Big: Old FISA Law Delayed Hunt For Kidnappers Of American Soldiers
Update: Video Report Added
Video: Now at Hot Air.
I'll just bulletpoint: Last May, Iraqi terrorists kidnapped three American soldiers. American intelligence officials searched for cyber-signals about the kidnapping... and actually found them. They found the kidnappers talking to each other on-line. However, they had to stop listening because the signals were passing through an American-based server and under the law that meant there could be no eavesdropping without a warrant. So they stopped listening in on foreign terrorists holding kidnapped American soldiers. For ten hours, officials worked to get "emergency authorization" to resume eavesdropping. This then required the personal okay of AG Gonzales, who couldn't be reached for two hours. So a 12 hour gap after the kidnappers had been discovered. The law has been changed to expressly permit eavesdropping in this situation, and some Democrats such as Rep. Reyes (D) are arguing for a rollback to the previous rule. One of those kidnapped soldiers, I'm told, was later found dead and mutilated. Whether the gap in eavesdropping may have averted this I don't know, and perhaps no one will ever know. Two of the kidnapped soldiers, Larwyn tells me, are still unaccounted for. Again: What might have been said in that 12 hour gap that could have tipped off US forces to their location? We don't know. Confronted with the bad outcomes caused by their ridiculous laws, Democrats always seem to argue, basically, that people should ignore the law when necessary. They insinuated that when the DoJ determined it did not have legal cause to examine Zaccharias Moussaui's laptop without a warrant, for example: They should have just had the foresight to know they should ignore the law and search for 9/11 plots on that laptop. This is not a tolerable view of the law nor how the law should function. True enough, there will be cases where any sane man will ignore the law when life hangs in the balance. But the Democrats just continue to pander to their paranoid BDS MoveOn voters with very restrictive and impractical laws, and then just parry criticisms of these laws away with vague insinuations that soldiers and CIA operatives ought to be brave enough to risk their careers in ignoring the laws they've made when "appropriate." "Appropriate" being defined as when it turns out, in the perfect clarity of hindsight, that their laws cost human lives. Perhaps they should strive to craft more realistic laws that don't rely on benign lawbreaking to make them function properly. More: From Powerline. Seattle Slough claims that FISA allows eavesdropping to happen with a warrant applied for 72 hours later. So that should take care of it, then, he asserts. Wrong. And when I say wrong, understand I am not 100% sure of this, but I'm pretty sure he's wrong. The old law permits the AG and the AG only (well, I guess the President too) to authorize this "emergency authorization" to permit eavedropping without court-issued warrant. However, the law requires the eavesdropping stop until this emergency authorization is approved, and furthermore, the law requires those seeking the authorization to determine all necessary facts to the extent possible (that these are foreigners not entitled to full Constitutional protections, that time is of the essence, etc.) and make a detailed case with a fully supported paper trail for later review. So no, Seattle, I don't think it's the case you can just continue eavesdropping and take all the time you like to apply for that warrant 72 hours later. I believe the law requires extensive and time-consuming pseudo-warrant-applications just to get the emergency authorization in order to continue the eavesdropping until the warrant is actually secured. If I'm wrong, I'll eat it with an admission, as I usually do. But I don't think I am. Correction: They didn't start eavesdropping and then stop; they never started at all while they filled out the paperwork for an "emergency authorization." If something is of an "emergency" nature, is paperwork really what you want people doing? Another print story from USAToday.It took time (to begin the tap)," McConnell said, because the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) required intelligence agents to first demonstrate to the U.S. attorney general that the target was likely an agent of a foreign power. Surveillance of foreigners overseas does not always require such an assurance. However, many foreign calls pass through U.S. telecommunications networks, requiring the attorney general's approval. McConnell called the requirement, which has been temporarily eliminated, "burdensome."Thanks to Drew for putting me some fucking information.
Comments
Confronted with the bad outcomes caused by their ridiculous laws, Democrats always seem to argue, basically, that people should ignore the law when necessary
Right, and when the reactionaries found out about it, they'd have a field day attacking the President, the DOD nad prosocuting whoever really did ignore the law in the pursuit of saving an American soldier.
I've just about had it with the reactionary left.
Cocksuckers, every last one of them.
Posted by: N. O'Brain at September 28, 2007 06:58 PM (PmWhP)
Posted by: topsecretk9 at September 28, 2007 06:59 PM (0Dt9v)
So, basically, what N. O'Brain said.
With more suck and less cock.
Posted by: Merovign at September 28, 2007 07:02 PM (IaYDo)
Saw it at powerline earlier today, it looks like the delay was actually almost 4 days. The twelve hours, is just in relation to the actual process of seeking the warrant, but it took 3 days, to look for a procedure to get the tap, and the legalisms needed to keep the tap.
They filed for the warrant almost 4 days after the initial plan was created, and didn't start tapping until they were comfortable with the legal sides, and applied. They couldn't tap until after the application, and the court had 3 days to review.
If some of the other "privacy issues" had been compromised on the side of the crazy left, he wouldn't have been able to tap until after the approval, meaning almost a 7 day gap.
Too many lawyers involved in things that are not their business.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 07:02 PM (QTv8u)
How is this FISA's fault when situations exactly like this were contemplated by FISA and accounted for?
Posted by: seattle slough at September 28, 2007 07:02 PM (H5l9d)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 07:05 PM (QTv8u)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 07:05 PM (QTv8u)
Posted by: z ryan at September 28, 2007 07:06 PM (PDeVA)
Posted by: Entropy at September 28, 2007 07:07 PM (HgAV0)
Disgusting. I've been saying for a while that if a Democrat gets elected they will reinstate these same programs they leaked because they know they are vital and do not want another 9-11 on their watch and they'll just repackage it and their fuckards nuts will all rejoice in the Dems brilliance and congratulate themselves for having saved terror wiretapping - only they're fucktards and they won't know what they are celebrating.
Posted by: topsecretk9 at September 28, 2007 07:12 PM (0Dt9v)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 07:15 PM (QTv8u)
Posted by: z ryan at September 28, 2007 07:18 PM (PDeVA)
Someone here needs to grow a pair and recognize when to escalate.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 28, 2007 07:20 PM (iuG/e)
Posted by: Editors at September 28, 2007 07:24 PM (1AOJB)
Posted by: Editors at September 28, 2007 07:24 PM (1AOJB)
First a JAG won't let us kill Mullah Omar
Now the dems get these troops tortured and murdered
If it weren't for the lawyers on our own side we might be able to win this war
Posted by: Paul in Iowa at September 28, 2007 07:27 PM (tOQXA)
I think one of the arguments made is that the application had to be formaly filed, rather announced for filing.
So, just running into fisc and saying "yo bitches, got a request coming in a few hours, gonna start now, catchya in a bit." cuz in legal terms, "emergency" means, after having clerks and paralegals take care of all the mintuae while the lawyers are looking for excuses, then re-reads, and corrections and re-writes, and then final drafts forwarded to the AG and Pres, then sent to fisc.
I prefer "notice" being of the "yo bitches" type, it's a lot more efficient.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 07:29 PM (QTv8u)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 07:30 PM (QTv8u)
The top U.S. spy agency, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, sent Congress a timeline detailing the wiretap effort as the Bush administration makes its case to wary Democrats for a permanent expansion of its authority to eavesdrop on the foreign communications of terrorism suspects
Makes the blood boil. But they support the troops!
Posted by: topsecretk9 at September 28, 2007 07:33 PM (0Dt9v)
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at September 28, 2007 07:33 PM (uOvAE)
Posted by: holdfast at September 28, 2007 07:33 PM (Gzb30)
Posted by: topsecretk9 at September 28, 2007 07:35 PM (0Dt9v)
Aside from the fact McConnell says that's not the case (and that even in an emergency situation a proffer of probable cause has to be made), why in the world are constitutional protections being afforded to people who are not within the borders of the US? Is the fact that two people outside the US are communicating over servers that are located in the US really a sufficient nexus to trigger 4th Amendment protections? Funny I always thought that was limited to you know 'the people' and not servers or switchers. And personally, I never thought of Iraqis or foreign terrorists as part of 'the people' the Constitution protected.
You fucking liberals are going to get a lot of people killed with this shit.
Posted by: Drew at September 28, 2007 07:47 PM (hlYel)
Something tells me we weren't looking for evidence to gather against these guys to use in court. When actual lives are in imminent harm, who cares about the admissibility of evidence?
PLUS, the fact that there were hostages in peril should have eliminated (or at least ameliorated) any warrant requirement in the first place. You don't need a search warrant to enter a house if you have reason to suspect there is a hostage inside.
Its why the fire department doesn't need a warrant to break your door down when the house is on fire.
This story claims that they were already listening in and then stopped? Because of FISA? Doesn't sound plausible to me. And this happened last
Posted by: seattle slough at September 28, 2007 07:48 PM (H5l9d)
The issue isn't admissibility. McConnell says he can't make the NSA do it without a warrant. The Director doesn't want to go to jail or screw his agency for conducting an illegal intercept. Given the Democrats preening on this issue, it's not an unreasonable position.
This story claims that they were already listening in and then stopped? Because of FISA? Doesn't sound plausible to me. And this happened last
This story says they couldn't start for 12 hours and this time-line shows the delay. It never got underway because by the time they jumped through the hoops, it wasn't useful.
Thanks Democrats!
Posted by: Drew at September 28, 2007 07:58 PM (hlYel)
I think the powerline article says that therre were delays because of legalisms, not a start stop. I think ace got that part wrong.
I am also tired of thise "unconstitutional" shit when it comes to foreign policy and the ability of the executive to excercise authority over operations. It isn't unconstitutional, it's inherint in the authority of the Command In Chief, of United States Armed Forces, which IS in the consitutional, and the individuals who's "rights" are being violated, have no access to constitutional authority, because they are extraconstitutional in the actions.
Illegal aliens, are extraconstitutional, enemies of every stripe who are not US Citizens, are extra constitutional. Unless the argument is that the computer servers have rights.
Which might be possible, since Pixy went through a number of revolts some time ago, or were they "protests?"
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 07:59 PM (QTv8u)
riiight...nice try at cya. Despicable.
Posted by: topsecretk9 at September 28, 2007 08:01 PM (0Dt9v)
Well,
Theres the civil suits, the loss of income because your ass will get fired, the inability to excercise your practiced trade, because your ass got fired, and you have to keep taking time off for the civil suits, there's the near terror, that the person filing the civil suit, doesn't think they are gonna win, will realize that you are unemployed, and unemployable, and that you are broke, and can't afford any realistic security making you worried for yourself and your family at all times until you die. There is john murtha saying your name on the floor of house, and accusing you of mccarthy like villainization of innocent persons, while engaging in nixonian cover-ups, just to please your masters like a foolish puppy.
WHAT COULD POSSIBLY go wrong SS?
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 08:07 PM (QTv8u)
Posted by: eman at September 28, 2007 08:14 PM (hc1YY)
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at September 28, 2007 08:17 PM (uOvAE)
This just looks like incompetence.
According to the timeline Drew posted, the FISA court is nowhere involved in this. They didn't even ask the FISA disk at DOJ about it until 5:15 (via telephone call, not via pleadings, affidavits, and declarations) and they didn't actually get an acting attorney general on the phone until about two hours after that. Gonzalez (not the FISA court) gives telephonic approval at 7:18 and they are intercepting communications 20 minutes later.
My read on the timeline says NSA wants to do something. They think they need approval from DOJ. DOJ (not FISA) takes ten hours to get the AG on the phone. Twenty minutes later they are conducting the surveillance.
Posted by: seattle slough at September 28, 2007 08:17 PM (H5l9d)
Posted by: seattle slough at September 28, 2007 08:21 PM (H5l9d)
As if we'd expect anything else from a bunch of preening politicians and bureaucratic paper pushers.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 28, 2007 08:22 PM (6Ie+q)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 08:24 PM (QTv8u)
Don't sell yourself short, you are also a lefty in the bag for Democrats and apparently have poor comprehension skills.
Read what McConnell says. You don't just call up the AG or his rep and say, 'hey can we do this? Okay? Great thanks". You have to provide him with material that demonstrates probable cause.
"It took time (to begin the tap)," McConnell said, because the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) required intelligence agents to first demonstrate to the U.S. attorney general that the target was likely an agent of a foreign power.
But of course in your little world the whole intelligence community doesn't know the law and were to lazy to do what they had to do to help 3 Americans in the hands of terrorists. It had nothing to do with the climate the Democrats have created. Nope nothing at all.
Posted by: Drew at September 28, 2007 08:27 PM (hlYel)
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at September 28, 2007 08:30 PM (uOvAE)
I couldn't agree with you more...and to read that Democrats said the situation was exaggerated (1 dead mutilated soldier, 2 missing) on the one hand but then say the agents should have just broken the law-- just break it, who cares?! A law that they seek to tighten beyond AND leaked to ruin in the past in the first place is just incredible.
Incomprehensible and indefensible on so many levels.
Posted by: topsecretk9 at September 28, 2007 08:37 PM (0Dt9v)
Posted by: denny hastert at September 28, 2007 08:45 PM (dtQ3T)
"rules" and "guidence" is why the Presidents authority to wage war is absolute, other than funding.
"you can't rule by committee."
and . . .
DAMN! whats the quote about compromise?
BRB with it, if I can find it.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 09:05 PM (QTv8u)
Concluding at 12:53 p.m. EDT that requirements for emergency eavesdropping approval had been met, officials spent more than four hours debating "novel and complicated issues" in the case.
I'll concede that perhaps the necessity to cover all the bases, and their asses, required them to discuss "novel and complicated issues". Not for four fucking hours while American lives are at stake. Some one in that meeting needed to say, in order to focus the minds in that room, 'Fuck it. This is what we're doing.'
I'd like to see Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, and Nancy Pelosi on their knees begging the parents of these soldiers for forgiveness. Never happen of course because they don't give a fuck. Some people in the DNI's office need to be fired, right now.
Pick a team American politicians: your countrymen or foreign terrorists.
Posted by: cranky at September 28, 2007 09:08 PM (7rKVk)
here's a bunch of quotes, some are good, most are almost unintelligible, none of them are what I'm looking for.
This is a good one.
"If you are not very clever, you should be conciliatory.
Author: Benjamin Disraeli"
His memory doesn't live in my mind, I keep thinking of "cream" whenever I read anything about that cat, simply because I'm a pop culture buffoon who can't keep track of that shit.
I can't find a reference to the one I was thinking of, I think it was by a brit "compromise is the failure of the ambitious due to a lack of imagination" or something like that.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 09:15 PM (QTv8u)
You must remember that the justice department is comprised of Clinton holdovers (WALL) and Dem lovers -- and Bush is prohibited in firing these assholes as he tried at the first of the year because it's an impeachable offense apparently. He's stuck with them and really it's his own damn fault for thinking he could trust careerists instead of going the Clinton route and firing them all.
Additionally, this ALL the Dem's doing... the Dem party at large, has politicized and neutered our government such to the extent they can't wipe their own ass without working it out to such a point that asshole Patrick Leahy won't want a stupid hearing.
Dems created this nightmare, they OWN it.
I intend to wrap it so tightly around their necks the circulation stops.
Posted by: topsecretk9 at September 28, 2007 09:21 PM (0Dt9v)
I am not sure Democrats really understand the purpose of rule of law anyway. They're always going on about how the courts should interpret the Constitution in a flexible, progressive manner. They do not see how that undermines the predictability and certainty that people need to get along in large societies, particularly in order to get any kind of business done.
In their poorly thought out world view, there's a correct way of thinking and acting, and if we can just get everyone to that imaginary state, everything will be good.
I know this well. Used to be a liberal. Then I did some thinking.
So, no flame thread tonight?
Posted by: qrstuv at September 28, 2007 10:00 PM (Z3lex)
"If it weren't for the lawyers on our own side we might be able to win this war"
Actually, they're on the other side, and so are a lot of progressive liberals.
Posted by: roy at September 28, 2007 10:21 PM (MAeaH)
This is our future with a D Presudent. Tell me we do not need to rally behind whomever the next R Presidential candidate is, regardless of what we may not like about their individual stand on individual isses. Sorry, but I stopped voting ISSUE and started voting party long, long ago. Do I wish we had a solid, 100% conservo candiadate? HELL yes. But if we don't, and it ends up Guliana, Romney or Fred! then they have my vote, and activism. We turned the tide with W and the immigration deal, at least we have a place to start. Stay home because G is too lib on the gay marriage thing, or Fred! is not sufficiently anti-immigration then THIS is what we get. Ds, Libs and/or Progressos will move us a giant step toward societal death, DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN!
Posted by: v at September 28, 2007 10:26 PM (uXHec)
If every action I have ever performed for all my life, I would have eventualy built up enough infractions to send me to prison for life.
If every action I had performed over any 4 year period were absolutely prosecuted and proved, I would spend a LOT of my life in prison.
If congress believed in the rule of law, they wouldn't make EVERY FUCKING SINGLE AMERICAN a CRIMINAL TERRIFIED about what the LAW might say about them.
One of the foundations of "law" is that it be understood, otherwise the government "of, for and by" is just a bumper sticker.
Laura Ingraham, "ENFORCE THE (ed: fucking) LAWS!"
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 10:26 PM (QTv8u)
They pass laws to make themselves feel good, but they don't actually accomplish anything.
Whats the Andrew Jackson Quote?
He was right.
The job of the congress, is to create an impossible situation for the executive, the job of the SCOTUS is to work whenever they please for whatever cause they support.
Only the CINCUSF is the one who must act, everyone else? they can campaign, and philosophise as they please, without responsibility, cuz HEY! they ain't the fucking CINCUSF.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 28, 2007 10:50 PM (QTv8u)
Wicked, you are quote alzheimers tonight.
Stay home because G is too lib on the gay marriage thing, or Fred! is not sufficiently anti-immigration then THIS is what we get.
Elections matter, vote republican...they at least have you and your son's back.
Posted by: topsecretk9 at September 28, 2007 11:31 PM (0Dt9v)
It's a standard wingnut approach: claim that government works badly and then, when in power, do such a bad job of running the government that it appears you were right.
Posted by: Bob Munck at September 29, 2007 12:42 AM (n0BzT)
Answer: about a year ago a FISA Court Judge (a Clinton appointee btw) EXTENDED through his decision FISA to REQUIRE a warrant for EVERY communication simply passing through ANY US Wire or service. Even if that communication is strictly foreign to foreign. Which meant that any IM, Sat Phone, or any other traffic in Iraq essentially required a warrant.
The Judge who made this decision knew this would happen (Justice argued so) but in his decision (parts of which have leaked out presumably by pissed off NSA folks) he noted that his interpretation of the Law mattered more than lives. Or words to that effect.
Posted by: Jim Rockford at September 29, 2007 12:46 AM (4878o)
Posted by: billfry at September 29, 2007 12:51 AM (dC60J)
Okay, the Director of National Intelligence and the Assistant Attorney General for National Intelligence says that's not true and that they needed to satisfy probable cause requirements before starting the surveillance.
Munck your qualifications to dispute them are what exactly? You offer what evidence to back up your assertion?
Posted by: Drew at September 29, 2007 12:52 AM (hlYel)
Seems kinda superfluous if it wasn't the case.
Posted by: Drew at September 29, 2007 12:55 AM (hlYel)
It doesn't care about facts, or ideas, or anything but the narrative its psyche hangs upon.
No doubt an interesting subject for psychological study, but with regards to policy discussions, not so much.
Posted by: Merovign at September 29, 2007 02:30 AM (IaYDo)
Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but the AG probably has to fly commercial. I don't think he has an Air Force 3 or whatever that whisks him around the country. Again, I could be wrong. But if he was indeed flying commercial, he'd have to turn off his cell and other electronic devices, no?
And I'm no legal expert, but the info on the law that I've seen today suggests that the exception would have to come straight from the AG himself, not a subordinate.
If I'm wrong about any of these things, well, shame on me. But if I'm not, well, it looks like you've done a heck of a job, Munckie!
Posted by: Sean M. at September 29, 2007 05:29 AM (XFqvL)
Wainstein said the law required officials to obtain enough details to support a search warrant — either before they create the wiretap or after if they seek retroactive approval — so they did it first.
They could either just do the wiretap and then justify it later, or justify it first and then do the wiretap. Which did they choose to do? D'oh!
This stinks of propaganda. What they want is the power to wiretap without having to provide justification later. If you're OK with that, fine, but kiss your privacy and by definition your liberty good-bye.
Also, I am pretty sure the AG has a dedicated Gulfstream III, four stars do, and the AG outranks a four star.
Posted by: icus at September 29, 2007 08:35 AM (OTNlI)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at September 29, 2007 08:41 AM (pzen5)
Hilarious.
Your ignorance is comical and embarrassing.
Posted by: Jay at September 29, 2007 09:37 AM (4svNr)
How would you know?
What they want is the power to wiretap without having to provide justification later.
What is funny is that an idiot like you pretends to care. Remember, moron, they'll doctor the evidence anyway.
Posted by: Jay at September 29, 2007 09:49 AM (4svNr)
a) Submission by Federal officer; approval of Attorney General; contents
Each application for an order approving electronic surveillance under this subchapter shall be made by a Federal officer in writing upon oath or affirmation to a judge having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title. Each application shall require the approval of the Attorney General based upon his finding that it satisfies the criteria and requirements of such application as set forth in this subchapter
It shall include—
(1) the identity of the Federal officer making the application;
(2) the authority conferred on the Attorney General by the President of the United States and the approval of the Attorney General to make the application;
(3) the identity, if known, or a description of the target of the electronic surveillance;
(4) a statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify his belief that—
(A) the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power; and
(B) each of the facilities or places at which the electronic surveillance is directed is being used, or is about to be used, by a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power;
(5) a statement of the proposed minimization procedures;
(6) a detailed description of the nature of the information sought and the type of communications or activities to be subjected to the surveillance;
(7) a certification or certifications by the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs or an executive branch official or officials designated by the President from among those executive officers employed in the area of national security or defense and appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate—
(A) that the certifying official deems the information sought to be foreign intelligence information;
(B) that a significant purpose of the surveillance is to obtain foreign intelligence information;
© that such information cannot reasonably be obtained by normal investigative techniques;
(D) that designates the type of foreign intelligence information being sought according to the categories described in section 1801 (e) of this title; and
(E) including a statement of the basis for the certification that—
(i) the information sought is the type of foreign intelligence information designated; and
(ii) such information cannot reasonably be obtained by normal investigative techniques;
(
a statement of the means by which the surveillance will be effected and a statement whether physical entry is required to effect the surveillance;
(9) a statement of the facts concerning all previous applications that have been made to any judge under this subchapter involving any of the persons, facilities, or places specified in the application, and the action taken on each previous application;
(10) a statement of the period of time for which the electronic surveillance is required to be maintained, and if the nature of the intelligence gathering is such that the approval of the use of electronic surveillance under this subchapter should not automatically terminate when the described type of information has first been obtained, a description of facts supporting the belief that additional information of the same type will be obtained thereafter; and
(11) whenever more than one electronic, mechanical or other surveillance device is to be used with respect to a particular proposed electronic surveillance, the coverage of the devices involved and what minimization procedures apply to information acquired by each device.
------------------------
Also:
50 U.S.C. Sec. 1805(f):
If the Attorney General authorizes such emergency employment of electronic surveillance, he shall require that the minimization procedures required by this subchapter for the issuance of a judicial order be followed. In the absence of a judicial order approving such electronic surveillance, the surveillance shall terminate when the information sought is obtained, when the application for the order is denied, or after the expiration of 72 hours from the time of authorization by the Attorney General, whichever is earliest. In the event that such application for approval is denied, or in any other case where the electronic surveillance is terminated and no order is issued approving the surveillance, no information obtained or evidence derived from such surveillance shall be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, office, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or political subdivision thereof
Posted by: Jay at September 29, 2007 10:03 AM (4svNr)
Posted by: zetetic at September 29, 2007 01:09 PM (ukuxx)
Yeah. When the fruits of your ignorant opposition come to light it's propaganda.
You sound like a pathetic truther.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 at September 29, 2007 01:18 PM (0Dt9v)
Posted by: ushie at September 29, 2007 02:34 PM (8nB5X)
If the Attorney General authorizes such emergency employment of electronic surveillance, he shall require that the minimization procedures required by this subchapter for the issuance of a judicial order be followed. In the absence of a judicial order approving such electronic surveillance, the surveillance shall terminate when the information sought is obtained, when the application for the order is denied, or after the expiration of 72 hours from the time of authorization by the Attorney General, whichever is earliest.
In other words, they had 72 hours after beginning surveillance to obtain approval. They actually took 12 hours to get it, so were a solid 2 1/2 days ahead of the deadline. Unfortunately, they stupidly didn't even start the surveillance until after this 12-hour period, and -- possibly because of this late start -- it failed to provide any useful information. That's the problem with having morons running the government.
They did take 2 of the 12 hours to get in touch with Gonzales, and wouldn't have been able to start until they had his go-ahead. USA Today said:
"It seems like an issue of command," said Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, the panel [House Intelligence Committee] chairman. Getting approval for such emergency wiretaps should take "only a few minutes" and "one phone call," Reyes said, citing Harvard University law professor James Baker, a former Justice Department surveillance specialist.
Of course, if Gonzales had been a competent and responsible AG, he would have never put himself in a position where it would take two hours to reach him, or he would have appointed an Acting AG with the authority to make the decision. Didn't he learn anything from the whole Ashcroft/hospital bed thing?
Who am I kidding? Bushies never learn from their mistakes. They just try to blame them on someone else, as is the case here.
Posted by: Bob Munck at September 29, 2007 02:43 PM (n0BzT)
But new details released this week portray a more complicated picture of the delay, which actually lasted about 9 1/2 hours and was caused primarily by legal wrangling between the Justice Department and intelligence officials over whether authorities had probable cause to begin the surveillance.
Justice officials also spent nearly two hours trying to reach then-Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales to authorize the emergency wiretap. He was in Texasappearing before a gathering of U.S. attorneys.
Someone said above that I was disputing the Director of National Intelligence. I guess I was; turns out he lied to Congress about the situation. Actually, it was easy to tell that he was lying; he was a Republican and his lips were moving.
Posted by: Bob Munck at September 29, 2007 03:02 PM (n0BzT)
Here's the point moron, there should be no doubt that probable cause is not remotely an issue when the people to be surveiled aren't in the US. Who has muddied this water? Democrats.
Again, answer me this, if the law was as crystal clear as you and the terrorist enablers in Congress claim, why did the Democrats change the law after this case to reflect what anyone with a modicum of brains knows it should be?
Posted by: Wesley Clark at September 29, 2007 03:21 PM (hlYel)
Posted by: Drew at September 29, 2007 03:22 PM (hlYel)
This has to be the most fornicated war when a rescue operation in theater has to be vetted past the lawyers.
Do any of these people know (1) "exigent circumstances" and (2) "It's easier to get forgiveness than permission"? I learned (1) that first year in law school and (2) my first year working post-high school for a city government.
Or is 'Dirty Harry' verboten in the US?
Posted by: Richard Stengal, TIME Magazine at September 29, 2007 06:20 PM (kAnhF)
A few weeks ago I wrote a post about the Democrats' new tactic to defeat the FISA legislation - a Plan B, so to speak. They want to eliminate immunity for telecom companies, so they will be afraid to participate with the government in pursing wiretap info.
If immunity isn't added, the telecoms could go bankrupt because of civil litigation. And it has to be retroactively enacted.
Posted by: ConservativeBelle at September 29, 2007 08:08 PM (/v6Id)
Good job guys, You are lawyering shit.
"Bottom line: the law of the land allowed them to start surveillance immediately "
WRONG! retard.
I'm sorry, but you are wrong so wrong that a twice dropout, 1 time court-martialed fool knows that you are so wrong, that if wrong had a bitch, you would be that bitch.
Really, it takes a lot of effort to be that stupid, and to be the wrong.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at September 30, 2007 05:10 AM (QTv8u)
A lot of this is just cowardice: you're so frightened of the scary terrists that you'll give up the Bill of Rights to "conserve" your sorry asses.
Posted by: icus at September 30, 2007 09:59 AM (OTNlI)
Logic much, stupid?
I bolded the part for you so it would become clear that if the AG/DOJ don't know in advance it will be approved, there is no point in engaging in the surveillance as it will be ordered to cease. Then what happens?
Well,
no information obtained or evidence derived from such surveillance shall be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, office, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or political subdivision thereof
Can you grasp this yet imbecile?
or he would have appointed an Acting AG with the authority to make the decision.
Uh, that would be illegal.
Nice job, dumbass.
Posted by: Jay at September 30, 2007 10:35 AM (4svNr)
What is most comical about this idiotic statement is that every single court ruling on the matter, including ones packed with liberal justices, has said this isn't a 4th amendment issue, it's a seperation of powers one.
In other words, you're a complete ignorant moron.
SMITH v. MARYLAND, 442 U.S. 735 (1979)
We therefore conclude that petitioner in all probability entertained no actual expectation of privacy in the phone numbers he dialed, and that, even if he did, his expectation was not "legitimate." The installation and use of a pen register, [442 U.S. 735, 746] consequently, was not a "search," and no warrant was required. The judgment of the Maryland Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Posted by: Jay at September 30, 2007 10:42 AM (4svNr)
If they don't know in advance that it will be approved? That makes no sense. How could they ever know for certain that it would be approved? You're saying that there's no point in wiretapping in the hopes of being able to free three kidnapped soldiers because there's a chance that it wouldn't be approved? I'd think you would go ahead with the tap even if it seemed unlikely to be approved, because it's still better than doing nothing.
"or he would have appointed an Acting AG with the authority to make the decision."
Uh, that would be illegal.
It's illegal to appoint an Acting Attorney General? Did Ashcroft know this when he appointed Comey Acting AG before going in for surgery?
Jay, you need to learn that name-calling isn't a very effective form of argument. I realize it's pretty much all you've got; your logic and grasp of the meanings of words seems pretty scanty. Wickedpinto has much the same problem, but his posts are so incoherent that it's hard to tell. Might I suggest a community college course in effective rhetoric?
Posted by: Bob Munck at September 30, 2007 11:39 AM (n0BzT)
Nice apples to oranges comparison you illiterate jackass.
If they don't know in advance that it will be approved? That makes no sense.
Really? You think so? You mean you are shocked that a Democratic Congress would write such a statute?
I'd think you would go ahead with the tap even if it seemed unlikely to be approved, because it's still better than doing nothing.
Nice to see you on record for lawbreaking.
ay, you need to learn that name-calling isn't a very effective form of argument. I realize it's pretty much all you've got; your logic and grasp of the meanings of words seems pretty scanty.
Calling you a moron isn't "namecalling" it's a factual statement.
Posted by: Jay at September 30, 2007 12:26 PM (4svNr)
No dumbass, I'm saying FISA can't encroach on the President's powers and to the extent it does, it is to be ignored. But silly idiots like you are too busy assigning blame to "wingnuts" rather than realizing the blame lies with your ignorant ideology in insisting that such laws be put into place in the first place.
Posted by: Jay at September 30, 2007 12:28 PM (4svNr)
Icus...not "everyone's"...just people who are outside the jurisdiction of the US. They have zero, none, nada expectation of 4th Amendment protection. Just because the server their emails go through are in the US doesn't magically give these people the same rights as citizens. And computer servers and telecom switchers don't have rights...well, they didn't until a Democratic Congress gave it to them.
Nice job.
And Munck, for the 3rd time...if the law was a crystal fucking clear as you say why did the Democratic controlled Congress change it to reflect what anyone with half a brian knows it should have been all along? If the law was as you claim there was no need to change it, was there?
I don't expect you or any of your terrorist enabling brethren to answer that question (again) because there is no answer consistent with your position.
Posted by: Drew at September 30, 2007 01:02 PM (hlYel)
Ashcroft was going to be unavailable for some period, so he appointed Comey Acting AG. If Gonzales was going to be unavailable, he could have done likewise. There's nothing "apples and oranges" about it. Gonzales certainly knew that situations like this could arise where he would have to be reached immediately to make an authorization, but apparently he couldn't even be bothered to carry a cell phone. It took them two hours to reach him; that's just pure irresponsible incompetence, nothing to do with what laws may or may not have existed.
why did the Democratic controlled Congress change it to reflect what anyone with half a brian knows it should have been all along?
You claim that they changed it "to say that warrants weren't required in cases where the parties aren't in the US but the tap is." Warrants weren't a consideration in the delay; they spent all their time trying to get in touch with Gonzales and arguing about whether they had probable cause. Soldier's lives were at stake; they should have gone ahead with the tap even if there was a possibility that they would be turned down by FISA later. The law allowed them to do that, but they didn't. I don't know why they didn't; my guess is that they feared that they would be personally embarrassed and made to look incompetent if the court had ruled that they didn't have probable cause. That threat weighed more heavily on them than the danger to the kidnapped soldiers.
The fact that Congress changed the law is purely a red herring on your part. Wainstein, assistant attorney general for national security, said that the law allowed them to begin the wiretap immediately but they chose not to do so.
Posted by: Bob Munck at September 30, 2007 02:53 PM (n0BzT)
By 10:52 a.m., the NSA had notified the Justice Department it would need a FISA order for some of it.
At 12:53 p.m., the NSA general counsel agreed that all the requirements for an emergency FISA authorization existed. The attorney general makes the authorization.
Obviously a warrant was an issue and who made it an issue? Republicans? Certainly not. Democrats did and they want to change it back!Look at what Jerrold Nadler says about the changes in the law:
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., chairman of the subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, called the effort a troubling "charm offensive."
"Let's have some truth in advertising. The act gives the president almost unfettered power to spy without judicial approval -- not only on foreigners but on Americans," Nadler said.
Yep, the Democrats are strong, tough and responsible on security. Dream on ass.Posted by: Drew at September 30, 2007 03:56 PM (hlYel)
I said that the warrant wasn't a consideration in the delay. After screwing around for 12 hours with their own bureaucracy, they had 72 hours after beginning the tap to get the request for a retroactive warrant into the FISA court. If they'd had the competence to start the tap immediately, they still would have beat the FISA deadline by 60 hours. That 12-hour delay is what everybody is complaining about; they could have started the tap 12 hours earlier, and it might well have made a difference in the outcome. Your continued attempts to shift the blame to Democrats just doesn't have any basis in the facts of the case.
Posted by: Bob Munck at September 30, 2007 08:13 PM (n0BzT)
Yes, I know you said that. You were wrong then and you are wrong now.
They needed to get the approval of the AG to waive the FISA requirement and start collecting within the 72 hour window. The problem is, as the USA Today article states, they still had to make a showing to the AG that they had reason to suspect these guys were relevant:
By the time officials obtained the legal permission for the tap, it was no longer useful, National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell told the House Intelligence Committee. The officials had to show that the target likely was a foreign agent and get the attorney general's approval, which is why it took so long, he said.
...
"It took time (to begin the tap)," McConnell said, because the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) required intelligence agents to first demonstrate to the U.S. attorney general that the target was likely an agent of a foreign power.
Surveillance of foreigners overseas does not always require such an assurance. However, many foreign calls pass through U.S. telecommunications networks, requiring the attorney general's approval.
McConnell called the requirement, which has been temporarily eliminated, "burdensome."
You just don't just call the AG and say, 'Hey Al is this okay? Great, thanks.' You have to offer him some proof about who and why you are monitoring. First, it took time to figure out if these guys triggered the FISA requirements. Once they decided they did, they had to build a case to present to the AG and then get a decision from him. Why is this so hard for you to understand? Are you stupid or a shill? Granted they are not mutually exclusive.
Look at what Nadler said, he thinks the temporary law which eliminated this BS gives intelligence agencies too much authority. You guys are simply not credible on this issue.
Posted by: Drew at September 30, 2007 09:33 PM (hlYel)
Let me break this into small pieces for you.
You and the Dems keep going on about the 72 hour window before you have to get a warrant. Do you realize that doesn't mean the NSA or the CIA or the DNI can just willy nilly monitor people for 72 hours? They can't. Before the monitorinig and that clock starts ticking they have to get a waiver from the AG. You get that right?
Posted by: Drew at September 30, 2007 09:36 PM (hlYel)
And they're all on the same team. This isn't a skeptical judge intent on defending the rule of law against overzealous prosecution. It's Gonzales; he likes wiretapping. He's going to accept the word of his subordinates and compatriots with no more than "Are you sure?" In fact, if some of the people coming to him work for him (FBI, etc.), that's what he should do; trust his subordinates. Again, USA Today said:
"It seems like an issue of command," said Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, the panel [House Intelligence Committee] chairman. Getting approval for such emergency wiretaps should take "only a few minutes" and "one phone call," Reyes said, citing Harvard University law professor James Baker, a former Justice Department surveillance specialist.
An interesting point in the AP timeline you pointed to:
On May 15, intelligence agents met at 10 a.m. to discuss collecting additional intelligence. By 10:52 a.m., the NSA had notified the Justice Department it would need a FISA order for some of it.
...
[5:30pm], the OIPR attorney on duty attempted to reach the solicitor general, Paul D. Clement, who in Gonzales' absence was acting attorney general. Clement had left for the day. [emphasis added]
Another two hours passed when Justice Department officials had trouble tracking down Alberto Gonzales, then the attorney general. He was speaking at a conference of U.S. attorneys in Texas.
Nearly two hours later, at 7:18 p.m., Gonzales authorized the requested surveillance. The FBI was notified, and at 7:28 p.m., the FBI notified intelligence agencies and personnel of the approval. Surveillance began at 7:38 p.m.
So they couldn't even reach the acting AG because, with three US soldiers in the hands of insurgents, he'd gone home at 5:30. What a bunch of doofuses. Note that getting the authorization from Gonzales took no time at all once they managed to reach him.
Posted by: Bob Munck at October 01, 2007 11:02 AM (n0BzT)
You can go on and on and on (and you have) about how this should have take 8 seconds and not 9 hours but whether you like it or not, it did. There were hurdles to jump through. So here's how you make sure that it doesn't even take 8 seconds from now on...remove any and all requirements for intelligence officials to get any legal permissions from the AG or a court to tap the phones or monitor the internet communications of foreigners outside the jurisdiction of the US.
Problem solved. Will you join me in supporting that common sense procedure to make sure this never happens again?
Posted by: Drew at October 01, 2007 02:15 PM (hlYel)
Posted by: peterwei at June 23, 2008 05:25 AM (JkTWa)
Posted by: njracks at July 09, 2008 01:52 AM (2dUNl)
Posted by: aswkin at July 17, 2008 05:53 AM (Gyixh)
Posted by: jtoeabscq hxiyjlwe at August 05, 2008 04:20 PM (l1+yn)
Posted by: playboy tv at August 06, 2008 03:01 AM (6QSwg)
Posted by: the grill room at August 08, 2008 12:43 AM (4tFi2)
Posted by: business school at August 09, 2008 03:40 PM (NnZuq)
Posted by: game boy advanced at August 10, 2008 03:06 AM (KZh70)
Posted by: online games at August 10, 2008 09:56 AM (Y6kE6)
Posted by: gas pipelines at August 11, 2008 06:58 AM (ZLuiZ)
Posted by: cerita lucah at August 12, 2008 08:06 AM (HIUBb)
Posted by: olympic village inn at August 13, 2008 06:11 AM (mKMPC)
Posted by: cerita mesum at August 16, 2008 11:28 AM (ya4UZ)
Posted by: perawan bugil at August 20, 2008 03:06 AM (ayt9H)
Posted by: bugil at August 20, 2008 04:15 AM (uu2k1)
Posted by: telanjang at August 20, 2008 05:57 AM (AzDJF)
Posted by: kerala news at August 21, 2008 12:47 AM (T3r9Y)
Posted by: oil and gas at August 21, 2008 01:38 AM (h2xq2)
Posted by: snake pictures at August 21, 2008 02:48 AM (YNwDe)
Posted by: mba admission at August 21, 2008 04:44 AM (/RE1M)
Posted by: artis point at August 21, 2008 09:59 AM (cYyMH)
Posted by: google translator at August 22, 2008 11:20 PM (i94OK)
Posted by: elisha cuthbert at August 23, 2008 09:05 PM (s01//)
Posted by: pamela anderson at August 23, 2008 10:42 PM (rn8XR)
Posted by: gadis desa at August 25, 2008 02:49 AM (HZrwV)
Posted by: cerita gadis at August 25, 2008 04:41 AM (nG/4l)
Posted by: cerita sek at August 25, 2008 11:20 PM (AB7Et)
Posted by: cerita anak at August 26, 2008 12:49 AM (Uw8xm)
Posted by: cerita ngentot at August 26, 2008 02:40 AM (DCoPY)
Posted by: cerita cinta at August 26, 2008 03:30 AM (B5yYg)
Posted by: cerita motivasi at August 27, 2008 05:14 AM (genZT)
Posted by: cerita cerita lucu at August 27, 2008 05:57 AM (BxbAk)
Posted by: cerita nyata at August 27, 2008 07:57 AM (rFgyO)
Posted by: cerita sedarah at August 27, 2008 08:45 AM (AH0iI)
Posted by: cerita pemerkosaan at August 27, 2008 09:39 AM (ZLuiZ)
Posted by: empire grill at August 29, 2008 07:24 AM (riEUH)
Posted by: thermos grill at August 29, 2008 09:21 AM (XYzMl)
Posted by: grill master at August 29, 2008 10:10 AM (nTOjn)
Posted by: pizde goale at August 30, 2008 12:29 AM (F42mH)
Posted by: filme at August 30, 2008 01:17 AM (7kFG5)
Posted by: midget porn at August 30, 2008 02:02 PM (S3yLP)
Posted by: porn pictures at August 30, 2008 04:18 PM (sYUv9)
Posted by: adult emoticons at August 31, 2008 06:04 AM (VogDw)
Posted by: classic xxx at September 01, 2008 12:01 AM (NFr+R)
Posted by: network at September 01, 2008 01:52 AM (YNwDe)
Posted by: lesbian dating at September 01, 2008 02:32 AM (ZkXwY)
Posted by: porn retro art at September 01, 2008 03:19 AM (F42mH)
Posted by: porn midget at September 01, 2008 04:01 AM (YNwDe)
Posted by: buy bbq at September 02, 2008 12:33 AM (sYUv9)
Posted by: bbq at September 02, 2008 01:20 AM (NPTP+)
Posted by: con artis at September 02, 2008 03:16 AM (vwK+H)
Posted by: wine bars at September 02, 2008 04:53 AM (n+J2R)
Posted by: dowload youtube at September 02, 2008 11:40 PM (sYUv9)
Posted by: youtube queen at September 03, 2008 01:32 AM (9IcGF)
Posted by: italian restaurant at September 04, 2008 10:24 AM (emQdz)
Posted by: youtube ti at September 05, 2008 02:12 AM (F42mH)
Posted by: youtube the office at September 05, 2008 03:07 AM (i94OK)
Posted by: arabic music at September 05, 2008 04:34 AM (UgFcP)
Posted by: arab names at September 05, 2008 06:18 AM (B+E2z)
Posted by: arabs at September 05, 2008 08:36 AM (9IcGF)
Posted by: arab alabama at September 05, 2008 09:33 AM (5oJVf)
Posted by: arab at September 05, 2008 10:38 AM (MRrad)
Posted by: bikini bikini at September 08, 2008 12:00 AM (HVDNq)
Posted by: crochet afghan at September 08, 2008 12:45 AM (u0rML)
Posted by: propane gas tank at September 08, 2008 02:35 AM (g78lH)
Posted by: gas storage at September 08, 2008 03:15 AM (hfFGP)
Posted by: 1964 at September 09, 2008 04:58 AM (Sa1pj)
Posted by: sport at September 09, 2008 08:10 AM (Gnmpa)
Posted by: gold medals at September 09, 2008 09:43 AM (Gnmpa)
Posted by: framed pictures at September 10, 2008 10:59 AM (lzZ1F)
Posted by: find gas station at September 10, 2008 11:44 AM (u0rML)
Posted by: gas regulator at September 10, 2008 12:38 PM (Gnmpa)
Posted by: mor furniture at September 10, 2008 02:23 PM (WXVXd)
Posted by: vintage crochet patterns at September 10, 2008 11:30 PM (oBKeg)
Posted by: cartoon network game at September 11, 2008 04:46 AM (IjIIl)
Posted by: free greeting cards at September 11, 2008 06:30 AM (oBKeg)
Posted by: dolce and gabbana shoes at September 12, 2008 05:19 AM (07cGX)
Posted by: slut wife at September 12, 2008 07:11 AM (TXOi2)
Posted by: pictures of horses at September 13, 2008 07:43 AM (pA1MO)
Posted by: wacovia bank at September 13, 2008 08:33 AM (+L6OT)
Posted by: college of dupage at September 14, 2008 08:08 AM (TvX9X)
Posted by: yang su at September 14, 2008 11:41 PM (hOVJI)
Posted by: bugil bunga citra gambar at September 15, 2008 02:31 AM (rsfdj)
Posted by: cerita kanak at September 15, 2008 04:08 AM (8ORf/)
Posted by: degree in business at September 17, 2008 03:33 PM (Idr52)
Posted by: university of chicago mba at September 17, 2008 05:03 PM (NH7/h)
Posted by: mba marketing at September 17, 2008 05:57 PM (LNWLn)
Posted by: filme subtitrari at September 17, 2008 10:25 PM (ifD/T)
Posted by: free xxxxxx at September 18, 2008 05:34 AM (CprPO)
Posted by: sunporno at September 18, 2008 01:06 PM (NH7/h)
Posted by: aqua grill at September 20, 2008 03:03 AM (qhU4Q)
Posted by: gas grill covers at September 20, 2008 03:52 PM (NH7/h)
Posted by: koleksi cerita seks at September 22, 2008 02:44 AM (jTILV)
Posted by: mba colleges at September 22, 2008 06:38 AM (RP3fM)
Posted by: mba at September 22, 2008 11:46 AM (bfiqE)
Posted by: contoh gambar at September 22, 2008 07:32 PM (tas29)
Posted by: cerita at September 23, 2008 03:13 AM (u2Xdo)
Posted by: top mba schools at September 25, 2008 03:52 PM (v4BVF)
Posted by: college rankings at September 25, 2008 07:43 PM (ICwgh)
Posted by: dog food recall at September 25, 2008 09:04 PM (UGL3f)
Posted by: blonde at September 26, 2008 03:24 AM (axZVb)
Posted by: big bobs at September 27, 2008 11:56 PM (7ub6h)
Posted by: cerita seru at September 28, 2008 12:32 AM (28GhK)
Posted by: map quest at September 29, 2008 06:54 AM (MjYsP)
Posted by: jocuri gratis at September 29, 2008 11:58 AM (NE2vh)
Posted by: latina porn at September 30, 2008 07:32 AM (VVaTd)
Posted by: live at September 30, 2008 06:06 PM (Bzkkq)
Posted by: campus at October 01, 2008 03:01 AM (VVaTd)
Posted by: university of kentucky at October 01, 2008 03:55 AM (cEJAw)
Posted by: harvard physics at October 01, 2008 01:15 PM (iAnhp)
Posted by: harvard at October 01, 2008 06:18 PM (RTA+G)
Posted by: harvard at October 01, 2008 06:35 PM (7+J4e)
Posted by: free arabic music at October 02, 2008 07:03 AM (2igPg)
Posted by: joy luck club at October 03, 2008 05:22 AM (cEJAw)
Posted by: discount furniture at October 03, 2008 11:07 AM (CTATT)
Posted by: xd picture card at October 04, 2008 06:03 AM (U+J5h)
Posted by: apartment ratings com at October 04, 2008 12:24 PM (PH2rd)
Posted by: crochet at October 06, 2008 10:54 AM (q3twD)
Posted by: wholesale apparel at October 06, 2008 02:46 PM (+2Y0B)
Posted by: mercy me at October 06, 2008 07:02 PM (D4s1l)
Posted by: woman at October 07, 2008 02:22 AM (YwVq6)
Posted by: stripteaser at October 07, 2008 04:43 AM (3Ng7r)
Posted by: nudists at October 07, 2008 12:07 PM (ljGPK)
Posted by: purse at October 08, 2008 04:32 AM (AWucd)
Posted by: printable coupons at October 09, 2008 12:27 AM (TFX0r)
Posted by: freeporn at October 09, 2008 05:18 AM (7DVdf)
Posted by: vegas shopping at October 11, 2008 01:27 AM (kzJ54)
Posted by: game store at October 11, 2008 04:28 AM (1nXLq)
Posted by: c store at October 11, 2008 07:25 AM (TNqsX)
Posted by: cheap gas at October 11, 2008 01:50 PM (cEJAw)
Posted by: pokemon emerald at October 11, 2008 08:05 PM (XQOlL)
Posted by: denise richards at October 12, 2008 04:18 AM (wc0Xb)
Posted by: teens at October 12, 2008 07:53 AM (kFi//)
Posted by: adult at October 12, 2008 11:24 AM (n3BY1)
Posted by: models com at October 13, 2008 02:48 PM (etLWJ)
Posted by: best gas mileage at October 15, 2008 04:49 PM (zw/TB)
Posted by: free poker clipart at October 15, 2008 10:54 PM (5n7m+)
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at October 16, 2008 02:24 AM (zw/TB)
Posted by: jerk off stories at October 17, 2008 12:31 PM (YhBZQ)
Posted by: cartoon network at October 17, 2008 04:05 PM (WX8mG)
Posted by: cerita tante at October 18, 2008 06:15 AM (uI0bi)
Posted by: toon porn at October 19, 2008 08:15 AM (wpzMK)
Posted by: xxxvogue at October 19, 2008 11:25 AM (iYr5n)
Posted by: cbc ca at October 20, 2008 05:05 PM (3PMcv)
Posted by: model nude teen at October 22, 2008 09:33 AM (WX8mG)
Posted by: irish crochet at November 07, 2008 01:42 AM (wUwAx)
Posted by: food pyramid at November 07, 2008 03:08 AM (CVgNu)
Posted by: sparkling wine at November 07, 2008 04:10 AM (5OgE4)
Posted by: free business plans at November 08, 2008 09:22 AM (HGi8c)
Posted by: oklahoma universit at November 08, 2008 10:48 AM (PiUsq)
Posted by: go to gemba at November 09, 2008 03:33 AM (h75rY)
Posted by: casino royale at November 09, 2008 04:51 AM (j/4tL)
Posted by: sunporno at November 09, 2008 11:23 AM (iki26)
Posted by: sarah young at November 09, 2008 02:01 PM (UtqGD)
Posted by: free crochet patterns at November 09, 2008 11:33 PM (+As4p)
Posted by: latina porn at November 10, 2008 04:29 AM (Q+zA/)
Posted by: free gay porn video at November 10, 2008 05:48 AM (vwtZT)
Posted by: cheat code central at November 10, 2008 09:16 AM (RZZCz)
Posted by: seed at November 10, 2008 11:43 AM (IqhQf)
Posted by: shay laren at November 10, 2008 02:06 PM (Q+zA/)
Posted by: printable coupons at November 10, 2008 03:08 PM (bi18w)
Posted by: grocery coupon at November 10, 2008 04:20 PM (ZxPH3)
Posted by: truck bed cover at November 10, 2008 05:26 PM (JTtvg)
Posted by: latina porn at November 11, 2008 10:29 AM (3K3ML)
Posted by: free gay porn video at November 11, 2008 11:46 AM (nGF2X)
Posted by: pet adoption at November 11, 2008 01:59 PM (UEje7)
Posted by: cheat code central at November 11, 2008 03:27 PM (CNWNK)
Posted by: fuck my wife at November 11, 2008 04:17 PM (lxxov)
Posted by: game cheat at November 11, 2008 06:44 PM (IaISd)
Posted by: grocery coupon at November 11, 2008 10:37 PM (8C/EW)
Posted by: truck bed cover at November 11, 2008 11:54 PM (OzVsU)
Posted by: horse sex at November 12, 2008 07:24 AM (U5Ap7)
Posted by: infant porno at November 12, 2008 08:29 AM (aVOA0)
Posted by: porn sites at November 12, 2008 09:41 AM (8C/EW)
Posted by: viagra use at November 12, 2008 10:41 AM (Q+zA/)
Posted by: hentai manga at November 12, 2008 11:52 AM (6lFN/)
Posted by: lesbian group sex at November 12, 2008 12:59 PM (kB5G+)
Posted by: porm gay at November 12, 2008 03:18 PM (VU5sn)
Posted by: anal pain at November 12, 2008 04:30 PM (GCxq0)
Posted by: porn retro at November 12, 2008 05:50 PM (VZ9DW)
Posted by: alyssa milano at November 13, 2008 04:04 AM (Qh7iy)
Posted by: pissing at November 13, 2008 05:17 AM (UtqGD)
Posted by: pamela anderson at November 13, 2008 06:24 AM (fr68a)
Posted by: celeb at November 13, 2008 07:23 AM (TZHoV)
Posted by: male at November 13, 2008 08:35 AM (xvQs+)
Posted by: nud at November 13, 2008 09:52 AM (KPZ2Z)
Posted by: men at November 13, 2008 11:06 AM (ktUta)
Posted by: personals at November 13, 2008 12:15 PM (lhlUW)
Posted by: photography at November 13, 2008 01:18 PM (UTjlS)
Posted by: gentleman club at November 13, 2008 02:35 PM (lhlUW)
Posted by: web adult at November 15, 2008 12:15 AM (+2NLW)
Posted by: adult movies at November 15, 2008 01:09 AM (UtqGD)
Posted by: porn midget at November 15, 2008 02:22 AM (+2NLW)
Posted by: putas con culos grandes at November 15, 2008 03:43 AM (DQQan)
Posted by: chinese sex movie at November 15, 2008 05:07 AM (UEje7)
Posted by: silicone sex dolls at November 15, 2008 06:28 AM (P273V)
Posted by: adult emoticons at November 15, 2008 07:26 AM (HLElc)
Posted by: teen porn at November 15, 2008 11:11 AM (3tRYV)
Posted by: teen sex at November 15, 2008 12:24 PM (dz//o)
Posted by: blowjob at November 15, 2008 01:31 PM (3s6V9)
Posted by: cerita islam at November 15, 2008 04:14 PM (5lBPL)
Posted by: cerita romantis at November 15, 2008 05:23 PM (HLElc)
Posted by: cerita seru wiro at November 15, 2008 07:55 PM (ZNq9i)
Posted by: cerita misteri at November 15, 2008 10:32 PM (3a6wn)
Posted by: cerita nafsu at November 16, 2008 12:54 AM (/7iUl)
Posted by: cerita hantu at November 16, 2008 02:15 AM (e5XFC)
Posted by: cerita bokep at November 16, 2008 03:30 AM (z17iH)
Posted by: adult youtube at November 16, 2008 12:47 PM (e5XFC)
Posted by: gambar at November 16, 2008 01:46 PM (Mt0/M)
Posted by: cerita lawak at November 16, 2008 03:16 PM (806IA)
Posted by: el cerita at November 16, 2008 11:16 PM (T7Pku)
Posted by: cerita baru at November 17, 2008 12:42 AM (ARCSY)
Posted by: cerita dewasa at November 17, 2008 02:02 AM (XhtCU)
Posted by: gambar bugil at November 17, 2008 03:27 AM (ZNq9i)
Posted by: arabic name at November 17, 2008 04:32 AM (VurYy)
Posted by: arabic news at November 17, 2008 08:05 AM (RYzr/)
Posted by: muslim at November 17, 2008 10:41 AM (4CAha)
Posted by: arab culture at November 17, 2008 11:45 AM (q6wLh)
Posted by: arabs at November 17, 2008 02:27 PM (fr68a)
Posted by: xxx photo at November 18, 2008 08:04 AM (lHgeg)
Posted by: vulva photo at November 18, 2008 12:40 PM (QwIZx)
Posted by: picture sex at November 18, 2008 04:42 PM (UtqGD)
Posted by: porn young at November 18, 2008 05:55 PM (rj0Hl)
Posted by: bleach xxx at November 18, 2008 07:05 PM (c9J6H)
Posted by: Audi in gift at November 18, 2008 10:00 PM (GvYwz)
Posted by: latina porn at November 19, 2008 06:31 AM (3tRYV)
Posted by: free sex at November 19, 2008 05:29 PM (xvQs+)
Posted by: free porn at November 19, 2008 06:53 PM (RuCIH)
Posted by: classic xxx at November 20, 2008 12:19 AM (6d2Ai)
Posted by: anal pain at November 20, 2008 01:15 AM (rj0Hl)
Posted by: clip porn at November 20, 2008 04:10 AM (P64wN)
Posted by: free horsesex at November 20, 2008 07:58 AM (RYzr/)
Posted by: sexy bra at November 20, 2008 10:54 AM (6d2Ai)
Posted by: porn young at November 20, 2008 12:33 PM (tnx/v)
Posted by: cristmas video at November 21, 2008 11:27 AM (ud0Z7)
Posted by: google cristmas at November 21, 2008 12:52 PM (UEje7)
Posted by: crismas at November 21, 2008 04:57 PM (l/REo)
Posted by: cristmas ornaments at November 21, 2008 06:10 PM (+IEA3)
Posted by: so this is cristmas at November 21, 2008 07:32 PM (LFtZv)
Posted by: cristmas songs at November 21, 2008 08:49 PM (F1gwv)
Posted by: cristmas at November 21, 2008 11:51 PM (/mUSe)
Posted by: xmas party at November 22, 2008 02:43 AM (MhkrC)
Posted by: spanish cristmas at November 22, 2008 06:42 AM (qWxGv)
Posted by: my cristmas at November 22, 2008 09:21 AM (1Ys7I)
Posted by: cristmas 2008 at November 22, 2008 03:34 PM (1Ys7I)
Posted by: father xmas at November 23, 2008 12:10 AM (xXKpy)
Posted by: xmas parties at November 23, 2008 01:20 AM (NzLj2)
Posted by: xmas art at November 23, 2008 02:50 AM (p4m+E)
Posted by: xmas video at November 23, 2008 07:06 AM (8uiZr)
Posted by: warbears xmas at November 23, 2008 11:03 AM (ZLgKm)
Posted by: youtube xmas at November 23, 2008 12:14 PM (3K3ML)
Posted by: xmas gift ideas at November 23, 2008 01:43 PM (8UJRu)
Posted by: e cards at November 24, 2008 02:15 AM (cWOKO)
Posted by: christms at November 24, 2008 03:32 AM (3K3ML)
Posted by: justice xmas at November 24, 2008 05:54 AM (ePy5E)
Posted by: war on xmas at November 24, 2008 09:32 AM (1P+Uy)
Posted by: xmas eve at November 24, 2008 10:57 AM (Dm9iQ)
Posted by: red xmas at November 24, 2008 12:20 PM (PtNei)
Posted by: after xmas at November 24, 2008 03:02 PM (/6r2Y)
Posted by: casinos at November 25, 2008 04:00 AM (GCxq0)
Posted by: iowa casinos at November 25, 2008 04:50 AM (RYzr/)
Posted by: best casino at November 25, 2008 06:20 AM (8iEfj)
Posted by: vegas casino at November 25, 2008 07:40 AM (HWqeF)
Posted by: gas pump at November 26, 2008 07:55 AM (rj0Hl)
Posted by: blossman gas at November 26, 2008 10:28 AM (pdBA8)
Posted by: free conference at November 27, 2008 02:47 PM (av4+/)
Posted by: free ass at November 27, 2008 03:42 PM (wEGjT)
Posted by: beligio casino at November 29, 2008 12:35 AM (dwoU3)
Posted by: xmas house at November 29, 2008 12:26 PM (3K3ML)
Posted by: realestate at November 30, 2008 06:22 AM (csxir)
Posted by: yorkie for sale at November 30, 2008 07:45 AM (T4rYQ)
Posted by: car sales at November 30, 2008 09:03 AM (UtqGD)
Posted by: baby models at December 01, 2008 02:05 PM (D1nXe)
Posted by: black mamba at December 01, 2008 04:40 PM (smuOy)
Posted by: atlantic bird at December 02, 2008 02:12 PM (YofYO)
Posted by: lesbian porn at December 04, 2008 11:47 AM (Da9P5)
Posted by: credit card at December 04, 2008 01:00 PM (m8KbV)
Posted by: viagra at December 04, 2008 02:07 PM (PVX30)
Posted by: sex videos at December 04, 2008 03:17 PM (ljJWi)
Posted by: dvd for sale at December 05, 2008 11:04 AM (yEFVW)
Posted by: one day sale at December 05, 2008 12:59 PM (Wd0wz)
Posted by: used car sale at December 05, 2008 01:50 PM (mt3Eo)
Posted by: bleach xxx at December 06, 2008 09:52 AM (xGbJO)
Posted by: sunporno at December 06, 2008 01:15 PM (ljJWi)
Posted by: irish crochet at December 07, 2008 03:17 AM (+8BLu)
Posted by: ukrainesex at December 09, 2008 06:35 PM (85Xpk)
Posted by: google pl at December 10, 2008 01:32 PM (Kstl1)
Posted by: pokemon rom at December 10, 2008 05:25 PM (VZRZc)
Posted by: google analitics at December 11, 2008 05:30 AM (WWTy+)
Posted by: google com at December 11, 2008 09:08 AM (g8dsC)
Posted by: google at December 11, 2008 01:17 PM (263Y1)
Posted by: emotions at December 12, 2008 01:38 AM (GbR90)
Posted by: msn plus at December 12, 2008 02:27 PM (yR+PT)
Posted by: business travel at December 12, 2008 10:24 PM (VJHQ1)
Posted by: www travel at December 13, 2008 02:39 AM (8KSM6)
Posted by: xmas christmas at December 15, 2008 04:08 AM (jpy+J)
Posted by: ecards xmas at December 15, 2008 08:49 AM (y3OK1)
Posted by: hotel at December 15, 2008 01:24 PM (D8e5D)
Posted by: youtube at December 15, 2008 05:41 PM (j1pNe)
Posted by: adwords at December 15, 2008 10:09 PM (Os/Hh)
Posted by: eudoramail at December 16, 2008 02:37 AM (k/oyn)
Posted by: all inclusive vacations at December 16, 2008 07:08 AM (lT4Qg)
Posted by: travel post office at December 16, 2008 11:23 AM (SZC1K)
Posted by: gas strike at December 17, 2008 02:03 PM (3+U1w)
Posted by: gas money at December 17, 2008 06:57 PM (9RImT)
Posted by: redneck xmas at December 18, 2008 12:51 PM (1P+Uy)
Posted by: xmas card at December 18, 2008 04:54 PM (UjcIV)
Posted by: irish crochet at December 18, 2008 09:04 PM (Sx+vn)
Posted by: hentai manga at December 19, 2008 03:56 AM (v7rLT)
Posted by: chinese sex at December 19, 2008 07:46 AM (zYcm0)
Posted by: paper models at December 20, 2008 01:16 AM (6DPj8)
Posted by: fred on cristmas at December 21, 2008 07:27 AM (d++XY)
Posted by: xmas holidays at December 21, 2008 11:02 AM (Vztgm)
Posted by: freeporn at December 23, 2008 05:40 AM (2C22h)
Posted by: anime sex xxx at December 23, 2008 09:41 AM (WlTlH)
Posted by: sexy breast at December 23, 2008 02:09 PM (QzUQy)
Posted by: heidiwood clothing at December 24, 2008 12:54 AM (2C22h)
Posted by: discount clothing at December 24, 2008 09:01 AM (JscX0)
Posted by: porn sites at December 25, 2008 04:21 AM (hwxKp)
Posted by: chinese sex movie at December 25, 2008 08:07 AM (TJyki)
Posted by: crochet shawl patterns at December 26, 2008 03:02 PM (ozvx7)
Posted by: filme porno xxx at December 27, 2008 03:40 PM (Of348)
Posted by: teen sex at December 27, 2008 07:29 PM (HByvU)
Posted by: porn mature at December 28, 2008 07:11 AM (WlTlH)
Posted by: pornocasters at December 28, 2008 11:28 AM (5bZmQ)
Posted by: sexy lesbians at December 28, 2008 03:39 PM (kB7jI)
Posted by: sweet young teens at December 28, 2008 07:56 PM (rFFNK)
Posted by: free anal movies at December 29, 2008 04:58 AM (ou4Ms)
Posted by: pregnant porn at December 29, 2008 12:57 PM (qia5X)
Posted by: sun porno at December 30, 2008 01:52 AM (qkjny)
Posted by: com pornotube youtube at December 30, 2008 05:30 AM (SNhuO)
Posted by: telanjang com at December 31, 2008 05:16 PM (dPl5w)
Posted by: porno com at January 02, 2009 01:15 AM (zQx5n)
Posted by: arabic songs at January 03, 2009 03:45 PM (GKHD8)
Posted by: free male porn site at January 04, 2009 01:26 PM (NCJtc)
Posted by: shay laren at January 05, 2009 04:28 AM (+IEA3)
Posted by: fishing license at January 05, 2009 03:39 PM (p4m+E)
Posted by: nude asian at January 06, 2009 09:46 AM (u1XAT)
Posted by: nude jumping at January 06, 2009 01:54 PM (L9yxF)
Posted by: young nonude at January 06, 2009 05:59 PM (2M5BM)
Posted by: angelina jolie at January 06, 2009 09:52 PM (Ug5dB)
Posted by: birthday romance at January 07, 2009 02:28 AM (8VCi2)
Posted by: online romance at January 07, 2009 01:35 PM (Ot7YX)
Posted by: romance biography at January 08, 2009 09:42 AM (65UMM)
Posted by: romance forum at January 08, 2009 06:30 PM (zQx5n)
Posted by: filet crochet at January 09, 2009 05:00 PM (ts0uA)
Posted by: ˛Č˝ĐľŻ˝÷ at January 30, 2009 09:00 AM (hXNNS)
Posted by: asian whore at February 13, 2009 07:42 PM (5zwBq)
Posted by: xxxvideos at February 14, 2009 03:12 AM (xhk5D)
Posted by: culos video at February 14, 2009 11:34 PM (tD38p)
Posted by: old mom porno at February 15, 2009 03:23 AM (StVYF)
Posted by: infant porno at February 15, 2009 11:20 AM (C7uoo)
Posted by: political cartoon at February 16, 2009 03:24 PM (obC3n)
Posted by: gif creator at February 16, 2009 07:32 PM (pR0Wq)
Posted by: lil kim at February 17, 2009 03:27 PM (vRGtw)
Posted by: celebritys at February 18, 2009 10:32 AM (4Wtoa)
Posted by: garden snake picture at February 18, 2009 02:33 PM (yNQmr)
Posted by: classic car parts at February 18, 2009 06:26 PM (dskUx)
Posted by: furniture com at February 19, 2009 02:43 AM (Mt8vr)
Posted by: bedroom furniture at February 19, 2009 06:41 AM (Mpz20)
Posted by: bnm at February 20, 2009 12:26 AM (riSnv)
Posted by: group sex porn at February 21, 2009 12:33 PM (EgGIW)
Posted by: toon porn at February 22, 2009 05:41 AM (hhcLp)
Posted by: free video clips at February 22, 2009 06:41 PM (oMbae)
Posted by: free cell phone at February 23, 2009 03:12 AM (sHJgX)
Posted by: free download at February 23, 2009 04:45 PM (osgXl)
Posted by: best casino at February 24, 2009 05:27 AM (yS37M)
Posted by: casino san diego at February 24, 2009 09:43 AM (maxIE)
Posted by: vegas casino at February 24, 2009 11:08 PM (F6QUl)
Posted by: bleach manga msn at February 25, 2009 03:56 PM (MeT2q)
Posted by: sunporn at February 25, 2009 08:27 PM (pQdgq)
Posted by: sarah young at February 26, 2009 12:35 AM (p1eEf)
Posted by: culinary arts at February 26, 2009 04:21 AM (jdsr5)
Posted by: naruto movie at February 27, 2009 12:38 AM (ez7Ka)
Posted by: gmbmn at February 27, 2009 02:29 AM (PFpvJ)
Posted by: momfuck at March 03, 2009 11:49 PM (ylaoc)
Posted by: hapy mealcom at March 04, 2009 06:43 PM (gMOyY)
Posted by: sfsdfsd at March 11, 2009 08:34 PM (2CpRx)
Posted by: contractor license at March 27, 2009 07:55 AM (C7mXM)
Posted by: sleep number bed at April 02, 2009 08:00 AM (ufHOG)
Posted by: Wedding Dresses at August 20, 2009 11:03 PM (syU91)
Nike air force one
Nike air force
Air force 1 mens
Air force one
UGG Boots
UGG Australia
UGG Shoes
UGG Sale
Lebron Shoes
Cheap UGG
UGG Boots
UGG Shoes
Discount UGG
UGG Australia
UGG Sale
UGG Online
Posted by: dfsasfsaf at October 18, 2009 09:34 AM (GQ3Y4)
ghd hair
chi hair straightener
ghd straighteners
chi straighteners
chi hair
chi hair iron
hair straighteners ghd
ghd hair straighteners
free shipping!
Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 07:36 AM (9oMrs)
cheap basketball shoes
mens basketball shoes
kobe shoes
kobe bryant shoes
lebron james shoes
free shipping!
Posted by: NBA SHOES at October 24, 2009 11:48 AM (/6617)
ugg boots
boots ugg
mbt shoes
nike running shoes
cheap nike shoes
nike footwear
cheap nike footwear
nike air max shoes
free shipping!
Posted by: nike air max at October 26, 2009 08:25 AM (n7GXH)
ugg boots
boot ugg
mbt shoes
nike running shoes
cheap nike shoes
nike footwear
cheap nike footwear
nike air max shoes
FREE SHIPPING!
Posted by: nike air max at October 27, 2009 10:43 PM (HOzQF)
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefree shipping
Posted by: discount ugg boots at October 30, 2009 12:40 AM (mBGLP)
ugg shoes
tall ugg boots
ugg classic boots
nike shox
air jordan shoes
nike air max
nike air force one
bailey button ugg
rainier ugg boots
ugg classic cardy
ugg crochet boots
ugg mini
ugg classic short
classic tall ugg
ugg coquette
ugg baby boots
ugg knightsbridge
ugg lo pro
new ugg boots
ugg short boots
ugg nightfall boots
ugg skimmer
ugg sundance boots
ultra short ugg
ugg ultra tall
discount ugg slippers
ugg sandals
ugg halendi
ugg slippers
ugg layback
ugg matala sandal
ugg napoule sandal
ugg persephone
tasmina ugg
air force 1 shoes
jordan air shoes
nike shox shoes
air max nike
free shipping!
Posted by: ugg boots at October 30, 2009 02:51 AM (3iF2y)
Posted by: mbt shoes at October 31, 2009 01:05 AM (D7Tew)
UGG Shoes Sale
UGG Australia
Discount UGG boots
UGG Bailey Button
cheap ugg boots
Posted by: uggsdream at November 02, 2009 11:14 PM (Uc43O)
Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 03, 2009 10:21 PM (t3uzf)
Posted by: NmLBNRGW at November 12, 2009 04:33 PM (MSDpR)
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force one
UGG Boots
UGG Australia
UGG Shoes
UGG Sale
Cheap UGG
mbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt saleform usa
Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 13, 2009 05:51 AM (oSzDE)
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 06:32 AM (xpuiO)
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:17 AM (xpuiO)
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 07:52 AM (C/zDM)
Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 19, 2009 06:18 AM (n0jE1)
Please feel free to contact us for further information. If you need these products, please contact us. Wish we could have good cooperations! MBT trainers Thank you!
Posted by: like at November 20, 2009 02:07 AM (A+PPY)
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale
Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 24, 2009 09:59 PM (fd1jz)
muscles in your legs, but also works the abdominal, back, buttock, and thigh muscles.
With every stride, the instability activates the whole body in concert and tones as it
stimulates different areas.mbt
footwear have a curved pivot sole that copies walking on soft moss. The sole of
href=http://www.mbtshoesbuy.com/products_new.html>new mbt turns even, flat ground
into uneven terrain. The mbt anti shoes challenges the muscles to work harder with
every step you take. The unique curved sole works by providing instability and makes
the muscles of your body more engaged and also helps burn more calories.
The mbt shoes walking shoes have been
highlighted for its ability to cushion your feet while challenging your muscles.
Clinical studies suggest that regular use improves balance, posture and circulation.
mbt lami shoes re-establish
the natural conditions for standing and walking.You will get more results out of your
workouts ? MBT shoes have technology in the sole design that make your working more
efficient and burn more calories. With every step, the instability activates your
muscles and the whole body is stimulated as your walk more and more.Free Shipping
1Week on Select Styles Of discount
mbt Walking Shoes Reviews !
Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at December 09, 2009 12:25 PM (B0M1x)
Lacoste Trainers
New Lacoste
Lacoste Sale
Mens Lacoste
camden lacoste trainers
lacoste trainers shoes
lacoste camden retro
camden lacoste trainers
lacoste carnaby shoes
lacoste carnaby retro
lacoste shoes sale
New Lacoste shoes
Lacoste shoes online
cheap Lacoste shoes
Lacoste shoe
mens lacoste shoes
Lacoste Shua Lace
Black Lace shoes
white Lace shoes
lacoste swerve shoes
White Lacoste shoes
Lacoste shoes sale
Cheap Lacoste shoes
Lacoste Women Shoes
Women Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Shoes online
on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping!
Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 15, 2009 12:48 PM (5o+JZ)
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 11:13 PM (1dySH)
Posted by: ugg boot ugguk uggs at December 17, 2009 09:32 AM (kjiNu)
Posted by: ugg boot ugguk uggs at December 17, 2009 11:09 PM (34RKy)
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 04:42 AM (1dySH)
Posted by: cheap Air Max at December 25, 2009 07:25 AM (ZgK+c)
Posted by: discount Christian Louboutin Boots at December 27, 2009 11:34 PM (QN9Ge)
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 08:12 AM (1dySH)
Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 06:40 AM (ndMAX)
Posted by: wedding gowns at January 25, 2010 06:08 AM (bBg/v)
womens air max
nike air max
womens air max
nike air max 360 shoes
air max
kids air max 90
kids air max classic BW
kids air max 360
kids air max 97
nike air max 180
nike air max 2009
nike air max 2010
nike air max 360 shoes
nike air max 87
nike air max 88
nike air max 89
nike air max 90
nike air max 91
nike air max 93
nike air max 95
nike air max classic BW
nike air max ltd
nike air max TN
womens air max 2007
womens air max 2009
womens air max 87
womens air max 90
womens air max 91
womens air max 95
womens air max 97
womens air max classic BW
Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 01:29 AM (JOSIc)
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots
Ugg classic cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
Posted by: ugg boots uggcardy.org shoemkt.com 87415555.com.cn at February 02, 2010 10:25 AM (b5xWG)
Ugg Australia
Ugg Australia
Ugg Australia
Ugg Australia
Ugg Australia
Ugg Australia
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots
Ugg classic cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots
Ugg classic cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
UGG cardy
Posted by: ugg boots uggcardy.org shoemkt.com 87415555.com.cn at February 03, 2010 11:34 AM (cz5KF)
Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 06:11 PM (TUJDt)
Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 08:29 AM (UTLu5)
Processing 0.24, elapsed 0.2612 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.04 seconds, 508 records returned.
Page size 326 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.
Dale's ECB
Election Projection
Federal Review
Real Clear Politics
Rasmussen Reports
Gallup
Zogby
FoxNews Polls
Sabato/Crystal Ball
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement
Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band
AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection
AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings)
George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer
Democratic Forays into Erotica
New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network
Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes
Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse
Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party"
Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad
Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up
Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry
NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom
Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?"
Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind
All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd
Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran
Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore
Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery
Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile
Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance
Collective Names for Groups of People
John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets
Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle
Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy
Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive"
Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments
John Edwards Campaign Excuses
John Kerry Pick-Up Lines
Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney
Torments in Dog-Hell
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)