OK, when I voted "news reporter" I got ads for political stuff.  When I voted "armed robbers and arsonists" I got ads for naked pictures of Whitney Houston?!?

Is Ms. Houston popular among the armed robber and arsonist demographic or something?  I guess they might be the last ones who would be interested in nude pics of a formerly beautiful woman who turned herself into a crack-ho look-a-like.

Somehow, "Ron Paul is the only man who can save America" won the poll.

I didn't even think that was an option...

I voted for the news reporter first and planned on voting two more times to include lawyer and politician except that I just limited to one more time for the politician.  I figured that basically almost all politicians are lawyers but not all lawyers are politicians so I just killed two lawyers with one stone.

I voted 'Politician.'

I'd rather my chidren went into careers in the comparatively respectible porn industry than that they become politicians.

Update:

http://community.myfoxdfw.com/blogs/sadoc/2007/10/18/Ms_Aguliars_Response

"I'm sorry you took my story the wrong way."

Not "I'm sorry I presented it in such a way as to be easily misinterpreted as my ambushing an old man and badgering him to tears."  It's YOUR damn fault it came off wrong, not hers.

She's nauseating.

Are pimps and whores covered under the umbrella of "Politician"? Cause, if not,  I'm staying home. And don't start talking your shit about SCOTUS nominees. I'm watching the 700 club and I don't want to be bothered right now.

Are pimps and whores covered under the umbrella of "Politician"?

That would be an insult to the entire sex-for-hire industry. There's a limit to what whores will do for money. Politicians have a 'wider stance.'

OH FUCK, LAWYERS!

RE: the 17 people who voted for "70 year old shopowners."

The poll is presented in a blue box. So I think they may have misinterpreted the question as "What is the most despised profession in blue states?"

Well, as someone who lives in Dallas, I've taken the time to go to Fox 4's website and ask them to fire Ms. Rebecca Aguilar.

This is getting a lot of play on talk radio here -

The guy had called the police 42 times in the past, but they weren't responding.

He lives above his business so this was a home-break-in situation; not just defense of property.

Most importantly, it was said that FOX has embargoed all the video on the net and that YouTube has pulled it down.  I don't know the means by which their attorney's got it pulled down.

what a fucking disgrace.  "I'm sorry you took my story the wrong way."

God help an employee of mine who 'apologized' like that.

"if another journalist tried this, i.e. standing between the door and and seat so you couldn't drive away, what would be the best way to handle this? push them away? remove them by force?"

Personally, I'm all for the "punch them in the face and run them over repeatedly" option, but legally speaking, the best thing to do is remind them that by preventing your freedom of movement without probable cause, they are violating your 4th Amendment rights.  Of course, these are reporters, a naturally dull species from an intelligence standpoint, so the lesson on the Bill of Rights might be met with drooling and breast-beating.

It is times like these when I wonder if society is beyond saving.  Y'know that sci-fi villain who wants to use some God-like power to erase all of history and rewrite it in his image?  I could totally do that. 

Glad to see lawyers pulling ahead of robbers and arsonists.  As a law student, I'll tell you all this: lawyers deserve to be much more reviled than they are.  However, they deserve it for reasons other than those popularly thought.  For example, giving a criminal defendant a full and fair defense?  Totally acceptable (this does not count cases where the lawyers attempt to do so through subversion of the justice system... which is a problem distinct from their acting as counsel for a defendant).  But the way law schools are run?  Completely unacceptable, tragic waste of high potential and valuable time in order to accomplish severe brainwashing and give credence to all manner of grievance theaters. 

Oh come on people.  Lawyers are bad, but worse than armed robbers and arsonists?

What about the lawyers for the Marines who are suing ABSCAM Jack Murtha?

-A disinterested non-lawyer

WTF?

You slimeball lawyers are voting against yourselves and rigging the poll against poor arsonists and shop owners.

How do you get them out from between the seat and the door?

I'd suggest the Taser^tm line of hand-held self defense products.  Light, portable, and doubly effective when employed against a reporter self-righteous assknob who's conducting her assault on ambush video.

Shit, I live here and this is the first I've heard of this.

Of course, I rarely watch local news.