Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Grim Milestone: For 10,000th Time, MSM Claims Bush Administration Claimed Hussein Behind 9/11 (While Failing to Provide a Quote or Citation for This Claim, Naturally)

McCain doubted the relationship between Hussein was "close enough" to support the idea of a joint Iraq/Al Qaeda operation behind 9/11.

Thus signaling a sharp disagreement with the Bush Administration... which also denied any evidence of Hussein's hand in the attack.

And yet the LAT insists, again, the Bush Administration claimed precisely the opposite of what the Bush Administration claimed.

Fact checking? We're well beyond errors explainable by negligence. The fact that the LAT cannot supply a single quote to support its claim proves they know none exist.

This is, as is becoming increasingly common and increasingly transparent, the MSM simply lying.

They're not even trying to hide it anymore.

They are writing solely for a particular type of very partisan reader who will not ask for evidence of their claims or object very strenuously to their occasional flights of fancy and fiction, so long as those claims fit their own worldview; and they don't much care about the facts. It's The Narrative that matters both to their few remaining readers and to themselves.

Posted by: Ace at 09:50 AM



Comments

1 At some point, somebody needs to sue one of these media outlets for libel.  The standard since New York Times v. Sullivan's been extremely high, but if this isn't "actual malice," described as publishing what you know to be false or acting with "reckless disregard for truth or falsehood," then I don't know what is.

Posted by: Dave J at March 24, 2008 09:55 AM (jUUaH)

2 Goebbels was right.

Posted by: along came Jones at March 24, 2008 09:57 AM (KOkrW)

3

The only thing the MSM is good for is sports scores.

Posted by: Don Carne at March 24, 2008 09:59 AM (wSNS7)

4 Oh, and lining birdcages and wrapping the fish you send to let them know where Luca Brasi is sleeping.

Posted by: Don Carne at March 24, 2008 10:07 AM (wSNS7)

5

Im not so positive Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11

Whats so fucking hard to imagine about that?

THats what cracks me up- its a matter of faith for these cocksucking liars that a brutal middle eastern dictator, who we embarassed in 1990-who harbored well known terrorists, who gassed his own people- who repeatedly engaged in "destroy America" rhetoric, could possibly have had anything to do with the 2001 attacks.

Is it really that much of a stretch?

Of course not.

But we cant fuck up the narrative.

Posted by: TMF at March 24, 2008 10:08 AM (KTgUG)

6

I'm going to guess, and I think from considering the business/corporate nature of newspapers and other media, that they do actually get together to plan out narratives like this.

How else to keep as consistent. Someone at that paper knows what is true and what is false and will be the supervisor-type person to remind people what is true and what is false, to be consistent and not embarrass the paper/media.

How fucked up is that...I'm sure that is how things work, it is a logical explanation.

Posted by: Sir Rev. Dr. E Buzz Heinz-Miller-Heinz, Esq at March 24, 2008 10:11 AM (sf4Oe)

7

I'm sick of media bias stories.  We've been going on about the liberal bias in the MSM since the 80's.  It's like death and taxes: we ain't never gonna be rid of it.

What makes these stories compelling now though is the sheer blatant nature of this bias, in some of the most respected rags the mainstream media has to offer.  They.Just.Don't.Care.Anymore.

Lets just put this stupid and outdated notion of "objective journalism" out of our collective misery.  One of the few things that I think we could take from European culture is the notion of very openly biased print media.  If you want the center-right news in Paris, you buy Le Figaro.  If you want the left wing news, you buy Le Monde.  Everybody knows exactly what you're getting.  No pretense of objectivity, although each is expected to carry the basic facts.

But the NYT and WaPo and LAT are going to have to learn to give up pretending to be something they're not: objective.  Its insulting to all of us to pretend they cover the news fairly.

Posted by: Fred at March 24, 2008 10:15 AM (ivbbD)

8 At one time I subscribed both to the NYT and the LAT. Now, I will neither buy nor read either paper. I rarely click on their links to deny them advertising revenue. However, lost of revenue seems to have very little effect on them.

Posted by: Mack at March 24, 2008 10:24 AM (oRE6l)

9 I have not studied American libel/slander/whateverucallit laws, but is there no way these guys can be sued for these deliberate lies?

Posted by: Guy who misunderstands everything at March 24, 2008 10:32 AM (IlgNp)

10 FAITH. BASED. HISTORY.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 24, 2008 10:33 AM (tvnQf)

11 That was me, above.

Posted by: Tushar D at March 24, 2008 10:33 AM (IlgNp)

12 Liberal media's goal is the same as the sleazy attorney's goal known as "C.O.D."
This stands for Confuse, Obstruct, Delay.

Posted by: dri at March 24, 2008 10:40 AM (qu/jV)

13

IM actually looking forward to seeing what kind of crazy hysterical shit their gonna lay down in the summer/fall.

It will surely be epic in scope.

Posted by: TMF at March 24, 2008 10:45 AM (KTgUG)

14 Hey, it's an election year, and we have a job to do.  If you say it enough, it becomes the truth.  Remember, we're the Deciders

Posted by: MSM at March 24, 2008 10:45 AM (ka9gR)

15

Let's face it, years from now a video will be unearthed where Hussien hands off a briefcase to OBL, with "Hijacker's Guide" in red letters, and then gives him a great big kiss.  This 'stashe-locked bombshell of the century will be met with a collective yawn.

This movie plot twist isn't up to even M Night Shamalan's standands ... because it doesn't say anything about the characters that we don't already know.  The media can argue about Col. Mustard in the library with the candlestick, but everyone -- everyone has a nagging doubt about Professor Hockey Mask and Chainsaw.

And it isn't anything that would have convinced the anti-war people in the first place.

 

Posted by: Cincinnatus at March 24, 2008 10:50 AM (tun6e)

16

Tushar-

It's tried, and every now and then it works, but go back and check out New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) to see when the media were essentially given legal protections rivaling that of kings (or Jacques Chirac). Here's the Wiki link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

By the way- for any interested, most periodicals (and television, for that matter) are not subsidized by subscriptions and purchases- they're subsidized by advertising revenue. Eliminate that revenue and watch the product sink.

As a matter of interest- in late '06-early '07, due to slumping revenues, New York Times Co. had to sell off its 9 broadcasting stations to Oak Hill Capital Partners (the price tag was roughly $575 million- cheap for that many stations). NYT's stock price has an interesting chart...

http://www.corporate-ir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=nyt&script=300

 

tmi3rd

Posted by: tmi3rd at March 24, 2008 10:50 AM (j0gzJ)

17 #5 TMF: "Im not so positive Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11"

Oh that's crazy talk!  Why would anybody think that?  It's not like he abetted any earlier WTC attacks or anything! 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Rahman_Yasin


Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2008 10:58 AM (+UFhT)

18 Oh now I'm so embarassed!  I found an error in the Wiki article I posted above.  Look at this: "However, the United States government has not publicly tied the Hussein regime explicitly to Yasin's indictment for the 1993 attack."
   But but but that can't be right, because the L.A.Times just got done telling me for the 10,000th time that the Bush administration has been swearing up and down, continuously since 2001-09-11, that S.Hussein was behind it.  Silly me.

Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2008 11:04 AM (+UFhT)

19

Hmmmmm

Friday, Dan Abrams spent a whole hour, calling for a "full and thorough investigation" into the breach of Cabana-Boy's passport files...

Then,

Keith Olbermann spent another whole hour, calling for a "full and thorough investigation" into the breach of Cabana-Boy's passport files...The Biggest Story since Watergate.

Today?

[chirp - chirp - chirp]

heh,heh,heh

Posted by: franksalterego at March 24, 2008 11:09 AM (CytYq)

20

#5

The 9/11 Commission declared they couldn't find proof of an operational connection between Saddam and al Qaeda. That doesn't exonerate Saddam. It just means we don't know, which is what Dick Cheney said.

Why does the MSM insist that it's impossible? After all, Clinton bombed the so-called aspirin factory because his national security people were convinced it was a joint operation between Saddam and al Qaeda to produce nerve gas. Clinton's SecDef Cohen, when he came before the 9/11 Commission, continued to maintain that the evidence was sound.

Clinton bombed Iraqi intelligence headquarters when it was discovered that Saddam had sent assassins to kill former President Bush. 

There are numerous bits of circumstantial evidence that point to cooperation.

So - besides partisan politics - why is it so hard to believe that Saddam and al Qaeda worked together against a common enemy?

Posted by: lyle at March 24, 2008 11:10 AM (fHfJ+)

21 You know, at some point "They're not even trying to hide it anymore" becomes old.  Let's face it. They've not even been trying to hide it for a very long time now.

Posted by: JohnJ at March 24, 2008 11:18 AM (di0nN)

22

I'll play devil's advocate:

But McCain openly disputed Bush administration claims that Hussein appeared linked to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. “I doubt seriously if there’s this close relationship between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein,” he told CBS News in September 2002.

Wasn't Cheney on a Sunday morning talk show back then talking up the alleged Prague meeting between a 9-11 al Qaeda operative and an Iraqi official?

Posted by: CJ at March 24, 2008 11:33 AM (9KqcB)

23

Here's the left's spin CJ.  If you note, they cannot rule out the connections but only put forth that they cannot confirm them.  Its CYA.   In anyevent, the Checzh intelligence stand by their report.

http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2005_cr/levin041505.html

Posted by: polynikes at March 24, 2008 12:10 PM (m2CN7)

24 Chzech = Chezch

Posted by: polynikes at March 24, 2008 12:15 PM (m2CN7)

25 Try 'Czech'.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at March 24, 2008 12:43 PM (O9Cc8)

26

Oh how I love walks down memory lane...

The United States also claims it had other evidence linking the plant with chemical weapons production. That evidence includes links between officials at the facility in Sudan and an Iraqi official who has been labeled by U.S. intelligence as "the father of Iraq's chemical weapons program."

The Iraqi, identified as Emad Al Ani, is said to have had extensive dealings with officials at the plant in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum.

And,

Saddam Hussein offered asylum

Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has offered asylum to bin Laden, who openly supports Iraq against the Western powers

Down the memory hole...

Posted by: Jay at March 24, 2008 12:57 PM (BNlV7)

27

Morons, you can't sue the media for "slandering" or "libeling" the gummint. 

The First Amendment would be as worthless as a Politician's Promise if you could. 

 In virtually all scenarios, you have no legal standing to claim that someone else, let alone the gumment or its officials, is being libeled.

Deal with it.

But take heart: the MSM is dying a "death by a thousand cuts", as naked partisanship has eroded their credibility, and with it their readership, profitability, stock value, and market share.

 

 

Posted by: Refried Confusion at March 24, 2008 12:57 PM (bgYHb)

28

On March 19, 2003 Bush sent a letter to the Congressional leadership in which he stated that the invasion of Iraq was permitted under legislation authorizing force against those who "planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/19/sprj.irq.letter/

Posted by: Luke at March 24, 2008 01:05 PM (Qq1Ah)

29 #19 "Friday, Dan Abrams spent a whole hour, calling for a "full and thorough investigation" into the breach of Cabana-Boy's passport files..
[...]
Keith Olbermann spent another whole hour, calling for a "full and thorough investigation" into the breach of Cabana-Boy's passport files..."

Has either of these douchenozzles, in the time since then, even attempted to climb down from this pinnacle? 
Or have they just relied on their viewers to forget about it?

Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2008 01:31 PM (+o60r)

30

On March 19, 2003 Bush sent a letter to the Congressional leadership 

Yes, that same Congressional leadership, Daschle, Kerry, Clinton, Edwards, Rockefeller, Feinstein, Torricelli, among others, voted that language into law.

As in:

Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the President to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

That is PUBLIC LAW 107–243

 

Posted by: Jay at March 24, 2008 01:43 PM (BNlV7)

31

Luke,

The entire presidential letter is a quote from Section 3b of the Authorization of the Use of Force. You have to read the bill to get the context.

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ243.107

Posted by: lyle at March 24, 2008 01:46 PM (fHfJ+)

32

Here's the left's spin CJ.  If you note, they cannot rule out the connections but only put forth that they cannot confirm them.  Its CYA.   In anyevent, the Checzh intelligence stand by their report.http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2005_cr/levin041505.html

But the 9-11/Czech claim means the LA Times is correct to say that the administration claimed "that Hussein appeared linked to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks."

I'm getting tired of the wordplay on both sides of this...but the Times appears correct.

Posted by: CJ at March 24, 2008 02:55 PM (9KqcB)

33

I agree with you CJ in that the administration provided circumstantial links between Al Queda and Iraq but at the same time they and the President specifically stated more than once that there is no claim or objective evidence to tie Iraq to 9/11.    As you know there is a difference between an Iraq / Al Queda link and an Iraq / 9/11 link.  The LA times would have you believe it all means the same.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/140133_bushiraq18.html

Posted by: polynikes at March 24, 2008 03:19 PM (m2CN7)

34 Luke, you lying sack of codswallop.

The full sentence is "(2) acting pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law 107-243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."

In other words, you lied by cutting relevant language out of the quote, you stole words to make it look like someone said something they didn't, and that makes you a weasely motherfucker, a liar, a cheat, a bounder, and presumed guilty of soccage-in-feif and barratry on the high seas.

Worse than all that, you're acting like a journalist! For shame!

Posted by: Merovign at March 24, 2008 05:05 PM (IaYDo)

35

I agree with you CJ in that the administration provided circumstantial links between Al Queda and Iraq but at the same time they and the President specifically stated more than once that there is no claim or objective evidence to tie Iraq to 9/11.    As you know there is a difference between an Iraq / Al Queda link and an Iraq / 9/11 link.  The LA times would have you believe it all means the same.

polynikes,

The Prague meeting was alleged to have involved people linked to 9-11 intself.

A former Iraqi intelligence officer who was said to have met with the suspected leader of the Sept. 11 attacks has told American interrogators the meeting never happened, according to United States officials familiar with classified intelligence reports on the matter....

...Asked about links between Iraq and Al Qaeda, Mr. Cheney replied: ''With respect to 9/11, of course, we've had the story that's been public out there. The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we've never been able to develop any more of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it. We just don't know.''

Except that we do know.

Posted by: CJ at March 24, 2008 05:11 PM (9KqcB)

36

Except that we do know

Oh we do, do we? Why do you say that?

Oh- now I see

A former Iraqi intelligence officer who was said to have met with the suspected leader of the Sept. 11 attacks has told American interrogators the meeting never happened, according to United States officials familiar with classified intelligence reports on the matter....

So the intel officer denied any meeting with Attah.

Well- that settles it then!!!

Pa-the-tic

Posted by: Keith Olbermann at March 24, 2008 05:39 PM (KTgUG)

37

Hey, whaddya know?

Apparently the Czechs stand 100% by their claim that Attah met with Iraqi intel in Prague.

http://www.praguepost.com/P02/2002/20605/news1a.php

Guess we dont know, now do we?

Posted by: TMF at March 24, 2008 05:43 PM (KTgUG)

38 They do this ten or twenty more times as often and they'll get close to the plastic turkey myth frequency. I gotta clue you, watching the media handle President Bush and I've begun doubting every single new story or thing I've heard about the last fifty years.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 24, 2008 05:44 PM (3+3kx)

Posted by: bncweer at January 15, 2009 08:57 PM (U5xPH)

40 Greeting. Nice original site. Help me! Looking for sites on: Cheapest paintball guns. I found only this - top 10 Paintball guns. We accept bt paintball gun scope mount base. Manufacturer of firearm replica paintball guns and markers also sell paintballs, more about the t military paintball gun. With love :-), Patton from Zealand.

Posted by: Patton at July 16, 2009 12:00 PM (kZgnP)

Posted by: linksfromlondon at October 02, 2009 02:15 AM (x6SNH)

Posted by: discount ugg boots at November 01, 2009 04:01 AM (MlIdd)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 09, 2009 03:12 AM (4uuE9)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 14, 2009 07:25 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 06:57 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 12:03 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 12:32 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 03:18 AM (C/zDM)

49 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 25, 2009 03:01 AM (fd1jz)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 11:34 AM (bsW/x)

51 The womens mbtchallenges the hard to reach
muscles in your legs, but also works the abdominal, back, buttock, and thigh muscles.
With every stride, the instability activates the whole body in concert and tones as it
stimulates different areas.mbt
footwear
have a curved pivot sole that copies walking on soft moss. The sole of
href=http://www.mbtshoesbuy.com/products_new.html>new mbt
turns even, flat ground
into uneven terrain. The mbt anti shoes challenges the muscles to work harder with
every step you take. The unique curved sole works by providing instability and makes
the muscles of your body more engaged and also helps burn more calories.
The mbt shoes walking shoes have been
highlighted for its ability to cushion your feet while challenging your muscles.
Clinical studies suggest that regular use improves balance, posture and circulation.
mbt lami shoes re-establish
the natural conditions for standing and walking.You will get more results out of your
workouts ? MBT shoes have technology in the sole design that make your working more
efficient and burn more calories. With every step, the instability activates your
muscles and the whole body is stimulated as your walk more and more.Free Shipping
1Week on Select Styles Of discount
mbt
Walking Shoes Reviews !

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at December 09, 2009 05:28 PM (B0M1x)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 15, 2009 07:18 AM (x7rNt)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 21, 2009 07:04 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: cheap Air Max at December 25, 2009 12:22 PM (ZgK+c)

55 Support by UK shopping links of London earrings was intuitive and nowadays we have matured internationally with stores in 1990.links of londonThe party resulted from a clean exact for her wife, links londonJohn Ayton, founded the jewelry mark,links of london sale Links of London. Relations of London were founded in the UK, Hong Kong, links of london charms USA and Canada.links of london charms Links of London is one of the chief jewelry brands in the United Kingdom.links of london sweetie bracelet It lays a lot of weight on producing jewelry featuring newer, exceptional designs.It has been reported that silver tiffany & co was regularly melted to oxidization are general accessories. links of london braceletJewelry designs however did not been fixed;

Posted by: links of london at January 02, 2010 06:17 AM (jhDD/)

Posted by: nike air max at January 20, 2010 05:05 PM (CZv6h)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 06:10 AM (JOSIc)






Processing 0.04, elapsed 0.061 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0305 seconds, 66 records returned.
Page size 78 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat