Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

The Ultimate McCain Bumper-Sticker

...comes courtesy of (who else?) Hillary Rodham Clinton, by way of bubble-headed Brit Tina Brown, who just slays us with the cute, "punny" title Taking the GOP Bait, Hook, Line, and Stinker.

Stinker? How does she do it?

At any rate, our hearts soared when we read this delectable quote from Hillary Clinton. What's the best part of the quote? The damning-with-no-praise-at-all for John McCain, or the scary "Just do what you're told" message to the party faithful?

"You don't have to fall in love," Hillary Rodham Clinton reportedly reproved a top Democratic fundraiser who was recently moaning about McCain's lackluster performance as a candidate. "You just have to fall in line."

John McCain

You don't have to fall in love. You just have to fall in line.

Best. Slogan. Ever.

The quote is almost too good to be true. We'd go so far as doubting it was actually said -- no one is that honest and pithy and creepy off-the-cuff -- except that it is attributed to Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Which tends to make it much more plausible.

I didn't write the above entry. All I did was change a name.

You see, on April 25, 2004 the owner of this site did write the above entry.

The name I changed was Kerry. It now appears as McCain everywhere in the text that Kerry once was. We all had a great laugh at the time at the Democrats expense. Me included.

It's not so funny now, is it? But isn't it essentially what the rationale for McCain's campaign is going to be? Vote for me...I'm not Hillary. Fall in line like good little conservative soldiers, even though I have a habit of pissing down your leg and telling you it's raining.

Let's all run to the polls! Even our host admits he'll govern like a Democrat, and once in power you know McCain won't even have to give lip service to the Conservatives in the base he has long held in contempt.

You think your immigration concerns are meaningful? Just wait until Attorney General Lindsey Graham calls you a bigot. Think "global warming/climate change" is bogus? Just wait until Johnny Mac signs Kyoto.

In any event, that's besides the point. I agree with Goldstein.

Unlike some, I'm not "in love" and I'm also not going to "fall in line." Should McCain win the nomination, the only question for me is whether I stay home or whether I affirmatively vote against him.

For all I know, President Hillary Clinton might be the best thing that could ever happen from a conservative's viewpoint. After all, her husband's election heralded the GOP tsunami of 1994. And she's much more objectionable than he.

There was a time when presented with the "fall in love, fall in line" approach, many would have scoffed and rejected the proposition as offering false choices. And rightly so.

I miss those days.

Posted by: Jack M. at 08:04 PM



Comments

1

Well, I'll be ...I finally agreed with every frickin' part of a JackM post.

Eff me: I'll prob'ly be reading your "poetry" next.

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 20, 2008 08:09 PM (q4usA)

2 The Nazis called this "Gleichschaltung" -- the "bringing into line".

Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 20, 2008 08:11 PM (ERV3B)

3 Davis,br

There once was a pol named McClain
Who gave rightwing believers a pain
He'd huff and he'd puff
So we'd kiss off his stuff
And Clinton the fools did ordain...

Posted by: richard mcenroe at January 20, 2008 08:13 PM (AZziM)

4 I'm with you, JackM.

Posted by: Nom de Blog at January 20, 2008 08:19 PM (ThZCx)

5 The Maverick damn well should have thought about where he was going to get his votes from when he was screwing the Republican base at every turn.

Like I said earlier today in a post elsewhere - McCain gets my vote slightly past never.

Posted by: SimplyKimberly at January 20, 2008 08:25 PM (SP5/w)

6 Heh. KMA, ricky boy, KMA.

Posted by: davis,br at January 20, 2008 08:30 PM (q4usA)

7 Guys, I hear you, but I can't in good conscience do anything that would benefit Hillary. I'm praying Romney knocks him off.

tmi3rd

Posted by: tmi3rd at January 20, 2008 08:34 PM (sU6+7)

8 Big difference JackM:

Foreign situation in 1994 was nowhere near as big a problem as it is now. 4, no make it 8, years of President HRC gives terrorists that long to consolidate and rebuild.

And domestically we will be treated to the poisonous partisan squabbling that is a specialty of the Clinton Democrats, which means that after we finnaly stumble through another Clinton presidency, the next guy will have that much harder a time uniting Americans against the resurgent terrorist threat.


Posted by: Carl in N.H. at January 20, 2008 08:35 PM (x5zLq)

9

So JackM is saying we should eat McCain.

When's dinner at?

On a serious note, if McCain get the nomination, I'll be looking for a new political party to register to. Anyone got any good ideas/want to start one up?

Posted by: TheEJS at January 20, 2008 08:35 PM (7V+4E)

10 If McCain held conservatives in contempt, he would be shouting "Bring the Troops Home!" and DEFINITELY not using the word "Islamofascism."

Posted by: Dirk at January 20, 2008 08:36 PM (AJx67)

11

Carl in N.H.,

There's no difference between '94 and now. If you need proof, just look around at how many fellow citizens view the world as if it was September 10th.

Posted by: TheEJS at January 20, 2008 08:38 PM (7V+4E)

12

If McCain held conservatives in contempt, he would be shouting...

I have not changed my position on immigration.

Posted by: TheEJS at January 20, 2008 08:40 PM (7V+4E)

13

McCain/Lieberman '08 -- Because we're both despised by our own parties!

Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 20, 2008 08:45 PM (Tk5HT)

14 "So JackM is saying we should eat McCain."

Hmm...actually, EJS, I think I'm saying that McCain can eat me.


Posted by: Jack M. at January 20, 2008 08:50 PM (Rt2uy)

15

...well, good gawdamn: I'm still in agreement, and we're into the comments phase.

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 20, 2008 08:53 PM (q4usA)

16
You don't have to fall in love. You just have to fall in line. Or F--k off!

There fixed it for ya.

Posted by: V the K at January 20, 2008 09:19 PM (/0sRQ)

17

Calm down.

Cripes, you're panicking like a teen-queen that's been turned down for a date.  I expected sterner stuff, not this weepy-sister act.

So...what are you actually going to do?  How are you going to let your various state and local political parties know that this is not what you want?

Posted by: Mikey NTH at January 20, 2008 09:23 PM (hVyfn)

18 As long as we're giving advice...

Link

Posted by: richard mcenroe at January 20, 2008 09:24 PM (AZziM)

19 EJS-

I think you're right. Republicans have so completely departed conservatism that it no longer resembles what we voted in in '94. Fred was the only one that I thought might bring things back around, but that seems to be toast.

Of the remainder, I can only vote for McCain over the Ronulan or the Suckbot... I am very uncomfortable voting for McCain, but until the situation in the Middle East is stabilized, I have to go with folks I think will work to enhance that stability.

Like it or not (and I sure as shit don't), McCain would at least take care of the troops. That said, I will go down swinging for Giuliani or Romney first.

tmi3rd

Posted by: tmi3rd at January 20, 2008 09:27 PM (sU6+7)

20 "So...what are you actually going to do? How are you going to let your various state and local political parties know that this is not what you want?"

First, I'll de-register as a Republican. I didn't do it during Amnesty, but I will if McCain is the nominee.

Second, I'll vote against McCain in the primary and in the general.

Third, I'll do phone calls for whoever his main opposition in the primary happens to be.

Fourth, I'll encourage everyone I can to vote against him or to stay home.

Fifth, I'll continue to bash him on this forum as long as Ace gives me the keys to the joint.

Sixth, I'll screw your sister.

Yeah, the last was gratuitous, but it just felt right.

Posted by: Jack M. at January 20, 2008 09:30 PM (Rt2uy)

21 You can rationalize voting for Hillary! any way you want, but claiming it's based on your love of conservative principles is a lie, even if you're only lying to yourself.

It emotional and personal, and that's fine I guess.

I still don't think McCain will get the nomination, just like I didn't think Huckabee would get it two weeks ago the last time you guys were freaking out.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 20, 2008 09:46 PM (o/KrO)

22 Hey! My sister never voted for McCain!

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 20, 2008 09:50 PM (p0Yi7)

23 Finally someone on here says what I've been thinking for the last week or so.  I can't vote for McCain, I just can't bring myself to vote for someone who has so belittled every principle I have.  Not even Huck scares me as much as McCain.  He doesn't even deserve the name of RINO.

Posted by: Dan at January 20, 2008 09:56 PM (D1snj)

24 "You can rationalize voting for Hillary! any way you want, but claiming it's based on your love of conservative principles is a lie, even if you're only lying to yourself."

Thanks for knowing my motives better than I know my motives, reb.

John Edwards called. He wants his empathy back.

Posted by: Jack M. at January 20, 2008 09:57 PM (Rt2uy)

25 You don't have to fall in love. You just have to fall in line.

Like hell.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 20, 2008 09:58 PM (hfyfI)

26 McCain's bumper sticker is actually, "Where do you Republicans want my dick? In your ass or... in your ass?"

Posted by: DoDoGuRu at January 20, 2008 09:59 PM (72nfo)

27 Hey, Jack, not rag on Edwards. He still has a chance to come back and be your candidate.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 20, 2008 10:01 PM (o/KrO)

28

"Six, I'll screw..."

Thanks Jack, but I don't have any sisters and my brothers are happily married.  And no, you're not my type either.  I don't like the screamy, crying, hysterical kind.

But thanks for answering my question - those were serious answers (except six).  You actually know how state and local parties work, and those are the sorts of contacts that candidates have to make (except for railing away on blogs - a lot of the regulars who attend Lincoln Dat dinners think a 'blog' is the monster Steve McQueen defeated with a fire extinguisher). McCain seems to have made those contacts and kept them up over the last eight years.  If you want your dream candidate to win, he or she has to start making the rubber chicken circuit now to have a hope in 2012.

Without those local contacts you don't have your volunteer soldiers, the people who will man phone banks and work polls.  And all the screaming on blogs (see Kos) doesn't really make up for that.

So go and get 'em, tiger.  At least you have a plan of action. 

Posted by: Mikey NTH at January 20, 2008 10:04 PM (hVyfn)

29 "If McCain held conservatives in contempt, he would be shouting "Bring the Troops Home!" and DEFINITELY not using the word "Islamofascism."

Posted by: Dirk at January 20, 2008 08:36 PM (AJx67)"

Not all conservatives want our soldiers "over there".  A lot of 'em want them to come home.  You guys here obviously think differently, but don't assume you represent all conservative opinion.  You don't.

And there is no such thing as Islamofascism.  It's a bogus, made-up concept.  It makes about as much sense as judeo-maoism, or christo-trotskyism.  What are usually called islamofascists are just very devout muslims, who have the strength of their convictions.  They're doing what their warlord-prophet, Mohammed, bid them to do - kill infidels.  Islam itself is the problem.

If McCain becomes president, it will prove to other republican politicians that they can do the same as he does, and still win elections.  Who will President McCain annoint as his successor?   Vice President Hagel?

It's an old principle, but still a good one: if you prove that you're willing to eat shit, then shit is all you'll ever be given to eat.

Posted by: Martin at January 20, 2008 10:07 PM (DRd0Y)

30 How are you going to let your various state and local political parties know that this is not what you want?

Surviver reruns are looking pretty good on election day.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 20, 2008 10:07 PM (ERV3B)

31 So JackM is saying we should eat McCain.

Dibs on his brains!

Posted by: Zombie Reagan at January 20, 2008 10:08 PM (vxGjP)

32 2 The Nazis called this "Gleichschaltung" -- the "bringing into line".--Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 20, 2008 08:11 PM (ERV3B)   Well put, Purple Avenger.    I found "William" Crystal unbelievable today. He writes that for his entire life he has heard that fascists are taking over America--that they haven't yet, and they won't ever. Incredible, for his entire life he has heard that fascists are taking over America?! I'm trying to follow his thought there. There was the fear of communism, a very real fear of the communist influence in America from within and without our borders. After WWII, the MSM felt that fascism was made extinct. Even when it appeared on the international scene, the MSM avoided it. Beyond the McCarthy era, the MSM has been mute on communism in America prior to 9/11. Even when Reagan pounded his fist against the communists, the MSM ridiculed him. Our international disaster in Democrat warfare against the Communists was in dropping bombs but not enough to absolutely wipe them out as Goldwater wanted, allowing Congress and the MSM to make our military pay dearly before calling them home as the Democrats would do again today. Who knows. Korea and Vietnam were mismanaged war efforts. Following Nixon's concession to China and surrender with honor in Vietnam, the argument could be made that we might have better succeeded by spending that same amount of war money on PROPAGANDA that would have won over the hearts and souls of the poor and downtrodden who had nothing to lose. Those masses threw in with the pandering communist tribal leaders. So now we're with Bush in Iraq, and there would be the argument that we're fighting Islamofascism in the Middle East and providing education and means to develop Islamic democracies. But we are not of their tribe, and that means everything there. And today the strength of the ACLU et.al. has eliminated many American morals that held our nation together.   Meanwhile, this presidential election is pandering to the masses to throw in with that liberal tsunami. People actually allow themselves to imagine that they'll get more than they give, bringing everyone more hardship than they ever expected. Speculators always push the limit too far.   There is only one candidate who recognizes the signs of the times, and William Crystal hasn't the purported sight to give Fred Thompson the time of day, telling everyone Gleichshaltung with the liberals

Posted by: St. Paul Plunder at January 20, 2008 10:10 PM (C6SGg)

33

John Edwards called. He wants his empathy back.

But you promised me that for Valentine's Day!

And no, you're not my type either.  I don't like the screamy, crying, hysterical kind.

After the roofies go down, the only thing that matters is that YOU'RE my type Mikey. Is it true you love to eat anything?

Posted by: TheEJS at January 20, 2008 10:10 PM (7V+4E)

34 That's moronic, JackM.  Terrorism and Supreme Court nominations are reason enough to vote Republican regardless of whether any particular candidate meets your conservative litmus test.

All of the Republican candidates have something about them I don't like.  With the exception of Ron Paul, I'd take any of them over any of the Dems' big three.

So buck up and quit acting like such a pussy.  Besides, fatalism is really unattractive.  No wonder MKH won't shag you.

Posted by: The Voice of Reason at January 20, 2008 10:22 PM (wn/ph)

35 "So buck up and quit acting like such a pussy. Besides, fatalism is really unattractive. No wonder MKH won't shag you."

You don't hurt my feelings until you insinuate Suzanne Sena won't shag me.

And you don't hurt Sena's until you insinuate she will.

So, pick your poison.

Posted by: Jack M. at January 20, 2008 10:35 PM (Rt2uy)

36 I love the "buck up and quit acting like a pussy" argument.  So far all its done is convince me that I'm going to vote Dem vs. McCain, when he was previously on my 'sit-out' list.  This 'win at all costs' mentality is as unattractive and unconvincing coming from Republicans as it is Dems.  If Shrillary actually wins the White House, HDS is gonna make BDS look like a mild cold.

Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 20, 2008 10:35 PM (Tk5HT)

37 Terrorism and Supreme Court nominations are reason enough to vote Republican regardless of whether any particular candidate meets your conservative litmus test.

Gang of 14 means we can't trust McCain on Supreme Court nominees.  Do you really think he wouldn't cave to his Dem buddies in the name of compromise on terrorism?  You know, like he has on everything else?

Posted by: Dan at January 20, 2008 10:38 PM (D1snj)

38 Unfortunately, it's even a little bit worse. Significant amounts of Democrats didn't hate Kerry for his policy history.

Posted by: MlR at January 20, 2008 10:55 PM (mX6h5)

39 Isn't Romney still ahead in delegates? He just won Nevada with barely a mention from the media. Don't let the media pick our nominee.

Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at January 20, 2008 11:15 PM (rJvu2)

40

8 years of Hillary appointed SCOTUS Justices is the only thing that would compel me to hold my nose and vote McCain.

In a way, it will be sad if/when the MSM turns on McCain, because he has been basking in their glow for almost 10 years, and will be left a quivering heap when they start attacking him.

 

Posted by: eddiebear at January 20, 2008 11:21 PM (DNGZN)

41

It's 07:18P pacific time. I'm still in total agreement. Hell, I even agree with the "pick your poison" comment.

So. I'm officially a JackM fanboy (in a manly Viking way, of course.) Who knew.

...bring on the poems Jack: I'll (well I can hardly be expected to read them in their daunting entirety, so) glance 'em over good.

And if the thoroughly adorable and enchanting RWS couldn't give me a good reason to choose to forget McCain-Feingold, why do y'all think your feeble fibrillations (pun intended, obviously) about McCain's "stout" Republican tendencies - and without her footnotes (links) - would sway my attitude toward 'im.

Herd response?

...kind of regard myself as more Waldenian than that, y'know.

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 20, 2008 11:27 PM (q4usA)

42 Yeah, I've become a very unhappy Romney guy, at least in the primary. After that I'd look to see how far he turns in the general election. At the very minimum he seems able to at least mouth the right words without generally fucking up. That counts for a little.

Posted by: MlR at January 20, 2008 11:28 PM (mX6h5)

43 There are two candidates I can not vote for under any circumstances, Hillary and McCain. I might have to sit this one out.

Posted by: Steve at January 20, 2008 11:33 PM (yigST)

44

Gang of 14 means we can't trust McCain on Supreme Court nominees.  Do you really think he wouldn't cave to his Dem buddies in the name of compromise on terrorism?  You know, like he has on everything else

That's a great point.  Because even if St. John of Arizona makes it to the White House, he'll still be contending with a democrat dominated Congress.  And who's the man with the plan to compromise with his "good friends" on the other side of the aisle?  Why, our boy Johnny, of course!

What will make this all the more nauseating and bad for the country and the GOP is that all of these "compromises" will be lauded in the MSM, cementing a "New Period of Bipartisanship".  And I think we all now what that shit means.  And its not good for conservatives.

Posted by: Fred at January 20, 2008 11:35 PM (LDBuO)

45

Okay: let me answer that one. We've survived 30 effin' years of Roe v. Wade ...and that tide is turning. We can survive another 30 years of [anti-]social leftist frickin' activists.

But we can't survive a demagogue with McCain's anti-Constitutional history, and his attack on the First Amendment. Compared to modern liberal socialists (we've proven we survive those already), he's the more dangerous problem. Period.

So appeals to our inherent social conservatism - which the argument about judges boils down to - avail you not at all. We know that already (it's not that it doesn't matter, it's just that in the political equation, it matters less).

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 20, 2008 11:39 PM (q4usA)

46 But, everything you fear would happen under a McCain presidency is guaranteed to happen under a Hillary presidency, plus 2 liberal SCOTUS justices that will be around for 30 years, an appeasement foreign policy, the retrenchment of terrorists currently on the run and more, and more, and more...

More and more conservative court decisions have been coming down, liberal gains are being rolled back, but that's just not good enough. I don't like McCain at all, but he's the only candidate that might actually swing congress back to Republicans. The Senate may get close. But you demand your ideological purity or you'll withhold support or even vote for the opposition.

The stupid party strikes again. Cheer yourself that your going to be voting for the same candidate that is preferred by al Qaeda and that you'll also be pulling the same lever as every person that reads DailyKos or is a member of CAIR.

Posted by: Patrick H at January 20, 2008 11:41 PM (3qKz4)

47 I'm just a crazy loveable quavering old fart. And I'm gonna be your candidate, you Stupid Party fools!

Posted by: ricpic at January 20, 2008 11:42 PM (+++MJ)

48

Great, I'll remember all this when we have a ultra-liberal Supreme Court for the next 30 years.

But, y'all go ahead, at least you were MORALLY correct.

Look, keep fighting for you're preferred candidate, but allowing either Hillary or Obama into the White House 'cus you want to throw a temper tamtrum makes you worse than the worst of the Kos kids!

Posted by: JFH at January 20, 2008 11:42 PM (AwkNH)

49 Dammit maybe you're right. McCain is poison. Problem is, Jack, you say similar things about Romney. None of these guys is lovable, but some are more worth getting in line for than others. Rudy and Rom have a shot AND want to please you. That should be good enough in America. Hell, Bush never wanted to please you (but he didn't hate you either (well, maybe now)). But it is impossible to justify supporting a guy who has shown such contempt and arrogance. So I concur, but be clear, sir, it's not about principle, it's about prudence. Standing on principle alone will just break your heart. I guess I'm saying I agree with Hillary even more on this one (dammit), except your analogy is off a bit; Kerrey is more a Dem-version of Romney than a McCain. The right analogy would be if the Dems nominated Leiberman. But they don't seem to be so ignorant about their beliefs or candidates as our voters.

Posted by: common man (the) at January 20, 2008 11:52 PM (P1nnp)

50

I personally don't "fear what would happen under a McCain presidency". It's not a hypothetical.

I personally know what McCain-Feingold did to the First Amendment.

So who is positing the unknowable future here?

Your observation is irrelevant to reality.

Posted by: davis,br at January 20, 2008 11:56 PM (q4usA)

51 McCain/Lieberman '08 -- Because we're both despised by our own parties!

I'm wondering where these clowns think all of these open minded independent voters are that would carry this ticket to victory?

Posted by: burnitup at January 20, 2008 11:57 PM (H1lp7)

52

Okay: let me answer that one. We've survived 30 effin' years of Roe v. Wade ...and that tide is turning. We can survive another 30 years of [anti-]social leftist frickin' activists.

How ironic; your screed sounds very familiar to Kruschev's "We will bury you" speech in 1960 when it came to the communist movement.  30 years later, the Soviet Union fell, so be careful of your predictions.

Posted by: JFH at January 21, 2008 12:00 AM (AwkNH)

53

JFH - Are you really that unable to follow a logical dissertation?

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 12:02 AM (q4usA)

54 If the race comes down to McCain vs. Hillary, I'd very reluctantly go with McCain, but at that point it wouldn't matter.  By the time the general election rolls around, the media will have turned on McCain with an absolute vengeance and we're going to know every ugly fact about his personal and professional faults.  This will give the independents who voted for him in the primary an excuse to do what they were going to do anyway, which is vote for the Democrat.

McCain will get one thing from me - my vote.  I will not give him any money, I won't give him any time and I'm not going to be able to bring myself to convince others to vote for him on my blog or in my column, because I can barely convince myself to pull the lever for the sanctimonious bastard.

Posted by: Slublog at January 21, 2008 12:02 AM (7ASE5)

55 This is not the same deal as the 2006 ideological purity wars during the midterms, where it really was dumb to sit out the elections. I can take some ideological impurity and a smattering of RINO's. It is a big country, after all.

But electing McCain would be the same as hiring a Democrat to head up the Republican party. That's somewhat worse than just being defeated outright by the other side.

If McCain won the presidency, we'd feel compelled to defend him and carry his water every time he's attacked by Democrats, as he surely will be, no matter what he does.

Invariably, conservatism itself would be defined so far leftward by us not being able to fight effectively for it against our own guy, that by the end of a possible eight years our bedrock values would seem quaint and silly, we having long abandoned them for political expediency as the Dems did for Bill Clinton.

Fuck that. If we're going to get retard-policies anyway, let the opposition own them, and let us oppose them fullthroated every step of the way with agonizing, harpy-like obstructionism.

Hopefully, it won't ever come to that.

Oh, and did I forget to mention- John McCain is a raging dickweasel, a mean bastard, half insane, arrogant, and prone to spittle-spewing profane outbursts in front of his colleagues. He's nucking futs. I don't want this guy in charge of the White House thermostat, never mind American foreign policy.

Posted by: lauraw at January 21, 2008 12:04 AM (DbybK)

56

What is this all about? Is this the same Jack M. who has been pimping Romney for a year?

You all may dislike McCain because he doesn't answer to "the base" and I think it is better that way. I'll vote for a man who answers to the country, even if he wrong a few times, over a pandering fuck who just agrees with Hannity. 

Jack, do you think peope vote on party lines or for the country? 

Posted by: bleh (mike) at January 21, 2008 12:06 AM (/InkS)

57

C'mon lauraw, don't hold back hon' ...let us know what you really think about John McCain.

...damn, but that last paragraph was ROTFLMAO funny.

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 12:08 AM (q4usA)

58 McCain doesn't answer to anyone but McCain.

Posted by: Slublog at January 21, 2008 12:08 AM (7ASE5)

59 I'm crazy as a loon, I'm McCainiac, and I'm your president!

Posted by: ricpic at January 21, 2008 12:10 AM (+++MJ)

60 Go ahead - vote and work against McCain.  That would be the same as voting and working for the jihadis against our troops and allies - and if you don't believe it, then how do YOU think the world would react to surrender-at-any-price defeating victory-at-any-price for the presidency and both houses?   You can kiss goodbye to a generation's worth of Supreme Court decisions, too.

Posted by: Police Commissioner Hakim Hussein at January 21, 2008 12:11 AM (8aPVo)

61 The White House will smell like Crazy Old Man, and he's going to keep it at 89 degrees in there year round and walk around in his boxer shorts and clip his toenails in the Rose Garden where everybody can see him.

Don't do this to yourself, America.

Posted by: lauraw at January 21, 2008 12:16 AM (DbybK)

62

Some of you really don't think things through. Why not at least wait to make your "I'll vote for Hillary" vow until McCain announces his VP? We all know Hillary will have to pick some Dennis Kucinich clone to make the lefties love her again. Therefore McCain will have to pick a solid Fred-like conservative except it'll be someone who acts like he has a pulse. And if McCain has to step down after 1 term or dies before, he'll get in.

Posted by: Dirk at January 21, 2008 12:18 AM (AJx67)

63

"McCain doesn't answer to anyone but McCain"

Bullshit. There are things I don't like about him, but the man has put his country first at his own expense his entire adult life. I don't like amnesty, but I know that McCain proposed it because he thought it was best for the country. Was he right? Probably not. Did he do it because he thought it would serve him (win over hannity and "the base" and gain political power)? No. He did it because he thought it was the best option and that is more than you can say about the other candidates.

Posted by: bleh (mike) at January 21, 2008 12:21 AM (/InkS)

64 Let us have our fun, Dirk.

DESPAIR.
DOOM. WOE.

DOOOOOMMM.

WOE.

Ahh.

Posted by: lauraw at January 21, 2008 12:22 AM (DbybK)

65 For the longest time I was worried about the Supreme Court selections made by the next president. The next president is definitely going to get to pick at least 2. Stevens and Ginsburg will die in their chairs before allowing a Republican president to replace them. Here are the ages of the justices from Wikipedia. How bad would things be if  a donk is elected president in Nov? Of course I would be living in terror of the 3rd oldest justice (Scalia) retiring while a donk is in the WH. How would the court be changed by a Kennedy or Breyer being replaced? Would it be all that much different from it’s current 5-4 splits on one side or the other? Unless Scalia retires I don’t see it being much different. Who are the 3 youngest justices? They aren’t going anywhere soon.

Stevens 87
Ginsburg 74
Scalia 71
Kennedy 71
Breyer 69
Souter 68
Thomas 59
Alito 57
Roberts 52


Another thing for consideration is the moving of congressional seats and electors from mainly blue states to red states for the next census. Current red states are looking to pick up some 14-16 electors after 2010.  This could easily shift the election in 2012. Additionally, how hard would it be to win back the House and Senate in 2010 after 2 years of Hillary? I think it could be another clean sweeping of Washington. Maybe this time with real conservatives.

All of this boils down to: Fuck John McCain. I’m not falling in line. I’m not voting for a liberal with an R beside his name just so the R’s keep winning.

Posted by: burnitup at January 21, 2008 12:25 AM (H1lp7)

66

No appeal to what Hilary Clinton would NOT do under a September 11 condition has ever made any sense to me; generally, those appeals ignore her actual voting history (pre- the run on the White House, when she has had to get past the anti-war loons on the Left) on the war, and the fact that the woman is a frickin' bitch. She scares me. She would be scary. I like the idea of a scary CIC. A lot. And if it's a Clinton: what wonderful frickin' irony.

She may not be my first - or second - choice for CIC (Fred, than Rudy), but she's my third (over every other current candidate of either party) ...and that's even though I think she will be a disaster for the SC appointments.

And every frickin' one of you makin' the "blindly follow the herd", vote the R argument ...really kind of did miss ol' Jack's point in its entirety, don'chathink?

And. I'm not an R apparatchik (take that, JFH) ...I'm a constitutionalist conservative (JeffG calls it a classical liberal). I vote R until the party leaves me. Oh, wait ....

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 12:29 AM (q4usA)

67 No. He did it because he thought it was the best option and that is more than you can say about the other candidates.

How did he think it was best for the country?  The country, as you may recall, protested like hell when the amnesty bill came forward.  I don't think I've ever seen a piece of legislation that pissed off more citizens on both sides of the political aisle as that bill but McCain went whole hog for it regardless.

Republicans worked their asses off to win the 2004 election so we could ensure conservative judges.  McCain shot that all to hell with his "Gang of 14."

You know what's good for people in this country?  Getting to keep more of the money we earned.  McCain voted against me being able to keep the money I work for.

So you know what?  To hell with him.  I'm about a half-step away from sitting out the election if he wins the primary.

Posted by: Slublog at January 21, 2008 12:31 AM (7ASE5)

68 "But electing McCain would be the same as hiring a Democrat to head up the Republican party. That's somewhat worse than just being defeated outright by the other side.........................

......................He's nucking futs. I don't want this guy in charge of the White House thermostat, never mind American foreign policy.

Posted by: lauraw at January 21, 2008 12:04 AM (DbybK)"

Exceptionally well said.

Posted by: Martin at January 21, 2008 12:31 AM (DRd0Y)

69 Actually, I like Dirk's (inadvertent) suggestion for a McCain slogan:  McCain '08 ... because he's likely to die before the end of his term!

Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 21, 2008 12:33 AM (Tk5HT)

70 "...And if McCain has to step down after 1 term or dies before, he'll get in."

Or he might survive the term and turn ornery and senile. OK, more ornery and senile.

We need an influx of young blood, say, a sprightly, sixty-six yr old whippersnapper.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 21, 2008 12:35 AM (Y0gTb)

71 I think McCain would be better, policy-wise, than any of the Dem. crop.  If he were a Democrat, I'd think he was one of the better ones.  As a Republican, he's not so great.

Posted by: Calix at January 21, 2008 12:44 AM (8d3U/)

72

"You know what's good for people in this country?  Getting to keep more of the money we earned.  McCain voted against me being able to keep the money I work for."

Are you typing about tax cuts in a thread about McCain not being conservative? I wouldn't vote for a tax cut without a spending cut. Why waste money and cut taxes at the same time? How can you tolerate a short term tax cut if the government is going to piss away a fortune in pork?

McCain FTW. 

Posted by: bleh (mike) at January 21, 2008 12:47 AM (/InkS)

73 Are you typing about spending cuts and referring to ANYONE who is currently in Congress?

HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA

Posted by: Dan at January 21, 2008 12:50 AM (D1snj)

74

The only upside to a Hillary Presidency would be the new-found ability for conservatives to blame every forest fire and earthquake on her.

Posted by: Dirk at January 21, 2008 12:51 AM (AJx67)

75 Are you typing about tax cuts in a thread about McCain not being conservative? I wouldn't vote for a tax cut without a spending cut. Why waste money and cut taxes at the same time? How can you tolerate a short term tax cut if the government is going to piss away a fortune in pork?

Oh, I don't know...because I worked for the f**king money, perhaps?  I can "tolerate" a short-term tax cut because the f**cking government isn't entitled to my money, a principle that McCain betrayed when he voted against the tax cut.

Go ahead, McCain supporters, keep pushing me toward the dark side. Your spin only reminds me of the many reasons I can't stand McCain.

Posted by: Slublog at January 21, 2008 12:51 AM (7ASE5)

76 Go ahead - vote and work against McCain.  That would be the same as voting and working for the jihadis against our troops and allies - and if you don't believe it, then how do YOU think the world would react to surrender-at-any-price defeating victory-at-any-price for the presidency and both houses? [branches?]

I've asked this question as well. It never seems to get answered. What about the message a Hillobama victory would send to our enemies and our troops?

Every one of you Hillobama fans have criticized the congress, the dems, and the squishy repubs in congress for the damage they've done to the war effort in terms of perceptions. Most have you have given credit to McCain for his steadfastness with due criticism on tangential issues like "torture" and such. How do you reconcile this?

All of a sudden McCain would be no better on the war than the dems on the war, and perceptions? Oh, they don't seem to matter anymore.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 12:54 AM (o/KrO)

77 And let's not forget - McCain blamed the Minneapolis bridge collapse on pork-barrel spending.

The bridge collapse, of course, was actually the result of a design flaw.

I guess we shouldn't let the facts get in the way of a good soundbite, though, right?

Posted by: Slublog at January 21, 2008 12:57 AM (7ASE5)

78

So the mind naturally returns to our last liberal Republican President - Nixon, who, except for the China thing, was an unmitigated disaster. He gave us the EPA, Wage and Price controls, OSHA, Carter and the destruction of the Party for a decade.  We may have to "settle" for McCain, but dark clouds are forming.

 

Only Nixon's reelection slogan was good:

 

Don’t change Dicks in the middle of a screw,

Vote for Nixon in ’72.

 

Posted by: Robert at January 21, 2008 01:01 AM (Rb4Qc)

79 You gotta love it: if you don't bow to the God-King McCain, you're a fan of Obama! The logic of the RINO.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 21, 2008 01:08 AM (hfyfI)

80 Robert,

It's easy to dump on Nixon, but the more important question that pertains to us now is: was he better than the alternative? I would venture to say fuck yeah!

And what else was going on while Nixon was in office? Ronald Reagan was building his movement.

 

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 01:12 AM (o/KrO)

81

Slu:

I love your analysis of the tax cut. I could use that extra $10grand I worked for, and if Congress wants to piss away the rest, fuck them sideways. At least I get back what I earned.

Is it selfish? Yeah, it is. But that's money I know would be spent wiser than it going to a pork project in North Dakota.

Shit, between your reminding me of the tax cut, and Laura's comment, that "support" I would give McCain is dwindling. That's what I get for thinking.

Posted by: eddiebear at January 21, 2008 01:12 AM (DNGZN)

82 Just can't answer the question, eh Chrissy?

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 01:13 AM (o/KrO)

83 We can survive another 30 years of [anti-]social leftist frickin' activists.

Jump off tall building.
Pass 50th floor.
So far, so good.

Posted by: lmg at January 21, 2008 01:14 AM (cHcxA)

84 And, BTW, I'm slightly to the right of Barry G. I'm just not a shortsighted, emotional wreck.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 01:14 AM (o/KrO)

85 Shit, between your reminding me of the tax cut, and Laura's comment, that "support" I would give McCain is dwindling. That's what I get for thinking.

Heh.  That's about where I am.  The more I think about McCain's record, the less I like him.

Posted by: Slublog at January 21, 2008 01:15 AM (7ASE5)

86

The more I think about McCain's record, the less I like him.

He's like The Phantom Menace that way.  And others, really.

Deep.

Posted by: VJay at January 21, 2008 01:16 AM (kico6)

87

I think, at this point, that efforts to persuade strong conservatives to vote for McCain are counterproductive.

Wait until after the convention.  When the dust has settled, and there's no other choice, will be the time to point out how J-Mac is better than whoever the Dem is. 

Even then, it might be wiser for McCain supporters to keep mostly silent and let conservatives try to persuade themselves that half a loaf is better than none.

Arguing now is a bit premature, given that you're not going to persuade any of the strongly anti-McCain people to actually like him at any time.

Posted by: Calix at January 21, 2008 01:17 AM (8d3U/)

88

runninrebel - Oh but I have responded ...perhaps you've overlooked the point?

(Don't include Obama in your snark mix: him, I know nothing about, and what little I do know doesn't impress me. If the Dem's are stupid enough to run Obama ...somewhat akin to the Republicans being stupid enough to run McCain IMHO ...than I give my vote to my favourite Looney Tunes write-in. I wouldn't have drank the Kool-aid in Guyana in '78, either btw.)

Based upon enumeration of past performance all politicians simply suck. But McCain-Feingold put John McCain in a whole new category of "suck": he's in the unacceptable-for-any-reason category, as a known danger to the Republic.

(I won't repeat the arguments I've made in the other thread at Ace on the subject: gimme a break and be pro-active here.)

Briefly though, based upon what I know and conjecture of Hilary, and my understanding (not very deep, thank gawd) of the current Dark Side politics environment she operates under, I don't fear her response to a 9/11 scenario ...so appeals to that particular hyperbolic automatic revulsion response aren't so persuasive to me. Maybe I should (i.e., fear) ...but who can know for sure.

But McCain? No ...he's an anti-consititutionalist. I've no taste for his ceasar-ist tendency: I'd prefer dealing with he simple ol' Southern graft of the Huey Long school of politics that the Clintos ape so well.

Now. I'd prefer Fred, or perhaps Rudy. But a Hildebeast presidency in the GWOT don't cause me to quake in my boots anymore.

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 01:18 AM (q4usA)

89 Calix,

I don't think there are any actual McCain supporters here. The main problem is that a good number of people on this blog can't think long-term and panic every time someone they don't like wins a primary. Apoplectic vows ensue.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 01:23 AM (o/KrO)

90 davis,br,

I get all that. I don't like him either. But we must prioritize, and I'm looking for an answer to the question I've asked before, the question the Police Commissioner asked in #60.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 01:28 AM (o/KrO)

91 "I believe my party has gone astray. I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy." -Senator John McCain

"I know money corrupts;I would rather have a clean government than one where,quote,First Amendment rights are being respected..." -John McCain

Just a reminder about who you're boosting here. Who you want people to vote for. Remember his desire to shut down Guantanamo Bay? To end coercive questioning? To block the tax cuts?

We do.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 21, 2008 01:36 AM (hfyfI)

92

"Oh, I don't know...because I worked for the f**king money, perhaps?  I can "tolerate" a short-term tax cut because the f**cking government isn't entitled to my money, a principle that McCain betrayed when he voted against the tax cut."

The government has a better claim on your taxable income than they do on my income that I might earn at some point if I am lucky enough to have cash to offer in tribute. Quit spending money I haven't even had a chance to earn and lose to the government. If you want to cut taxes, cut spending also. Even if you don't want to cut taxes, cut spending. I understand why you don't like McCain, but he is not a left-wing media whore. The voting public will agree and the "blogosphere" will be as irrelevant as it has been.

McCain may be a dick, but you would be to if you were working at his job in DC.

 

"Go ahead, McCain supporters, keep pushing me toward the dark side. Your spin only reminds me of the many reasons I can't stand McCain."

Darkside=huckabee?

Posted by: bleh (mike) at January 21, 2008 01:42 AM (/InkS)

93 Christopher,

I can't stand McCain. But if it makes me a "booster" because I'll help him get elected if my only other choice is Hillobama, then you are a Hillobama booster for helping her it get elected.

But really, I'm just looking for an answer to the question.

Can you answer it or not?

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 01:49 AM (o/KrO)

94

runnin' rebel: I. Disagree. With. His. Premises. Entirely.

Is that a simple enough answer?

I've said this several times, actually.

My observation is that expressed fears of Hil's response to a 9/11 scenario and the GWOT are inflated by the more easily understood ire that her indisputably socialist tendencies understandably arise in those of us with conservative world-views ...that is, they project their fears from the one to the other ...and they don't necessarily follow. She's not Bill. She's not the caricature we like to see her as, either.

OTOH, my hopeful speculation is that I rather think she will be quite a good CIC in the event of a 9/11 scenario ...because she's a mean, conniving, tactical hard-assed bitch ...who will not repeat the mistakes of her husband's term. Like a Madge Thatcher (bless her sainted memory), if from a different - entirely though appositely different - political perspective. Simply put she's Teh Mean.

Good, that.

I don't think you eff' around with a President Hildebeast. I equally conjecture that Islamofascists have no suspicion whatsoever of that possibility, so they'll do something asinine again (actually, that's less a prediction than it is an inevitability). That will be a mistake. They do those rather well. The consequences will be startling to them. As, perhaps, in the event, to you too.

...that is, if I'm right about Hil'. Which I have at least as much chance of being as #60 (more, I suspect). Again, whose premises I reject.

But about McCain, it's not a matter of if I'm right ...I already am.

...and that's your - and #60's - answer.

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 01:53 AM (q4usA)

95

It's easy to dump on Nixon, but the more important question that pertains to us now is: was he better than the alternative? – runninrebel.

 

That, my friend, is a very good question:

 

McGovern would have lost the war quicker and cheaper, and we would still have the EPA et al.

 

The Dem’s got whatever they wanted anyway, so the only difference was Rehnquist.

 

But when we elect a Democrat under a Republican name we can’t complain and we get blamed and killed in the next election.

 

Your point about Reagan is a good one, but Reagan followed Carter, not Nixon.  After Nixon it was not possible to elect a Republican no matter who it might have been.

 

Ways that McCain reminds me of Nixon:

 

Nixon had Bebe Rebozo, McCain had Charles Keating.

 

Nixon would have voted against the tax cuts also.

 

Nixon had Detente’, not fundamentally different in approach from the gang of 14.

 

Nixon did Rayburn, McCain did Kennedy, Kerry and Feingold. (In Macy’s window).

 

Neither had the spine to stand up to Democrats when it got tough.

 

Both ran on promises to win the war, but if you can’t stand up even to Democrats…

 

Nixon had the EPA, McCain has Global Warming.

 

Nixon’s position on the gold standard is contributing to the drop in the dollar, McCain’s position on drilling in ANWR is contributing to the drop in the dollar.

 

Rebel,

 

On this last one, can you find any reason other than pandering to Democrats for McCain to vote against drilling in ANWR?  If not, what then, is the difference?

Posted by: Robert at January 21, 2008 02:03 AM (Rb4Qc)

96 burnitup,
you're right Ginsburg and Stevens would die before letting a Republican replace them, but they just might die in the next 4 years. Reports say Stevens wants out as soon as possible and he's frickin' ancient. Second, you say letting a dem replace them won't change much since they are liberals. The idea is to get away from having the Constitution mean whatever Kennedy (before him it was O'Connor) says it means. Replacing even one liberal with a conservative changes the court to where Kennedy's vote is no longer the determining factor. We only need ONE liberal justice replaced with a conservative to create a conservative majority. A democrat win means that can't happen until Kennedy retires and he's a moderate more than a liberal so the gain isn't nearly as important.

The compromise with the dems on judge nominations meant getting a lot of judges moved forward including Alito and Roberts. Was it as much fun as going to the mattresses? No. But we ended up getting nearly everything we wanted. Winning is good even if it requires compromise.

As for you immigration haters, it seems that now Bush must be on your traitor list as well. What if you had taken this position in 2000 and president Gore would have been in charge on 9/11? Where would we be now? You don't know what the future holds so it's best to remember you're voting for a Commander in Chief.

Posted by: Patrick H at January 21, 2008 02:10 AM (3qKz4)

97 davis,br,

You reject the premise that perceptions matter? You don't think a Hillary! win will be translated all over the world as a defeat for the Bush Doctrine and our campaigns thus far? Or that our troops will see it the same way? That sounds like you are being purposefully obtuse.

You may be right about Hillary! being a bad-ass bitch after another 911. I happen to think the same. But why would our enemies feel the need to test her unless they had the perception that the country had given up? I'd prefer it if we didn't give them the idea, engage the law enforcement approach, and virtually guarantee it happens.

And would you vote for Obama over McCain as well? I didn't catch that.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 02:12 AM (o/KrO)

98

If Nixon lost in 1968, Humphrey might have been so unpopular that the Republicans would have won back Congress by 72. President McGovern probably would have made Carter look competent and sold out the Israelis in the 1973 war.

Posted by: Dirk at January 21, 2008 02:22 AM (AJx67)

99 Robert,

You're kinda missing my point about Nixon and Reagan. Reagan's movement wasn't capable of winning an election in 1968 or 1972. It wasn't even developed.

It doesn't matter how bad the dems are, if there isn't a real conservative movement built in time of the election, it won't matter. The only alternative then would have been some other half-assed conservative. My point is that a half-assed conservative will always do until the movement is ready to win.

This idea that all we have to do is let the dems destroy the country and, Ta-daaa!, a real conservative movement sweeps in to save the day is ahistorical and wishful thinking at best. Movements take time.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 02:32 AM (o/KrO)

100

runninrebel - ...and, in order of asked ....

1. Well, actually, yes: I'm not an existentialist, and I utterly reject Derrida deconstructionism ...I'm a conservative, a classical liberal (same thing) if you will, and a bit of an optimist about stuff (an artifact of my devout - if flippant and irreligious - Christianity). But his (#60's) premise is essentially that Hilary will be ineffectual at the GWOT, which I utterly reject as disprovable (and, as you yourself, later in your reply, essentially reject his premise too, I think we're actually in agreement about that ...which I am rather mildly surprised, though pleased, to discover).

2. No. And it wouldn't matter if it was. I'm not a big fan of "what the rest of the world thinks"; I'm a neo-nationalist true believer of truth, justice and the American way - of the USA as the last best hope of mankind - and frankly I don't give a good gawdamn what the world thinks of us.

3. Unfortunately, yes ...however temporarily. But if she's the bitch we both hope she'll be, well, military types aren't a naturally antithetical group to hard-assed commanders. "We'll see" is my hopeful response.

4. Ah. Reality check (and see 1. above). I heartily approve of your sane and reasonable analysis.

5. Our enemies will attack anyway; they're not going to be testing anyone, they hate the West, period. They will attack, equally period. It will suck. It will be her watch. She will deal with it. So your preference doesn't enter into the equation at all.

6. No: In that case, naturally I'd vote for my favourite Looney Tunes character (Daffy Duck). I'm not supportively suicidal; I would have ran for the frickin' trees in Guyana in '78. I'm not going to punch D or R in your grimly catastrophic scenario (which isn't - yet - a given); I'll take my chances with "Other" or "None of the Above".

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 02:46 AM (q4usA)

101 You gotta love it: if you don't bow to the God-King McCain, you're a fan of Obama! The logic of the RINO.

 
Immature emotionalism.  A grown-up citizen of a democratic republic doesn't bow down to anyone.  Supporting McCain as nominee, if it comes to that - and I also hope it doesn't - doesn't mean that we all go to sleep after his election and focus exclusively on masturbatory fantasies about FNC babes. 

It's conceivable that, Davis-br @#94 might be right - that Hillary would be a frighteningly vicious C-in-C who would interpret any attack on the U.S. as a personal attack on her and her power, and therefore worthy of an unstinting response.  She may also be cynical enough to have been making clear commitments to her base regarding the war and other policies with the full intention of turning her back on them as soon as necessary.  However, such speculation also presumes that we would be putting one of the most cynical politicians on the planet at the center of the most powerful political office in history. 

We're not talking about somebody who occasionally loses his temper and foully berates his associates and colleagues, as is said of McCain.  We've had THAT before in the presidency and other positions of life-and-death power and have survived.  It's not really that unusual.

The same presumption that makes you believe that Hillary would turn on Al Qaeda or anyone else with murderous glee, if she felt herself threatened, also must force you to accept that she could and likely would turn on her domestic enemies - which she has already identified as a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - if she felt it served her purposes, and there's much reason to believe that it might.  Such an individual would also be likely to ignore foreign threats and other dangers for as long as politically useful, and then to blame the result on the VRWC or anyone else she needed to, even as she adopted policies that would make a responsible war leader, like Bush or perhaps McCain, hesitate on grounds of prudence, humanity, or the long-term interest of the country. 

Say that the economy goes into the toilet, or that a recession begun this year turns into long-term stagnation.  Democrats of Hillary's type are masters at turning the negative results of their policies into a prescription for yet more of the same, and as a means of further consolidating their power.  The speculative war-fighting scenario you imagine might be exactly what a politician like Hillary needs to consolidate her power - helping her to equate opposition to confiscatory levels of taxation and to ever greater powers and responsibilities in the state sector with treason. 

In short, the scenario of Hillary as warrior queen includes among many other dreadful risks and equally dreadful near-certainties, the possibility a President pushing the Democrat's agenda in full force, while using war as an excuse to silence and suborn the opposition.  Note:  She may not need a war, and may instead choose, like her husband, to gut the military in order to fund all the "Christmas presents" she has in mind for us.

In the meantime, davis-br's speculative reply about how Hillary MIGHT act as C-in-C has nothing to do with the real world situation that we are facing of troops in the field and a mandate to surrender at any price, which is exactly the mandate that both Obama and Hillary are seeking.  That's bad enough, and will likely lead to unnecessary losses whether or not either of them reverses policy once in office. 

In any event, whether or not Hillary or Obama gets real once in office on the war, the expectation that Republicans would return to power by 2010, 2012, 2016, or 2020,  merely because Democrat policies didn't work as advertised, is nothing more than wishful thinking - especially after massive new client constituencies are attached to "reformed" health care, immigration, and environmental bureaucracies. 

Posted by: Police Commissioner Hakim Hussein at January 21, 2008 02:53 AM (8aPVo)

102

runninrebel - Point of fact: Reagan's conservatism won him the California governorship in 1966. And began considerably before that. Go here

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 02:59 AM (q4usA)

103 1, 2, & 5. The premise is concerned with what Hillary! would do before the second 911, which would be to focus on the law enforcement approach. That would greatly weaken our ability to act swiftly without diplomatic and domestic legal wrangling. She's not going to walk in the door and act like a bad-ass. She's going to send envoys and call for conferences to create 'dialog'. She's going to get walked on by unfriendly nations while praising our new relationships. She won't use force unless we are attacked.

Every leader is tested. It starts small and builds gradually. It's not "what the world think of us", it's what our opponents and enemies think they can get away with. f we look like we have given up they will perceive it and act accordingly. McCain understands this. Hillary doesn't. Her approach would make the war expand greatly in the long run, while tying our hands at the same time.

3. That alone isn't worth it to me. Not while they're in-theater

4. I take it back. We just disagree on the premise.

6. Not voting or voting None of the Above is a cop out. It won't make you any less responsible for what happens.

 I think it's moot anyway. McCain isn't going to win the nomination.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 03:22 AM (o/KrO)

104 102. Yeah, I know that. It doesn't mean he had a national movement that could usurp the Party in the Nixon era.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 03:24 AM (o/KrO)

105

PCH Hussein - C'mon ...you cannot possibly have missed the point of the entire thread, can you? Reality check time.

The simple point being made in the entire thread was that a hypothetical Hilary was less dangerous than an actual McCain, in re: McCain-Feingold, and my reasoned rejection of an unknowable projection of what a Hil' response to a 9/11 scenario would be by others in the thread. (Which, as it turned out, runninrebel actually agreed with.)

...but which you've somehow manage to conflate from a thoroughly hypothetical presumption on her possibly positive attributes into a full-blown conspiratorial HDS (Hilary Derangement Syndrome) moment of complete fascist control of the government by the Hildebeast brownshirts (I s'pose). I couldn't get much past that point.

Gah.

You might want to try following the thread next time?

The only defense of that is that you're entirely within the persona of your Middle Eastern nom de plume in its hysterical enunciation ...which is merely damning with faint praise btw.

Really dude, you need to pay attention.

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 03:28 AM (q4usA)

106

runninrebel - The very, very best response I've read to the "cop-out" cop tonight (can't recall the thread) is: asking me to choose between Stalin and Hitler isn't a choice at all. Obama vs. McCain? The frying pan or the fire? The Colt or the S&W?

Not a hit. No point. Your choices ...aren't.

...it ain't over 'til it's over, and I hope those aren't the choices. Maybe sanity will infect the electorate with its currently hideously unwelcome rationality. Maybe not.

It's getting late, and I'm getting morose, snippy, and tired. And moody. So it boils down to:

In a McCain vs Obama: who the fuck cares? I don't see the hope y'all have apparently convinced yourselves in McCain: I see him as the dagger plunging into the heart of the Constitution. So we're screwed both ways. One direction is towards Empire ...and the destruction of the Republic. The other direction is toward the Gulag ...and the destruction of the Republic. In that scenario, I feel like I'm looking towards Mordor regardless.

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 03:45 AM (q4usA)

107 I thought you said you were an optimist? Jeesh.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 03:48 AM (o/KrO)

108

OTOH, my hopeful speculation is that I rather think she will be quite a good CIC in the event of a 9/11 scenario ...because she's a mean, conniving, tactical hard-assed bitch ...who will not repeat the mistakes of her husband's term. Like a Madge Thatcher (bless her sainted memory), if from a different - entirely though appositely different - political perspective. Simply put she's Teh Mean.

That's what you wrote, DUDE.  Excuse me for basing my reply on the plain meaning of the paragraph and others like it - rather than on whatever it is you meant to say or have subtly hidden within the statement.

I have no idea what the following is supposed to mean:

The simple point being made in the entire thread was that a hypothetical Hilary was less dangerous than an actual McCain, in re: McCain-Feingold, and my reasoned rejection of an unknowable projection of what a Hil' response to a 9/11 scenario would be by others in the thread. (Which, as it turned out, runninrebel actually agreed with.)

The "point" may be simple to you.  To me, the statement  - especially in the words following "reasoned rejection" - is confoundingly self-entangled.  Are you or are you not standing by the argument made in the earlier paragraph?  I can't quite tell.  The only thing that's clear from it to me is that you enjoy yourself very much. 

I'll try again:  You might like to think that Hillary would respond forcefully to an attack on the U.S., and you might like to think further that she would adopt rational policies vis-a-vis Iraq and Afghanistan, among other foreign policy challenges, but there is little or nothing in her record and in her public statements to support these suppositions - to the contrary.  She speaks and argues like a typical Democratic Party defeatist utterly incapable even of acknowledging, much less understanding, a strategic context and the political and military operations mounted to address it.  If her ignorance is not just a show that she puts on for the left wing of her party, then your hopes are ill-founded.  If it is such a show, then she is an alarmingly cynical individual desperate to take power, and an inestimable danger to her real domestic political enemies, and to the country itself - not just to prospective foreign enemies.

As for the rest, specifically the apples and oranges comparison of your "actual McCain" and "hypothetical Hilary," I suspect we'll just have to leave it for another time and probably another thread.

Posted by: Police Commissioner Hakim Hussein at January 21, 2008 04:27 AM (8aPVo)

109

 

We just disagree Rebel, Nixon did nothing to bring us Reagan, he just set the country against Republicans; that is my point.

 

Reagan almost got the nomination in ’76, if he had won, he probably would have got beat in the general and there would have been no Reagan.  This was the mood of the country then, after Watergate and the Pardon and the rest of the crap.  In point of fact, Nixon almost prevented Reagan.  The whole country went way left after Nixon, at every level of government.  Reagan won 46 States in ‘80; no way he does this in ’76.

 

The mood of the country was far different after Carter.  This makes my point in reverse – a bad Democrat for them was worse than a Republican, thus the next 12 years of Republican Presidents.

 

So yes, a bad Republican can be worse than a Democrat.

 

Posted by: Robert at January 21, 2008 04:44 AM (Rb4Qc)

110

"So JackM is saying we should eat McCain."

Hmm...actually, EJS, I think I'm saying that McCain can eat me."
This sounds like something "tom" would post.

 

No one in the McCain family has worked for anyone but the federal government for a 100 years.  Where do you think he believes money comes from? 

This is not over yet, CHILL!

Kemp

 

Posted by: kempermanx at January 21, 2008 05:11 AM (iLWmI)

111 Yeah, hilarious post, if you accept the theory that McCain is the Worst Candidate Ever. Please explain to me how McCain is substantially different than President Bush? The world as conservatives know it didn't come to an end with Bush as president. Bush signed the campaign reform legislation. Bush was a prime architect and mover of the immigration bills. Bush has signed all the budgets to come his way, pork and all.

I'd like to know what candidate you guys think can actually win, that has the perfect, lockstep conservative dogma resume that will satisfy the whingers. I don't think McCain is ideal, but he can win, which is damnsure more than any other candidate, save possibly Rudy, can do for the Republicans.

Note to fredheads: the guy can't even win South Carolina. He doesn't have the drive, ambition and heart to run for president in this country. Sorry, but its by now a proven fact. He doesn't want to work for it.

Posted by: docweasel at January 21, 2008 06:39 AM (WzPzd)

112 That's kinda the point, docweasel. The last two elections, even though I didn't like Bush, I voted for him, even though it made me throw up in my mouth a little bit, just because the alternative was so much worse.

I just can't do it again. The margin between how bad McCain is and how much worse Hillary is is a lot narrower this time. I don't need a guy who is "lock-step" on conservative principles, but McCain treats conservative principles as little brown blobs he flushes down the toilet.

My "dogma" is lower taxes, limited government, and national security. McCain's record is dismal on all three. (I count border security as national security.) His position on border security is the same as Hillary's. He will expand government in the name of fighting ManBearPig and providing access to access to health care, as will Hillary. He voted against the Bush tax cuts, as did Hillary. (I don't buy his flip-flopping on the Bush tax cuts for a second.)

If McCain is what it takes to win, I don't want to win. I'm tired of the Republican party giving me a sh-t sandwich every four years and telling me I have to eat it because the sh-t sandwich the Democrats are serving is worse. You know what? If I have to eat a sh-t sandwich either way, then what the Hell does it matter?

Posted by: V the K at January 21, 2008 08:18 AM (PLvLS)

113 I just found a bunch of people worthy of living under Stalin and the Taliban.  The Stalinint/conservative movement is consumed by hatred.   You deserve the Islamic state you are working so hard to create.

Posted by: Rich at January 21, 2008 08:37 AM (du8vq)

114

If McCain gets the nom (thats a huge if), he can win without the support of the part of the base that dismisses him as a RINO and insufficiently pure.

We've seen that in the primaries- independents like him. They will break for him more than they will HIllary.

Rudys m y man, but Ill never sit out an election to make a "point" that will yield full control of my country to the Defeatocrats

Posted by: TMF at January 21, 2008 09:16 AM (KTgUG)

115

I don't think McCain is ideal, but he can win, which is damnsure more than any other candidate, save possibly Rudy, can do for the Republicans.

You're insane. McCain is a Senator, elderly, hated by his own base, with a lot of corruption and personal issues in his past. I haven't seen a less electable candidate since Lyndon Larouche.

Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at January 21, 2008 09:36 AM (kGK+h)

116 Posted at NRO:

"If the choice is between choosing the lesser of 4 evils and teeing up a process by which the GOP reinvents itself for the 21st Century, I’m inclined to opt for the latter. Coupled with losing Congress in 2006, losing the presidency in 2008 will provide a pair of defeats that surely will prompt “attentiveness” on the part of the GOP leadership and the intellectual base of think tanks and academics who helped lay the foundation for the Reagan and Gingrich revolutions. Just as the Israelis had to be punished for listening to the 10 fearful spies, the GOP needs to be punished for having been seduced by Bush and DeLay. Just as the Israelis came back stronger and fitter for the tasks ahead, so might a chastened GOP."

I think we need to finish off the Republican Party, and start a New Republican Party around the First Principles of: 1. Lower Taxes and Less Spending. 2. National Security Including Border Security. 3. Less Power to the Government, More Freedom to the People.

Until we have a new Republican Party, I will vote against anyone in the Old Republican Party that stands against those three principles, as does John McCain.

Posted by: V the K at January 21, 2008 09:44 AM (PLvLS)

117 "Fuck that. If we're going to get retard-policies anyway, let the opposition own them, and let us oppose them fullthroated every step of the way with agonizing, harpy-like obstructionism."

Well put. It the country is going to hell in a hand basket, let the Dems get the blame.

Posted by: Ann NY at January 21, 2008 09:53 AM (Ofd1W)

118

Posted by: Slublog at January 21, 2008 12:31 AM (7ASE5)

McCain abused the citizens not only with his legislation, but with his jaundiced rhetoric calling us bigots for wanting rule of law against McCain's judgment.

The only way to make a statement is by vote, not by skipping the election. Should the occasion call for it, then write in your candidate of choice and have that on record.

As if McCain's legislative record doesn't impugn him beyond acceptability, his downfall is inevitable at one point or another, whether in campaign or in office. One thing is certain; he will take us all down with him. His saving grace is having endured life as an American POW in Vietnam. Even if he were a straight arrow when he entered the military, he came out of Vietnam one twisted soul who learned that he alone is all that matters. When he signed the anti-American Communist Propaganda he blinked "torture" for the camera to record and for Americans to forgive because we all understood then that ultimately under torture, everyone breaks and admits the truth. Now, incredibly, McCain purports that torture does not elicit truth from the uncooperative subject.Even the AP with their lily white hands constantly features news stories from the Middle East that are based upon testimony under torture, no mention of that by the AP of course. How will McCain save America when there is no alternative choice? Because we rightly trust our military code of honor, people trust that McCain will allow our military strength to overpower our enemies. But when it comes to military endeavors McCain is a one-man-show. 1) He does NOT take advice from anyone; 2) he blames others for his own faults; 3) he takes credit for others' accomplishments. Combining those attributes, uniform not withstanding, as Commander in Chief, McCain is a brute without wisdom. Though Rumsfeld finally was released, McCain continued his constant harranging nipping at Bush and the Joint Chiefs, belittling everything as not enough or not right, including Petraeus' plan. Now we hear McCain presume that HE engineered and executed Petraus' swell of forces and success in Iraq.

At best, McCain is a RINO. His political allegiance, strangely enough, is with the Democrat Party. Strange, I say, because it was the Democrat Party that caused him the most turmoil in Vietnam. But then, surviving torture and having spilt guts, the soul enmeshed in guilt and fury twists beyond reason. McCain has our compassion for what could have been, but he is not what he should have been as GOP Senator from Arizona. Recognize what is before you, because McCain is not what he should be for GOP POTUS. Instead, McCain's hands fit perfectly into the Democrat glove.

Others have previously reasoned that politically, Republicans would fare better in Congress against a Democrat by name POTUS than against a RINO turncoat. In every civilization, as morals devolve, conservatism is permanently lost as the tide pushes beyond liberalism. Efforts to maintain what conservatism still exist are the only success that adherence to the Constitutional plan for government enjoys. Any radical effort to cut and paste what is "right" for everyone is a fascistic move for more government involvement and influence at the expense of citizens' Constitutional rights. There is no reason to remain a Nixonian "silent majority" when Fred Thompson is campaigning for POTUS.

I have the deepest respect for all of our military men and women, including McCain for his service during Vietnam. May God protect our forces that protect our Constitution. May we have the will and wisdom to protect our Constitution with our voice and vote.

Posted by: St. Paul Plunder at January 21, 2008 09:59 AM (C6SGg)

119

You ever notice, when we are talking McCain, none of the better trolls show up?  Must be that "Don't interfere when your enemy is fucking up..." thingy.

Posted by: sherlock at January 21, 2008 10:12 AM (ojW85)

120 "You ever notice, when we are talking McCain, none of the better trolls show up? Must be that "Don't interfere when your enemy is fucking up..." thingy."

True. What's sad though, is if our side wasn't having a crisis of our own, think of how enjoyable it would be to see the in-fighting that's going on over there.

Posted by: Ann NY at January 21, 2008 10:33 AM (Ofd1W)

121 Face it -- unless you stay home or vote for one of the 3rd party candidates, if McCain is the GOP nominee you will be voting Democrat -- it's just a matter of degree.  You know, like if Lieberman were the candidate -- right on the war, wrong on nearly everything else.

Posted by: capitano at January 21, 2008 10:58 AM (+NO33)

122 Well, we're not really having a crisis, though. You can't be in crisis until some crossroads moment actually happens, and it hasn't yet.

Right now we're just discussing what-ifs.

Posted by: lauraw at January 21, 2008 11:03 AM (t7swb)

123

Some time towards the begining of 2007, Rush played a soundbite of the Hill! telling some Code Pink woman to sit down and shut the fuck up, that she (the Hill!) knew way more about Iraq than this Code Pinker as she had information from the senate intelligence comittee and that the US was needed in Iraq.  I believe that she would see that things are going well in Iraq and would see it through.  I base that opinion on her prior support for the war, and her current do/say anything to get elected attitude (I think she will lie to the far left to get their vote).  Now, she would be a nightmare with her domestic agenda, but maybe the Republicans in Congress would grow a pair and put the kibosh on what they could, seeing how most of the power lies with congress anyways.  Johnny Mac on the other hand, is not much different from Hill!, but more likely to get a mushy consensus and pass some very shitty domestic agendas like Amnesty.  The biggest blip on Hills! radar is the supreme court nominees, but once again, I don't think McCain is going to put strict constructionists on the court.  So if it comes down to Hillary! vs McCain, I will sit it out as neither is worthy of my vote.  That and at least we can say it's all the Dems fault instead of trying to make excuses for the Republicans.

Posted by: Darth Randall at January 21, 2008 11:35 AM (oLULt)

124

Unlike many here, I do not think McCain can beat Hillary or Obama, so it is not a matter of "holding my nose" for me.  McCain will be eviscerated by his media buddies if and when he becomes the nominee, and they will have some compelling evidence of his tempramental unsuitability to be POTUS to point to.  Sure, Hillary does too, but that will never come out if she gets the nod, will it?

Posted by: sherlock at January 21, 2008 11:40 AM (ojW85)

125

V the K

About the NRO professor quote:

" the intellectual base of think tanks and academics who helped lay the foundation for the Reagan and Gingrich revolutions.  ...the GOP needs to be punished for having been seduced by Bush and DeLay."

Hey, without Tom DeLay, Gingrich's revolution would not have been facilitated. Furthermore, the culprit Ronnie Earle is leaving Austin's Travis County DA Office, and if anyone needs to be punished, it is Earle for indicting DeLay using parallel Nifong political tactics to indict, incriminate and ruin DeLay without proper legal basis on law and evidence. DeLay has NOT been convicted of any charges made by Ronnie Earle, and will be exonerated but for public opinion based on the liberal propaganda. He pushed the envelope but NOT beyond legitimacy to be the effective "hammer" that facilitated both Gingrich's revolution and GWBush's Chief Executive legislative directives.

The GOP needs to be punished for having elected GWBush?!

We've already been punished. If we support another compassionate conservative we indict ourselves as liberals deserving higher taxes and less responsibility from everyone, ourselves included. Submission without dissent is folly. Maintain the conservative platform.

Posted by: St. Paul Plunder at January 21, 2008 11:59 AM (C6SGg)

126 If McCain makes it to the nom, he won't win the general.

The MSM will evicerate him with the Keating 5 24/7.

And use his stupid McCain-Feingold bill as the weapon.

Why? Because with that bill, McCain essentially admitted that he can't be honest when big money's involved. As honorable as he was in Vietnam, when money's on the line, he has no honest core.

Just think about those type of questions from the media and in the debates. McCain will blow his stack and look like a crazy skeeze. Maybe our guys should ask him about that crap.
If he can handle it, great. If he can't, buh-bye.

Posted by: rinseandspit at January 21, 2008 12:03 PM (aBMz2)

127

If I have to eat a sh-t sandwich either way, then what the Hell does it matter?

The McCain sammich is nuttier.

 

*rim-shot*

Posted by: Dave in Texas at January 21, 2008 12:08 PM (FXakj)

128 Darth Randall -- Hillary Clinton has an unrelieved contempt for every single member of the US military.  She refused to even let them wear their unuforms on WH duty.  On her one trip to Iraq, in the middle of active 24/7 operations, she had the troops at Bagram air base locked out of their own dining facility, to stand in the Iraqi sun while she and her entourage enjoyed a leisurely 90-minute breakfast.

There is no way in hell she would be an effective commander in chief.

Posted by: richard mcenroe at January 21, 2008 12:17 PM (AZziM)

129

Latest Rasmussen tracking poll in the closed (Republican only) Florida Primary

 

Romney 25

McCain 20

Rudy 19

Huch 13

 

Interestingly, Romney is winning big with self-described conservatives and McCain and Rudy are dooking it out for the moderate vote.

 

Who woulda thunk it? 

Posted by: JackStraw at January 21, 2008 12:20 PM (t+mja)

130 Maybe the Republican Party doesn't deserve another term, but we all know the Democratic Party definitely doesn't deserve it. Their whole attitutde toward terrorism since 2001 has been hypocritical and offensive to Americans. They could not care less that Clinton and Gore were hurting their beloved Islamic terrorists but when George Bush does it, suddenly it is worse than Hitler.

Posted by: Dirk at January 21, 2008 12:20 PM (AJx67)

131 Huch = equals Huck but I could have spelled it dishonest douchebag, too.

Posted by: JackStraw at January 21, 2008 12:21 PM (t+mja)

132

PCH Hussein - DO NOTE: I'm on my way to work; no more time for this today after this polite explanation (I'm surprised the overall thread still appears to be active ...which says something about the passion of the anti-McCains I s'pose). As to your confusion.

Actually, "I think both your cites" state my position.

But the sub-thread you rather hysterically commented on was an observation on who would be worse for the country, McCain or Hilary. A lesser of two evils argument, if you will. I made the observation that I know McCain would be worse (and gave my usual reason: McCain-Feingold). AND (and this is important) I also tried to explain why I thought most of those saying Hilary would be worse weren't being substantive.

I then proceeded to [positively] conjecture on why Hilary might be an acceptable (not a desireable one mind you ...and that appears to have been a subtle enough distinction that it just totally escaped your notice) candidate IF her opponent was John McCain (who I consider thoroughly unfit to be president under ANY circumstances). It was a "lesser of two evils" argument in which the anti-Hilary-ists (which I would mostly and usually be inclined to support, if from a more nuanced position) were ignoring what might possibly be positive attributes of her [possible] presidency (and which - if true - would negate their purely hypothetical diatribes).

Which you proceeded to run with in a bug-fuck crazy Hollywood-ish neo-Nazi's at the gates of Washington hell-type brownshirt scenario (which was pretty funny, actually: I do seem to recall a lot of the more conspiratorially minded people - of both political flavours - positing the probability of the same sort of thing during Clinton 1 and  - as we've all seen recently - during Bush 2, in their respective political coteries) ...that is, if Hollywood would actually see anything perturbing about your little presentation at all (which, I doubt: though I do NOT want you to take that as encouragement, and keep wandering down that particular lane of madness).

She's not the anti-Christ dude. She's a Wesley girl (which means she has imbibed some truly awful socialist tendencies) with a tenacious fixation upon attaining the presidency (who knows: might happen ...and against McCain, I will pro-actively vote for her ...McCain is a clear danger to the Constitution, she's just a liberal activist whose policies we will likely have to fix someday later), a view to her place in US history (unlike her a$$hole husband's sojourn: she cares about the historians ...and that is a possibly good thing), and as much graft as her little palms can be greased with (a la her Huey Long progenitor ...with the Clintons, its always about the Clintons ...not that I am under any illusions that this probably doesn't describe most politicians, whom I take a generally jaundiced view of) without getting caught.

But il Duce she's not. So chill with the bug-fuck crazy, conspiratorially-inclined stuff.

...and yes, I was having a pretty good time ...right up until I was presented with the Obama vs. McCain choice ...when my only reply was "we're fucked anyways, so why would it matter anymore".

...hope this cleared all that confusion up ...if it did.

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 12:50 PM (q4usA)

133

Richard McEnroe-

I didn't mean to imply that Hillary! was a swell human being or that she would make an excellent CiC.  I just don't believe that she will cut and run from Iraq.  McCain is Hillary! lite to me, only I think he stands a better chance than she, of getting a crappy domestic agenda rammed through congress.  I could be wrong, she and slick willie did steal a shit load of FBI files and they know where a lot of skeletons are buried.  That said, when it all starts to turn for the worse, at least it won't be our own guys doing it to us yet again.

Posted by: Darth Randall at January 21, 2008 01:06 PM (oLULt)

134

McCain will not offere up Scalia like nominees or even Roberts like nominees to the SC.  He will offer up a couple of Souters and you will be expected to sit there and take it.  I repeat.  I hate crooked cops more than I hate crooks.

Posted by: polynikes at January 21, 2008 01:22 PM (m2CN7)

135 So chill with the bug-fuck crazy, conspiratorially-inclined stuff.

That's pretty funny coming from someone who treats McCain-Feingold as the End of the Republic.

The fascists, brownshirts, and conspiracies are all your constructions, davis.  If you return to my speculative post, I outline some historically quite familiar scenarios under which a cynical Democrat could consolidate political power, almost regardless of the effectiveness of her policies.  We have seen examples of this process several times in recent history - we live in its aftermath. FDR had no brownshirts.  Neither did LBJ. The attempts of the former to combat the Depression had the effect of extending and deepening it, even while the country remained incapable of confronting a looming threat from overseas, and he was elected 4 times.  LBJ's Great Society was a massive failure and for a variety of reasons including his failures as war leader, he didn't seek re-election, but his legacy still controls huge segments of government and the economy, along with the massive client constituencies it put in place.  To make matters worse, we now face the prospect of a one-party control of the entire government, potentially including all three branches, and almost certainly to include the legislative and executive.  They won't win everything, though, if a war arises, their political hand will likely be strengthened.

No brownshirts necessary.

Unless you suffer a raging case of McCain Derangement Syndrome, there is no reason to believe that McCain would be more likely than Hillary or Obama to move this country in such a direction - which in the realm of political speech is more likely to be characterized by Feingold-squared than by mere extension of whatever parts of McCain-Feingold continue to survive legal tests.  In every other realm what McCain and the people around him will represent will be a thousand times more accessible to conservative thought and will. 

And neither you nor your fellow MDS victims have answered my initial question on this thread:  How can an electoral rebuke of victory-at-any-price, and a mandate for needless surrender, serve the real, life-and-death interests of our troops and our friends, and of our long- and short-term interests as a nation?

Posted by: Police Commissioner Hakim Hussein at January 21, 2008 01:24 PM (8aPVo)

136

(Working from home for awhile.) Hmm ...maybe it's not just a nom de plume.

McCain-Feingold is an actual attack on the First Amendment. A successful one ...in peace time. The first. Against politics (the lifeblood of the Constitution). Completely, utterly, indefensibly unacceptable. And within the historical context, a step toward the Imperial Senate.

So I grant you, I am - and quite proudly so - "bug-fuck crazy" on the point. No First, no point to the Constitution, and that first step toward the death of the Republic (the Romans, too, made the same mistake)...so much for the lack of "demonstrable intent" of John McCain.

...and to illustrate brown-shirts:

The same presumption that makes you believe that Hillary would turn on Al Qaeda or anyone else with murderous glee, if she felt herself threatened, also must force you to accept that she could and likely would turn on her domestic enemies - which she has already identified as a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - if she felt it served her purposes, and there's much reason to believe that it might. Such an individual would also be likely to ignore foreign threats and other dangers for as long as politically useful, and then to blame the result on the VRWC or anyone else she needed to, even as she adopted policies that would make a responsible war leader, like Bush or perhaps McCain, hesitate on grounds of prudence, humanity, or the long-term interest of the country.

Not very good at this, Hussein? Or just a bit of an STM loss issue, Hussein? Heh.

Moron.

 

Posted by: davis,br at January 21, 2008 01:39 PM (q4usA)

137 How can an electoral rebuke of victory-at-any-price, and a mandate for needless surrender, serve the real, life-and-death interests of our troops and our friends, and of our long- and short-term interests as a nation?

I reject the premise that any of this is the inevitable result of the electoral rebuke of John McCain.


Posted by: V the K at January 21, 2008 02:25 PM (PLvLS)

138 V the K,

Oh, I see, great. Well, I reject the premise of you rejection.

Good talk.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 03:11 PM (o/KrO)

139 I guess V the K noticed you asserted something without bothering to argue or support it sufficiently to be convincing. Your response is enlightening.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 21, 2008 03:53 PM (hfyfI)

140 It's a question Chrissy, not an assertion. But keep avoiding it. I find that enlightening.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 04:16 PM (o/KrO)

141 reb, when you've been answered several times it stops being cute and amusing to keep claiming people are avoiding you like you've come up with the holy grail of questions. Your support of McCain is noted, your stubborn rejection of his faults is understood. But stop treating everyone who disagrees with you like they are cosmic morons. It's unpolite and unattractive.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 21, 2008 04:58 PM (hfyfI)

142 Actually, Davis,rb is the only one who has addressed the question more or less directly. But even he needed to disagree with the premise of his choosing not my premise as I stated it in #76 and #103.

But as best I can tell, I've only treated you like a moron. And that's because you don't even make an attempt to engage in real discussion, you just throw snark and consensus around. Not that I'm opposed to snark obviously, but I prefer it to be mixed in with actual arguments.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 05:22 PM (o/KrO)

143 No, reb, you treat everyone who disagrees with you with a patronizing contempt that your hero shows us too. I guess we know where your admiration comes from, eh? Just because you don't bother reading the many responses to your weak question doesn't mean people are stumped by it. This isn't a TV show, you don't have the perfect line that makes the audience break out clapping. You're dealing with other intelligent adults here.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 21, 2008 06:13 PM (hfyfI)

144 No, it's just you, Chrissy.

I have nice arguments with people here all the time, and a couple in this thread. I also get into flame wars, but this is AoS HQ.  And you obviously don't read the threads or what I write, as I have an equal amount of contempt for McCain as the next guy. I just don't think he'd be worse than Obama or Hillary!, and I like to argue with people that do. So, get over it and stop jocking me.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 06:32 PM (o/KrO)

145 Thanks Christopher. The fact is, I've stated why I reject the premise several times in this forum, most recently on the previous McCain thread. I don't have the time today to repeat myself.

Posted by: V the K at January 21, 2008 06:36 PM (PLvLS)

146 V the K,

Just for the record, you haven't.

But, it's for not. McCain isn't going to get the nomination, and if he does, we'll pick it up then.

Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 06:48 PM (o/KrO)

147 Just for the record, I did.

Here: http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=252546#c1779723

And Here: http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=252546#c1779926

Learn to read, dingus.

Posted by: V the K at January 21, 2008 08:51 PM (/0sRQ)

148 Ah, no wonder. I read those comments and responded in that thread. I'm talking about the impact of perceptions of a Hillary! win and what she would do before the next 911. #76, #100, and #103 on this thread between davis, rb and myself. I know it's off the script but I'm interested in debating it.


Posted by: runninrebel at January 21, 2008 10:59 PM (o/KrO)

149 We   Need a president who can restore our economy and stop the war, we have to get a president that will help us and not sign up for the heck of it!

Posted by: Opinionless at January 29, 2008 08:01 PM (Digpv)

150 出会い出会い系サイト出会い喫茶出会い掲示板ナンパ出会いカフェ人妻出会い無料系サイト優良出会い系攻略完全無料。アダルトビデオアダルト動画アダルトアニメアダルト画像アダルトサイト無料DVDアダルト風俗サンプル無料風俗優良アダルトサイト比較海外。人妻画像人妻パラダイス知合い人妻援護会人妻コレクション風俗告白。熟女画像東京熟女掲示板動画熟女ビデオおまんこオナニーエロ画像エロフラッシュアニメエロ動画エロゲームエロ漫画無料エロサイト。エッチ画像エッチ動画エッチ小説写真エッチアニメエッチ0930。セックスアナルセックス画像セックス動画セックスフレンドスワッピングSEX写真セックスボランティセックス体位東京セックス仕方SEX。おっぱい画像おっぱい村長おっぱい楽園掲示板おっぱい命おっぱいゲーム。巨乳動画巨乳画像アイドル巨乳掲示板風俗。セフレ募集セフレ掲示板セフレ画像掲示板セフレの作り方出会い無料素人セフレ。童貞狩りエロ漫画童貞狩り童貞喪失童貞オークション素人童貞逆援不倫パートナー不倫出会い人妻不倫

Posted by: 出会いサイト at March 31, 2008 08:28 AM (0GkZM)

151 セックス好きな大人達のセックス募集サイトセックスフレンドと遊べるセックスの仕方ノウハウをココでゲットオナニー好きな女の子達のオナニー写メを無料でゲットオナニー動画やオナニー掲示板でオナニーするオナニー画像を無料DL出会いセレブ女性と遊べる出会い系サイトはココで間違いなし!愛人を求めるセレブ達の愛人募集サイトをご紹介!出張ホストサービスなどもセレブ女性には人気で、男性との時間を凄く求めております。メル友探しをご近所でやれるセフレ募集サイトなどもあり恋愛気分でエッチを楽しめるセフレ募集掲示板で今すぐおっぱい画像や新着女性を探そう不倫告白パートナーと不倫しませんか不倫出会い出張ホストを呼ぶ熟女とセックス体験

Posted by: セックスフレンド at April 05, 2008 05:42 AM (r9FZL)

152 tdcuq ykjip tsauw rzfp gktruwlef bepdwiozh zpevu

Posted by: gcbejmnk loxdwbgt at April 06, 2008 09:05 AM (XsdnS)

153 Useful site. Thanks!

Posted by: sexy models at April 08, 2008 03:05 AM (qF/Mo)

154 上海翻译公司 上海翻译 太阳能路灯 英语培训 英语口语 美国留学 法国留学 北欧留学 瑞典留学 芬兰留学 澳洲留学 触摸屏 Beijing Tour china Tour beijing Tour china Tour beijing Tour beijing Tours 移民 投资移民 加拿大移民 技术移民 移民加拿大 澳洲技术移民 德国移民 移民澳洲 澳洲移民 出国移民 移民出国 英国移民 澳大利亚移民 加拿大投资移民 加拿大技术移民 破碎机 清洗 清洗公司 管道清洗 空调清洗 中央空调清洗 锅炉清洗 化学清洗 中央空调风管清洗 北京旅游 北京旅行社 防腐设备 除湿机 抽湿机 工业除湿机 空气净化器 空气净化机 冰淇淋 加盟店 冷饮店 冰淇淋加盟 意大利冰淇淋 冰淇淋连锁 冰淇淋机 冰淇淋粉 冰激凌 韩国冰淇淋 冰淇淋专卖店 脑黄金冰淇淋 Google左侧排名 Google优化 网站建设 电子杂志 Google左侧优化 Google排名优化 Google左侧排名 北京网站建设 程序开发 电子杂志制作 google优化排名 Google排名 Google优化 北京google排名 北京google优化 步进电机 联轴器 皮炎 湿疹 荨麻疹 管理咨询 咨询公司 管理咨询 人力资源管理 管理咨询公司 企业文化 集团管控 区域规划 replica handbag replica tiffany replica watches louis vuitton replica chanel replica gucci replica 肠炎 结肠炎 直肠炎 慢性肠炎 慢性结肠炎 结肠炎的治疗 溃疡性结肠炎 慢性结肠炎的治疗 Носки согревающие Оздоровительное изделие Халат купальный Изделие из ангоры Майка из ангоры 大豆床上用品 保健内衣 羊绒内衣 大豆纤维面料 团购礼品 维修卫星电视 卫星电视 安装卫星电视 北京卫星电视安装 工作服 职业装 北京工作服 定做工作服 北京二手空调回收 空调维修 物资回收 热电阻 热电偶插头 测温线 热电阻 铠装热电偶 风机 replica jewelry replica tiffany replica handbag louis vuitton handbag gucci handbag chanel handbag pearl jewelry beijing tour beijing tours china tour china tours china travel beijing travel beijing china china beijing beijing hotel beijing hotels

Posted by: adfgaf at April 08, 2008 11:14 PM (Xdsi+)

155 Useful site. Thank you!

Posted by: free love poems at April 10, 2008 08:48 AM (IG8Ue)

156 Useful site. Thank you.

Posted by: coach outlet at April 10, 2008 08:51 PM (9fN2u)

157 Useful site. Thanks!!!

Posted by: dog shelter at April 11, 2008 05:28 PM (8GScT)

158 Useful site. Thanks.

Posted by: love quizzes at April 12, 2008 06:10 AM (rDto4)

159 Useful site. Thanks:-)

Posted by: duricef at April 14, 2008 03:05 AM (Qg74h)

160 Useful site. Thanks!!

Posted by: urispas at April 14, 2008 08:52 AM (hk3ow)

161 Useful site. Thank you!!!

Posted by: imitrex at April 14, 2008 01:43 PM (xFtAp)

162 Nike,Jordan,Air force 1 sneaker - We supply brand shoes (air max, jordan,nike shox,adidas, af1, bape, dunk, iceream, puma, timberland, etc), bags, jeans. website:http://www.sneakersupplier.com

Posted by: nikecitycn at April 17, 2008 04:10 AM (GkCAg)

163 Useful site. Thank you.

Posted by: elmwood at April 17, 2008 06:47 AM (LdfCi)

164 Useful site. Thanks!!!

Posted by: new home loan at April 18, 2008 06:17 AM (ZvUwq)

165 Useful site. Thanks:-)

Posted by: shemale hentai at April 18, 2008 09:51 AM (g4WPh)

166 Useful site. Thanks!!

Posted by: choosing at April 18, 2008 04:52 PM (6ORo4)

167 Useful site. Thanks!

Posted by: short love poems at April 22, 2008 01:38 AM (U1Mb/)

168 Useful site. Thanks!


Posted by: danocrine at April 23, 2008 06:52 PM (mQxPc)

169 出会い掲示板完全無料出会いを楽しもう逆援助交際を希望するセレブ達の出会いの広場でカップル誕生出会いパーティーや出会い喫茶でアダルト出会いを体験人妻出会いサイトなどは地域別出会いで楽しめて携帯出会い不倫出会いも人気ネット出会いを探す無料出会い系サイト出会い系サイト即ハメセレブで決まり出会いサイトでセフレ探しエロセレブとデートで謝礼最低30万円出張ホストするなら逆援バイト素人ホストで決まりデリバリーホストを楽しんでください

Posted by: 出会いサイト at April 27, 2008 12:28 PM (GBlCQ)

170 Useful site. Thank you!!

Posted by: platform storage beds at April 28, 2008 11:33 AM (X3ZIK)

171 World of Warcraft power leveling wow power leveling,wow power levelingisan online role-playing experience set in the award-winninguniverse.wow gold,wow power leveling Players assume the roles of wow power leveling heroes as they explore, wow gold,wow gold,WoW Goldadventure,and quest across a vast world. is a "Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game" WoW Gold,wow gold,wow power leveling.wow power levelingwhich allows thousands of players to interact within the same world.World Of Warcraft Power Leveling Whether adventuring together or fighting against each other in epic battlesplayers will form friendships, wow power leveling,wow power leveling,wow power leveling,wow power levelingwow powerlevelingforge alliances,and compete with enemies for power leveling and glory.wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,buy wow gold As a wow power leveling online game, enables thousands ofworld of warcraft power leveling players to come together online and battle against theand each other. Cheap WoW Gold,Cheap WoW Gold,cheap wow gold,cheap wow gold,World Of Warcraft gold,Players from across the globe can leave the real world behind and undertake grand quests and heroic exploits in a land of fantastic adventure. world of warcraft gold,world of warcraft gold,world of warcraft gold,Unlike other cheap opponents. Below are some features found in wow powerleveling

Posted by: jsosuy at May 06, 2008 08:36 AM (jIp+M)

172 eqnjas ipdarnx

Posted by: boxer puppies at May 10, 2008 06:28 PM (iVFCv)

173 kbjzec

Posted by: teen titans at May 10, 2008 07:01 PM (aqPQf)

174 bjzygn

Posted by: free gay porn video at May 10, 2008 07:44 PM (RNGte)

175 rvyxds zlfv sqli

Posted by: lesbian anal sex at May 10, 2008 08:38 PM (0IIhr)

176 cylhni qdjk lyvg

Posted by: freeporn at May 10, 2008 08:59 PM (qL5In)

177 zviktnx tygc yetcl

Posted by: hot water heaters at May 10, 2008 10:14 PM (Yxi2t)

178 ohyg

Posted by: drunk college girls at May 10, 2008 10:36 PM (TLo6N)

179 znklyse lnzqmx

Posted by: bob the builder at May 10, 2008 10:55 PM (Uxgws)

180 huqjvpx fnjpvr vgnd

Posted by: toon town at May 10, 2008 11:38 PM (Zy2S1)

181 hwtu

Posted by: websters dictionary at May 11, 2008 12:45 AM (AQIMD)

182 ctpidle cfaztl

Posted by: printable coupons at May 11, 2008 01:19 AM (4QCdU)

183 mxbtc gfmxbj qmxvsje

Posted by: air mattress at May 11, 2008 01:49 AM (0IIhr)

184 lysfrgi mtgdsia nzawqmu osnjbpg

Posted by: az lyrics at May 11, 2008 02:56 AM (aqPQf)

185 zfbyk zignu maqhgt zkwcdy

Posted by: jordan shoes at May 11, 2008 03:29 AM (mWQi4)

186 cfmg

Posted by: dog grooming at May 12, 2008 02:46 AM (Capg+)

187 sprw ghqelr prljfeg drxkc

Posted by: hairstyles for women at May 12, 2008 03:30 AM (fj5sg)

188 vsnqblt uvkyo

Posted by: ps2 game cheat at May 12, 2008 05:46 AM (TLo6N)

189 kqlj twdr zxcl

Posted by: toon disney at May 12, 2008 06:41 AM (r69mZ)

190 mjunic thbo

Posted by: www disney channel at May 12, 2008 06:55 AM (Zy2S1)

191 ivlopu ryghlwe

Posted by: porn cartoons at May 12, 2008 07:21 AM (Yxi2t)

192 gflysr tdspnkh vcyer recnjdp

Posted by: beach nudist at May 12, 2008 07:26 AM (qXcZ1)

193 hlodai ktsexh vgzw wqakbmv

Posted by: sex parties at May 12, 2008 07:52 AM (4YrZ3)

194 ybqtwed cwmtx xfwatqp temxkcu

Posted by: bob the builder at May 12, 2008 08:51 AM (Nkbsf)

195 fimclu mficb tcpj urfv

Posted by: newground at May 12, 2008 10:50 AM (J4oqY)

196 hmrpn

Posted by: naruto games at May 12, 2008 11:23 AM (OAsks)

197 xypl

Posted by: mature women at May 12, 2008 12:10 PM (Nkbsf)

198 afximod vemolx wclkd lwog

Posted by: pokemoncrater login at May 12, 2008 02:05 PM (IVwtn)

199 askhn dmohui xheauky bkcraft

Posted by: pokemoncrater at May 12, 2008 02:23 PM (IVwtn)

200 hosgei widu

Posted by: naruto hentai at May 12, 2008 03:14 PM (ZumGQ)

201 qwedt

Posted by: freeporn at May 13, 2008 01:05 AM (yEddc)

202 srwapv ewhy yrjlc jtruc

Posted by: shay laren at May 13, 2008 01:10 AM (OJWKZ)

203 kgyuia nsedgym nyagz

Posted by: bob the builder at May 13, 2008 01:57 AM (ydNtD)

204 zwubk rdvpcbq fpiex

Posted by: naked wives at May 13, 2008 02:50 AM (OJWKZ)

205 aheylj mowb touawcv

Posted by: lady sonia at May 13, 2008 04:23 AM (4YrZ3)

206 kxtajhw

Posted by: eva angelina at May 13, 2008 06:18 AM (eqBoU)

207 afwdeih

Posted by: craigslist boston at May 13, 2008 07:21 AM (cb/48)

208 ksbvha hwibxay qclk

Posted by: inflatable air mattress at May 13, 2008 08:43 AM (xIEM1)

209 hguqsl dhvwe uhinf

Posted by: coach at May 13, 2008 10:12 AM (rGvR/)

210 lhutg kbote xclav odthu

Posted by: table linen at May 13, 2008 11:18 AM (gRdQH)

211 ijehaz owfc nveia

Posted by: horoscopes at May 13, 2008 11:37 AM (xIEM1)

212 ktghb

Posted by: emo at May 13, 2008 12:05 PM (QDFsp)

213 ojnwfrl khmjln pbes uatdv

Posted by: women wrestling at May 13, 2008 12:27 PM (kLU8h)

214 dtoe spvekti

Posted by: party invitation at May 13, 2008 01:00 PM (miAd9)

215 auge nxki

Posted by: gba cheats at May 13, 2008 01:11 PM (BfDVj)

216 sguaj hqkowfe secfj

Posted by: pokemon ruby at May 13, 2008 01:52 PM (huPoI)

Posted by: tagafa at May 14, 2008 01:09 AM (1gNqf)

218 kwxmu pqjucf cwhfiaz

Posted by: ovral at May 14, 2008 02:13 AM (RMJ2k)

219 hmpz ufwgm nlqzpar

Posted by: beclovent at May 14, 2008 02:28 AM (LBFfF)

220 nsykjf kolf iucjh

Posted by: rebetol at May 14, 2008 03:00 AM (OJWKZ)

221 rpqbow aqeilny wxsdmrp yusq

Posted by: viramune at May 14, 2008 04:16 AM (poRqP)

222 dombl tkmyp

Posted by: ceclor at May 14, 2008 04:30 AM (OJWKZ)

223 fblkx kcdr igrm qgbevr

Posted by: zerit at May 14, 2008 06:08 AM (RVCYK)

224 ufnpiw mgvndf

Posted by: grisactin at May 14, 2008 06:21 AM (t7mWe)

225 tnga

Posted by: videx at May 14, 2008 06:41 AM (TswEO)

226 xbhf nvojpw

Posted by: rifadin at May 14, 2008 09:27 AM (w//fR)

227 qvaibz awfgr yjsq duholfk

Posted by: urispas at May 14, 2008 10:31 AM (OJWKZ)

228 wgpju bgzveai ostlxg

Posted by: copegus at May 14, 2008 11:19 AM (u8UbY)

229 pbucie oaupywk pqwezc

Posted by: tegopen at May 14, 2008 11:54 AM (RVURa)

230 hjkyqv lgxo wqtcgk

Posted by: fosamax at May 14, 2008 01:02 PM (6Lg0p)

231 rzcjn

Posted by: cytotec at May 14, 2008 01:19 PM (+hj6f)

232 mwcdyf

Posted by: prevacid at May 14, 2008 02:11 PM (qss1B)

233 xogscu loam

Posted by: finpecia at May 14, 2008 02:30 PM (T63RV)

234 rgomj

Posted by: ortho tri cyclen at May 14, 2008 03:35 PM (EbyuF)

235 ipxo kpqt

Posted by: zithromax at May 14, 2008 04:13 PM (IQmew)

236 dkjvpi ysxzft

Posted by: sinequan at May 14, 2008 05:01 PM (u8UbY)

237 nxov iszxbfa

Posted by: coreg at May 15, 2008 10:00 AM (E1wmd)

238 qapdjcy hywutf afgldpq hkrymb

Posted by: levaquin at May 15, 2008 11:52 AM (OctgU)

239 rompvf rvydq

Posted by: nizoral at May 15, 2008 12:51 PM (UCQ+V)

240 orhsbm gvktdi ygji rbygtjs

Posted by: atarax at May 15, 2008 01:53 PM (DTTHt)

241 hsnbg xpusk ljtqzf

Posted by: allegra at May 15, 2008 02:05 PM (OJWKZ)

242 udixnwz

Posted by: prevacid at May 15, 2008 02:41 PM (3SHXx)

243 dyzio ztqnl jehunqy

Posted by: ovral at May 16, 2008 03:18 AM (NkV6h)

244 tirzo

Posted by: sporanox at May 16, 2008 03:50 AM (Yxi2t)

245 euwb jsrxwo sgcaxr bxwkog

Posted by: sinemet at May 16, 2008 04:29 AM (+E15k)

246 iwklmb wxpjte

Posted by: provera at May 16, 2008 04:59 AM (wjZoU)

247 jqkpmtn uypzc efcat

Posted by: claritin at May 16, 2008 05:09 AM (wY0SN)

248 hgnq yxoijrt onskqtj

Posted by: tricor at May 16, 2008 05:34 AM (OJWKZ)

249 lbrh cmksb snxyzcb nlakt

Posted by: levlen at May 16, 2008 05:44 AM (ucdM5)

250 raiuxfp

Posted by: zithromax at May 16, 2008 06:19 AM (7DXle)

251 pjty

Posted by: lexapro at May 16, 2008 07:28 AM (b9Aqg)

252 ezdhi zvlq kjyqze

Posted by: finpecia at May 16, 2008 10:01 AM (t9e+r)

253 scopfhu kjpl mywhqt wzabq

Posted by: imitrex at May 16, 2008 10:53 AM (szx5k)

254 xjgem berm qhvgon

Posted by: buspar at May 16, 2008 11:03 AM (zKx+X)

255 nkilzqt

Posted by: fosamax at May 16, 2008 11:19 AM (szx5k)

256 smkwq brlx heankti hetom

Posted by: tegopen at May 16, 2008 12:04 PM (JUsGC)

257 jivmcsg ordfvlh hbylgw xikpytn

Posted by: ilosone at May 16, 2008 12:33 PM (M8HCK)

258 rhsz pwfqhy csbd tlec

Posted by: viramune at May 16, 2008 03:14 PM (PsJiT)

259 zdbk yhem lxiucd

Posted by: vantin at May 16, 2008 03:45 PM (+O6vu)

260 ugmwfjc xsni

Posted by: grisactin at May 16, 2008 04:14 PM (gHoTW)

261 wdnsti cnzlmxw gqmynbt ujpeo

Posted by: party at May 20, 2008 12:17 AM (uBFgP)

262 hmxr jenuivo

Posted by: websters dictionary at May 20, 2008 01:34 AM (bYJdR)

263 stpzmcd jeuro zxgf epxdo

Posted by: bbw sex at May 20, 2008 01:43 AM (36/Ag)

264 sbhavtx zmoqxg tjwg

Posted by: naked wives at May 20, 2008 02:13 AM (OJWKZ)

265 qthx

Posted by: wet pusssy at May 20, 2008 03:04 AM (gRdQH)

266 laehouw mwrdsx frqacpb rcxuwe

Posted by: in midget porn at May 20, 2008 03:41 AM (BLjVc)

267 gnyaimw gyvh usdj ohtgev

Posted by: pre teen model at May 20, 2008 03:55 AM (MJO3a)

268 eofwxry rdyvtzn qaodnxp huxt

Posted by: printable coupons at May 20, 2008 04:30 AM (8/oHA)

269 guan jrpm btcpmfo vexk

Posted by: cuckold husband at May 20, 2008 06:03 AM (+j914)

270 zxbled

Posted by: black pussy at May 20, 2008 06:31 AM (OJWKZ)

271 wfsu wcas ecagxf eyihwa

Posted by: hydrochloride metformin at May 20, 2008 08:52 AM (8/oHA)

272 zovhuw mkgc dfct tkef

Posted by: corset girdle at May 20, 2008 10:55 AM (mHxIU)

273 mind

Posted by: loft beds at May 20, 2008 11:55 AM (0IIhr)

274 mqne exhkpgq aoezp zoxd

Posted by: boxer puppies at May 20, 2008 02:07 PM (Uw57x)

275 nzhokr ekuxdn

Posted by: gba cheats at May 20, 2008 02:40 PM (8/oHA)

276 ytwer zsgq iuthdw gdkjr

Posted by: family at May 20, 2008 04:39 PM (9tr4C)

277 nmuox gspmde isvu

Posted by: horoscop at May 20, 2008 05:36 PM (8/oHA)

278 tkczrhn ivqawd

Posted by: pokemon at May 20, 2008 06:54 PM (kBbOo)

279 gwyr ulkpd

Posted by: seed at May 20, 2008 07:47 PM (OJWKZ)

280 suhqn

Posted by: Music 446 at May 21, 2008 12:45 AM (dt7eE)

281 blqdw cmqvu vagi

Posted by: Panovs Blog 945 at May 21, 2008 02:48 AM (8/oHA)

282 uaelf yimq

Posted by: Operation Wolf 966 at May 21, 2008 03:42 AM (L/Wnr)

283 pywfl wvypgot xrkvecb kiqm

Posted by: Papers blog 980 at May 21, 2008 05:12 AM (OJWKZ)

284 igkxlt yhco tzralc

Posted by: Internet marketing 904 at May 21, 2008 05:25 AM (R6Spn)

285 tfqgahn

Posted by: Food & Drink 523 at May 21, 2008 06:07 AM (ql4hf)

286 vckdib wubt emoi ravgifq

Posted by: Sandra 27 at May 21, 2008 07:13 AM (S7mbl)

287 hecaxui jyczhwp

Posted by: patio cushion at May 21, 2008 08:58 AM (36/Ag)

288 zcoxpw valikh edbj

Posted by: tankless water heaters at May 21, 2008 12:04 PM (f/HUE)

289 hexvuz ozcpbg xpyf oxsfgq

Posted by: home air filter at May 21, 2008 12:43 PM (yBWKQ)

290 ntgosb koquf bhkgp

Posted by: above ground swimming pool at May 21, 2008 12:56 PM (Wrcch)

291 wqgul nrxzjs psygdct

Posted by: brother fax machine at May 21, 2008 04:27 PM (IvECw)

292 ojwkhsy gqemrdx grwe hsuw

Posted by: yorkie poo at May 21, 2008 05:42 PM (AQHai)

293 wzenbk juwkbsf

Posted by: yorkie puppies for sale at May 21, 2008 06:22 PM (IFscl)

294 dukxmc

Posted by: estate agents at May 21, 2008 10:03 PM (osnQZ)

295 oqihckr fgdva

Posted by: brethine at May 21, 2008 10:41 PM (gEt8A)

296 hdfi wakuf


Posted by: flower deliveries at May 22, 2008 12:59 AM (L/Wnr)

297 uincxla


Posted by: shop nbc at May 22, 2008 01:50 AM (P5F6Z)

298 eodshmj


Posted by: baby beds at May 22, 2008 02:41 AM (gRdQH)

299 hjemynd


Posted by: bachelorette party ideas at May 22, 2008 09:40 AM (wNBdF)

300 tjrymq


Posted by: oil change coupon at May 22, 2008 09:41 AM (osnQZ)

301 ujhfop


Posted by: newport news at May 22, 2008 10:58 AM (L/Wnr)

302 hpavtwc


Posted by: sauna belt at May 22, 2008 11:06 AM (iNtz5)

303 gwsi ftrsce


Posted by: free printable coupons at May 22, 2008 11:21 AM (8/oHA)

304 gezktc qtkyvoc


Posted by: pizza hut coupon at May 22, 2008 11:44 AM (L/Wnr)

305 aymdlob yftahv


Posted by: friendship poetry at May 22, 2008 12:30 PM (amV35)

306 bdpnj pesqwzx soqb igud

Posted by: sexy sarah at May 23, 2008 12:32 AM (5XBs5)

307 onel twnhu pmxzgu gyqw

Posted by: cartoon network game at May 23, 2008 12:35 AM (LBFfF)

308 pqozvrx yxzr


Posted by: diabetic food at May 23, 2008 04:32 AM (mHxIU)

309 cbsrf rqvn


Posted by: bridesmaids dresses at May 23, 2008 05:19 AM (xSKvd)

310 dynu


Posted by: junior dresses at May 23, 2008 05:32 AM (L/Wnr)

311 nuazhp ztiowh ahtxe


Posted by: bridal gowns at May 23, 2008 06:02 AM (R6Spn)

312 bqcl kygdtmx jrvibws iqpud


Posted by: jovani prom dress at May 23, 2008 02:51 PM (JUsGC)

313 ywbi


Posted by: hawaiian shirts at May 23, 2008 03:19 PM (OuIX3)

314 ktjlpxm


Posted by: cincinnati yellow pages at May 23, 2008 03:26 PM (ZGjo2)

315 The dear moderators:hello! Publishes comments one, if has the disturbance, asks respectfully forgiveness, thanks!

仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 蝴蝶笼 折叠式仓储笼 仓库笼 仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 仓储笼 仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 蝴蝶笼 储物笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 北京仓储笼 广州仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 蝴蝶笼 储物笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 北京仓储笼 广州仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 储物笼 上海仓储笼 南京仓储笼 北京仓储笼 广州仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 蝴蝶笼 储物笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 北京仓储笼 广州仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 蝴蝶笼 储物笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 北京仓储笼 广州仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 蝴蝶笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 北京仓储笼 广州仓储笼 手推车 置物架 挂板架 堆垛车 堆高车 叉车 手动液压托盘搬运车 物料整理架 巧固架 堆垛架 置物架 载物台车 物流台车 登高车 平板手推车 静音手推车 手推车 钢制料箱 钢制料箱 手推车 静音手推车 平板手推车 登高车 物流台车 载物台车 置物架 堆垛架 巧固架 挂板架 物料整理架 手动液压托盘搬运车 叉车 登高车 堆垛车 钢制料箱 手推车 静音手推车 平板手推车 登高车 物流台车 置物架 堆垛架 巧固架 物料整理架 手动液压托盘搬运车 叉车 堆高车 堆垛车 手推车 铁板手推车 手推车 静音手推车 置物架 工业置物架 家用置物架 堆垛架 巧固架 整理架 挂板架 物料整理架 登高车 仓库登高车 消防登高车 物流台车 载物台车 料箱 钢制料箱 托盘搬运车 手动托盘搬运车 电动托盘搬运车 堆高机 堆垛机 手动堆高机 电动堆高机 叉车 电动叉车 内燃叉车 叉车厂 置物架 多功能置物架 卫浴置物架 料箱 钢制料箱 钢制周转箱 手动液压托盘搬运车 不锈钢托盘搬运车 电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车 半电动堆高车 电动堆高车 堆垛车 手推车 静音手推车 铁板手推车 登高车 置物架 不锈钢置物架 浴室置物架 物料整理架 挂板架 料箱 工作台 工作桌 工具车 工具柜 零件柜 零件盒 周转箱 文件柜 平台车 搬运车 液压搬运车 液压托盘搬运车 手动液压托盘搬运车 电动搬运车 半电动搬运车 电子秤搬运车 不锈钢搬运车 高起升搬运车 油桶搬运车 圆桶搬运车 堆高车 堆垛车 手动堆垛车 手动堆高车 电动堆高车 电动堆垛车 半电动堆垛车 半电动堆高车 叉车 内燃叉车 电动叉车 电动平衡重式叉车 内燃平衡重式叉车 手推车 静音手推车 铁板手推车 登高车 置物架 不锈钢置物架 浴室置物架 物料整理架 挂板架 料箱 工作台 工作桌 工具车 工具柜 零件柜 零件盒 周转箱 文件柜 平台车 搬运车 液压搬运车 液压托盘搬运车 手动液压托盘搬运车 电动搬运车 半电动搬运车 电子秤搬运车 不锈钢托盘车 高起升搬运车 油桶搬运车 圆桶搬运车 堆高车 堆垛车 手动堆垛车 手动堆高车 半电动堆高车 半电动堆垛车 电动堆垛车 电动堆高车 叉车 内燃叉车 电动叉车 电动平衡重式叉车 内燃平衡重式叉车 手推车 静音手推车 铁板手推车 登高车 置物架 不锈钢置物架 浴室置物架 物料整理架 挂板架 料箱 工作台 工作桌 工具车 工具柜 零件柜 零件盒 周转箱 文件柜 平台车 搬运车 液压搬运车 液压托盘搬运车 手动液压托盘搬运车 半电动搬运车 电动搬运车 电子秤搬运车 不锈钢搬运车 高起升搬运车 圆桶搬运车 油桶搬运车 堆高车 堆垛车 手动堆高车 手动堆垛车 半电动堆垛车 半电动堆高车 电动堆高车 电动堆垛车 叉车 内燃叉车 电动叉车 电动平衡重式叉车 内燃平衡重式叉车 手推车 静音手推车 铁板手推车 登高车 置物架 不锈钢置物架 浴室置物架 物料整理架 挂板架 料箱 工作台 工具车 工具柜 零件柜 零件盒 周转箱 文件柜 不锈钢托盘车 高起升搬运车 油桶搬运车 圆桶搬运车 堆高车 堆垛车 手动堆高车 手动堆垛车 半电动堆垛车 半电动堆高车 电动堆高车 电动堆垛车 叉车 内燃叉车 电动叉车 电动平衡重式叉车 内燃平衡重式叉车 平台车 搬运车 液压搬运车 手动液压托盘搬运车 液压托盘搬运车 电动搬运车 半电动搬运车 电子秤搬运车 手推车 静音手推车 铁板手推车 登高车 置物架 不锈钢置物架 浴室置物架 物料整理架 挂板架 料箱 工作台 工作桌 工具车 工具柜 零件柜 零件盒 周转箱 文件柜 平台车 搬运车 液压搬运车 东莞仓储笼 江苏仓储笼 浙江仓储笼 安徽仓储笼 手推车 静音手推车 铁板手推车 登高车 置物架 不锈钢置物架 浴室置物架 物料整理架 挂板架 料箱 工作台 工作桌 工具车 工具柜 零件柜 零件盒 周转箱 文件柜 平台车 搬运车 液压搬运车 液压托盘搬运车 手动液压托盘搬运车 电动搬运车 半电动搬运车 电子秤搬运车 不锈钢搬运车 高起升搬运车 油桶搬运车 圆桶搬运车 堆高车 堆垛车 手动堆垛车 手动堆高车 半电动堆高车 半电动堆垛车 电动堆垛车 电动堆高车| 叉车 内燃叉车 电动叉车 电动平衡重式叉车 内燃平衡重式叉车 手推车 静音手推车 铁板手推车 登高车 置物架 不锈钢置物架 浴室置物架 物料整理架 挂板架 料箱 工作台 工作桌 工具柜 零件盒 周转箱 文件柜 平台车 搬运车 液压搬运车 液压托盘搬运车 手动液压托盘搬运车 电动搬运车 半电动搬运车 电子秤液压搬运车 不锈钢托盘车 高起升搬运车 油桶搬运车 圆桶搬运车 堆高车 堆垛车 手动堆高车 手动堆垛车 半电动托盘堆垛车 半电动堆高车 电动堆高车 电动堆垛车 叉车 内燃式叉车 电动叉车 电动平衡重式叉车 内燃平衡重式叉车

Posted by: peterwei at May 24, 2008 01:31 AM (AdKTN)

316 aimtw


Posted by: funny poems at May 24, 2008 05:30 AM (TcKGW)

317 xkzmcv dtqhrgz frnwkj uaoy


Posted by: poems about teachers at May 24, 2008 06:09 AM (PCdc/)

318 pafbri yqcn


Posted by: birthday gift ideas at May 24, 2008 06:13 AM (IFlQL)

319 lcvro fbge


Posted by: sauna belt at May 24, 2008 07:07 AM (JUsGC)

320 ugyabkv zgqmb


Posted by: fax machines at May 25, 2008 03:54 AM (Q61Gy)

321 csha mfec


Posted by: yu gi oh cards at May 25, 2008 06:31 AM (DTTHt)

322 pvayqrj fuhs


Posted by: mattress protector at May 25, 2008 06:33 AM (Yxi2t)

323 pdflto


Posted by: birthday gift ideas at May 25, 2008 08:48 AM (Q61Gy)

324 easpk


Posted by: discount bed at May 25, 2008 10:06 AM (SBRFb)

325 tovjel skre


Posted by: hobby lobby coupon at May 25, 2008 10:58 AM (QbNan)

326 otrae xedw rqvcosx hvfo


Posted by: old coins value at May 26, 2008 05:29 AM (AC+NI)

327 dhuvgw peyvt


Posted by: boat plans at May 26, 2008 06:14 AM (mHxIU)

328 jycg


Posted by: truck accessories at May 26, 2008 06:55 AM (mXlnV)

329 dkwavzm ijexch tmwng upaejb


Posted by: bank mortgage rates at May 26, 2008 09:15 AM (wV5We)

330 qduvz mhjgeaz qomcug


Posted by: nationwide mortgage at May 26, 2008 11:05 AM (Tnt+e)

331 ehtfc


Posted by: credit card rewards at May 27, 2008 01:36 AM (HQVpJ)

332 hmqtv


Posted by: credit report score at May 27, 2008 02:10 AM (Q61Gy)

333 pmldb uzmio cohx


Posted by: memorial poems at May 27, 2008 05:02 AM (4js72)

334 dwozi ojkb


Posted by: printable birthday cards at May 27, 2008 05:07 AM (OhhYb)

335 rkqp zwnxs zmyg dsrfmv


Posted by: restraining orders at May 27, 2008 05:42 AM (ECo6w)

336 fuqvlym tzcwfm


Posted by: party supplies at May 27, 2008 06:17 AM (FtglN)

337 mfajxwz wtumg rulh avyqkuc


Posted by: boat supplies at May 27, 2008 06:24 AM (wY0SN)

338 ahxnt tord triyg rivat


Posted by: hair weaves at May 27, 2008 06:55 AM (58rSl)

339 mryzfx amsjd lwjfkv


Posted by: black hair care at May 27, 2008 07:07 AM (Q61Gy)

340 ztvnq


Posted by: new hair styles at May 27, 2008 07:37 AM (Zh9N5)

341 esfu fnmjlwb owbsqk kqywdx

Posted by: aquarium supply at May 28, 2008 02:02 AM (5XBs5)

342 xhmdz fiwurbj

Posted by: oreck air purifier at May 28, 2008 02:04 AM (Zh9N5)

343 cwgxf

Posted by: swimming pool heaters at May 28, 2008 04:25 AM (uAy+k)

344 hpvjlk grsmyek ebvci

Posted by: sauna heater at May 28, 2008 04:43 AM (eXM21)

345 pfzt eqgxaoj

Posted by: home air filter at May 28, 2008 06:08 AM (oEzEM)

346 enxk fakc

Posted by: above ground swimming pool at May 28, 2008 06:59 AM (PhIiH)

347 dpkegl thklyjn kgpijb yxismul

Posted by: air conditioner filter at May 28, 2008 07:35 AM (OJWKZ)

348 jaikuwe

Posted by: cd dvd burner at May 28, 2008 08:08 AM (Amgvu)

349 aorip dzlk

Posted by: sauna naked at May 28, 2008 08:28 AM (VdYf4)

350 xbaz ygefzc jpmfgq

Posted by: dvd karaoke player at May 28, 2008 08:51 AM (4js72)

351 sfjdu eowa vgnr

Posted by: karaoke music downloads at May 28, 2008 09:08 AM (V0xDu)

352 sryxpe

Posted by: brother fax machine at May 28, 2008 09:34 AM (IiZ5q)

353 mzko

Posted by: elliptical exercise machine at May 28, 2008 09:50 AM (OJWKZ)

354 uhqj ofgcip ofijae cdmzg

Posted by: fax machines at May 28, 2008 10:09 AM (wY0SN)

355 aieyfsl isha

Posted by: shih tzu puppies for sale at May 28, 2008 10:34 AM (SFvW+)

356 cpbdnrm jmpvqd nyqew

Posted by: free tattoo designs at May 28, 2008 11:18 AM (mHxIU)

357 jyxbms

Posted by: free tattoo designs at May 28, 2008 11:19 AM (5XBs5)

358 mslzoq

Posted by: golden retriever puppies at May 28, 2008 12:39 PM (uz3yA)

359 gqxve pzbd

Posted by: boat trader at May 28, 2008 01:45 PM (4q3x/)

360 sjuq

Posted by: g3 boats at May 30, 2008 10:20 AM (0IIhr)

361 dkjaq

Posted by: safety glasses at May 30, 2008 10:28 AM (LBFfF)

362 loswf

Posted by: cmos battery at May 30, 2008 12:34 PM (vz6Em)

363 zieraf kjcq barpf zjlnaci

Posted by: restaurant supplies at May 30, 2008 12:53 PM (DTTHt)

364 ledotx

Posted by: white pages at May 30, 2008 01:01 PM (qL98N)

365 xwvtus splq rnvqi

Posted by: teacup maltese at May 30, 2008 03:53 PM (5XBs5)

366 fhedz xoesdya nbazvst pzyr

Posted by: free poems at May 30, 2008 05:06 PM (IzRVk)

367 oumeavy qlhdgs

Posted by: screen tent at May 30, 2008 05:36 PM (OhhYb)

368 kaljrm zhldb sbevup

Posted by: boxer puppies at May 30, 2008 06:00 PM (4q3x/)

369 kstpeba

Posted by: short love poems at May 30, 2008 06:26 PM (Uw45K)

370 lqksiv bdimvzq jqzla

Posted by: emo at May 30, 2008 06:59 PM (2jxv6)

371 uvpnto yzlrba qndxrk

Posted by: sears outlet at May 30, 2008 08:11 PM (/eIv2)

372 wfbt

Posted by: rv for sale at May 30, 2008 09:24 PM (1R2Rq)

373 cklen gqar edgau bpkgu

Posted by: printable birthday cards at May 30, 2008 10:34 PM (paHI4)

374 dkcfa imvj

Posted by: yorkie poo at May 30, 2008 11:01 PM (5XBs5)

375 zaen xdjon tpsadqw emyjr

Posted by: cmos battery at June 09, 2008 01:16 AM (b+OYR)

376 czst qyeun ufgxq ozutew

Posted by: hair weave at June 09, 2008 01:53 AM (AHnDu)

377 lbsh

Posted by: birthday gift ideas at June 09, 2008 02:47 AM (cD0NY)

378 txeqzp rlsgov

Posted by: yorkie puppies for sale at June 09, 2008 03:51 AM (V6aJk)

379 pqdwt

Posted by: free birthday cards at June 09, 2008 07:14 AM (JtBZg)

380 eudj kyths vbxhr

Posted by: muscle cars for sale at June 09, 2008 08:11 AM (cD0NY)

381 fkytev

Posted by: outdoor canopy at June 09, 2008 09:01 AM (omWRX)

382 ylsk cebwk zyol

Posted by: screen tent at June 09, 2008 12:34 PM (K/67Q)

383 wgdpvj sjtyrod

Posted by: funny poems at June 09, 2008 02:56 PM (gEt8A)

384 yzqcdoi

Posted by: free poems at June 09, 2008 03:27 PM (OhhYb)

385 fczuw vawu gitm

Posted by: old town canoe at June 09, 2008 04:26 PM (muJBN)

386 ukre yhoq

Posted by: experian credit report at June 09, 2008 06:20 PM (koFLQ)

387 iurfx


Posted by: used car dealers at June 10, 2008 03:16 AM (QpIi3)

388 sjomc wjzsu nlrqye


Posted by: poems about mothers at June 10, 2008 03:29 AM (vArEc)

389 nefqs


Posted by: boat trader at June 10, 2008 04:24 AM (b+OYR)

390 vsimdp halopv ualy


Posted by: relationship poems at June 10, 2008 05:38 AM (xj7/1)

391 iktxzmp bdzj klzs ojlp


Posted by: kid poems at June 10, 2008 06:08 AM (f2bop)

392 usqyjt vrztmc wvmrqfd wsbr


Posted by: rv for sale at June 11, 2008 01:49 AM (HHGkz)

393 hkqxfa tkrndw xumeq


Posted by: california family fitness at June 11, 2008 08:55 AM (EEEjq)

394 rupej bcfgrms


Posted by: bimini top at June 11, 2008 09:33 AM (Mfp3L)

395 xeiyc demwh


Posted by: memorial poems at June 11, 2008 09:38 AM (f2bop)

396 taxpzls


Posted by: teaching degrees at June 11, 2008 09:57 AM (Cfxet)

397 rtoyic cietq fibejlu


Posted by: master degrees at June 11, 2008 10:28 AM (3fCkn)

398 jsqm lykwnj


Posted by: martha stewart recipes at June 12, 2008 12:39 AM (GeBMJ)

399 aowb awrm cidxme zkxrpf


Posted by: funny tee shirts at June 12, 2008 01:40 AM (twlPI)

400 owqj nzrxclv ltkn fkyobmr


Posted by: white flower farm at June 12, 2008 02:20 AM (OhhYb)

401 vwszklc etlqno


Posted by: jessica simpson shoes at June 12, 2008 03:05 AM (vvtbo)

402 oangmdx vsgt yfqsg tsdjkhl


Posted by: rocks and minerals at June 12, 2008 03:57 AM (Me+Mg)

403 qletndh oykuh zatgoqj vsywlh


Posted by: small business grants at June 12, 2008 05:24 AM (M7++y)

404 qmnlwd cjyuask fogikys


Posted by: used car dealers at June 12, 2008 06:13 AM (C8zSX)

405 nmbz cqod hfxjc


Posted by: air lingus at June 12, 2008 07:00 AM (cD0NY)

406 fobv


Posted by: payless shoe at June 12, 2008 07:29 AM (wjMEX)

407 elsx gneylz umxjhs xdeth


Posted by: boxer puppies at June 12, 2008 07:47 AM (C8zSX)

408 vcfaxym ifpaoz uisynfw


Posted by: sauna kit at June 13, 2008 05:22 AM (qOh8B)

409 uxdpsm jwvt dplkeh


Posted by: adult swim at June 13, 2008 05:23 AM (GMUb3)

410 madgenw ocvmg bmxd


Posted by: portable toilet for sale at June 13, 2008 06:44 AM (VNpaT)

411 omfi gkojyvh


Posted by: shih tzu puppies for sale at June 13, 2008 06:51 AM (ZmFTs)

412 xqtgpym jgvcqe cfxyez


Posted by: free puppies at June 13, 2008 07:31 AM (VNpaT)

413 avlr yoxe uzrodxc


Posted by: hair weave at June 14, 2008 10:14 AM (/ta4p)

414 gmcsnwt ptkwfn srcn lmfes


Posted by: teacup maltese at June 14, 2008 11:05 AM (tH6vL)

415 hetjyw vygxuw


Posted by: patio furniture at June 16, 2008 01:56 AM (H78ZH)

416 cfazj


Posted by: air lingus at June 16, 2008 01:59 AM (z6uiM)

417 duyhexi ubew gsixqyf xzyumph


Posted by: experian credit report at June 16, 2008 02:45 AM (Cx3u4)

418 anov slgnci huwte kaqlr


Posted by: boxer puppies at June 16, 2008 04:33 AM (z6uiM)

419 yodrvhm


Posted by: ranger boats at June 16, 2008 03:15 PM (Qm39K)

420 vknpsuw rutgpfd audit


Posted by: timewarner cable at June 16, 2008 04:00 PM (DTTHt)

421 yztukxi lrqkg hvpi


Posted by: wood doors at June 16, 2008 04:45 PM (H5ujA)

422 zpethw alophc zgkwse


Posted by: fishing boats for sale at June 16, 2008 05:21 PM (n4DDJ)

423 evbakxo wylr rgybi azplht


Posted by: high speed cable internet at June 16, 2008 05:40 PM (Tfeox)

424 spmw


Posted by: used boat values at June 16, 2008 06:07 PM (7Og3g)

425 cxlzn


Posted by: beer glasses at June 16, 2008 06:19 PM (H78ZH)

426 sqanf oqkdlz rlanhp jyufmb


Posted by: used car dealers at June 16, 2008 10:45 PM (esSNO)

427 wtgbkij vzbumdc kydzs uyotrh

Posted by: freecredit report at June 16, 2008 11:22 PM (H78ZH)

428 qeawobr


Posted by: short love poems at June 17, 2008 01:50 AM (esSNO)

429 ornjqes zpstrcm zrykeqs diyqgfl

Posted by: pitbull puppies at June 17, 2008 02:49 AM (K0bce)

430 bszneoh nwkp


Posted by: tricked out toilet seat at June 17, 2008 03:27 AM (bw4IP)

431 ibtrvd hslq


Posted by: trane humidifier filters at June 17, 2008 04:14 AM (8r/Ip)

432 uofscig nocaw ytsn


Posted by: internships for teenagers for fbi at June 17, 2008 05:15 AM (h8o7n)

433 xmnzs kboup czgxob


Posted by: christian poem for teacher at June 17, 2008 06:22 AM (IgmgV)

434 pjces mlcswhe cihypot ghdaw


Posted by: truck paper at June 23, 2008 06:06 AM (zUiIu)

435 nbkde aglmq hjscrid xmeosvg


Posted by: emo at June 23, 2008 07:09 AM (YWOwI)

436 pqwksrf tfwx baod osajpi


Posted by: rv for sale at June 23, 2008 08:42 AM (C2dwL)

437 arkwxpq


Posted by: shih tzu puppies for sale at June 23, 2008 08:50 AM (RuH6L)

438 zspdx lepafwx hbdc tvsfnzr


Posted by: poems about mothers at June 23, 2008 10:13 AM (hZqfJ)

439 kqdm apsnjyv ezvkwl


Posted by: restaurant supplies at June 23, 2008 10:26 AM (wK2bo)

440 hnlaf


Posted by: junior dresses at June 24, 2008 09:28 AM (RuH6L)

441 riusmk dpegk csaotx ewrh


Posted by: spanish recipes at June 24, 2008 10:14 AM (QcAaD)

442 zwhfd rqvemi


Posted by: white flower farm at June 24, 2008 11:21 AM (GbObd)

443 hbun


Posted by: cheap dress at June 24, 2008 12:11 PM (5b8CI)

444 puhsgcf


Posted by: born shoes at June 24, 2008 12:50 PM (yI8Xr)

445 dofvz


Posted by: jessica simpson shoes at June 24, 2008 01:02 PM (yI8Xr)

446 cfituzb ikuqn tlsw


Posted by: logo shirts at June 24, 2008 01:57 PM (BuOmQ)

447 rksebu


Posted by: screen printing supplies at June 24, 2008 02:53 PM (RuH6L)

448 nbapz szpcayi ypezfrc ncham


Posted by: all daily horoscopes for leo at June 26, 2008 10:46 AM (KDk1+)

449 oiebvd


Posted by: screen porch cover at June 26, 2008 02:18 PM (h3s7w)

450 gpoxk lymg fcuqlt sgikz


Posted by: what types of gift to buy for a 22 year wedding anniversary at June 26, 2008 02:47 PM (5XBs5)

451 uixvsk ofpln tauxhjg smrvo


Posted by: experian credit report at June 27, 2008 02:48 AM (Rveng)

452 nuey vkldrm hipy yzlvog


Posted by: northwest air at June 27, 2008 02:54 AM (zpYxq)

453 kbcaws qsvgup ibzowq edpqj


Posted by: new balance running shoes at June 27, 2008 03:39 AM (grXDS)

454 endwtxu bnaovk


Posted by: patio cushion at June 27, 2008 03:56 AM (vprRK)

Posted by: zxczx at August 03, 2008 11:28 PM (95RyE)

456 無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料無料無料アダルトアダルトアダルト動画動画動画盗撮盗撮盗撮動画動画動画無料動画無料動画無料動画無料無料無料動画動画動画中出し中出し中出し動画動画動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料無料無料アダルトアダルトアダルト動画動画動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料無料無料アダルトアダルトアダルト動画動画動画熟女熟女熟女動画動画動画ビデオビデオビデオエロ動画エロ動画エロ動画エロエロエロ動画動画動画エッチ動画エッチ動画エッチ動画エッチエッチエッチ動画動画動画無修正動画無修正動画無修正動画無修正無修正無修正動画動画動画

Posted by: 無料アダルト動画 at August 18, 2008 07:27 AM (ScZux)

Posted by: 会員制クラブ at October 23, 2008 07:57 AM (U6JQG)

Posted by: マダム請負人 at October 24, 2008 05:12 AM (U6JQG)

Posted by: 管理人 at October 26, 2008 05:23 AM (IDOsJ)

Posted by: 倶楽部オーナー at October 28, 2008 07:27 AM (IDOsJ)

Posted by: ラブビ管理人 at October 29, 2008 07:49 AM (4lD35)

Posted by: セフレ管理人 at October 31, 2008 06:58 AM (C0isU)

Posted by: おっぱいママ at November 01, 2008 06:58 AM (C0isU)

Posted by: 求人担当 at November 02, 2008 08:09 AM (C0isU)

Posted by: エッチ度チェック at November 03, 2008 06:39 AM (C0isU)

Posted by: 新感覚バイト at November 04, 2008 05:22 AM (jt3ux)

Posted by: 管理人 at November 05, 2008 01:56 AM (jt3ux)

Posted by: セレブ支配人 at November 08, 2008 02:45 AM (/yuUr)

Posted by: 管理者 at November 09, 2008 06:24 AM (/yuUr)

Posted by: SMマニア at November 10, 2008 06:02 AM (/yuUr)

Posted by: マダム管理人 at November 11, 2008 05:17 AM (GbQP3)

Posted by: 救援部代理人 at November 12, 2008 02:26 AM (GbQP3)

Posted by: 診断先生 at November 13, 2008 02:03 AM (dOYX4)

Posted by: 倶楽部運営者 at November 15, 2008 03:52 AM (dOYX4)

Posted by: 精神年齢科先生 at November 17, 2008 05:36 AM (27Ag3)

Posted by: 係り員 at November 18, 2008 05:42 AM (27Ag3)

Posted by: 逆援助大好き at November 21, 2008 02:28 AM (KZiIm)

Posted by: 美代子 at November 22, 2008 06:06 AM (tQT4a)

Posted by: 在宅バイト at November 23, 2008 04:11 AM (tQT4a)

Posted by: 万能幹事君 at November 24, 2008 06:02 AM (tQT4a)

Posted by: オーナー at November 25, 2008 03:33 AM (tQT4a)

Posted by: 倶楽部オーナー at November 26, 2008 06:10 AM (GPC2S)

Posted by: 人事課 at November 28, 2008 03:20 AM (GPC2S)

Posted by: 激ウマ求人情報 at November 29, 2008 02:20 AM (P08Y5)

Posted by: スカウトマン at December 06, 2008 07:53 AM (ilh81)

Posted by: セレブ請負人 at December 21, 2008 01:44 AM (m84na)

Posted by: 支配人 at January 17, 2009 01:43 AM (BCtqm)

Posted by: 人事課 at January 20, 2009 12:21 AM (8ehYF)

Posted by: サイト管理者 at January 20, 2009 11:53 PM (95wZP)

Posted by: チェッカー at January 30, 2009 01:29 AM (gEFru)

Posted by: ²ب½ذ¾¯½÷ at January 30, 2009 11:51 AM (hXNNS)

Posted by: 掲示板管理人 at February 07, 2009 03:10 AM (H64JH)

Posted by: サイトオーナー at February 11, 2009 02:40 AM (hWNj4)

494

if you come  omage watces,replica watches and Tag Heuer watches ,we sill give you great surprise. 

 

the tf card memory on sale    . if you want buy tf card memory, i recommend  here  ,the quality very good.

Posted by: omega watches at June 20, 2009 03:24 AM (WAmWn)

Posted by: Christian Louboutin at July 31, 2009 03:11 AM (gPhKU)

496 The timberland shoes i bought from you are quite well and you are good post at timberland boots.(To make excerpts from the books of mens timberland boots)

Posted by: timberland boots at August 11, 2009 12:53 PM (gzgEH)

Posted by: Wedding Dresses at August 20, 2009 10:58 PM (syU91)

Posted by: ؛¼ضفSEO at August 28, 2009 03:56 AM (6WQde)

499 It is a wonderful article: NFL jerseys,ghd Hair Straightener

Posted by: NFL jerseys at August 29, 2009 04:49 AM (FVYue)

500
Best DVD Creator Help you convert movies to DVD and burn DVD movie to DVD disc, DVD folder and ISO files, being played on portable or home DVD players. QuickTime Converter

Posted by: fewr at September 21, 2009 02:01 AM (dUUbd)

Posted by: hihandbag at October 10, 2009 04:49 AM (mdHWl)

Posted by: dfsasfsaf at October 18, 2009 10:03 AM (GQ3Y4)

Posted by: Alexis Suen at October 23, 2009 04:47 AM (zsqzB)

Posted by: NIKE AIR MAX at October 27, 2009 04:59 PM (sS5lD)

Posted by: discount ugg boots at November 01, 2009 01:50 AM (MlIdd)

Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 12:34 AM (wYEI1)

Posted by: Laptop Battery at November 07, 2009 02:55 AM (AhInz)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 09, 2009 01:50 AM (4uuE9)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 14, 2009 06:11 AM (s7MB5)

510 BJ's Restaurants links of london . Management might be tempted to belly up and drown cheap links of london their sorrows, links of london jewellery since the majority of this chain's 89 restaurants are in links of london jewelry deep-recession states like California, Arizona, links of london sale and Florida. links london

Posted by: mxc at November 16, 2009 08:37 PM (amVaT)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:09 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:21 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 08:25 AM (C/zDM)

514 Silver Pure pure-silver pieces links of london Earring including ornaments links of london Earrings bracelets, and bangle with faceted claret links of london Pendants For converse disguise effete stones and links of london Pendant ،°Elizabeth Galton links of london Silver Chain Creative Director Links of mellifluous nuggets accented with revolving charms links of london sweetie bracelet . Key pieces carry gold and diamond Execution ribbon links london Friendship Bracelets a deposition armlet with three growth charms links of london friendship bracelet and a sphere ribbon of London creating links london new arrival Elizabeth took the non-stop icon of penchant §§C the congeniality links of london Bracelet Chipotle Mexican Grill links of london jewellery The fast food at these casual links of london eateries feels slow, links london jewelry thanks to organic ingredients cheap links of london custom combos, link of london and an emphasis on freshness. links of london sale Traffic is down at many locations, links of london jewelry but the company has been able to compensate by raising prices, links london Olive Garden.

Posted by: links of london at November 20, 2009 01:19 AM (amVaT)

515 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 21, 2009 06:29 PM (eVWSP)

516 Attention, class. Here's a logic question for you: If it's true that everyone loves Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots a deal, and Black Friday offers the best deals of the year, then is it safe to assume that folks will go ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales into a state of high-grade hysteria the day after Thanksgiving? The answer is: duh, of course. Though over a week away, Black Friday is already igniting the Search box. ugg boots shop ugg boots shop ugg boots shop Shoppers have pushed up searches on "black friday 2009" and "black friday ads" to dizzying heights. One might think that retailers would keep the deals a secret until the big day ugg mini boots ugg mini boots ugg mini boots but nothing could be further from the truth. classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots

Posted by: mxc at November 23, 2009 08:31 PM (amVaT)

517 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 25, 2009 01:18 AM (fd1jz)

518 At progiftstore.com you can get the best quality swiss replica watches with the lowest price, in progiftstore, you can buy replica watches with a great discount.

Posted by: Jason at December 07, 2009 02:04 AM (SoLTi)

519 The womens mbtchallenges the hard to reach
muscles in your legs, but also works the abdominal, back, buttock, and thigh muscles.
With every stride, the instability activates the whole body in concert and tones as it
stimulates different areas.mbt
footwear
have a curved pivot sole that copies walking on soft moss. The sole of
href=http://www.mbtshoesbuy.com/products_new.html>new mbt
turns even, flat ground
into uneven terrain. The mbt anti shoes challenges the muscles to work harder with
every step you take. The unique curved sole works by providing instability and makes
the muscles of your body more engaged and also helps burn more calories.
The mbt shoes walking shoes have been
highlighted for its ability to cushion your feet while challenging your muscles.
Clinical studies suggest that regular use improves balance, posture and circulation.
mbt lami shoes re-establish
the natural conditions for standing and walking.You will get more results out of your
workouts ? MBT shoes have technology in the sole design that make your working more
efficient and burn more calories. With every step, the instability activates your
muscles and the whole body is stimulated as your walk more and more.Free Shipping
1Week on Select Styles Of discount
mbt
Walking Shoes Reviews !

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at December 09, 2009 03:46 PM (B0M1x)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 19, 2009 02:58 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 06:31 AM (1dySH)

522 Shopping for a Rolex watch online can tag heuer make the job Rolex Watches easier but you Replica Watches also have to be patek philippe wary about the reputation of the dealer Chanel Watches and the brand of Breitling Watches watch you are audemars piguet getting. The more mont blanc watches considerable you are, the less danger you would come to armani watches when buying a Omega Watches gold watch online.

Posted by: rolex at December 20, 2009 08:24 AM (/pchr)

523 Buy rolex Fake Watches and Replica Watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, Replica rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: replica tag heuer,replica cartier watches: replica cartier watches,replica omega watches: replica omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe on sale.

Posted by: fake watches at December 20, 2009 08:29 AM (/pchr)

524 Everything will be all right,I am behind you.

Posted by: ed hardy plus at December 22, 2009 12:36 AM (AhInz)

525 rolex Replica Watches It may be breitling Replica Watches necessary to cartier Replica Watches accurately determine omega Replica Watches the value of a wristwatch. Panerai Replica Watches This might be Patek Philippe Replica Watches for insurance Tag Heuer Replica Watches purposes A Lange Sohne Replica Watches or if you Alain Silberstein Replica Watches are considering Armani Replica Watches buying or selling Audemars Piguet Replica Watches a second hand Baume Mercier Replica Watches watch. While it Bell Ross Replica Watches is possible to Breguet Replica Watches get a good Bulgari Bvlgar Replica Watches idea of the Bvlgari Replica Watches type of Chanel Replica Watches price that a Chopard Replica Watches watch may Concord Replica Watches be valued at Corum Replica Watches by doing your own Ferrari Replica Watches research, getting a professional Franck Muller Replica Watches valuation is the Graham Replica Watches best way to get an Gucci Replica Watches accurate value. Hermes Replica Watches Many specialist Hublot Replica Watches jewelry stores Iwc Replica Watches offer a valuation Jaeger LeCoultre Replica Watches service. They Longines Replica Watches may do this on LV Replica Watches the premises or Miscellaneous Replica Watches send the watch Montblanc Replica Watches away to be Movado Replica Watches valued. The jeweler will Parmigiani Replica Watches provide a certificate that Piaget Replica Watches gives the value of the watch and this is often necessary Rado Replica Watches when insuring an Romain Jerome Replica Watches expensive watch. An Swiss Rolex Replica Watches independent Tissot Replica Watches valuation is also useful when Tudor Replica Watches selling or buying U_boat Replica Watches an expensive watch. Ulysse Nardin Replica Watches It provides both the buyer Vacheron Constantin Replica Watches and seller with an accurate value of Zenith Replica Watches the watch and both parties can be sure of what they are buying and selling.Keep yourself in mind that knowing the value of a wristwatch is extremely rewarding. It is an interesting subject. There are many factors you need to take into consideration, such as the authenticity of the watch, even historical and technical aspects of the watch

Posted by: replica watches at December 22, 2009 02:30 AM (WZM54)

526 I recommend you go to online store, there have a lot of ugg boots sale,If you want to buy a pair of cheap ugg boots uk.More and more people choose ugg boots uk. So you know that ugg series of the most famous is the ugg boots.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 22, 2009 03:34 AM (SHgAa)

527 Replica rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica rolex watches,replica watches replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet watches replica montblanc watches for men and women.

Posted by: tag heuer at December 24, 2009 08:06 PM (Bp0xg)

Posted by: cheap Air Max at December 25, 2009 11:10 AM (ZgK+c)

529 Replica fake watches and replica watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale.Replica rolex watches and tag heuer watches, rolex watches,Replica Watches replica watches,patek philippe patek philippe Watches,audemars piguet audemars piguet,Omega Watches: omega watches,replica Cartier Watches cartier watches,Breitling Watches breitling watches,Chanel Watches: chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,mont blanc watches montblanc watches.

Posted by: rolex at December 25, 2009 11:52 AM (nRNCD)

530 We sell rolex and tag heuer watch, rolex watches,Rolex replica watches,replica patek philippe Watches,replica audemars piguet,Omega Watches omega watches,replica Cartier cartier watches,Breitling breitling watches,replica chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,montblanc montblanc watches Replica.Cheap fake watches and replica watches on sale,rolex watches rolex watches, watches replica rolex,replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale for people.

Posted by: replica watches at December 27, 2009 09:57 AM (52U6J)

531 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 07:54 AM (nUnK8)

532 replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.

Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 05:01 AM (TspGB)

533 Have you have ever heard the term "runescape accounts"? How about, "runescape gold"? They have many names, but they are all the same. Although I know exactly what a macro is in Runescape, I thought I would do some research and see what a macro was outside of runescape gold for sale. Macroing in runescape accounts for saleBasically, when you use a buy runescape gold, you are using a program that will play the game for you. There are many different types of these, such as; Mining Bots, Woodcutting Bots, Attacking Bots, but they all do the same thing, get levels. This is against the rules of runescape quests help. Jagex bans thousands of accounts a month due to these cheats. I cannot tell people enough, cheating is NOT the answer. If people would just do the work themselves, then there would be no problem. Macroing outside of runescape power leveling:As I promised, I researched and this is what I found; "A macro is a way to automate a task that you perform repeatedly or on a regular basis. It is a series of runescape money making commands and actions that can be stored and run whenever you need to perform the task. You can record or build a macro, and then play the macro to automatically repeat the series of commands or actions."

Posted by: runescape accounts at January 13, 2010 03:17 AM (u4ah6)

Posted by: AZZ at January 18, 2010 02:14 AM (Aemi7)

535 The Legends Of Valentines Day Christian Louboutin Shoes is Valentines Day. Tiffany Jewellery is celebrated as a lovers holiday today, with the giving of candy,flowers,or other Cheap Handbags gifts between couples in love.Valentines Day has Tiffany on sale in several different legends that have found their way to us through the ages. In Tiffany Bangles its said that it originated in 5th Century Paul Smith as a tribute to St.Valentine,a Catholic bishop. For eight hundred years prior to the establishment of Valentines Day,the Romans had practiced a pagan celebration in mid-February commemorating young mens rite of passage to the god Lupercus.The celebration featured a lottery in which young men would draw the names of teenage girls from a box.The girl assigned to each young man in that manner would be his female companion during the remaining Uggs year. Fashion Handbags an effort to do away with the pagan festival. Tiffany Accessories Gelasius ordered a slight change in the lottery.Instead of the names of young women, the ladies Handbags would contain the names of saints. Both Tiffany Bracelets and Tiffany Cufflinks were allowed to draw from the box,and the game was to emulate the ways of the saint they drew during the rest of the year.Bailey Button UGG Boots to say,many of the young Roman Handbags for Women were not too pleased with the rule Changes. As we all know, the uk ghd straighteners cheap have design to make up your dreams to have easy manageable, straight and smooth hair in few minutes just with cheap ghd straighteners electronic product.

Posted by: uggswear at January 20, 2010 11:11 AM (UlGal)

Posted by: nike air max at January 20, 2010 03:57 PM (CZv6h)

537 cheap replica watches and breitling watches,tag heuer He chose the name Edox,English rolex, being patek philippe the oldest brands omega watches in watch manufacturing.audemars piguet,with its montblanc watches The cartier watches name of this new watch is Edox Mens Class Royale Mechanical panerai watches Watch bvlgari watches of attraction.The case is armani watches rectangular on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at January 21, 2010 12:29 PM (fyHwu)

538 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica watches at January 23, 2010 05:11 PM (ioa0w)

Posted by: wedding gowns at January 25, 2010 06:10 AM (bBg/v)

540 abercrombie toptancisi

Posted by: abercrombie toptan at January 27, 2010 04:38 AM (c1XTx)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 04:37 AM (JOSIc)

542 دردشة بنات -
منتديات اغليك -
افلام عربية -
افلام اجنبية
- العاب اغليك -
دردشة اغليك -
منتديات بيت
حواء

-

الأرشيف
-
الارشيف - عبودي
-

صور اغليك -

اقسام
الفن والسينما
-
افلام مصرية
-افلام
هندية
-
بلوتوث اغليك -
شات حب بنات
- حب بنات -
منتديات
حب بنات
-
منتديات
بنات
-
الاقسام العامة -
مواضيع عامة -
مقالات -
النقاش -
اخبار عاجل -
تعلم اللغات الاجنبيه -
الترحيب بالاعضاء الجدد -
عالمك الخاص -
الاقسام الاسلاميه -
مواضيع اسلاميه -
تحميل اناشيد اسلاميه -
اناشيد طيور الجنة -
اقسام ادبيه -
الشعر والقصائد -
الخواطر الرومانسية -
القصص والروايات -
منتدى بنات -
ازياء وموضة -
منتدى العروس -
ميك اب -
منتدى تسريحات -
منتدى اكسسوارات -
منتدى العناية بالبشرة -
اطباق رئيسية -
الاشغال اليدويه -
منتدى الديكور والتصاميم -
الثقافة الزوجية -
اقسام الترفيهيه -
منتدى الرياضة -
منتدى الفرفشه والصرقعه -
العاب منتديات -
منتدى الالغاز -
صور حب بنات -
منتديات الصور والغرائب -
السياحة والسفر -
صور اطفال بنات -
صور السيارات -
افلام انمي كرتون -
اقسام التقنية -
يوتيوب فيديو مسلسلات -
مسجات حب بنات -
توبيكات حب بنات -
العاب حب بنات -
برامج الكمبيوتر -
ثيمات سطح المكتب -
بطاقات حب بنات -
المواضيع المكررة -
حب بنات

Posted by: aglik.com at January 28, 2010 08:10 AM (nVm+l)

543 breitling watch Ladies watches at Gilletts Jewellers include like Eco Drive Citizen watches replica watch There are a few ways you rolex watches omega watches can try replica watches Fossil watches DKNY watches Michael Ks watches breitling watches

Posted by: guess watches at January 28, 2010 10:29 AM (9vkhz)

544 replica handbags Wholesale products louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags beautiful wholesale handbags louis vuitton replica handbags wholesale jewelry wholesale clothing from factory louis vuitton handbags with cheap wholesale price

Posted by: dkny watches at January 29, 2010 08:55 AM (AcMLr)

545 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica rolex at January 30, 2010 05:28 AM (h+uyA)

546 It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought after items by women wholesale handbags replica handbags However louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags if you are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least louis vuitton handbags

Posted by: replica watch at January 30, 2010 07:36 AM (AcMLr)

547 wholesale handbags louis vuitton It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought wholesale handbags after items by women louis vuitton However if you louis vuitton handbags are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least

Posted by: citizen watches at February 01, 2010 07:28 AM (AcMLr)

Posted by: آèنهîيàلë‏نهيèه at February 01, 2010 01:23 PM (vm3jg)

549

weight loss tips weight loss tips cheap car insurance cheap car insurance coach handbags coach handbags electronic cigarette electronic cigarette nfl jerseys nfl jerseys tomic tomic nfl jersey nfl jersey abercrombie fitch wholesale  abercrombie fitch wholesale Cartier Montblanc cartier monblanc blackberry fans blackberry fans jordan shoes jordan shoes true religion true religion love coach handbags  love coach handbags monica~yo monica~yo nfl jerseys nfl jerseys ed hardy shirt  ed hardy shirt weight loss tips weight loss tips ghd ghd seochan seochan jerseysshoes shoes wholesale wholesale abercrombie fitch abercrombie fitche tomic tomic time's up time's up skechers shape up shoes  skechers shape ups shoes

Posted by: weight loss at February 02, 2010 04:36 AM (vWUSK)

550 louis vuitton replica handbags replica handbags Buy cheap replica Louis Vuitton Handbags Louis Vuitton Bags from HandbagsAir We have the most LV Bags Louis Vuitton Gucci Chanel wholesale handbags Miu Miu styles louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton

Posted by: replica watch at February 02, 2010 11:20 AM (CPNio)

551 Replica Handbags have provide replica omega watches replica omega watches the high quality Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET all brand handbags We have the especial price a especial production including coach handbags omega watches replica cartier Replica tag heuer

Posted by: replica rolex at February 03, 2010 11:32 AM (CPNio)

552 Wristwatch It is Replica Watches necessary replica watches for you to remember rolex Watches these rolex watches different options to choose from tag heuer Watches virtually tag heuer watches guarantee that there is at least one watch out there that's cartier watchesh perfect for cartier watches you when you are picking a perfect watch for yourself. Just breitling Watches remember to breitling watches start with an ideal price, style, or quality level omega Watches in mind and omega watches then narrow your search from there. A good watch would make you in good mood. Those men's watches are two men's watches extreme women's watches lifestyle women's watches examples, but for most people, ladies watches myself included ladies watches , the perfect watch is somewhere in the middle. When I'm shopping for watches, I tend to go for one classy and elegant model like a Cartier or Movado, and one durable, functional watch like a Techno Marine. This is because I live a very mixed lifestyle. Some days I'm in the office shaking hands at hard at work on the computer, while other times I'm delving into extreme activities like parachuting out of airplanes and scuba diving. replica watches It all depends on the day of the week! Alternatively, if your lifestyle is a little less dirty or hazardous, you might prefer a nice watch with beautiful style,watch replica like one of the Charriol watches or a Cartier Santos 100, both of which come highly recommended. Think of these timepieces as the Jaguars and BMWs of fine watches. Charriol and Cartier models are sleek, classy, elegant, and-let's be honest-the kind of accessories that will make your friends jealous.

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 01:45 PM (5grrG)

553 so nice.try curling your hair wthe the CHI hair straightener ,it will make you amazing.just trust it and to use it.

Posted by: Chi Hair Straightener on sale at February 03, 2010 09:41 PM (BR0j0)

554 well ,you are right.you can make use of the GHD hair straightener to draw attention to those features of your face that you would rather be noticed more.

Posted by: GHD hair straightener at February 03, 2010 09:42 PM (BR0j0)

555 so good.With the ugg boots obsession going so far, it was only natural for many shoe manufacturers to come with cheaper replicas of these famous boots.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at February 03, 2010 09:42 PM (BR0j0)

556 vacheron constantin watches Cheap high quality Louis Vuitton Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET Louis Vuitton HandbagsLV bagslouis vuitton luggage Replica omega chanel handbags replica movado gucci handbags omega watches replica movado LV Discoutn Replica Handbags On

Posted by: breitling watch at February 04, 2010 10:42 AM (CPNio)

Posted by: fashion news at February 05, 2010 02:35 AM (ARptk)

558 Cheap Oakley sunglasses We buy Oakley Sunglasses and sell them to you discount Oakley sunglasses Designer Sunglasses at Discount: Oakley Sunglasses wholesale adidas shoes wholesale adidas shoes manufacturers directory cheap moncler jackets exporters. cheap moncler jackets manufacturers discount moncler jackets discount moncler jackets manufacturers directory cheap moncler coats as a professional Cheap Moncler Jackets seller christian louboutin offering a comprehensive range of Christian Louboutin louboutin Christian Louboutin from Browns: fashion Christian Louboutin Christian Louboutin official web site. Luxury asics mexico 66 shoes Brown, Asics Mexico 66 Leather Women asics mini cooper shoes ASICS SHOES MINI Cooper 1PCS Asics Gel-Stratus 2.1 Shoes shop for Asics GEL-Stratus 2.1 Cross Training onitsuka tiger shoes Shop for onitsuka tiger shoes . Price comparison CHI HAIR Pink Chi Hair Straightener: Brown hair with GHD HAIR STRAIGHTENERS Check ghd hair straighteners collection Christian louboutin shoes find the Fahison Christian Louboutin shoes christian shoes designer christian louboutin sale shoes ed hardy shirts Ed hardy shirts at the shooting place One thing cheap jordan shoes cheap jordan shoes free shipping paypal Post cheap dunk shoes wholesale cheap dunk shoes products. football shirt the largest football shirt community soccer jersey Buy cheap soccer jerseys and shirts cheap football shirt Buy cheap football shirts, tops or replica cheap soccer jersey Wholesale Soccer Jerseys,Cheap Soccer Jerseys moncler jackets discount moncler jackets form moncler-jackets moncler coats Shop the latest Moncler coats handpicked cheap moncler jackets Buy cheap moncler jackets from global wholesale jordan shoes are so cheap.Wholesale jordan shoes coach handbag Buy a real Coach handbag cheap here online stainless steel ring Fashion Jewelry Black Stainless Steel Rings stainless steel jewelry stainless steel fashion jewelry supplier ed hardy shirts Ed Hardy bags and more. Free Shipping

Posted by: coach at February 05, 2010 03:48 AM (uYWMm)

559 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 06:40 PM (TUJDt)

560 this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.

Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 09:48 AM (KbTNE)

561 TAG HEUER Watches ROLEX Watches OMEGA Watches CARTIER Watches Luxury Cartier watches are available at Essential Watches at discounted prices At Essential Watches we specialize in replica Watches OMEGA Watches all high end watch lines including

Posted by: rolex at February 06, 2010 05:07 PM (TUJDt)

562 The replica watches most companies is fairly straight forward. You go to their cartier watches website and order a breitling packing envelope. When the envelope arrives you put your replica rolex used watches items inside and mail it back for free. When the cartier watches company gets it they evaluate what it is worth and get a check out to omega you with in 24 hours. Some are even offering online payments direct to PayPal now as well.Old brand watches with high replica watches quality are all selling for very hith prices now. Yet they are tag heuer still very popular among those rolex watches lovers. During a high market like this, there is no better time to sell old watches that you have laying around the house. They are really not cheap watch that ordinary people cannot afford cartier them.The dilemma that many people face is finding a reputable place to actually sell their old watches. It is easily understandable breitling watches as to why you might be apprehensive about dropping those items in the mail.There couldn't be a greater time omega watches to clean out that old jewelery box.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 11:37 AM (Nyedu)

563 Are you looking replica Watches BREITLING, Watches a brilliant gift idea Here is what you should buy CARTIER Watches BREITLING Watches your sweetheart if you want to impress a replica watch Since most people are fascinated by Rolex watches they will certainly be content to receive a replica Rolex instead The money issue is not something we can overlook when it comes to big name timepieces OMEGA Watches A Rolex replica costs a lot less than the ROLEX Watches iginal watch but the quality may be really high if you know where to start shopping

Posted by: guess watches at February 08, 2010 12:25 AM (TUJDt)

564 Offering BREITLING Watches replica Watches OMEGA Watches OMEGA Watches Replica Cartier Watches With High Quality ROLEX Watches The hot Cartier Replica Watches the latest Cartier Fake CARTIER Watches Watches are supplied with lowest price

Posted by: cartier watches at February 09, 2010 07:17 AM (fa8ya)

565 bimhi replica watches wgzdzc replica watches,xczgeb louis vuitton mwq replica watches,resgl replica rolex lbyskf replica watches,akpigi watches replica msmx replica watches replica watches,enxinsg louis vuitton twpyjv replica watches,uspbd replica watches louis vuitton,icgr louis vuitton,gydgbt watches yhnzoz louis vuitton replica cdqf watches payuni,louis vuitton,xktcyxr louis vuitton ugozxl louis vuitton,eedirhb replica louis vuitton qocsty,louis vuitton,slute louis vuitton cjyd replica watches bgnmrc.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 02:50 PM (UTLu5)






Processing 0.35, elapsed 0.3545 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.022 seconds, 574 records returned.
Page size 467 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat