Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

"Talks Are Set On Ending Battle of Iraq"

We've won, says Don Surber, which may or may not be premature but I'm not quite sure it can be evidenced from a "Declaration of Principles" reached on the future Iraq-US relationship.

Still, it sure seems like good news. Surber writes:

This should have made Page 1.

With a sailor kissing a nurse on Times Square.

Funny how while the Democrats were calling for a troop withdrawal and the surrender of Iraq to al-Qaeda — while the New York Times was even condoning genocide — President Bush changed course and won the war.

Incredible.

The New York Sun seems alone in thinking this is a big deal.

As I've said before, I'm not sure that Bush's change-of-course and Petraeus' new strategy won the war, so much as it helped take advantage of trends already underway. "The surge won the war" is a compelling narrative, direct and simple, but it may well be that Bush's blundering stubbornness earlier in the war, and of course our troops' amazing heroism in darker times, actually wore out the enemy and set the table for the victories that would later follow.

What won the war might have been Bush's "simplistic" and nuance-lacking determination that we would not give up no matter how bad things to get. In this one crucial determination he seems to have been right, even if he (arguably) got so much else wrong.

H/t CJ.


Posted by: Ace at 04:13 PM



Comments

1 if we won the war, why aren't our troops coming home?  now, and not sometime in the distant future?  let's see, our troops have to stay because, why?  yeah, because we haven't won anything.

Posted by: steve sturm at November 27, 2007 04:28 PM (sWhRW)

2 I'm not certain we can say the war has been won when the opposition hasn't officially surrendered.  I'm not trying to take away from the fantastic progress made in Iraq, just posing the question.  Has the opposition been squashed enough to declare outright victory without the possiblility of it regrouping and attacking after we've turned over the reigns?

Posted by: compos mentis at November 27, 2007 04:28 PM (sq2LV)

3 Our permission from the Iraqi government to even be in the country runs out in 2009. Which is why the Iraqis and US are starting talks to determine the nature of an extension and the future disposition of US forces (about 50k for years). I'm not really sure why Surber is saying that that amounts to victory, as the negotiations (and inevitable drawdown of forces) would take place whether we were winning right now or not. (which we are right now, to be clear)

Posted by: Bill from INDC at November 27, 2007 04:31 PM (yZMsp)

4 There is spin and there is spin.

Posted by: Bill from INDC at November 27, 2007 04:32 PM (yZMsp)

5

There will always be some level of violence in Iraq, either of a sectarian or a jihadi variety

THe goal was always to significantly hamper the ability of the terrorists to cause havoc and casualties, and to assist the moderate Iraqis in building a power sharing gov't that the various sects could live with and that would not serve as a surrogate for the maniacal mullahs.

I think we are probably close to acheiving those goals

Posted by: TMF at November 27, 2007 04:33 PM (KTgUG)

6 As I've said before, I'm not sure that Bush's change-of-course and Petraeus' new strategy won the war, so much as it helped take advantage of trends already underway.

Whoa, bullshit, arsehole. Let's get the BS flag uncovered, and run it up the pole so I can pop a crisp salute. Listen, I understand that the idiots to the left of Marx believe that we were just "lucky" that the demographic trends, yadda, yadda, yadda. But guess what? We made those trends. We broke them down, step by step by little bitty step.

These mincy steps around the wagon, this modesty is no such thing. People paid for it in blood. We did the only two things that count in an insurgency: separate the people from the fighters and crush the fighters with overwhelming force.

Did the Iraqis have something to do with it? Um, yeah, just like the US Army had something to do with Patton's lightning charges or the Roman legionnairies did for Scipio Africanus. But soldiers do not win wars, generals do. Without the General, victory is unattainable, and you need a fantastic man to even hope for victory. The Iraqis would have surrendered to the fanatics, like, um, f$cking the entire Middle East has. Or Fallujah did.

But this was OUR victory. Those trends wouldn't have lasted without our firepower, our troops, our initiatives, our men giving EVERYTHING they ever had to the mission. Our victory.

Call it like it is.

Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 27, 2007 04:36 PM (mROCs)

7 "...our troops' amazing heroism in darker times, actually wore out the enemy and set the table for the victories..."

Of course they did. Our troops didn't just wear them out. Our heroes wore them out, the terrorists quit or died, then the next batch came in, our heroes wore them out, the terrorists quit or died, etc. repeat as necessary.

Our fighters wore out wave after wave of 'em - over years of time.

AQ must truly have felt like they were butting their heads against a solid steel wall. 'Cause they were!

I believe that it has finally sunk into their tiny little skulls that they cannot wear our guys down. Our guys don't wear down! That must be horribly demoralizing for th terrorists to know  - that they are doomed to failure.

Our soldiers are gods gift to this country - and the planet!

Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at November 27, 2007 04:36 PM (41Dd+)

8 steve sturm, don't make me pull out the troops in Germany comparison!

Frankly I think America is going to have some troops in Iraq, even when it is the Germany and S. Korea of the ME. just makes sense to have a presence there. Better there than Saudi Arabia or Yemen.

Posted by: billhedrick at November 27, 2007 04:36 PM (OWcCI)

9

There will always be violence, correct. The "end state" of stability that you talk about is dependent on security and political events reaching a tipping point of momentum where the overall security and the Iraqi government in its present form (not including the peaceful transfer of authority via elections) are guauranteed. At this point, I'd say it's very possible, maybe even more likely than not. If I were wagering, I'd lean towards putting money on it.

But the security gains will solidify with political accomodation between provincial and national players (read: effective distribution of oil wealth and some degree of official power-sharing), and these political gains have not happened yet and are current problems, though they are in fitful, frustrating progress.

And as long as America stays as a broker, which it looks like will happen whether a D or R is CinC, I'd say victory, as defined above, is attainable. But not assured, not yet.

Which is why these rushes to declare victory are so headscratching, as, when any setback is encountered in the near future (say, reinvigoration of Iran's efforts to destabilize), such statements will be spun as folly by war opponents. Better to be realistic and sober and really hammer home why a stable Iraq is important and now actually obtainable, rather than asserting a "victory," "last throes" meme.

Posted by: Bill from INDC at November 27, 2007 04:45 PM (yZMsp)

10 billhedrick: we're not looking to keep troops in Iraq to protect them from invasion from Turkey or Iran, such as was the case with Europe and the Soviets, they're being kept to protect the Iraqis from each other, akin to our having troops in Germany to keep the Germans from killing one another, which obviously wasn't the case.

by the way, I wouldn't have any problem if we kept troops in Iraq in order to have them pre-positioned in case Bush does something with Iran, or to have them on call to go after terrorists in other neighboring countries, but again, that isn't why they're being kept there.

Posted by: steve sturm at November 27, 2007 04:50 PM (sWhRW)

11 Haha. 
I am sure all those stationed in the middle east are whooping it up right now.
We won!  It's over!  Don Surber declares victory in Iraq! And some guy with a 4 year lag on quirky internet videos named Ace concurs but with qualifications! Let's head on home! Meet me at Yankee Doodles for jell-o shots!

Don't get me wrong I like this shit bubbling all around the wingnut web ring, it pushes your sad little fucking dingy further out to sea. 

The fact that this war has always been about the Republican domestic political agenda is writ large here. 

You are stuck with this nightmare your sick ass political representatives foisted on the country no matter what kind of bullshit you spin.


Posted by: tommy at November 27, 2007 04:54 PM (G+fLm)

12 There are two wars in Iraq.  We have won the first, against the Baathists, Al Qaeda and affiliated Sunni groups.

The second war, against the Iranian supported Shia party militias who control large parts of southern Iraq, and their allies in the forces of elected Iraqi government which we trained and equipped, hasn't even begun to be fought.

Posted by: icus at November 27, 2007 05:01 PM (OTNlI)

13

your sick ass political representatives

You mean like Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Joe Biden and John Kerry?

Posted by: TMF at November 27, 2007 05:03 PM (KTgUG)

14 tommy, your expertise in Iraq is based on what? Do you read the reports from Michael Yon or even the NY Times (a neo-con rag)?

Steve, good points, but I am thinking post war, the troops we have there in 2012 will be basically what you envision. Basically standard bases, for easy police work through out the ME

Posted by: billhedrick at November 27, 2007 05:05 PM (OWcCI)

15

Agree with Bill's comments - no point declaring victory, and then have every single future attack, no matter how ineffective slammed in our faces.  Of course, if we keep saying that we're making progress without ever saying we won, then the MSM will spin that too ('cause lets face it, we said that in the past when we were at best marking time).

It seems to me that there were several necessary ingridients for the turn-around:

1) Attrition among AQ forces from years of battling our guys.

2) AQ over-playing its hand and pissing off the local population.

3) Changes in US strategy - primarily working with the tribes and moving our guys out of the big camps and into squad and platoon houses out among the population.  Thank General Petreaus for this.

4) The program for training the Iraqi military finally bearing fruit in a big way - especially the (re-)training of NCOs and company and field grade officers.  You cannot do this overnight - and it was Petreaus wearing his previous cap who put this into place.

5) Bush finally listening  to guys like McCain and Lieberman (and presumably Gates and the generals) and authorizing the surge of troops

Of these all were, I think necessary elements - though one might argue that the last was not as necessary as the others.

Posted by: holdfast at November 27, 2007 05:06 PM (Gzb30)

16 Bill INDC,why are you so scared to declare victory? You've been there. You know that the more that the population believe we have won and that the terrorists have lost the more they will get with the program.  They follow the big dog and big talker in the Middle East.  We are in a position to declare victory based on the present facts on the ground and we need to take it and run with it.

Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 05:08 PM (m2CN7)

17 The problem with declaring victory is knowing what damn war we are fighting. Desert Storm, Desert Fox, OIF and then the insurgency. Will there be another war? Yeppers, because our enemies are still out there; Iranians, Syrians, Palestinians, Pakistani, Chechyan, Uzbeki terrorists, plus Saudi Arabia and Eritrea and Somalia, and the Sudan, and on and on.

The Napoleonic wars lasted for 20 years and were in 14 separate actions, some like the Swedish-Russian war that Napoleon didn't take part of, and some 70+ major battles, and decided the face of Europe. We are deciding the face of the Middle East. This is an Epochal War. Let the old war--which we won--go away, so we can fight the new one.

Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 27, 2007 05:15 PM (mROCs)

18

Bill INDC,why are you so scared to declare victory? You've been there.

Because I've been there, and seen how corrupt and broken some Iraqi logistical and reconstruction efforts/systems are, for examples. I'm also doing a piece on how American advisors interact with the national government on reconciliation and legislation.

Victory = sustainability without American training wheels.

Right now, American administration/advisorship and money is rebuilding provinces as well as organizing the local neighborhood watches. This oversight and funding is required for the new security but is not sustainable in its present form, and the Iraqi feds are dragging feet in taking up the slack.

That's not at all saying they won't, but it's pivotal and it hasn't happened to a significant enough degree yet.

We are in a position to declare victory based on the present facts on the ground and we need to take it and run with it.

I'd say we are in a position to capitalize on recent gains by restating our committment to a stable Iraq and pressing our current advantages, while beating down the significant challenges which remain. The Sunni nationalists are fairly patient and realistic about this, I think, but they will not wait forever to be reintegrated into larger Iraqi society. Iran has not given up on Iraq, and neither has al Qaeda, despite leadership attrition and failure to resupply from comfortable bases in Pakistan.

3 months of positive trends, no matter how positive, do not constitute victory.

Posted by: Bill from INDC at November 27, 2007 05:19 PM (yZMsp)

19

Steve Sturm:  If you think that we kept troops in Germany ONLY to prevent the Soviets from invading Europe, then you are pretty naive.  Sure, that was one reason, but we learned the lessons from WWII that we didn't learn from WWI:  1.  The Europeans can't keep from killing themselves by the tens of millions now that they have the technology to do so, so we have to stay there with a permanent troop presence, AND 2., no way is Germany ever going to be completely empty of foreign troops, because we don't ever want them to rise again as a threat to European peace, as they did in 1870, 1914, and 1939.  The same holds true for Iraq.  Now that "Bush's War" is a victory, our troops will stay there to make sure that Iraq stays non-aggressive with its neighbors, to keep the Turks out of northern Iraq, to keep our military close to Iran in order to keep those lunatics from launching any interesting ventures. 

Tommy:  "The fact that this war has always been about the Republican domestic political agenda is writ large here."  That's the single fucking dumbest thing I've ever seen written in a blog comment section.  Did you have your own cock in your mouth as you typed it, and hence not thinking straight?  Fucking idiot.  We're in the Iraq war because, what?  The economy sucks so bad?  Because Harriet Miers wasn't confirmed?  Social Security hasn't been reformed?  Because it's easier to win elections in a landslide when a foreign war isn't going well for a couple of years?  Get your head out of your ass before you comment next time, shit-for-brains.

 

Posted by: Sharkman at November 27, 2007 05:20 PM (UioS4)

20 The fact that this war has always been about the Republican domestic political agenda is writ large here.

Well, if it's writ so durn tootin large, please rattle off a few chapters on how trying to drain the Islamist swamp is "about" the domestic, "compassionate conservatism" agenda.

No really, tell me all about it. I must know The Fact.

Cordially...

Posted by: Rick at November 27, 2007 05:22 PM (2QPR+)

21 BillyH I guess you haven't been noticing but expertise on anything only gets in the way here. 

Bill INDC,why are you so scared to declare victory?

Yes Bill why so timid?  Don Surber has already informed the greater world community that we have won. Why so shy?  Embrace this victory, don't be ashamed. 

You know that the more that the population believe we have won and that the terrorists have lost the more they will get with the program.  They follow the big dog and big talker in the Middle East.  We are in a position to declare victory based on the present facts on the ground and we need to take it and run with it.


i.e. I am ready to move on to more serious political issues like chasing out the mexicans.

Poly this is some really serious analysis you should think about doing this professionally or at least benefiting  a think tank or two with your lucid mind magic.  Take your own sterling advice, don't be afraid to declare victory!

Things are in a lull right now and it would be great if the civilians in Iraq could get to some sort of normalcy in the upcoming years, but all this cya political bullshit is serving only your needs which is all it was about in the first place. 


Posted by: tommy at November 27, 2007 05:23 PM (G+fLm)

22

  "The fact that this war has always been about the Republican domestic political agenda is writ large here." 

 

What's funny is tommy has no idea what this is even supposed to mean. It's just a slogan. Though it would be interesting to find out why the AUMF regarding Iraq passed Congress by larger margin's than the AUMF for Desert Storm did if it's all about the Republicans. Remember, little Tommy Daschle was the Senate leader at the time...

 

Posted by: Jay at November 27, 2007 05:28 PM (BNlV7)

23 Remember, little Tommy Daschle was the Senate leader at the time..

Heeeeyyyy, wait a minute here.....  Former Senator Daschle is no longer in the senate.....tommy-boy seems to have a ton of time on his hands to spout his stupid slogans and talking points.....

Senator Daschle, is that you?

Posted by: wiserbud at November 27, 2007 05:38 PM (IHbof)

24 Willpower is a big deal.

One thing I've seen over and over again in commentaries on Iraq from people I respect is that the enemy had to have been shaken when, after the big democratic congressional victories in Nov 2006, Bush responded by INCREASING US troop levels. The bad guys thought they had won and now saw that it was going to get even harder on them.



Posted by: Arthur at November 27, 2007 05:42 PM (QsU2K)

25 Sharkman wins.  tommy has a dick in his mouth.

Posted by: MAJ O at November 27, 2007 05:54 PM (bQ4oU)

26 Harry Reid's dick.  Or, Nancy Pelosi's.

Posted by: Sharkman at November 27, 2007 06:01 PM (UioS4)

27

I don't know if this war is "won" or not, but a pattern is emerging.

We won WWII and our troops are still in Germany and Japan.

We won the Korean War and our troops are still in Korea.

Hopefully we will win this war and our troops will be in Iraq for a long time.

This is a pattern that works. Germany and Japan could rebuild stable societies because the presence of our troops kept them in line and gave them a chance to get on with building an economy and a society rather than putting all their energies in to war and preparation for war. The Koreans did the same thing because they knew that our troops guaranteed that they would be defended from the North. I hope the same thing works for Iraq. I hope that when the Iraqis - all of them - see what they can do for themselves without a dictator, or a war, or tribal feuds, they will decide they like democracy and will go on to something much better than they've ever had before.

It's the traditional Arab world's worst nightmare.

Posted by: Scott at November 27, 2007 06:13 PM (AYBqR)

28 BTW - to clarify, my "spin" comment was directed at the idea that the war is won based on a negotiation of the Iraq-US security agreement, which has been slated to take place all along.

Posted by: Bill from INDC at November 27, 2007 06:22 PM (khYUg)

29 Ace's comments on why we are "winning" - the AQI backlash and local security efforts abetted by the Surge and US tactical change - are pretty much on target as the main factors.

Posted by: Bill from INDC at November 27, 2007 06:27 PM (khYUg)

30 OK, the 'tard and isuc have weighed in with their idiocy, so where's Munch for the trifecta?

Posted by: hhuummbbeerrtt at November 28, 2007 11:42 AM (f7A+e)

31

OK, the 'tard and isuc have weighed in with their idiocy, so where's Munch for the trifecta?

Probably still shaking the stamp-vending machine in the lobby waiting for his Snickers bar to drop out.

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 28, 2007 01:41 PM (WTn2v)

32 ★莫道不消魂,帘卷西风,人比黄花瘦★
塑料托盘 =>厦门塑料托盘,塑料托盘制造商,宁波塑料托盘,天津塑料托盘,北京塑料托盘。
仓储笼 =>仓储笼报价,苏州仓储笼,仓储笼诺恒,无锡仓储笼,广州仓储笼。
仓储货架 =>仓储货架厂,北京仓储货架,苏州仓储货架,无锡仓储货架,广州仓储货架。
货架厂 =>佛山货架厂,天津货架厂,成都货架厂,常熟货架厂,服装货架厂。
超市货架 =>超市货架尺寸,超市货架效果图,杭州超市货架,超市货架摆放,广州超市货架。
专业从事组合式仓储货架、建材超市及仓储式超市货架设计、制造、安装、调试的企业, 是国内最大的货架制造商之一。公司已承接近千座仓储货架(http://merryrack.cn.ec21.com)工程的设计、制造和安装。 ★鼠标好比爱情箭,上网一点胡乱窜★
货架公司 =>无锡货架公司,杭州货架公司,苏州货架公司,超市货架公司,广州货架公司。
广州货架 =>广州货架厂,广州货架批发市场,广州货架公司,广州货架市场,广州货架制作。。
北京货架 =>北京货架批发市场,北京货架厂家,北京货架制作,北京货架价格,北京货架销售。
仓库货架 =>仓库货架厂,北京仓库货架,无锡仓库货架,深圳仓库货架,广州仓库货架。
南京货架 =>南京货架厂,南京货架网,南京货架公司,南京货架制造厂,南京货架价格。
塑料托盘. 南京麦瑞(塑料托盘)有限公司是国内专业从事(塑料托盘http://blog.hsw.cn/261491/viewspace-328795.html)集研发、生产、 销售、安装于一体的大规模企业之一。汇集国内( 塑料托盘)制造业众多技术精英,所 ...

Posted by: 托盘 at August 04, 2008 09:57 PM (sk/Le)

33 ★白天没水,晚上没电,发的工资只够买面★ 仓储笼 =>南京仓储笼,求购仓储笼,折叠式仓储笼,苏州仓储笼,无锡仓储笼。 仓储笼 =>仓储笼图片,仓储笼报价,常州仓储笼,麦瑞仓储笼,折叠仓储笼。 仓储货架 =>仓储货架厂,北京仓储货架,苏州仓储货架,无锡仓储货架,广州仓储货架。 货架厂 =>佛山货架厂,天津货架厂,成都货架厂,常熟货架厂,服装货架厂。 超市货架 =>超市货架尺寸,超市货架效果图,杭州超市货架,超市货架摆放,广州超市货架。 塑料托盘专业制造商—塑料托盘制造有限公司南京麦瑞欢迎您!南京麦瑞(塑料托盘 http://www.ewkej.com/suliaotuopan.htm)有限公司是国内最具影响的物流产品大型生产企业,主要生产的产品有塑料托盘,塑料卡板箱, ... ★打开邓选,找到答案:原来是社会主义初级阶段★ 货架公司 =>无锡货架公司,杭州货架公司,苏州货架公司,超市货架公司,广州货架公司。 广州货架 =>广州货架厂,广州货架批发市场,广州货架公司,广州货架市场,广州货架制作。。 北京货架 =>北京货架批发市场,北京货架厂家,北京货架制作,北京货架价格,北京货架销售。 仓库货架 =>仓库货架厂,北京仓库货架,无锡仓库货架,深圳仓库货架,广州仓库货架。 南京货架 =>南京货架厂,南京货架网,南京货架公司,南京货架制造厂,南京货架价格。 塑料托盘. 南京麦瑞(塑料托盘)有限公司是国内专业从事(塑料托盘 http://ybmerry.photo.hexun.com/1043873_section.html)集研发、生产、 销售、安装于一体的大规模企业之一。汇集国内( 塑料托盘)制造业众多技术精英,所 ... ★再往后翻,我靠!还一百年不变★ 木托盘 =>木托盘标准,木托盘价格,塑木托盘,熏蒸木托盘,求购木托盘。 工具柜 =>工具柜价格,天钢工具柜,北京工具柜,安全工具柜,苏州工具柜。 工作台 =>超净工作台,防静电工作台,净化工作台,回转工作台,超净工作台价格。 工作桌 =>不锈钢工作桌,厦门工作桌,重型工作桌,电脑工作桌,防静电工作桌。 周转箱 =>塑料周转箱,防静电周转箱,周转箱英文,周转箱模具,中空板周转箱。 塑料托盘广告招租网热线:13805186030,塑料托盘在中国正处于高速增长期。目前,国内流通所需(塑料托盘http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/reader_4fd7a58a01000d54.html)每年约为8000万只,其中港口用2000万只(出口),总需求还会进一步 ...

Posted by: 货架 at September 05, 2008 05:10 AM (PYpbd)

Posted by: ²È½Ð¾¯½÷ at January 30, 2009 10:23 AM (hXNNS)

35 Hello. That's very nice site but I've seen this before here: http://text.inguaro.com/fd20bcc7ad17bb3828e23d23648aa382 fd20bcc7ad17bb3828e23d23648aa382

Posted by: Dwight at March 12, 2009 06:58 AM (NmQlL)

Posted by: 货架 at August 15, 2009 11:10 AM (p8fyt)

Posted by: google排名 at August 19, 2009 02:29 AM (fEtAO)

Posted by: linksfromlondon at October 01, 2009 09:39 PM (SgUdh)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 11:12 AM (9oMrs)

Posted by: NBA SHOES at October 24, 2009 05:35 PM (/6617)

Posted by: nike air max at October 26, 2009 12:55 PM (n7GXH)

Posted by: NIKE AIR MAX at October 27, 2009 01:55 PM (sS5lD)

Posted by: discount ugg boots at October 30, 2009 04:09 AM (mBGLP)

Posted by: ugg boots at October 30, 2009 06:41 AM (3iF2y)

Posted by: shoesshoe at November 03, 2009 09:36 PM (LHCCE)

Posted by: Omega Rolex Watches at November 04, 2009 01:13 AM (BH2sU)

Posted by: 钢丝绳 at November 09, 2009 01:43 AM (SIx8Q)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 14, 2009 05:18 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 05:25 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:47 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:31 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 07:04 AM (C/zDM)

53 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 19, 2009 09:20 AM (n0jE1)

54 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 25, 2009 12:02 AM (fd1jz)

55 As you consider the many famous brand names mbt shoes, don't just consider the price tag. Consider the health of your feet , as they are your main guide to life and will likely endure more physical trauma on a daily basis than any other part of your body. mbt shoes-Your best choice .

Posted by: meruu at November 25, 2009 03:49 AM (1aNEH)

Posted by: replica rolex at December 07, 2009 07:24 AM (G0kk2)

57 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots at December 08, 2009 04:36 PM (JOSIc)

58 The womens mbtchallenges the hard to reach
muscles in your legs, but also works the abdominal, back, buttock, and thigh muscles.
With every stride, the instability activates the whole body in concert and tones as it
stimulates different areas.mbt
footwear
have a curved pivot sole that copies walking on soft moss. The sole of
href=http://www.mbtshoesbuy.com/products_new.html>new mbt
turns even, flat ground
into uneven terrain. The mbt anti shoes challenges the muscles to work harder with
every step you take. The unique curved sole works by providing instability and makes
the muscles of your body more engaged and also helps burn more calories.
The mbt shoes walking shoes have been
highlighted for its ability to cushion your feet while challenging your muscles.
Clinical studies suggest that regular use improves balance, posture and circulation.
mbt lami shoes re-establish
the natural conditions for standing and walking.You will get more results out of your
workouts ? MBT shoes have technology in the sole design that make your working more
efficient and burn more calories. With every step, the instability activates your
muscles and the whole body is stimulated as your walk more and more.Free Shipping
1Week on Select Styles Of discount
mbt
Walking Shoes Reviews !

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at December 09, 2009 02:28 PM (B0M1x)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 15, 2009 05:49 PM (5o+JZ)

60 i just want to say,the article you write is great,today is my first visit here,and i'll come again to read your new blog.in our website,we sell all kind of nike air max,like nike air max 360 shoes and so on,the womens air max is so popular that you can view them and purchase.(air max)
http://www.my-nikeshoes.com/

Posted by: womens air max at December 22, 2009 05:19 PM (xnxK1)

Posted by: cheap Air Max at December 25, 2009 09:40 AM (ZgK+c)

62 Support by UK shopping links of London earrings was intuitive and nowadays we have matured internationally with stores in 1990.links of londonThe party resulted from a clean exact for her wife, links londonJohn Ayton, founded the jewelry mark,links of london sale Links of London. Relations of London were founded in the UK, Hong Kong, links of london charms USA and Canada.links of london charms Links of London is one of the chief jewelry brands in the United Kingdom.links of london sweetie bracelet It lays a lot of weight on producing jewelry featuring newer, exceptional designs.It has been reported that silver tiffany & co was regularly melted to oxidization are general accessories. links of london braceletJewelry designs however did not been fixed

Posted by: links of london at January 02, 2010 03:13 AM (jhDD/)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 06:11 AM (ndMAX)

Posted by: nike air max at January 20, 2010 02:41 PM (CZv6h)

65 lihor replica watches wsfyup replica watches,wbwpfs louis vuitton myw replica watches,rgzqg replica rolex nanezy replica watches,isqaak watches replica bdiv replica watches replica watches,emdzwcb louis vuitton yivtto replica watches,eghaj replica watches louis vuitton,ycku louis vuitton,dynook watches mwdyhf louis vuitton replica ilxu watches usvjsy,louis vuitton,aqhpjsz louis vuitton ybcxtg louis vuitton,ijrwcri replica louis vuitton vwjiyp,louis vuitton,ytquk louis vuitton hqfs replica watches rovbxe.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 11:50 AM (UTLu5)






Processing 0.04, elapsed 0.0483 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0062 seconds, 74 records returned.
Page size 102 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat