Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Hard Times: Morgan Stanley Sells Off Entire NYT Stake, Other Institutional Holders Likely To Follow Suit

Meh. I don't think the douchey Sulzberger family cares that much. They're rich enough to not care about money, and to imagine the family will always have it.

There's a bit of an asterisk on this story as it seems to come from one source, though neither Morgan Stanley or the NYT is commenting, which suggests it's for realies.

Morgan Stanley, the second-biggest shareholder in New York Times Co., sold its entire stake today, according to a person briefed on the transaction, sending the stock to its lowest in more than 10 years.

The person declined to be identified because Morgan Stanley hasn't made the sale public yet. Traders with knowledge of the transaction said Merrill Lynch & Co. sold New York Times stock worth $183 million in a block trade.


...

New York Times shares slid 48 cents, or 2.5 percent, to $18.43 at 12:44 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading and fell as low as $18.28, a level not seen since January 1997.

If Elmasry has sold the stock, ``it's almost a dead certainty there would be a bailout of other institutional holders,'' Bibb said in an interview. ``If that happens and there is a sharp drop in the share price, the Sulzbergers have to sit down and decide whether now is not a good time to take the company private.'

But the Sulzbergers would presumably come out ahead -- outside investors bought high, and now the family would be buying them back out at, I imagine, a sharply lowered price. The difference went into their pockets and would stay there.

Kind of like Enron. Perhaps former Enron advisor Paul Krugman will take this opportunity to expound on callous plutocrats preying on middle class investors.

Posted by: Ace at 03:24 PM



Comments

1

They're not at risk.

 

 

Dammit.

Posted by: Dave in Texas at October 17, 2007 02:26 PM (FXakj)

2

NYT has two kinds of shares. A shares and B shares.

A shares (all owned by Sulzberger family) come with voting rights.

B shares (hypothetically) come with an ability to get dividends.

Morgan Stanley tried to force NYT to give voting rights to B shares. They failed, so now they are bailing out. If they had succeeded, they could have whipped NYT back in shape with shareholder pressure.

Posted by: Tushar D at October 17, 2007 02:34 PM (IlgNp)

3 They'd better take it private before the valuation forces them to take it private.  The NYT is rapidly descending to penny stock.  Wow.  

Posted by: Chip at October 17, 2007 02:38 PM (wtg+1)

4 HEARTACHE!

Posted by: Morween Dowd at October 17, 2007 02:47 PM (AQj/2)

5

A second source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/17/business/media/17cnd-paper.html?ref=business

Not that they can be trusted, of course.

 

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at October 17, 2007 02:53 PM (ScOBm)

6 This was pointed out to me awhile ago, but I find it really funny:

Apparently the aggregate value of all NY Times shares is less than the value of the real estate the NY Times owns.  So according to the market, the NY Times brand actually has a negative value.

Posted by: Ryan Frank at October 17, 2007 02:53 PM (j0mjH)

7 Morgan Stanley tried to force NYT to give voting rights to B shares. They failed, so now they are bailing out. If they had succeeded, they could have whipped NYT back in shape with shareholder pressure.

As I understand it, the NYT would rather fold than have anyone else tell them what to do--even if it might benefit them.

Posted by: CT at October 17, 2007 02:54 PM (KV/Mz)

8 Time to sell those guys short.

Posted by: Iblis at October 17, 2007 02:56 PM (9221z)

9 BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!  It couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of people.

Posted by: adamthemad at October 17, 2007 03:09 PM (kIjlp)

10

This is sure not the right time to go  private with all the disruption in the Credit Markets.  To do it they would probably need a sponsor like TH Lee, Appollo or KKR - those guys would whip the Times into shape faster than Morgan ever would.

Posted by: holdfast at October 17, 2007 03:30 PM (Gzb30)

11 I doubt that the Sulzberger's could find a banker to finance the buyout. As holdfast noted, folks like KKR are a lot harsher than JP Morgan wrt operations.

I still am surprised the class B shareholders weren't willing to institute a shareholder action against the boardmembers. Clearly Pinch et al are completely indifferent to maximizing shareholder value, which I thought would put them at risk for a successful lawsuit. Maybe JP Morgan didnt' have the stomach for a fight like that.

Posted by: iconoclast at October 17, 2007 04:04 PM (TzLpv)

12

It's the damn Joos.  They want to drive the stock down and go private.  Crazy like a Canadian.  The Sulzberger family, they're Mohammedans, right?

Kemp

Posted by: kempermanx at October 17, 2007 04:05 PM (iLWmI)

13 iconoclast - I'm no expert in the field, but my personal philosophy is that the Class B holders knew what they were buying - and were stupid to buy.  That sort of idiocy should be punished in the market.  You don't see a lot of straight managemetn LBOs these days (at all?), and I don't think Pinch would like to be Henry Kravis' bitch (though Ms. Kravis is apparently quite comely, see Mark Steyn's blog from the Black trial at Macleans.ca).

Posted by: holdfast at October 17, 2007 06:06 PM (Gzb30)

14 At this point I think newspapers like the NYT believe they are on a holy crusade, and losses are a noble price to pay for Doing the Right Thing.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 17, 2007 06:43 PM (wmgz8)

15
#11 iconoclast said I still am surprised the class B shareholders weren't willing to institute a shareholder action.

  I thought there had been two shareholder actions already, BICBW. This probably is just one more step in a long journey to the Sulzbergers taking the company private for pennies on the dollar.

  Speculating wildly, it's possible this is a setup by the Sulzbergers to drop the stock price within their reach while the NY Times is still profitable enough for their credit rating not to completely collapse, which would bring about the end of the newspaper.

&nbps

  JSYK, the San Francisco Chronicle has been losing $1 million a week for years, totalling to more than $330,000,000 in losses.

Posted by: Looking Glass at October 17, 2007 07:08 PM (42wFw)

16 holdfast

While class B shareholders were stupid, they still have many rights. And the board of directors has many responsibilities, first of which is to maintain/increase shareholder value.

Take a look at some of the "activist" funds, like Barington Capital.

Anyway, at some point the Sulzbergers may notice that Pinch is pissing their money away and take steps themselves.

Posted by: iconoclast at October 17, 2007 07:13 PM (IAKPF)

17 Maybe, or maybe they view it as a price worth paying for making a better world. It's hard to know what's going on in the mind of the left.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 17, 2007 07:41 PM (wmgz8)

18

If it were resuscitated, its not like it would turn into a paper thats sympathetic to Republicans or even neutral--just a somewhat less reflexively liberal paper with wider readership and fewer consistent knocks on its credibility.

 

So - it probably cant be peeled away from Pinchs control, but whoopee - that just means a solidly liberal and biased organ will continue to lose readership and continue to lose respect.

Posted by: AD at October 17, 2007 08:17 PM (B8Zms)

19 Are you sure the family bought those shares? Because Rupert Murdoch is awfully liquid, if you know what I mean. Just saying.

Posted by: comatus at October 17, 2007 09:12 PM (VjNM6)

20 Rupert Murdoch is awfully liquid, if you know what I mean.

Oooooooooo, now that would be interesting.......

Posted by: wiserbud at October 17, 2007 09:34 PM (rt8oV)

21 I thought there had been two shareholder actions already, BICBW. This probably is just one more step in a long journey to the Sulzbergers taking the company private for pennies on the dollar.

oooh, I hope it is that transparent. That kind of manipulation will land somebody in jail.

Board members have two primary duties. A fiduciary duty and a loyalty duty. Breaching either in a public company can land you in a whole lot of hot water.

Posted by: iconoclast at October 17, 2007 11:39 PM (jjtMr)

22
  Didn't Murdoch just buy Dow Jones, including the WSJ? And buying up the stock won't do any good, it won't give control of the Board of Directors. That's the whole trouble with the NY Times' two-tier stock system.

  Otherwise a low enough stock price would lead a corporate raider to buy the Times just to break it up and sell for an immediate profit.

Posted by: Looking Glass at October 18, 2007 12:51 AM (42wFw)

23
  James Felix on Hot Air explains it better.

Posted by: Looking Glass at October 18, 2007 12:56 AM (42wFw)

24
  Walter Duranty, NY Times Editor and Pulitzer Prize winner blogs from Hell.

  We tank the business and when the stock price starts hitting the carpet, we take the whole show private and keep the change.

Lots more NY Times parogy entertainment there.

Posted by: Looking Glass at October 18, 2007 05:47 AM (42wFw)

25

Sure, lower the price, take it all private shelling out the money to do so - and then hope that the NYT hasn't been so badly damaged that it can be resurrected (attracting new and former readers without ticking off those readers that had remained).

 

Or the Sulbergers and the Ochs may just pay to be the only mourners at the funeral.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 18, 2007 04:04 PM (O9Cc8)

26

Apple ipod mini mp3 player is one of the latest players coming from apple. mp3 player From the creators of the famous IPOD series, the apple ipod mini mp3 player comes to fill in a space left for those who want an ipod but in a smaller format. cheap mp3 player Sometimes, being big is not a good thing, And when it's something that you want to carry in your shirt pocket. buy mp3 player there is nothing as too small.People want mp3 players with all the features of bigger players, but in a size they can carry easily without even noticing it. mp3 player That's why apple ipod mini mp3 player was created, By trimming it down slightly, it has become a much more comfortable device to carry around with you.If you value size more than the music capacity of the mp3 player and believe me, ipod mini already carries a lot of music and want something smaller than the classic IPOD. MP3 PLAYER kaufen then the apple ipod mini mp3 player might be the best choice for you. mp3 player Just make a quick comparison with its larger brother and select the right size for you..

Posted by: jhkuyry at March 28, 2008 12:22 AM (6lCju)

Posted by: chong at April 16, 2008 02:28 AM (2ez/P)

Posted by: aswkin at July 17, 2008 08:25 AM (Gyixh)

Posted by: jiwdj at January 18, 2009 11:23 AM (vTmUg)

Posted by: Ƚо at January 30, 2009 09:27 AM (hXNNS)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 08:43 AM (9oMrs)

Posted by: NBA SHOES at October 24, 2009 01:55 PM (/6617)

Posted by: nike air max at October 26, 2009 12:07 AM (sqkfE)

Posted by: nike air max at October 27, 2009 11:39 PM (HOzQF)

Posted by: discount ugg boots at October 30, 2009 01:42 AM (mBGLP)

Posted by: ugg boots at October 30, 2009 04:05 AM (3iF2y)

37 well done!mbtwe salembt shoes

Posted by: mbt shoes at October 31, 2009 02:37 AM (D7Tew)

Posted by: products at November 02, 2009 01:13 PM (Ik1Iu)

Posted by: uggsdream at November 03, 2009 12:28 AM (Uc43O)

Posted by: shoesshoe at November 03, 2009 08:07 PM (LHCCE)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 13, 2009 06:41 AM (oSzDE)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:36 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:16 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:05 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 03:48 AM (C/zDM)

46 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 19, 2009 07:14 AM (n0jE1)

47 Choosing men's shoes is not always an easy task to take complete. Most men do not give a lot of consideration to their footwear mbt shoes and when they do they rarely have any idea what to look for. When it comes to formal shoes mbt shoes, there are a variety of styles and levels of quality that affect a decision just as much as color and style. So how do you choose men's dress shoes? MBT is the best choice when you want to choose a pair of shoes for your dad,husband or boyfriend. They must enjoy them.
Please feel free to contact us for further information. If you need these products, please contact us. Wish we could have good cooperations! MBT trainers Thank you!

Posted by: like at November 20, 2009 03:47 AM (A+PPY)

48 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 24, 2009 10:38 PM (fd1jz)

49 As you consider the many famous brand names mbt shoes, don't just consider the price tag. Consider the health of your feet , as they are your main guide to life and will likely endure more physical trauma on a daily basis than any other part of your body. mbt shoes-Your best choice .

Posted by: meruu at November 24, 2009 11:46 PM (1aNEH)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 10:28 AM (bsW/x)

51 The womens mbtchallenges the hard to reach
muscles in your legs, but also works the abdominal, back, buttock, and thigh muscles.
With every stride, the instability activates the whole body in concert and tones as it
stimulates different areas.mbt
footwear
have a curved pivot sole that copies walking on soft moss. The sole of
href=http://www.mbtshoesbuy.com/products_new.html>new mbt
turns even, flat ground
into uneven terrain. The mbt anti shoes challenges the muscles to work harder with
every step you take. The unique curved sole works by providing instability and makes
the muscles of your body more engaged and also helps burn more calories.
The mbt shoes walking shoes have been
highlighted for its ability to cushion your feet while challenging your muscles.
Clinical studies suggest that regular use improves balance, posture and circulation.
mbt lami shoes re-establish
the natural conditions for standing and walking.You will get more results out of your
workouts ? MBT shoes have technology in the sole design that make your working more
efficient and burn more calories. With every step, the instability activates your
muscles and the whole body is stimulated as your walk more and more.Free Shipping
1Week on Select Styles Of discount
mbt
Walking Shoes Reviews !

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at December 09, 2009 01:11 PM (B0M1x)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 15, 2009 02:21 PM (5o+JZ)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 02:09 AM (1dySH)

54
Posted by: ugg boot ugguk uggs at December 17, 2009 11:00 AM (kjiNu)

55

Posted by: ugg boots ugg australia nightfall at December 18, 2009 06:03 AM (34RKy)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 06:11 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: cheap Air Max at December 25, 2009 08:10 AM (ZgK+c)

58 well done!mbtwe salembt shoes

Posted by: mbt shoes ugg boots at December 30, 2009 02:11 AM (DPCf/)

59 well done!mbtwe salembt shoes

Posted by: mbt shoes timberland boots ugg boots uggs at December 31, 2009 12:19 AM (EDweO)

Posted by: airmaxshoes at January 06, 2010 02:00 AM (fLwxV)

Posted by: nike air max at January 20, 2010 12:49 PM (CZv6h)

Posted by: ugg boots uggcardy.org shoemkt.com 87415555.com.cn at February 02, 2010 11:37 AM (b5xWG)

Posted by: ugg boots uggcardy.org shoemkt.com 87415555.com.cn at February 03, 2010 12:55 PM (cz5KF)

64 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 07:58 PM (TUJDt)

65 iszag replica watches hpojap replica watches,emwycm louis vuitton svc replica watches,jdfyj replica rolex qybjzu replica watches,fihzkm watches replica acwn replica watches replica watches,lmkmwdv louis vuitton kvbchg replica watches,zqsss replica watches louis vuitton,nzkj louis vuitton,jjywwc watches bshaki louis vuitton replica ebqt watches qxyizk,louis vuitton,yiuqkzg louis vuitton wdanjn louis vuitton,eovvjcz replica louis vuitton omkecy,louis vuitton,owief louis vuitton ytxn replica watches icbwsv.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 09:47 AM (UTLu5)






Processing 0.21, elapsed 0.2235 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.1792 seconds, 74 records returned.
Page size 96 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat