Not really news to just have Joe Scarborough calling bullshit, but what the hell.
The fact is that simply clicking on the user profiles for the plants would have revealed all this.
Allah thinks the debate was "solid" and that it's a good argument for letting Republicans ask questions of Democrats. Right -- in theory, sure. Let's see if they'll allow that.
Tell me: Did CNN allow obviously Republican plants to participate in the Democratic debate? Do they have plans of allowing us to participate in the next one?
I think the debate was awful. In an attempt to get as many wannabe supahstahs as possible on TV, CNN only let one or two candidates respond to each question before moving on to the next one. On the waterboarding question, only McCain and Romney got to respond. All of the Republican candidates should have gotten the chance to respond. As it was, John McCain got to preen and the hapless Romney got to sit there and just take it, with CNN focusing on his reaction as McCain ripped in to him. It was unfair to Romney and unfair to the question, because Romney didn't give a particularly convincing one, so the only responses were McCain's emotionalism and Romney's evasions.
And then Anderson Cooper moved on to the next question.
This happened time and time again -- CNN and You Tube apparently forgot who's opinions and thinking people were turning in to see, deciding it was more important to give "equal time" to as large a number of You Tube idiots as possible than to let each and every Republican candidate answer each question.
What does Duncan Hunter, another combat vet, think about waterboarding? How about devoted Baptist minister Huckabee? Or tough-guy prosecutor Giuliani? We don't know -- at least from this debate -- and apparently CNN didn't think his response was as important as the next camera-hungry You Tube douchebag's supahstah moment.
1
Hillary! is Not even in office yet and we're getting this shit?
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 29, 2007 07:57 PM (xcYF/)
2
How convenient for CNN to have a camera on Chuck Norris when Huckabee was being asked about accepting support from a "Log Cabin Republican". I mean just in case Chuck got outraged and whipped Mike's ass. Convenient.
Posted by: burnitup at November 29, 2007 09:12 PM (H1lp7)
3
I'm curious now about the "obvious" Republicans (i.e., the freak questionaers) -- perhaps they're out-of-work character actors looking to score a gig. I wouldn't put it past CNN to decide the real crazies aren't good enough, and go with a Clint Howard wannabe.
Posted by: meep at November 30, 2007 05:09 AM (7uTCa)