| Support
Contact
| GOP Facing an Uphill BattleTuesday, the Washington Post will have an interesting article on the GOP's current minority status and the increasingly difficult task we have ahead of us. [GOP] Party officials insist that the retirements -- 17 members of the House and six senators -- are simply the result of individual decisions and not indicative of a broader negative sentiment within the party. "I don't hear a drumbeat that 'We're not effective and I don't like it here anymore,' " said National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Cole (Okla.). [...] Many retirements have come in seats and states that are competitive between the parties. Republican senators' retirements in Virginia, Colorado and New Mexico have created races in which Democrats are favored to win next November. The same holds true in the House, where open GOP districts in Ohio, Arizona and Illinois are primed to go to Democrats. Emboldened by the House and Senate majorities they won last year, Democrats have had almost no retirements. Five members of the House are stepping down or running for higher office in 2008, but none of the vacated seats is expected to be competitive. No Senate Democrat up for reelection this cycle has announced plans to retire.Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott officially announced his retirement early today; Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert made a surprise announcement that he had officially resigned. The article dances around the idea that Republicans are "getting while the getting is still good." I think that low morale, caused by the prospect of years in the minority, is contributing to the problem, especially for members of Congress who saw their power peak during the early Bush years. Members who were toppled by the 2006 election are noticing that the GOP won't be retaking their committee chairs anytime in their congressional careers. Part of the problem is that there is no one in the party that can credibly ask members that are thinking about leaving to stay. The obvious choice for that role, President Bush, doesn't seem up to the task, either by choice or because he's too busy fighting the war and the Democrats in Congress at the same time. The GOP just doesn't have many promises to give for incumbents who are ready to call it quits. I don't mean to be Mr. Doom & Gloom, but Republicans need to be aware that, barring some unusual event, they will not be taking Congress back any time soon. The WaPo article notes that the Democrats have us outmatched when it comes to money, too: Republicans also face a daunting financial gap at the congressional level, the likes of which they have not seen in decades. At the end of October, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee had $29 million in the bank to spend on House races -- roughly 14 times the $2.56 million its Republican counterpart had at that time. The disparity on the Senate side is smaller but no less significant. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee showed $23.4 million on hand at the end of October, compared with $9.5 million for the National Republican Senatorial Committee.The difference in funds to some degree reflects low morale among Republican donors, too. And if Republican congressfolk and Republican donors are having a mopey moment, you can bet that Republican voters are, too. Things aren't all bad, though. The positive news coming out of Iraq is slowly working its way into the public mind. At this point, Democrats cannot benefit at all from good news in the War on Terror. Unfortunately, I doubt very much that Election 2008 will focus so exhaustively on the war like the elections in 2004 and 2006. Economic indicators are also generally good (and have been), which reflects well on the President who--against all reason--wears the Chief Economist hat. That, too, is suspiciously taking its sweet time getting into the think skulls of Economic Eeyores. However slowly people learn of it, some of that good news will hopefully be taken up by the Republican presidential candidates credible promises of more to come. In short, the GOP is facing an uphill battle, one that is getting steeper. I'm praying for a leader who will pull the party back together. God willing, whichever presidential candidate we select will be that leader. If not, it's going to be a long eight years. Comments1
But Gabe, don't worry. If we have our way, we can help drive the GOP morale even lower. Just give us a chance.
Posted by: Michelle Malkin and Allahpundit at November 27, 2007 03:35 AM (7+W7p) 2
Part of the problem is that there is no one in the party that can credibly ask members that are thinking about leaving to stay. Should they stay? I keep going back to Gingrich and the "revolution" of the 90s. The idea congressmen would be swapped out after 3 terms in the house, 2 in the senate, was radical yet worked. I don't want Imperial Wizards guiding my party into their 90s, not sure if they're passing a bill or bowel. Only people that would want to keep a bunch of old hags around probably also troll on the blogs as famous Conservatives, or atheist slaves working for their souls back of such. Posted by: TheEJS at November 27, 2007 03:54 AM (KINJc) 3
Yeah these GOP resignations are just rats jumping ship. It's gonna be a long time in the wilderness after Bush goes home.
Posted by: Barry in CO at November 27, 2007 04:01 AM (aJtCl) 4
The war in Iraq is going just well enough to let the libertarian and social cons in the GOP bicker and split the votes.
But frankly, maybe a housecleaning of GOP members in Congress is in order? Posted by: Aaron at November 27, 2007 04:10 AM (0ATZS) 5
I'm glad to see them go. We need new, fresh people in Washington. They will be more in tune with the common man.
Posted by: Dogstar at November 27, 2007 04:34 AM (FgxdU) 6
If they're not willing to fight for their constituencies' interests, they need to go. I don't see leaders; I see indolent parasites.
Posted by: goddessoftheclassroom at November 27, 2007 07:12 AM (/rYbR) 7
"I don't see leaders; I see indolent parasites."
Agreed. These hoary old goats need to go. Fresh blood will work wonders for the republican party. Posted by: Ken at November 27, 2007 08:29 AM (TphLT) 8
I don't think it's a morale issue as mush as I think it's a disgust issue. There are a lot of conservative voters taking stock of what happened the last 8 years, and are wondering what happened. The litany of "socialism light" programs that have spawned under the current admin is shocking to many of us. I am having a hard time seeing what the difference would have been between Kerry, and Bush. I will give credit for the GWOT, but just about everything else Bush has done has isolated not only the conservative base, but everyone else.
We had both houses the first 4 years, and we still gave up ground. Why should I donate, and be excited now? There are still people out there that call Bush one of the greatest presidents ever. I think history will judge him mush harsher. Probably as the one that destroyed the GOP. ASW Posted by: ASW at November 27, 2007 09:01 AM (TsGEc) 9
This reminds me a lot of the Democrats after the 1994 elections. A decent number of Dems retired rather than stay in the minority. We could be looking at a decade or so of donkey rule.
Posted by: physics geek at November 27, 2007 09:09 AM (MT22W) 10
I think the main problem is that Republican "control" of Congress translated to doing whatever the Democrats told them to, as long as their portions of pork were sufficient.
Posted by: David C at November 27, 2007 09:13 AM (Kueb8) 11
"God willing, whichever presidential candidate we select will be that leader." Do we have to start this up again? Posted by: the ghost of bob munck at November 27, 2007 09:55 AM (4gHqM) 12
Glad all those uber-conservatives stayed home in 06 to show their displeasure. Still, I thought Bush was the dumbest man alive for holding back Rumsfeld's resignation until the day after he lost Congress. Firing Rummy would have helped turn out more of the military vote, I can assure you of that. Still, I can't be too hard on the current Congress. The more incompetent they behave, the less likely they are to pass damaging legislation. And the ultra-aggressive fundraising tactics are wearing thin on me. For the Virginia elections this month, I received 3-a-day phone calls, pleas for money, and daily mailings. I had to call the campaign to tell them to knock it off. Posted by: Xenu at November 27, 2007 09:57 AM (5sbpE) 13
I wonder why donations to the RNC are down so much *cough*(build the wall)*cough*.
Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at November 27, 2007 10:05 AM (TB8pr) 14
Glad all those uber-conservatives stayed home in 06 to show their displeasure. Yeah, I'm sure it wasn't amnesty or pork spending that killed the party. Blame the voters for not bending over far enough. Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at November 27, 2007 10:07 AM (TB8pr) 15
That big toilet on Capitol Hil needed flushing. Maybe we can have some real Republican candidates run, instead of those fat porkers. The Rep. legacy of the last several years won't be the Iraq war, it'll be Roberts and Alito and a more in-control SCOTUS. Posted by: roy at November 27, 2007 10:12 AM (QBYjk) 16
It's aggravating to have to constantly point out the conservative advances made in the past 7 years to the gloom and doomer and the complain about virtually everything people. From overturning Clinton's last minute executive orders to the tax cuts to the sunsetting of the AWB and the withdrawal from the ABM treaties to the issues of life regard to partial birth, cloning and embryotic stem cells to changing the make up of the Supreme Court to name just a few. The greatest conservative, President Ronald Reagan had a deficit larger than the Bush administration compared to GNP. His tax cuts were also less in both number of cuts and the size of the cuts. He compromised with Tip ONeil far more than Bush has with the Dems. He appointed two of the worst SC justices. We lost a greater number of seats in Congress in his second term than we did in 2006. The number of indictments and convictions of his administration far exceed anything in the Bush administration. And lest we forget, he signed an actual amnesty bill. God help us if we would have had the intertubes during Reagan's terms like we have now.
Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 10:12 AM (m2CN7) 17
ahhhhhhh!!! I Told you so!! Posted by: typical freeper at November 27, 2007 10:26 AM (wnU1W) 18
I think the main problem is that Republican "control" of Congress translated to doing whatever the Democrats told them to, as long as their portions of pork were sufficient. Posted by: David C God help us if we would have had the intertubes during Reagan's terms like we have now. Posted by: polynikes Polynikes - I'm afraid that I have to agree with David C. The Republicans didn't DO anything but milk the tax-teat to fund their personal agendas. They counted on us to vote against the Dems, regardless of what they (the Repubs) did or didn't accomplish. Additionally, I don't agree with you that the Internet would have bad for Regan. He, and Gingrich in his day, gave us something to vote FOR. There was an agenda, and a purpose to where they were going. Yes, there were sins committed along the way, but they were the sins of our saints, and thus forgiven more easily than the sins of our current loafers. Although I'll go and vote in 2008, it will be a vote against Hillary rather than a vote for Republicanism. However, I'm resigned to a Hillary win; the election is hers to lose, sad as that is. In my state election for Governor, I'll stay home. He's a Republican who promised to tighten Texas' borders and then blatently broke his campaign promise. Although he can't run again here, the party must be punished for not forcing him into action on his promise. I think a decade in the wilderness may just be the best thing for the Repbulicans, in the long run. In the wilderness the old and the weak will die off. Posted by: Lokki at November 27, 2007 10:28 AM (wSBsc) 19
"Forfeited principle for power and lost both." If Trent Lott is indicative of the people leaving, good riddance. Posted by: MlR at November 27, 2007 10:42 AM (9f5Pa) 20
I'm not crying over losing Lott and Hastert. Their most important constituents were their fellow Congressmen and they made is very plain that's who they considered their top priority. The only way Republicans stay in the wilderness for very long is if no one else steps up to fill the ranks of the scoundrels who have departed. The President can't really help with that, nor can anyone in Congress. That's pretty mich going to be up to the state party groups to find likely candidates and get them up and running. Right now, the GOP's strategy of "find a bunch of rich guys" isn't goign to help them a lot. What the need to be doing is finding a lot of folks who remember what being a Republican actually means. Posted by: Jimmie at November 27, 2007 10:53 AM (bofTB) 21
The big problem is that there are no real republicans running on the GOP ticket anymore.
GWB was not a true GOP member, he got the nomination because of his family name. The DEMS are trying to do the same thing with Hilary Clinton, reason why there is this push behind Obama, who has even less experience for the Executive Office than Hillary is because people HATE Hillary, 100% of Republicans and 50% of Democrats hate her. Look at Obama, I may disagree with his views but I don't hate him, while I just loathe Hillary to the core of my being. Despite all this doom and gloom, I do not think the DEMS are going to get the white house in 2008, there are some factors that will hurt them. Iraq, things are getting better and will nto be an issue next november, and due to the writers strike delaying production and the total cluelessness of Hollywood we will have more of these insipid anti-war movies being released for the next two years. Some other films such as a "Blackwater" trilogy and a film about Valerie Plame are in the planning in hopes it will swing public opinion in the DEMS favor. Recent box office earning and public mood on these films pint otherwise. Those films are going to COST the dems big politically. I think Hillary will lose as others mentioned, people are going to go to the polls in droves to vote AGAINST her. Despite the recent Zogby poll, she will get the nomination because she has the Clinton name and money behind her. Posted by: GTBurns at November 27, 2007 10:54 AM (iInYK) 22
Lokki, I'm a Texan also. I don't agree with everything that Perry has done regard to immigration but its disingenuous to indicate he has done nothing. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4441/is_20070417/ai_n19059469 As for your decade in the wilderness I can only reply with my stock sarcasm reply which is not directed at you but at that strategy. Yes that's how businesses succeed. They allow themselves to fail and allow others to implement long term procedures diametrically opposed to your preferred business strategy. Then they allow this to simmer for a decade or so with the hope that not too much damage will be done and then grab the reigns again with the intentions of setting up the perfect business model and wah lah! success! Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 10:55 AM (m2CN7) 23
Actually reclaiming the House is easily within reach, the Senate is another story
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at November 27, 2007 10:56 AM (Lgw9b) 24
Good, the party needs a good housecleaning.
I'll be happy when we don't have to try and buy votes like the Dems. Posted by: Techie at November 27, 2007 11:07 AM (AV8Z6) 25
GWB was not a true GOP member, he got the nomination because of his family name. You are kidding right? Before he became a successful twice elected Republican Governor of a previously Democrat controlled state government and who was responsible for its present Republican makeup, he worked for the campaigns of any number of Republicans across the country. He obtained many of his positions based on his proximity and admiration of Reagan. His pre presidency BDS opponents thought he was the conservative devil incarnate. I was able to get my CHL as a result of his Governorship. You may not like Bush which is all well and good but your standard of who is considered a member of the 'true' GOP needs review. Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 11:13 AM (m2CN7) 26
Unless the leader is unapologetically conservative there is no hope.
Posted by: ricpic at November 27, 2007 11:22 AM (Evbsd) 27
Polynikes was able to get osteoporosis-preventing daily protein supplements thanks to Bush's governorship. And it tasted like marshmallows, too. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 11:23 AM (m6c4H) 28
Maybe they wouldn't have job approval, and financial donations problems if they weren't so interested in amnesty and pork.
Posted by: Clark at November 27, 2007 11:30 AM (ADyNR) 29
Entropy gets his protein supplement the same way Andi Sullivan gets his. Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 11:37 AM (m2CN7) 30
No, I remember in 2000, Bush was considered the candidate by the MSM and the Washington establishment. And the crappy leadership has very much been a product of the D.C. ethic in Congress and the White House. What I hate about the Democrats has become, for the most part, true of the Republicans:
Dumb everything down, pander to the lowest common denominator, smear your opponents, fear your constituents, grow the government, spend my money, restrict my freedoms, bend the rules for yourselves, hold the other guy to a high standard, wrap it up in self-righteous language. If conservative voters are at fault for anything, it is for swallowing the GOP's crap for 6 years straight. And it's hard to blame people for avoiding the Democrats. But that excuse no longer applies. And, quite possibly, we will have to endure a Democrat majority for a while. But maybe we can get our sense back, start making decisions based on reason instead visceral gut reactions to smarmy slogans, propose good policies, and earn the right to rule again. Until the Washington establishment coopts us again and ruins our winning formula. Posted by: Oops at November 27, 2007 11:37 AM (tOFGj) 31
I think the broad lesson to be learned is "If you're a majority party, act like it! The Democrats always do, even (especially!) when they're not actually in the majority. And you can bet they're working hard now to ensure that their rule over the country will be permanent and uni-partisan.
I don't even especially care about particular policies and agendas all that much, but I would've liked to see the Republicans when in power standing up proudly and saying "We're in charge now, and THIS is our agenda!" Instead, we got this quivering bunch who seemed to say at every opportunity "Well, maybe we'll do this... if the Democrats say it's OK, I mean...." Oh, of course some compromise is necessary, but don't make it your first resort. Posted by: suedenim at November 27, 2007 11:38 AM (YxbTJ) 32
If you're a Republican Man I wouldn't be so worried. The GOP and the opportunist career politicians within it will find a way to survive. In their worst case scenario, they'll work "bi-partisanly" with the Democrats to suck off the public tit and get their pork, even if it means their supposed long-term agenda is fucked. In the best case scenario, they'll take advantage of the Democrats continued incompetency, attack them on the left and adopt much of their program (Global warming, free crap for everyone, etc) to make themselves 'relevant' (See the British Tories). The Republican Party will do great, even if Conservatives and American don't (in the long term - but the politicians will be gone by then anyway).
Posted by: MlR at November 27, 2007 11:44 AM (9f5Pa) 33
Eric Hoffman noted that Revolutions were officially over when they were coopted by opportunists who were more worried about maintaining their perks than pushing the Revolution forward. We're at that stage now. The establishment crowd, guys like Lott - these aren't true believing Conservatives. They're politicians in the worst sense of the term, with the Republican Party's simply a vassal for them. To many of the beltway types in general, the actual Conservatives are an embarrassment and threat to their cushy position (see their reaction to the immigration fiasco). The Democrats have the same problem as well, sometimes, but at the end of the day they at least think their base's heart is in the right place. Our leadership thinks we're nuts, impractical, and throwbacks. Given the demographic trends (importing Democratic voters by the millions), the sad part is they might be right on the last two. Posted by: MlR at November 27, 2007 11:57 AM (9f5Pa) 34
I don't think the movie script for 'Mr. Smith Goes To Washington' was made up out of whole cloth. This coopting by opportunists has been going on since the beginning of the revolution. Thankfully the system the founders set up allowed the republic to bend and not break.
Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 12:08 PM (m2CN7) 35
Although it is still the best in the world, we no longer operate under the system that the founders set up. See federalism, constitutionalism, limited government. Posted by: MlR at November 27, 2007 12:20 PM (9f5Pa) 36
Maybe if the GOP hadn't shit all over its base for so long with its massive spending, stupid social programs, and coddling of illegal aliens people would be ponying up cash to to help. But as it stands right now, they learned nothing in 2006, and still seem to be clinging to the bridge to nowhere mentality.
Abandon your principles, and you better be willing to accept minority status. Posted by: gabriel at November 27, 2007 12:25 PM (fIDx2) 37
I think Laura Bush should run for president. Her qualifications are similar to Hillery's.
Idea from Don Surber's blog Posted by: Doug_S at November 27, 2007 12:26 PM (9I1GM) 38
the libertarian and social cons in the GOP bicker and split the votes
No. That's Party spin. Don't eat it. They're both leaving, or considering it, or staying home, or preparing to, because neither of them ever get anything they want from the Party, which opposes them both more than they oppose each other. The social con/libertarian split is a small one, or it should be, except insofar as social cons mistake the state for the Lord and render unto it too much, and libertarians hate them for it in the terms that are readily at hand, the left's. The split's not real. It's only evidence of the Republican Party's failure. A new party that includes them both, as the GOP used to, would do well. The Party as it is now is precisely the opposite of that. It's the Democratic Party of 1967. It needs bricks thrown at it. Posted by: Retired (Not Gay) at November 27, 2007 12:27 PM (k5JzA) 39
If these guys don't quit, who will make up the VITAL pool of lobbyists for bridges to nowhere 10 years from now?
Posted by: Dirk at November 27, 2007 12:32 PM (AJx67) 40
"Yeah, I'm sure it wasn't amnesty or pork spending that killed the party. Blame the voters for not bending over far enough." But here's the thing: as a result of sitting out the election, amnesty came much closer to reality and pork spending is even more ridiculous. Refusing to vote for Republicans out of principles made things worse. Here's a better, more pragmatic principle: no Democrats in office. It's not enough, I understand, but it's still essential. No Democrats in office, and then find some other means of beating the GOP into submission. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 12:35 PM (kFwRi) 41
The Party as it is now is precisely the opposite of that. It's the Democratic Party of 1967. It needs bricks thrown at it. Bingo. Which isn't to say its worse than the current Democrats (who are grown-up McGovernites), but that neither are selling limited government Conservativism. Posted by: MlR at November 27, 2007 12:39 PM (9f5Pa) 42
Although it is still the best in the world, we no longer operate under the system that the founders set up. See federalism, constitutionalism, limited government. Also see slavery, suffrage, term limits. But that was not your originial point. You indicated that we have reached a point where the system has been coopted by opportunists. I point out that opportunists have been present from the beginning and that our system allows us to overcome that human enivitability. The sky is not falling. Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 12:42 PM (m2CN7) 43
polynikes,
It's great to read the posts of someone I can agree with on this issue. And for those of you that turn away from Republicans for voting for pork...how's that working out? Pork isn't going away and it darn sure isn't enough reason to allow dems to control congress or the presidency. Most of you hate the big spending programs under Bush, but each had a hidden bomb that helps lead to cures of the biggest problems we face. The prescription drug plan expanded HSAs and includes market forces and personal responsibility. Mandatory HSAs are the solution to the health care problem that can best combat the Dems plan. NCLB forces the failures of schools and is a good first step toward getting vouchers passed and destroying the teacher's union, plus making inroads with black and inner city voters.He tried for SS reform and started the debate where others wouldn't touch it. Bush has been better in his choices for judges and justices than any president in a long time. I don't understand the anti-Bushites. As for contributions, I'm simply waiting for someone to pull away from the field. I'm going to contribute more than ever, but I want to put it where it will do the most good. I'm sure a lot of others look at it the same way. Posted by: Patrick H at November 27, 2007 12:43 PM (3qKz4) 44
Here's a better, more pragmatic principle: no Democrats in office. All that will do is simply bleed the Republic to death just a little more slowly. Any better ideas? Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at November 27, 2007 12:47 PM (PMGbu) 45
But that was not your originial point. You indicated that we have reached a point where the system has been coopted by opportunists. I point out that opportunists have been present from the beginning and that our system allows us to overcome that human enivitability. The sky is not falling. No. I said the Conservative Revolution had been coopted by opportunists and is dead. Posted by: MlR at November 27, 2007 12:49 PM (9f5Pa) 46
"All that will do is simply bleed the Republic to death just a little more slowly. Any better ideas?" Nonsense! But even if what you're saying is true, that still gives us a "little more" time to beat the GOP into submission to conservative principles. You do that by relentlessly hammering them like we did during shamnesty, etc. Give them not an inch once they're there and promote more conservatives to replace the indolent when they run, but for God's sake don't give their offices to Democrats! That's the first principle. Learn it, live it, love it: No Democrats In Office. Without that we've got nowhere to build. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 12:52 PM (kFwRi) 47
And yes, it stinks that "No Democrats In Office" is so blunt and basic, but that's where we've got to be right now. We cannot afford Democrat rule, either economically, militarily, or culturally. No Democrats In Office. Make it a mantra. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 12:55 PM (kFwRi) 48
The prescription drug plan expanded HSAs and includes market forces and personal responsibility. With "victories" like these... According to: Bruce Bartlett (confirmed by a quick search): "Interesting, the Social Security actuaries estimated in 2005 that the unfunded obligation for that program in perpetuity was just $11 trillion (present value)...For Medicare, however, according to the 2005 estimate by the actuaries, the unfounded liability (present value in perpetuity) for Part A was $24.1 trillion and another $25.8 trillion for Part B, for a grand total of $68.1 trillion for the entire Medicare program, equivalent to 7.1 percent of GDP forever - about the same as the entire individual income tax." According to the Medicare Trustees annual report, the projected cost of Part D was over $10.8 trillion. We included some "market forces" prvisions - praise the lord. The way they sold it, by the way, was criminal. The same way they tried to do immigration - they didn't even release the entire plan until after it was voted on and threatened the careers of Republicans who saw it was a diaster. "When someone's in trouble, government's got to move." Posted by: MlR at November 27, 2007 01:07 PM (9f5Pa) 49
If you want to get a message across to the GOP and that message is fiscal responsibility, tight-fisted conservatism, you have to join The Club For Growth. The fatasses fucking hate them. It's awesome. Seriously, you want bang for your buck, to have your dollars heard loud and clear, there's your crowd right there. Posted by: spongeworthy at November 27, 2007 01:07 PM (uSomN) 50
"No Democrats in Office" is just an apology for shitty rule.
And it's a recipe for non-voting, civic disengagement, and cynicism. How about, make the politicians suffer for lousing things up. We donate money to their campaigns, we vote for them in droves, we get them into a cushy job with ridiculous benefits, and the promise of high-paying lobbying work after they leave office. In exchange, they ignore us and take care of themselves. The only meaningful way to hold them accountable is to stop supporting their pathology. And when a good candidate comes along, support them. I have a new rule: Support Good Candidates. Posted by: Oops at November 27, 2007 01:10 PM (tOFGj) 51
I have a new rule: Support Good Candidates. And I am the sole judge of who is a good candidate. And if there are no good candidates, my strategy is to have the worst candidate elected. That will show 'em. Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 01:15 PM (m2CN7) 52
And I am the sole judge of who is a good candidate. And if there are no good candidates, my strategy is to have the worst candidate elected. That will show 'em. You really don't understand the concept of voting do you? Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 01:18 PM (m6c4H) 53
That's right, poly. You are the best judge of what a good candidate is, as far as your vote is concerned.
Posted by: Oops at November 27, 2007 01:23 PM (tOFGj) 54
Here's a better, more pragmatic principle: no Democrats in office. In all honesty I beleive anyone pushing this line doesn't understand long term thinking, and is really being anything BUT pragmatic if they actually think they can maintain a single-party lock on politics for anything more then a couple of terms, and downright deluded if they think it's desirable they'd do so any longer. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 01:24 PM (m6c4H) 55
"How about, make the politicians suffer for lousing things up." Worked out real well in '06, didn't it? The country suffers more than Sen. Screwup (R) when his office is turned over to Sen. Douchebag (D). "I have a new rule: Support Good Candidates." My rule, No Democrats In Office, incorporates your rule. Your rule is not currently possible without mine. That's unfortunate, but it's true. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 01:25 PM (kFwRi) 56
The numbers do the rest. A weak, uninspiring, Republican probably will lose to dynamic Democrats who claim to have new ideas.
But this doesn't have to happen if a strong, inspiring Republican runs. We, as a nation, would also be greatly served if we stopped basing our big decisions on TV, and instead returned to reading, critical thinking, and the careful expression of our views, particularly in regards to politics and government. Posted by: Oops at November 27, 2007 01:29 PM (tOFGj) 57
You do that by relentlessly hammering them like we did during shamnesty, etc. That is not viable. If that were possible, we wouldn't need the assholes at all. Fire them all. Get rid of them entirely. Direct democracy. But people have jobs. And lives. And most don't give a shit what's going on 2000 miles away, and most don't want to hear about what's going on 2 miles away after a long day at work. People elect politicians because they don't want to have to deal with trying to govern the country constantly. Watching these assholes is a full time position, and one that does not pay, and one that is not enjoyable in any way for most decent people. You cannot stay on top of them always. You're lucky if you can create that kind of groundswell occasionally, when things get really bad. The idea that the same amount of fury over amnesty will be maintained constantly for years over everything is preposterous. We need better caretakers. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 01:30 PM (m6c4H) 58
"In all honesty I beleive anyone pushing this line doesn't understand long term thinking" Nonsense. I never said having Republicans in office was good enough, just that giving GOP offices to Democrats is foolish, both with regard to short-term concerns and also long-term ones. I'm not saying give the GOP free reign, just deny reign to Democrats. In the long term, you promote more conservative candidates, and you run them against bad Republicans, but you don't give a bad Republican's seat to a worse Democrat and then pat yourself on the back for your principles. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 01:30 PM (kFwRi) 59
Oops aren't you the person that once stated that Ron Paul was the best one out of all the candidates now running?
Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 01:30 PM (m2CN7) 60
Also, I'm not promoting "single party rule," in the long term, just single party rule until the Democrats stop being batshit crazy.
Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 01:32 PM (kFwRi) 61
We, as a nation, would also be greatly served if we stopped
basing our big decisions on TV, and instead returned to reading,
critical thinking, and the careful expression of our views,
particularly in regards to politics and government.
Oh! I can see it now. It's so simple. If only you had written that in 2006, things would have been so different. Now if only I can get people to return to critical thinking and careful expression... Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 27, 2007 01:33 PM (s8O+4) 62
"We need better caretakers." Great. Let me know how enabling Democrats brings this closer to reality. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 01:33 PM (kFwRi) 63
Seriously - do you hire a babysitter you have to stay home and watch? Would you hire a babysitter that was fine....so long as you stuck around and made sure she didn't shake the baby to death or put him in the oven by mistake? What the fuck is the point of the babysitter in that scenario? If you've got to stick around and watch her constantly, you may as well not hire her since you're staying home anyway. The sitter is actually serving no purpose whatsoever, except to complicate your task and confound you by waking the kid up every time he falls asleep and trying to stick him in the microwave, to 'help'. Until finally you're greatful when she just yaps on your phone and runs up your bill because at least she's not breaking anything. And for this you pay her $5/hr. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 01:34 PM (m6c4H) 64
Oh, and I have a Ron Paul exception to everything I've written in this thread. No Ron Paul In Office. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 01:36 PM (kFwRi) 65
Great. Let me know how enabling Democrats brings this closer to reality. Long term thinking, Kensington. I'm not sure you've got the perspective to appreciate it. You really think you're going to keep democrats out of power indefinetly? You really think the GOP can hold government for what, 32 years straight? YOU WILL GET DEMOCRATS. Until you've accepted the fact that there WILL be democrat wins from time to time, you're stuck where you are. Sooner or later, later if not sooner, they will win. All you think about is sooner. You want the dems to win later. Later, it's sooner again. You're not looking long term at the effects of what's going on in politics over the span of a generation. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 01:38 PM (m6c4H) 66
"Would you hire a babysitter that was fine....so long as you stuck around and made sure she didn't shake the baby to death or put him in the oven by mistake?" If I cannot find a good baby-sitter, yet I must have a baby-sitter, I'll take the klepto baby-sitter over the pedophile baby-sitter and then work really hard to find some decent baby-sitters for the future. What I won't do is hand my baby over to the pedophile baby-sitter and then hope the klepto got the message. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 01:39 PM (kFwRi) Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 27, 2007 01:42 PM (s8O+4) 68
The majority political party comes and goes but their policies, justices and laws stick around. That's long term, critical thinking that requires all efforts to stay in power as long as possible.
Posted by: polynikes at November 27, 2007 01:45 PM (m2CN7) 69
"Until you've accepted the fact that there WILL be democrat wins from time to time, you're stuck where you are. Sooner or later, later if not sooner, they will win." Are your arguments so weak that you have to resort to lying about my positions? Now you're just being ridiculous. I don't deny that Democrats will win at times. I'm saying that Republicans shouldn't help them win by tossing out flawed Republicans in favor of worse Democrats. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 01:46 PM (kFwRi) 70
I don't deny that Democrats will win at times. I'm saying that Republicans shouldn't help them win by tossing out flawed Republicans in favor of worse Democrats. Do you think democrats will allways win? Republicans will also win at times. Make sure they're good republicans when they do. This plays out 2 ways. People are disgusted with republicans, but you say the dems are worse. So we A) elect the same republicans. People become even more disgusted, and the situation is even more hopeless next time, and dems win in 2012. B) dems get elected. People become disgusted with dems. Republicans win in 2012. Or, dems hang on by a thread, but people become even MORE disgusted with them, republicans win in 2016. In the mean time, these corrupt old men are cockblocking good leadership. Clear the decks and get ready for the next wave. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 02:00 PM (m6c4H) 71
It's simply too dangerous to allow the modern Democrat party free reign to enact bad legislation and appoint liberal judges on speculation that the public will eventually be disgusted enough by them to turn them out. They can do too much long-term damage whilst they're there. If the ones doing so are Republicans, even bad Republicans, we at least have a chance of influencing them. If they're Democrats, we have no chance. But if you're banking on base Democrats to get disgusted with their party, consider again that Democrats specialize in making people dependent on the state, and they're very good at it. Further, people who become dependent on the state aren't generally inclined to turn out their governmant benefactors, and they're numbers are growing. So, yes, clear the decks, promote and support more conservative candidates, but don't hand it over to donkeys whilst doing so. Rather, keep identifying the bad ones and keep challenging them in primaries. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 02:16 PM (kFwRi) 72
Look, Entropy, I see your point. I just don't agree with your conclusions. At this point I think I'm starting to go in circles with you, so I'll leave it at this, unless some extraordinary new perspective comes into the debate.
Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 02:17 PM (kFwRi) 73
Gallup (more accurate than Zogby) has Hillary beating all GOP http://www.gallup.com/poll/102862/Democratic-Candidates-Look-Good-Latest-2008-Trial-Heats.aspx
Posted by: TMF at November 27, 2007 02:17 PM (KTgUG) 74
See, you SAY you understand my point, but you really don't seem to have internalized it. It's simply too dangerous to allow the modern Democrat party free reign to enact bad legislation and appoint liberal judges You can't stop them. on speculation that the public will eventually be disgusted enough by them to turn them out. Speculation or not, it's true. They will. They can do too much long-term damage whilst they're there. They will be in there. You can't stop them. We allways live through it, it's never quite as bad as you say it will be, often never even remotely near, and it will happen again too. But in your (somewhat irrational) fear of what they'll do, you'll rush to put ANY republican in office, allways, and due to your lack of discrimination you'll get shitty ones more often. AND you'll get dems more often too - because shitty republicans don't win as often as good ones do. Want less dems? Get better republicans. Want no dems? Really? Longer term thinking - get better republicans. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 02:38 PM (m6c4H) 75
I think I'm starting to go in circles with you That's what I meant by: Until you've accepted the fact that there WILL be democrat wins from time to time, you're stuck where you are. I haven't even touched the tip of the iceberg on why this makes sense to me. I haven't talked about how the political parties are intrinsically related to one another, or how societies change. And I'm not gonna, because frankly, I think you're stuck on this part and won't get past it. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 02:42 PM (m6c4H) 76
If you want to get a message across to the GOP and that message is fiscal responsibility, tight-fisted conservatism, you have to join The Club For Growth. The fatasses fucking hate them. It's awesome. Pop quiz: who recently referred to the Club For Growth as 'The Club For Greed'? a) Dennis Kucinich b) Howard Dean c) John Edwards d) Mike Huckabee The answer is a good example of why exactly the GOP blows diseased donkey schlongs. Posted by: OregonMuse at November 27, 2007 03:04 PM (uzP/l) 77
"See, you SAY you understand my point, but you really don't seem to have internalized it." You misunderstand. I've "internalized" your point. I just think it's short-sighted and stupid. I was trying to be polite earlier, but you don't seem to have enough class to accept that without seeming to question my intelligence. Rather, you keep insisting on misrepresenting my positions and pretending that my principle of not sitting out elections to punish bad Republicans at the expense of worse Democrats means that I refuse to accept that Democrats will sometimes win. You've constructed a straw man of my position, and an inane one at that. Enough. Posted by: Kensington at November 27, 2007 03:15 PM (kFwRi) 78
BS MSM spin. They begged Mark Foley to stay and run again, even though he was in a supposedly "safe" republican seat, and even though they knew there were scandal problems. Please, let these bastards leave if they want to. These are the porkmeisters, the ones who voted to override the pork veto, the ones who haven't been good or vocal in opposing shamnesty. Good riddance. The test will come when we see what the GOP "leadership" finds to run for the open seats. Posted by: funky chicken at November 27, 2007 03:32 PM (I+jPP) 79
Oh, these are open seats. It's just as much of an "uphill battle" for the dims as the GOP. Open seats don't have an incumbent, everybody starts from scratch basically. Duh. It's kinda like the coin toss. Every independent event is, ya know, independent. Posted by: funky chicken at November 27, 2007 03:33 PM (I+jPP) 80
Aww fuck new comments. Fuck them. Kensington, you don't understand what I'm saying. I've never questioned your intelligence and I never created a straw man. I did not. You do not understand what I'm saying - and that's got nothing to do with intelligence. Beyond that - FUCK these comments. Posted by: Entropy at November 27, 2007 04:13 PM (m6c4H) 81
salt pepper set salt & pepper shakers salt and pepper shaker salt pepper shakers pepper shaker pepper shakers salt shaker salt and pepper salt pepper shaker salt pepper RC MODELS SUPPLIER R C MODEL WHOLESALE RC HOBBY AGENT RADIO CONTROL TOYS WHOLESALE RC TOYS SUPPLIER RC BOAT WHOLESALE RC AIRPLANES WHOLESALE RC CARS WHOLESALE RC HELICOPTERS WHOLESALE RC PLANE WHOLESALE REMOTE CONTROL CAR WHOLESALE RC ACCESSORIES SUPPLIER MINI RC TANK WHOLESALE RC TRUCK WHOLESALE RADIO CONTROLLED MODELS SUPPLIER RC HELICOPTER SPARE PARTS RADIO CONTROL HELICOPTER WHOLESALE REMOTE CONTROLS SPARE PARTS
Posted by: RC Helicopter wholesaler at April 13, 2008 07:56 AM (WVWp+) Posted by: tagafa at May 14, 2008 07:13 AM (1gNqf) 83
★莫道不消魂,帘卷西风,人比黄花瘦★
塑料托盘 =>厦门塑料托盘,塑料托盘制造商,宁波塑料托盘,天津塑料托盘,北京塑料托盘。 仓储笼 =>仓储笼报价,苏州仓储笼,仓储笼诺恒,无锡仓储笼,广州仓储笼。 仓储货架 =>仓储货架厂,北京仓储货架,苏州仓储货架,无锡仓储货架,广州仓储货架。 货架厂 =>佛山货架厂,天津货架厂,成都货架厂,常熟货架厂,服装货架厂。 超市货架 =>超市货架尺寸,超市货架效果图,杭州超市货架,超市货架摆放,广州超市货架。 专业从事组合式仓储货架、建材超市及仓储式超市货架设计、制造、安装、调试的企业, 是国内最大的货架制造商之一。公司已承接近千座仓储货架(http://merryrack.cn.ec21.com)工程的设计、制造和安装。 ★鼠标好比爱情箭,上网一点胡乱窜★ 货架公司 =>无锡货架公司,杭州货架公司,苏州货架公司,超市货架公司,广州货架公司。 广州货架 =>广州货架厂,广州货架批发市场,广州货架公司,广州货架市场,广州货架制作。。 北京货架 =>北京货架批发市场,北京货架厂家,北京货架制作,北京货架价格,北京货架销售。 仓库货架 =>仓库货架厂,北京仓库货架,无锡仓库货架,深圳仓库货架,广州仓库货架。 南京货架 =>南京货架厂,南京货架网,南京货架公司,南京货架制造厂,南京货架价格。 塑料托盘. 南京麦瑞(塑料托盘)有限公司是国内专业从事(塑料托盘http://blog.hsw.cn/261491/viewspace-328795.html)集研发、生产、 销售、安装于一体的大规模企业之一。汇集国内( 塑料托盘)制造业众多技术精英,所 ... Posted by: 托盘 at August 04, 2008 05:39 AM (JlpeZ) 84
★白天没水,晚上没电,发的工资只够买面★ 仓储笼 =>南京仓储笼,求购仓储笼,折叠式仓储笼,苏州仓储笼,无锡仓储笼。 仓储笼 =>仓储笼图片,仓储笼报价,常州仓储笼,麦瑞仓储笼,折叠仓储笼。 仓储货架 =>仓储货架厂,北京仓储货架,苏州仓储货架,无锡仓储货架,广州仓储货架。 货架厂 =>佛山货架厂,天津货架厂,成都货架厂,常熟货架厂,服装货架厂。 超市货架 =>超市货架尺寸,超市货架效果图,杭州超市货架,超市货架摆放,广州超市货架。 塑料托盘专业制造商—塑料托盘制造有限公司南京麦瑞欢迎您!南京麦瑞(塑料托盘 http://www.ewkej.com/suliaotuopan.htm)有限公司是国内最具影响的物流产品大型生产企业,主要生产的产品有塑料托盘,塑料卡板箱, ... ★打开邓选,找到答案:原来是社会主义初级阶段★ 货架公司 =>无锡货架公司,杭州货架公司,苏州货架公司,超市货架公司,广州货架公司。 广州货架 =>广州货架厂,广州货架批发市场,广州货架公司,广州货架市场,广州货架制作。。 北京货架 =>北京货架批发市场,北京货架厂家,北京货架制作,北京货架价格,北京货架销售。 仓库货架 =>仓库货架厂,北京仓库货架,无锡仓库货架,深圳仓库货架,广州仓库货架。 南京货架 =>南京货架厂,南京货架网,南京货架公司,南京货架制造厂,南京货架价格。 塑料托盘. 南京麦瑞(塑料托盘)有限公司是国内专业从事(塑料托盘 http://ybmerry.photo.hexun.com/1043873_section.html)集研发、生产、 销售、安装于一体的大规模企业之一。汇集国内( 塑料托盘)制造业众多技术精英,所 ... ★再往后翻,我靠!还一百年不变★ 木托盘 =>木托盘标准,木托盘价格,塑木托盘,熏蒸木托盘,求购木托盘。 工具柜 =>工具柜价格,天钢工具柜,北京工具柜,安全工具柜,苏州工具柜。 工作台 =>超净工作台,防静电工作台,净化工作台,回转工作台,超净工作台价格。 工作桌 =>不锈钢工作桌,厦门工作桌,重型工作桌,电脑工作桌,防静电工作桌。 周转箱 =>塑料周转箱,防静电周转箱,周转箱英文,周转箱模具,中空板周转箱。 塑料托盘广告招租网热线:13805186030,塑料托盘在中国正处于高速增长期。目前,国内流通所需(塑料托盘http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/reader_4fd7a58a01000d54.html)每年约为8000万只,其中港口用2000万只(出口),总需求还会进一步 ...
Posted by: 货架 at September 04, 2008 10:17 PM (PYpbd) 85
¥»¥Ã¥¯¥¹¥»¥Õ¥ì¥¢¥À¥ë¥È¥¨¥íSEXÉ÷¯¥ª¥Ê¥Ë¡¼½Ð²ñ¤¤¥¨¥í¥»¥Ã¥¯¥¹¥»¥Õ¥ì¥¨¥Ã¥Á½Ð²ñ¤¤½Ð²ñ¤¤¥»¥Ã¥¯¥¹Áǿͥ¨¥Ã¥ÁµðÆý½Ï½÷½Ï½÷SEX½Ï½÷
Posted by: ²È½Ð¾¯½÷ at January 30, 2009 10:22 AM (hXNNS) 86
Good evening. Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear. Help me! I find sites on the topic: Green charcoal grill. I found only this - homemade charcoal grills. Basics of charcoal grilling ezinearticles. Mla style citation roach, larry basics of charcoal grilling. With best wishes :confused:, Jabari from Ukraine.
Posted by: Jabari at July 17, 2009 05:05 PM (di2HJ) Posted by: 货架 at August 15, 2009 10:55 AM (p8fyt) Posted by: google排名 at August 19, 2009 02:25 AM (fEtAO) 89
Badly need your help. Forget injuries, never forget kindnesses. Help me! There is an urgent need for sites: Dentures henderson. I found only this - Dentures price sacramento. Want to subscribe our rss feed it absolutely free! Or you can receive updates by email. Uk helps you in your search for personal care by providing you with reviews and low prices. THX :confused:, Mariah from Jamaica.
Posted by: Mariah at August 20, 2009 06:45 AM (Zh9Nr) 90
links of london
london links jewellery links jewellers london links links necklaces links bracelet links charms links rings links earrings Posted by: linksfromlondon at October 01, 2009 09:37 PM (SgUdh) 91
discounthair straighteners
ghd hair chi hair straightener ghd straighteners chi straighteners chi hair chi hair iron hair straighteners ghd ghd hair straighteners free shipping! Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 11:09 AM (9oMrs) 92
Buy discountnba shoes
cheap basketball shoes mens basketball shoes kobe shoes kobe bryant shoes lebron james shoes free shipping! Posted by: NBA SHOES at October 24, 2009 05:32 PM (/6617) 93
Buy discountugg shoes
ugg boots boots ugg mbt shoes nike running shoes cheap nike shoes nike footwear cheap nike footwear nike air max shoes free shipping! Posted by: nike air max at October 26, 2009 12:53 PM (n7GXH) 94
Buy Discount ugg shoes
ugg boots boot ugg mbt shoes nike running shoes cheap nike shoes nike footwear cheap nike footwear nike air max shoes FREE SHIPPING! Posted by: NIKE AIR MAX at October 27, 2009 01:52 PM (sS5lD) 95
discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes Nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefree shipping Posted by: discount ugg boots at October 30, 2009 04:07 AM (mBGLP) 96
discountugg boots sale
ugg shoes tall ugg boots ugg classic boots nike shox air jordan shoes nike air max nike air force one bailey button ugg rainier ugg boots ugg classic cardy ugg crochet boots ugg mini ugg classic short classic tall ugg ugg coquette ugg baby boots ugg knightsbridge ugg lo pro new ugg boots ugg short boots ugg nightfall boots ugg skimmer ugg sundance boots ultra short ugg ugg ultra tall discount ugg slippers ugg sandals ugg halendi ugg slippers ugg layback ugg matala sandal ugg napoule sandal ugg persephone tasmina ugg air force 1 shoes jordan air shoes nike shox shoes air max nike free shipping! Posted by: ugg boots at October 30, 2009 06:39 AM (3iF2y) 97
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg bootsfrom usa Posted by: shoesshoe at November 03, 2009 09:34 PM (LHCCE) Posted by: Omega Rolex Watches at November 04, 2009 01:24 AM (BH2sU) Posted by: 钢丝绳 at November 09, 2009 01:36 AM (SIx8Q) 100
buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 14, 2009 05:17 AM (s7MB5) 101
Replica Cartier | Replica Omega | Replica Cartier | Replica Watches | Replica Cartier | Bell & Ross Replica Watches | Audemars Piguet Replica Watch | Baume & Mercier Watches Replica | Patek Philippe Fake | Blancpain Watches | Richard Mille Watch Replica | Raymond Replica | Hamilton Watch | Concord Replica Watches | Alain Silberstein Watch Replica
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 07:32 AM (xpuiO) 102
soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Watches | Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Watches | Replica Omega | Hublot Watch | Replica Daniel Roth Watch | Chanel Watches Replica | Jaeger LeCoultre Fake | Replica Richard Mille Watches | Gucci Replica | Omega Fake | Hamilton Watch Replica | Vacheron Constantin Fake | Corum Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:52 PM (xpuiO) 103
Replica watches | replica soccer jersey | Fake Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Fake Watches | Audemars Piguet Fake | Hamilton Watch Replica | Zenith Watches Replica | Breitling Replica | Fake Omega Watches | Replica Hamilton Watches | Replica Patek Philippe Watches | Daniel Roth Fake | Girard Perregaux Fake Watches | Raymond Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:21 PM (C/zDM) 104
Replica watches | replica soccer jersey | Replica Omega | Replica Watches | Fake Watches | Cartier Fake Watch | best replica watches | Christian Dior Fake Watch | Fake Alain Silberstein | Christian Dior Fake Watch | Fake Dkny Watch | Patek Philippe Fake Watches | Tudor Replica Watch | Gucci Watches | watches brand
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 06:41 AM (C/zDM) 105
UGG BOOTS
Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 19, 2009 09:18 AM (n0jE1) 106
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap buy mbt shoes shoes mbt sale Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 25, 2009 12:01 AM (fd1jz) 107
As you consider the many famous brand names mbt shoes, don't just consider the price tag. Consider the health of your feet , as they are your main guide to life and will likely endure more physical trauma on a daily basis than any other part of your body. mbt shoes-Your best choice .
Posted by: meruu at November 25, 2009 03:45 AM (1aNEH) 108
soccer jersey supplier | Replica Omega | Replica watches | Fake Watches | Replica watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Omega | Replica Breitling Watches | replica watch | replica wristwatch | replica wristwatch | watches brand | replica watches | best replica watches | replica watches | watches brand | Luxury watches | best replica watches | replica watch | watches brand | replica watch | watches brand | watches brand | watches brand | replica watches | replica watches | best replica watches | best replica watches | replica wristwatch | replica watches | Luxury watches | best replica watches | replica watch | replica watch | replica watch | Luxury watches | watches brand | Luxury watches
Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 10:49 AM (bsW/x) 109
I will have a hard time buying ugg classic cardy at normal brick and mortar store for now on knowing that I can browse the largest selection I have ever seen and purchase confidently. Thanks for being a great company.Although your ugg boots cardy website is entered by users, the site has a lot of accurate and useful information on it.your net shop is kept to a minimum and favours websites connected to the ugg cardy boots Web Design Library in appearance and subject.
The popular blue ugg is renowned for its comfort. But some doctors worry that the popular black ugg could cause serious foot pain in the long run.So some podiatrists across the country are telling ugg classic cardy lovers to watch their steps. In fact,there is nothing wrong! The crochet boots online retailer also knows bargain-hungry shoppers are scouring the Web for discounts, and its UGG Classic Crochet rivals are more than happy to provide them. So it is putting coupon codes on ugg classic crochet that customers can use to save money on its site. Posted by: makol UGG at December 05, 2009 06:59 AM (cmMdO) 110
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots at December 08, 2009 04:35 PM (JOSIc) 111
The womens mbtchallenges the hard to reach
muscles in your legs, but also works the abdominal, back, buttock, and thigh muscles. With every stride, the instability activates the whole body in concert and tones as it stimulates different areas.mbt footwear have a curved pivot sole that copies walking on soft moss. The sole of href=http://www.mbtshoesbuy.com/products_new.html>new mbt turns even, flat ground into uneven terrain. The mbt anti shoes challenges the muscles to work harder with every step you take. The unique curved sole works by providing instability and makes the muscles of your body more engaged and also helps burn more calories. The mbt shoes walking shoes have been highlighted for its ability to cushion your feet while challenging your muscles. Clinical studies suggest that regular use improves balance, posture and circulation. mbt lami shoes re-establish the natural conditions for standing and walking.You will get more results out of your workouts ? MBT shoes have technology in the sole design that make your working more efficient and burn more calories. With every step, the instability activates your muscles and the whole body is stimulated as your walk more and more.Free Shipping 1Week on Select Styles Of discount mbt Walking Shoes Reviews ! Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at December 09, 2009 02:27 PM (B0M1x) 112
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 15, 2009 05:46 PM (5o+JZ) 113
Hublot Fake Watches | Jacob & Co Replica Watches | Replica Juicy Couture Watches | Replica Louis Vuitton Watches | Blancpain Fake Watches | Glashutte Fake Watches | Dolce & Gabbana Fake Watches | IWC Fake Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Piaget Fake Watches | Replica Hublot Watches | Watches Technomarine Fashion | Parmigiani Replica Watches | Replica Roger Dubuis Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Breguet Fake Watches | Dolce & Gabbana Fake Watches | Watches Rolex Fashion | Porsche Design Fake Watches | Chanel Replica Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 07:31 AM (1dySH) 114
i just want to say,the article you write is great,today is my first visit here,and i'll come again to read your new blog.in our website,we sell all kind of nike air max,like nike air max 360 shoes and so on,the womens air max is so popular that you can view them and purchase.(air max)
http://www.my-nikeshoes.com/ Posted by: womens air max at December 22, 2009 05:16 PM (xnxK1) Posted by: cheap Air Max at December 25, 2009 09:39 AM (ZgK+c) 116
Glashutte Replica bags | Replica Tissot Handbags | Zenith Fake Handbags | Replica Patek Philippe Handbags | Blancpain Replica bags | Luxury TAG Heuer handbags | Replica Fashion Jacques Lemans handbags | Replica Piaget Handbags | Breguet Replica bags | Christian Dior Replica bags | Strap Replica bags | Luxury Baume & Mercier handbags | Bedat & CO Fake Handbags | Replica Fashion Panerai handbags | Luxury Franck Muller handbags | Replica IWC Handbags | Replica Ebel Handbags | Oris Fake Handbags | Best Hublot bags | Bedat & CO Fake Handbags | Replica Fashion Graham handbags | Twin Barrels Fake Handbags | Replica Extra Strap Handbags | Replica Fashion Jacques Lemans handbags | Replica Zenith Handbags
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 27, 2009 10:36 PM (1dySH) 117
Support by UK shopping links of London earrings was intuitive and nowadays we have matured internationally with stores in 1990.links of londonThe party resulted from a clean exact for her wife, links londonJohn Ayton, founded the jewelry mark,links of london sale Links of London. Relations of London were founded in the UK, Hong Kong, links of london charms USA and Canada.links of london charms Links of London is one of the chief jewelry brands in the United Kingdom.links of london sweetie bracelet It lays a lot of weight on producing jewelry featuring newer, exceptional designs.It has been reported that silver tiffany & co was regularly melted to oxidization are general accessories. links of london braceletJewelry designs however did not been fixed;
Posted by: links of london at January 01, 2010 10:32 PM (UTjDs) 118
Luxury Balenciaga handbags | Best Louis Vuitton Wallets bags | Luxury Fendi handbags | Best Gucci bags | Hermes Replica bags | Replica Fashion Louis Vuitton Monogram handbags | Replica Fashion Balenciaga Wallet handbags | Replica Chanel Handbags | Luxury Louis Vuitton Leather handbags | Yves Saint Laurent Replica bags | Best Miu Miu bags | Best Louis Vuitton Cuir Taiga bags | Best Thomas Wylde bags | Chanel Watches Replica bags | Louis Vuitton Shoes Replica bags | Luxury Gucci Shoes handbags | Designer Wallets Fake Handbags | Replica Fashion Louis Vuitton handbags | Replica Fashion Prada handbags | Best Wallet bags | Replica Louis Vuitton Monogram Denim Handbags | Chanel Watches Replica bags | Mulberry Fake Handbags | Replica Louis Vuitton Handbags | Best Louis Vuitton Watches bags
Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 09:44 AM (ndMAX) 119
kids air max 360
kids air max 97 nike air max 180 nike air max 2009 nike air max 2010 nike air max 360 shoes nike air max 87 nike air max 88 nike air max 89 nike air max 90 nike air max 91 nike air max 93 nike air max 95 nike air max classic BW nike air max ltd nike air max TN womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 womens air max 87 womens air max 90 womens air max 91 womens air max 95 womens air max 97 womens air max classic BW womens air max ltd air max air max air max air max air max air max air max air max Posted by: nike air max at January 06, 2010 05:26 PM (JEcK0) 120
ghd hair straighteners,chi hair straighteners,ghd hair,chi hair,ghd straighteners,chi straighteners.ghd hair straighteners,chi hair straighteners,ghd hair,chi hair,ghd straighteners,chi straighteners.hair straighteners,ghd hair straighteners,hair flat,hair straight,chi hair straighteners.hair straight,ghd hair straighteners,hair flat,hair straighteners,chi hair straighteners.
Posted by: hair straighteners at January 08, 2010 08:35 PM (NZm2O) 121
nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max nike air max womens air max nike air max 360 shoes air max kids air max 90 kids air max classic BW kids air max 360 kids air max 97 nike air max 180 nike air max 2009 nike air max 2010 nike air max 360 shoes nike air max 87 nike air max 88 nike air max 89 nike air max 90 nike air max 91 nike air max 93 nike air max 95 nike air max classic BW nike air max ltd nike air max TN womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 womens air max 87 womens air max 90 womens air max 91 womens air max 95 womens air max 97 womens air max classic BW womens air max ltd Posted by: nike air max at January 20, 2010 02:40 PM (CZv6h) 122
nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max nike air max womens air max nike air max 360 shoes air max kids air max 90 kids air max classic BW kids air max 360 kids air max 97 nike air max 180 nike air max 2009 nike air max 2010 nike air max 360 shoes nike air max 87 nike air max 88 nike air max 89 nike air max 90 nike air max 91 nike air max 93 nike air max 95 nike air max classic BW nike air max ltd nike air max TN womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 womens air max 87 womens air max 90 womens air max 91 womens air max 95 womens air max 97 womens air max classic BW Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 03:22 AM (JOSIc) Processing 0.08, elapsed 0.0875 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|