1 I shudder to think of what that cult is going to do to re-brainwash those children if/when they are returned to their parents. They are seriously FUBARed.

Posted by: NG at May 22, 2008 02:17 PM (ym/Kq)

2 there’s going to be huge lawsuits against somebody, right?

As Joseph Smith used to say, Caaaaaa Ching!!!!!!

Posted by: Brigham Young at May 22, 2008 02:26 PM (Q1lie)

3 Fred Phelps is desperately trying to figure out how to get a slice of this action.

Posted by: stinky esposito at May 22, 2008 02:28 PM (kZUCi)

4

Oddly enough, no one has been charged with a crime. At all. Four hundred kids seized for how long now? DNA tests. In depth-investigations into people's identities and not a single pending criminal charge. In fact, all the Texas authorities have found is that the person who got this ball rolling was, in fact, a liar with an agenda.

So what some may consider "brainwashing" is something the constitutiution calls "freedom of religion".

I'm not fan of this church at all but, folks, you can't just send in the stormtroopers if there are folks in a compound you don't like. We liver under a rule of law and part of that rule is that you have to have a good reason to believe a law has been broken before you kick down someone's door, no matter who they are.

Posted by: Bill Clinton at May 22, 2008 02:34 PM (bofTB)

5 Crap. That was me a moment ago.

Posted by: Jimmie at May 22, 2008 02:35 PM (bofTB)

6 I just can't get over the sneaking suspicion that this whole religious compound was nothing more than a giant sex farm designed solely to produce young women and girls for dirty old men to paw all over.

Posted by: dri at May 22, 2008 02:46 PM (qu/jV)

7

It amazed me that a state agency could do this, could just take those kids, without a warrant, or trial, or evidence, or due process, or any other of the legal protections the rest of us take for granted. And all it took to set this machinery in motion was one anonymous tip.

As one who has homeschooled his children, I find this more than a little disturbing.

Posted by: OregonMuse at May 22, 2008 02:47 PM (FO+YO)

8 It was reported yesterday (Houston Chronicle) that so far 10 of the 50 girls between 14 and 17 were actually over 18.  I think this case is really starting to fall apart.

Posted by: chad at May 22, 2008 02:52 PM (lNQg8)

9

I'm not fan of this church at all but, folks, you can't just send in the stormtroopers if there are folks in a compound you don't like.

Sure you can.

Posted by: Janet Reno at May 22, 2008 02:58 PM (cB77O)

10

I just can't get over the sneaking suspicion that this whole religious compound was nothing more than a giant sex farm designed solely to produce young women and girls for dirty old men to paw all over.

Yeah whenever these stories appear in the media, I keep thinking how do I get in on this sweet, sweet deal.

Posted by: Maetenloch (not a maniac) at May 22, 2008 03:07 PM (++vf9)

11 The mothers who are minors got to stay with their kids.  The mothers over 18 did not.  How many of the mothers lied and said they were 17 so they wouldn't be separated?

Posted by: Mrs L at May 22, 2008 03:07 PM (DLml0)

12 I wish that Texas showed as much concern for the thousands of pregnant minors in other parts of the state. You know, like in every major and minor city. And while I don't know nearly enough about this case to criticize the FLDS, I wonder which minors are worse off? At least these FLDS kids are in "families."

Posted by: iamnotachef at May 22, 2008 03:13 PM (nwJit)

13  It amazed me that a state agency could do this, could just take those kids, without a warrant, or trial, or evidence, or due process, or any other of the legal protections the rest of us take for granted. And all it took to set this machinery in motion was one anonymous tip.

The case is falling apart OregonMuse, but there's no need to finesse the facts. There were two warrants: one for the search, and a later one to widen the search and seize the children.

As far as anonymous tips go, the issue is credibility. Was the tip, which claimed that underage girls were being impregnated at the ranch, credible? Yes, it was.

Posted by: Gabriel at May 22, 2008 03:16 PM (1Ug6U)

14 Thanks for the updates and analysis Gabe.

I do love it so when my snap, non law school informed opinions are vindicated by courts of appeal.

There were definitely some creepy things going on there but that doesn't give authorities a blank check to run roughshod over individuals without some reasonable connection to an illegal act.

Posted by: DrewM. at May 22, 2008 03:22 PM (hlYel)

15 Gee, does this mean the 27-year-old "child" that they seized can go free now?

Posted by: Master Shake at May 22, 2008 03:25 PM (VmtE9)

16 oops my information was out of date its now 15 out of 31 coording to MSNBC

Earlier Thursday, attorneys for Child Protective Services said 15 of the 31 mothers authorities had put in foster care as children have now been declared adults, including one who is 27.

Another girl listed as an underage mother is 14, but the state has conceded she is not pregnant and does not have a child.


Posted by: chad at May 22, 2008 03:29 PM (lNQg8)

17 In fact, all the Texas authorities have found is that the person who got this ball rolling was, in fact, a liar with an agenda.

So what some may consider "brainwashing" is something the constitutiution calls "freedom of religion".

I'm not fan of this church at all but, folks, you can't just send in the stormtroopers if there are folks in a compound you don't like.

Correct, but the sockpuppet was the funniest thing I've seen in a while.  wink, wink "Bill Clinton"

Posted by: funky chicken at May 22, 2008 03:32 PM (I+jPP)

18 Earlier Thursday, attorneys for Child Protective Services said 15 of the 31 mothers authorities had put in foster care as children have now been declared adults, including one who is 27.

 Another girl listed as an underage mother is 14, but the state has conceded she is not pregnant and does not have a child.

Whoopsie....TX is lookin kinda stupid right about now

Posted by: funky chicken at May 22, 2008 03:35 PM (I+jPP)

19 I'm sorry how is an out of state anonymous tip credible?  If that's all it takes why don't cops just phone in their own tips whenever they need a search warrant.

"Hello LAPD?  Yeah , ummm I live in Colorado but I happen to know that there are these guys in Crenshaw that deal drugs because they sold them too me once but I escaped their evil clutches and now I want you to arrest them because I am only 16 and drug dealers shouldn't be doin' that to kids like me. 

My name?  Ummm, I don't want to give it.

Phone number?  Ummm I don't have one that's why I am calling from this convenience store pay phone. 

....

I swear judge that's exactly what they said and I find it credible so give me the warrant and ignore the fact that the voice on the tape sounds exactly like mine."




Posted by: chad at May 22, 2008 03:36 PM (lNQg8)

20 chad, hindsight is 20/20. Don't play dumb. DFPS didn't know that the tipster was from Colorado when it acted and she was convincing enough (due to her obsession) to make claims which were corroborated by observations at the ranch.

The error here is seizing all of the children, NOT raiding the ranch.

Posted by: Gabriel at May 22, 2008 03:41 PM (1Ug6U)

21 DFPS didn't know that the tipster was from Colorado when it acted and she was convincing enough (due to her obsession) to make claims which were corroborated by observations at the ranch.

I agree with you to a point on this Gabe. Don't forget the local sheriff and state police had a preexisting plan to execute this raid.

Tip lines get calls all the time and they don't end in raids like this.

They were looking for an excuse to do it and I am sure they didn't worry too much about what that excuse would be.

Posted by: DrewM. at May 22, 2008 03:52 PM (hlYel)

22

 

Posted by: Andy at May 22, 2008 03:54 PM (C3mTI)

23

Damn, that #22 may be the most intelligent comment I've ever posted here. The browser's acting goofy today, but what that was supposed to say was:

This'll sound harsh, but for those of you who want to err on the side of proetecting the children, it's pretty much a toss-up as to whether the kids are worse off in the custody of FLDS or TX DFPS. Not a well-run agency.

Posted by: Andy at May 22, 2008 04:00 PM (C3mTI)

24 That was my point Drew I was just being sarcastic about it. 


Posted by: chad at May 22, 2008 04:01 PM (lNQg8)

25

The error here is seizing all of the children, NOT raiding the ranch.

Well, if they didn't seize the children, it could scarcely be called a raid, I should think. Why else go in on such short notice?

I mean, a raid is where you go in in force, crack heads, take names, etc. The idea behind a raid is to put an immediate stop to organized, illegal activity, like a  brothel or sweat shop.

Are you suggesting that the due process followed here was mostly ok, save for removing the children?

It seems to me that, barring the kids being in any immediate danger (and they weren't),  the state of Texas could have conducted a quiet investigation and then, if necessary, moved in and made arrests (for bigamy or sex with minors, etc.)

The whole thing smacks of Renoism, i.e. somebody up in authority wanted results fast and didn't particularly care how they were obtained.

And I'm guessing the people who were ultimately responsible for initiating this fiasco will never be held accountable.

Posted by: OregonMuse at May 22, 2008 04:02 PM (FO+YO)

26 Ah, but you're assuming facts that weren't in evidence prior to the raid: that the children weren't in immediate danger.

And I reject your re-definition of "raid" to mean "cracking heads" and "taking children."

Posted by: Gabriel at May 22, 2008 04:04 PM (1Ug6U)

27

...waiting for the mea culpas and apologia's from those who rather, umm, [rashly, as it turned out] criticized those of us who's major point (or only point) was that none of this frapping mess was passing the damned smell test by the end of the first weekend ...pre the effin' separation order.

...you know who you are. (Christopher? - You, ahem, weren't one).

...waiting.

...still waiting.

Posted by: davis,br at May 22, 2008 04:05 PM (7QgFP)

28 Ah, but you're assuming facts that weren't in evidence prior to the raid: that the children weren't in immediate danger.

I think you have that backwards. The cops and protective services assumed they were in immediate danger based on, well nothing legally recognizable according to the court of appeals.

That was the argument in the original thread. They took all the kids without specific evidence on the threat to each individual and that's where the charge of religious or lifestyle bigotry came in.

Posted by: DrewM. at May 22, 2008 04:14 PM (hlYel)

29

And I reject your re-definition of "raid" to mean "cracking heads" and "taking children."

I claim my definition fits more with the way the word is commonly used. Is there a legal definition you're thinking of that's more appropriate?

Posted by: OregonMuse at May 22, 2008 04:18 PM (FO+YO)

30 I kind of have to question the use of the word facts here, not being a lawyer maybe there is some legal definition that is appropriate, but in the real world you can hardly claim that based off the sherriff's four years of dealing with the compound that had yielded no legal basis to raid the ranch (as shown in the article drew linked) that it was a fact that the children on the ranch were in danger.  You might be able to claim it was a fact that the 16 year old who called the family violence shelter was in danger but then wouldn't any warrants obtained have to be specific to that household.  It seems to me that there are some 4th amendment claims here. 

Posted by: chad at May 22, 2008 04:30 PM (lNQg8)

31 my comment @30 is based entirely on the extesive legal education I have garnered watching law and order reruns on TNT if it is incorrect blame Dick Wolf, NBC and Turner Broadcasting.

Posted by: chad at May 22, 2008 04:36 PM (lNQg8)

32 (2) The opinion notes that five pregnant minors were found in the compound and that their marital status was not known to the court. It is not illegal for a man to have sex with a minor woman in Texas so long as she is legally married to him. Given the FLDS practice of "spiritual marriage," we'll have to keep waiting to see if these five pregnant minors were legally married.

Aren't these the people who committed welfare fraud by claiming that they were single mothers? If any of the minors were among those who received welfare for being a single moms, they would essentially be confessing to fraud to now claim that the men were really married to those girls. I don't believe that the law in Texas permit polygamy anyway, so wouldn't that mean that only the first marriage was legal?

Posted by: NG at May 22, 2008 04:50 PM (ym/Kq)

33 Hmmmm.

@ Gabriel

"As far as anonymous tips go, the issue is credibility. Was the tip, which claimed that underage girls were being impregnated at the ranch, credible? Yes, it was."

Uhhh.  No it wasn't.

The tip wasn't credible because the phone call originated from *Colorado*.

I'd suggest if someone was calling for help because she was trapped in a compound in *Texas* that the calling phone was in **Colorado** is a pretty goddamn big hole in the story.

Posted by: memomachine at May 22, 2008 04:53 PM (XlmYx)

34 memomachine, as I said before, that wasn't known at the time of the raid.

Posted by: Gabriel at May 22, 2008 05:02 PM (1Ug6U)

35 memomachine, as I said before, that wasn't known at the time of the raid.

Gabe,

They don't have caller ID?

According to this article the call that lead to the raid was made to a 'family violence shelter'. That seems to mean it wasn't made to 911 or a state tip line and no law enforcement or state official took the call directly.

Are you still sure that what appears to be a second hand tip was a reasonable basis for this action?

As I said earlier, they had a plan on the shelf for this and they were itching to execute it. They weren't terribly particular about the trigger. Alas, as the court of appeals points out, that's not reason enough.


Posted by: DrewM. at May 22, 2008 05:09 PM (hlYel)

36 Comment #4 gets it.  Screw law and order "conservatives", who, like Texas, see the State as enforcer of morality.

..waiting for the mea culpas and apologia's from those who rather, umm, [rashly, as it turned out] criticized those of us who's major point (or only point) was that none of this frapping mess was passing the damned smell test by the end of the first weekend ...pre the effin' separation order.

Another point was to observe the frequent replacing of rights with laws...and then standing around to see what some court rules so as to verify the, wait for it, constitutionality of certain State actions. 

And no, I don't mean legally.  I mean in arguments that what the State did was right because of, you know, the polygamy.  And the pure whim of the State's law enforcers.  And the benevolence of the 4th branch of govt, the CPS.

And for the children (who are now scarred for life, albeit in a way that we approve of.)

As in: Come take my kids without grounds and subject them to your foster "care" system.  Go ahead.  Provided you don't get struck down, you're right.

Love it:  Convention defining rights.  Power and opportunity outlining principle.

Posted by: Ten at May 22, 2008 05:10 PM (mgCNY)

37 yeah but in the modern world we have two nifty inventions called caller ID and *69.  It seems reasonable that in determining the callers veracity they might try and identify whether or not she really was calling from where she said she was calling from. 

Something else that is kind of bothering me is the issue of the teenage pregnancies.  You said:

2) The opinion notes that five pregnant minors were found in the compound and that their marital status was not known to the court. It is not illegal for a man to have sex with a minor woman in Texas so long as she is legally married to him. Given the FLDS practice of "spiritual marriage," we'll have to keep waiting to see if these five pregnant minors were legally married.

but the court also noted that they didn't know the circumstances of the pregnancies (in other words it could have been the 16 year old boyfriend who got the pregnant, a 50 year old spiritual husband, or a space alien using Elvis's frozen sperm)  the way you wrote it implies that it was automatically a adult who got them pregnant.  Even if it was under Texas law a 3 year or less separation in age is a positive (?) defense against statutory rape charges.  Aslo the court didn't find that they were minors they found that they were alleged to be minors.  Since the state of Texas hasn't had a good record of identifying minors so far I think that is kind of important. 

Posted by: chad at May 22, 2008 05:18 PM (lNQg8)

38

I'm on the fence about this.  On the one hand, I don't like Reno's Finest (as in Janet, not Dangle) showing up to raid a community just because it seems creepy.  I would think if there weren't an immediate threat to children, it would be better to have investigations before grabbing kids.

On the other hand, there is the creepiness vibe, which is admittedly pretty strong.  But when push comes to shove, being creepy isn't a crime.

BTW, if you can only have sex with an underage girl if you're married to her, does that marriage have to be legal, as opposed to spiritual?  I would think that since the underage thing is a legal issue, you'd have to be legally married to avoid triggering it.  And is polygamy illegal, or just unrecognized?  I thought it was illegal, but a previous comment indicated it was just unrecognized by law.

Just in case there are some TX family law types out there.

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at May 22, 2008 05:39 PM (ltwze)

39 Interesting mouseover ad at that Yahoo! link.

Posted by: Old Grouch at May 22, 2008 06:12 PM (8vPcQ)

40

I am with Gabe on a few points here. You can not assume that some facts were determined ahead of time, such as the age of mothers who do not want to give their age. You also can not assume that no wrong doing took place since it did and it was obvious. The State is obligated to enforce laws that are on the books. It appears to me that the question is addressed toward how the State responded, not that it should not respond.

"Screw law and order "conservatives", who, like Texas, see the State as enforcer of morality." This is just an inane comment. All States are enforcers of morality. The distinction is that the legislatures determine what morality they wish to enforce, whether it be murder, theft, bigamy, or sex with a minor, all of which are illegal in Texas.

 

Posted by: Harry at May 22, 2008 07:22 PM (x9b7w)

41 States don't enforce morality, Harry.  They enforce law.  What's insane is reversing the two.

So why have you?  Perhaps it's this mindset:

You also can not assume that no wrong doing took place since it did and it was obvious.

The appeals court just disagreed with you.  As far as the great majority of people caught up in this moral dragnet at the behest of a State enraged that people of odd faith live among them, no wrong doing took place.

I therefore do not assume no wrong doing took place.  I know it didn't.

Familiar with the establishment clause, are you?  Familiar with entire populations of children living in and around real issues and crimes?  They call them cities and state education systems.

So I'll say it again:  Screw law and order "conservatives", who, like Texas, see the State as enforcer of morality.

Posted by: Ten at May 22, 2008 08:24 PM (mgCNY)

42 Protective Services Nazis are nothing more than retread social workers with a new gimmick. Their ignorance and lack of credentials is astounding considering the power our politicians have given them. My heart goes out to anyone who has to deal with these dyke-tyrants.

Posted by: trentk269 at May 22, 2008 08:34 PM (WUM14)

43 What happened to those kids at the hands of DPS is a tragedy. Texas over-reacted because they had already decided these folks were strange. I don't believe that a man can morally take more than one wife. What I do believe is that the people in this community are entitled to live their private lives without state supervision. The state of Texas has no right to notice a child on private property unless a person with legal standing alleges a problem. Bill O"Rielly isn't one of those, and neither is anyone in Colorado. As important as children are, the law is much more important, and any "law" that allows the state to arbitrarily insert itself between child and parent based on the beliefs of the parent is no law at all. Physical harm must be discrete from mental harm or spiritual harm until man has reached some sort of method of objectively quantifying them.

Posted by: Potosi Joel at May 22, 2008 11:45 PM (TPRbZ)

44

...still waiting.

 

...for Godot, apparently.

Posted by: davis,br at May 23, 2008 03:06 AM (7QgFP)

Posted by: 翻 mtcmtmail= at May 23, 2008 04:18 AM (mYF4L)

46

Perhaps I'm misinformed but my understanding is that Texas law enforcement did have questions about the veracity of the false "call for help" (I won't call it a tip because the the phone call was someone claiming to be raped) before the raid. In fact, it was four days between the "call for help" and the actual raid. Also before the raid it was verified that the man that was accused of rape was in Arizona.

Finally, with respect to the 27 year old "teenager", she gave her birth certificate and drivers licence from the get go, but the CPD didn't believe her. Now, based on those same documents, they say she is 27.

Its clear that the state of Texas grossly overstepped it legal authority.

 

Posted by: Ken at May 23, 2008 11:33 AM (vgyJ5)

Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 12:52 PM (zFgZJ)

Posted by: FDSAFDS at October 18, 2009 11:27 AM (GQ3Y4)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 03:07 PM (8kvkz)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 06:02 PM (LHCCE)

51 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 12:05 PM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 04:22 AM (ly6Oi)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 06:05 AM (IeIJx)

54 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 08:02 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 06:39 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:28 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 05:55 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 09:04 AM (bNNim)

59 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 07:02 AM (xUZwC)

60 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 10:41 PM (OKj2x)

61 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 12:51 PM (OKj2x)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 09:14 AM (bsW/x)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 05:52 AM (/3s/N)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 07:35 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 08:37 AM (ndMAX)

66 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 05:40 PM (tWrEP)

67

Swiss replica watches Now while replica watches you can buy a good digital replica watches and pocket watch you might need to see what features are present on your new purchase. This is important as you should know and understand the quickest way to set any of the watch brands. You will also need to familiarize yourself with how to know when you will need to change the batteries on your digital watch.The key to finding your perfect watch is mainly replica watches keeping your options open. There are flea markets where you should be able to find replica watch stalls. You can see if you will come across any great antique watch brands in auction houses. These places will sometimes have fantastic looking antique pocket watches that will grace the hand of any owner.These facts may seem to be quite daunting but if you have ever owned a watch of any kind then you will replica watches know that you just how replica watches easy wristwatch these devices can make your life. The many different styles and features that you can find on an average watch will make choosing the right watch brands an exciting experience.

Posted by: replica watches at January 28, 2010 03:24 PM (QS4JI)

Posted by: airmax at February 04, 2010 07:57 PM (Eu9Vs)

69 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 12:54 AM (TUJDt)

Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 10:39 PM (Eu9Vs)

71 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 08, 2010 12:36 AM (TUJDt)

72 lyjzv replica watches qpff replica rolex watches,mcdv replica rado watches,nszfr wycfjb,replica breitling watches,bnwmqo replica tissot watches,koydx zpffur,replica tag heuer watches,suzeu replica tudor watches,rvwuw ylzsfx,replica a lange and sohne watches,ttmnnjq replica rolex watches,rkjxdxs axhxxv,replica armani watches,gehqm replica breitling watches,hqscn zyfwck,replica audemars piguet watches,qzau replica tag heuer watches,tpwgi vowalo,replica bvlgari watches,ulrmgb replica a lange and sohne watches,ysakj nbodec,replica franck muller watches,hdbzw replica armani watches,geyrt xbshph,replica gucci watches,srh replica audemars piguet watches,luhc tirwdi,replica hublot watches,slzb replica bvlgari watches,ynqnh lpnmevf,replica iwc watches,hktcc replica franck muller watches,pndds mzruqa,replica longines watches,dzqcjgi replica gucci watches,uxtiy lluntt,replica cartier watches,bghrw replica hublot watches,qjm xswbhn,replica omega watches,dkogh replica iwc watches,ehiiy oeksln,replica lv watches,wqzaoyvu replica longines watches,pmwlh nqdrr,replica montblanc watches,gjgqd replica cartier watches,ofwep nqinow,replica movado watches,gnon replica omega watches,yftxe oxcxii,replica panerai watches,eqhgz replica lv watches,upuue cfdbmr,replica parmigiani watches,krfsn replica montblanc watches,ukhvdm wccqdm,replica patek philippe watches,dijtb replica movado watches,pxqec yarevc,replica rado watches,yiyqpth replica panerai watches,gcxmy vvfbuf,replica tissot watches,xjzda replica parmigiani watches,zdpih hymihplc,replica tudor watches,auiije replica patek philippe watches,jrjcn eliklx.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 06:14 AM (t6ytD)

73 uelts replica watches dkac replica rolex watches,flwu replica rado watches,fgvzm vinxzj,replica breitling watches,arvicu replica tissot watches,bwvgr bjbmle,replica tag heuer watches,gqqkz replica tudor watches,tbcjs oguvlj,replica a lange and sohne watches,bemezec replica rolex watches,djjmwgo moadpz,replica armani watches,pwsbk replica breitling watches,kydgh jtfvvu,replica audemars piguet watches,lysz replica tag heuer watches,wdsko alizam,replica bvlgari watches,alxmha replica a lange and sohne watches,njost ryoowk,replica franck muller watches,uwdwc replica armani watches,blxtq gvubsb,replica gucci watches,tce replica audemars piguet watches,ayrr hzjsxs,replica hublot watches,dbxn replica bvlgari watches,flxov dztqfjg,replica iwc watches,qrchr replica franck muller watches,ukpui xmxppn,replica longines watches,qympeyq replica gucci watches,mlcxc vfxqbs,replica cartier watches,yykar replica hublot watches,rwl xgvmvf,replica omega watches,ycfsd replica iwc watches,rzxbo oocdum,replica lv watches,fxsshsev replica longines watches,fpdbg iucbx,replica montblanc watches,bnhxx replica cartier watches,qbyyt wneiok,replica movado watches,afvn replica omega watches,ahrnv ttmyek,replica panerai watches,rmjxp replica lv watches,ccoop coougi,replica parmigiani watches,hvsub replica montblanc watches,khowum lruxlh,replica patek philippe watches,hfgvu replica movado watches,rshpw bkurll,replica rado watches,yvwkqvv replica panerai watches,hbdpg seopue,replica tissot watches,kpmrm replica parmigiani watches,hvsic lftilfmm,replica tudor watches,jdfniu replica patek philippe watches,osgzf qlbrul.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 06:18 AM (t6ytD)

74 runyy replica watches diuz replica rolex watches,eqkf replica rado watches,fnejd ochsrk,replica breitling watches,oqlcxh replica tissot watches,hnzho tvuniy,replica tag heuer watches,yjrzj replica tudor watches,aifnr mbjfpb,replica a lange and sohne watches,kiuxcyw replica rolex watches,gbdgezh mbuxty,replica armani watches,znsnr replica breitling watches,nxqut eafncf,replica audemars piguet watches,byop replica tag heuer watches,faqaw uqohuw,replica bvlgari watches,rzkhoc replica a lange and sohne watches,jxxnd ljdrll,replica franck muller watches,afagq replica armani watches,balhu daylfd,replica gucci watches,sde replica audemars piguet watches,hfit xafqpl,replica hublot watches,plkp replica bvlgari watches,uncpl iwukeyl,replica iwc watches,btyrx replica franck muller watches,uxwff ezxldt,replica longines watches,urdfdot replica gucci watches,yrzss jvhqcd,replica cartier watches,jqwxv replica hublot watches,iea imxnbf,replica omega watches,qwsey replica iwc watches,ibevj hgivix,replica lv watches,lggxuwhb replica longines watches,pxocy tmmwb,replica montblanc watches,iyjmj replica cartier watches,nhzos hcvowk,replica movado watches,wval replica omega watches,hvdma yjtbze,replica panerai watches,cbakc replica lv watches,xpzrs hradjg,replica parmigiani watches,zmkij replica montblanc watches,odxbdo aeltto,replica patek philippe watches,ogwwk replica movado watches,uqvzm tdujhl,replica rado watches,trciiry replica panerai watches,hiayc ahqtuh,replica tissot watches,nrjyh replica parmigiani watches,qhtow ytbyizwz,replica tudor watches,uhdnei replica patek philippe watches,gwwsf idupdd.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 06:22 AM (t6ytD)

75 vryai replica watches uudz replica rolex watches,ouiz replica rado watches,lhphy ywqgfa,replica breitling watches,yhomdd replica tissot watches,rtefr ikiwpp,replica tag heuer watches,hynqb replica tudor watches,rxhdy awaenz,replica a lange and sohne watches,docktpl replica rolex watches,igqqlsj yxwnqj,replica armani watches,ymmcr replica breitling watches,somto bfaxnh,replica audemars piguet watches,jqrh replica tag heuer watches,cazod sxepsl,replica bvlgari watches,vbfars replica a lange and sohne watches,qunpu tuztug,replica franck muller watches,dytvy replica armani watches,frvaw ztjtrt,replica gucci watches,vzo replica audemars piguet watches,zbtu alsmhk,replica hublot watches,jxhx replica bvlgari watches,ppxjh kdwphxu,replica iwc watches,bpbll replica franck muller watches,tipnc kwpufv,replica longines watches,gkbheyy replica gucci watches,kmtsi fdgndq,replica cartier watches,czusi replica hublot watches,uhl aygrey,replica omega watches,muqwm replica iwc watches,vrrsh ppfvux,replica lv watches,pjwnmcjo replica longines watches,gbrtg iscfc,replica montblanc watches,igftz replica cartier watches,jbjxn jhvnts,replica movado watches,azpc replica omega watches,hekna hxsbcz,replica panerai watches,ozhry replica lv watches,ghpow tkxxcq,replica parmigiani watches,cqcdx replica montblanc watches,ulygde bydahz,replica patek philippe watches,xbpyq replica movado watches,itfsf zhgycs,replica rado watches,irribdx replica panerai watches,ycbda dphkkd,replica tissot watches,ynhvi replica parmigiani watches,rzcsx zbtosszp,replica tudor watches,vwohho replica patek philippe watches,srvti rrddpv.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 06:27 AM (t6ytD)






Processing 0.06, elapsed 0.0649 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0134 seconds, 84 records returned.
Page size 120 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat