Keith Olbermann: Rupert Murdoch More Of A Terrorist Than Bin Laden

Considering his ratings, I can understand the sentiment.

Al Qaeda really hurt us, but not as much as Rupert Murdoch has hurt us, particularly in the case of Fox News. Fox News is worse than Al Qaeda — worse for our society.

Thanks to Mike.

Posted by: Ace at 12:00 PM

Comments

1 The kicker is the next line, you should include it. The one where he compares them to the Klan.

Can't see how this isn't fireable.

Posted by: Techie at September 10, 2007 12:03 PM (T+8Gr)

2 Fox News is worse than Al Qaeda — worse for our society.

It's amazing how one news show and two news commentaries on a cable network can change civilization as we know it. What a loon Olbermann is!

Posted by: dave at September 10, 2007 12:04 PM (IHg8T)

Olby is making my Sunday football habit less fun too, what with his inane and grasping commentary.

What a maroon.

Posted by: Fred at September 10, 2007 12:06 PM (ivbbD)

Message to Olbertard:

Name 3000 people killed by FOX News.

/Why bother asking, you know his answer is "By enabling the evil BushHitler junta, FOX news has murdered at least 600,000 innocent Iraqis as demonstrated by the Lancet report, etc.

Posted by: TMF at September 10, 2007 12:10 PM (KTgUG)

Right said, Fred! (sorry, I had to)

I started to watch "Football Night in America" but then saw his ugly face.

Click

Posted by: captkidney at September 10, 2007 12:12 PM (age8s)

6 This is the finger I flip Olbermann off with.

Posted by: JackStraw at September 10, 2007 12:14 PM (t+mja)

7 PLease tell me this smug prick goon doesnt get any poontang with his "truthteller" schtick

Posted by: TMF at September 10, 2007 12:14 PM (KTgUG)

Props to the universally reviled (amongst the right) John McCain

He's done a phenomenal job lately defending the right policy in Iraq

Posted by: TMF at September 10, 2007 12:17 PM (KTgUG)

9 That's such weapons-grade stupid that you can't even formulate a coherent reply.

And now he's on that football show that I would otherwise watch if it weren't for him. Well, and for Collingsworth.

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at September 10, 2007 12:19 PM (Lz6uE)

PLease tell me this smug prick goon doesnt get any poontang with his "truthteller" schtick

I think there's a better than even chance of this being so. Even Moonbat chicks don't want to fuck a creep, except maybe The Big Creep himself.

Posted by: Kensington at September 10, 2007 12:29 PM (kFwRi)

11 They need to bring back Craig Kilborn.

Posted by: LiveFromFortLivingRoom at September 10, 2007 12:34 PM (wdOeU)

Man, wouldn't be awesome if there was a Republican sweep in '08 and Olbermann's head exploded?

Posted by: Some Guy at September 10, 2007 12:52 PM (lPxkl)

Chicks would let Olbermann bang them, but the word has already gotten out via one of his terribly disappointed conquests that he really, really sucks at it.

"These are the fingers by which I am forced to please myself", as it were.

Effeminate, whiny, smug, arrogant, hyper-unmasculine, uber-liberal beta males being no good at pleasing women? Now I've heard everything!

Posted by: VJay at September 10, 2007 12:52 PM (qEool)

14 When you're nobody you have to exaggerate to get attention. It's not as if anyone important is waiting for the next pearl of wisdom to fall from Keith's mouth.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at September 10, 2007 12:55 PM (O9Cc8)

15 Those aren't pearls of wisdom falling from Keith's mouth. Remember his prior gig as fluffer for homo porno film company.

Posted by: nikkolai at September 10, 2007 01:00 PM (B1NVJ)

16 The worst person in the world every day should be whoever has sex with this idiot.

Posted by: LiveFromFortLivingRoom at September 10, 2007 01:02 PM (wdOeU)

17 I posted this here a few weeks back, but it's worth re-posting:

Here (part 1) and here (part 2) is a list of 83 notable media screw-ups including fraud, fabrication, misquoting, doctoring stories, unsubstantiated reporting, and plagiarism. It spans a time period from the early 20th century (Walter Duranty's NY Times Pulitzer for essentially reprinting Stalin-era propaganda denying famines in the Ukraine) up through (and especially focusing on) recent years' well-known journalistic and media debacles.

Not one item on the list comes from Fox News.

Olbermann and his co-ideologists need to have that rubbed in their smug little faces and to be challenged to substantiate their criticisms of the network with specifics.

Posted by: Alex at September 10, 2007 02:34 PM (fgyj8)

18 Did anybody on this board consider reading/listening to Olberman's reasons for saying FoxNews was worse than Al Quaida? Maybe he feels that the Bush administration and the republican party lied about Iraq, WMDs, and about them being a threat, and that Fox was THE forum for them...leading to public support of an unjustified war, re-election of the administration, and what will likely be 1 million deaths of Iraqis that had nothing to do with 911. Just my thoughts on where he might be coming from. Is Fox worse than Al Quaida? Well...do any of the Fox journalists/entertainers openly advocate for the killing of people in the middle east? And is there view supported by the best military in the world? Olberman's theory is interesting and I think he can make an argument, but I don't think I buy it.

Posted by: jim at September 25, 2007 12:00 PM (zysRn)

Posted by: ²È½Ð¾¯½÷ at January 30, 2009 08:19 AM (hXNNS)

Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 05:35 PM (zFgZJ)

21 discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefree shipping

Posted by: discount ugg boots at November 01, 2009 09:18 AM (wMYD4)

22 buy air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force one
UGG Boots
UGG Australia
UGG Shoes
UGG Sale
Cheap UGG
mbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt saleform usa

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 09, 2009 08:19 AM (pEyMs)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 14, 2009 11:17 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:39 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 02:30 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 06:55 AM (C/zDM)

27 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 25, 2009 08:55 AM (8NtpF)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 10:31 AM (bsW/x)

29 I will have a hard time buying ugg classic cardy at normal brick and mortar store for now on knowing that I can browse the largest selection I have ever seen and purchase confidently. Thanks for being a great company.Although your ugg boots cardy website is entered by users, the site has a lot of accurate and useful information on it.your net shop is kept to a minimum and favours websites connected to the ugg cardy boots Web Design Library in appearance and subject.
The popular blue ugg is renowned for its comfort. But some doctors worry that the popular black ugg could cause serious foot pain in the long run.So some podiatrists across the country are telling ugg classic cardy lovers to watch their steps. In fact,there is nothing wrong!
The crochet boots online retailer also knows bargain-hungry shoppers are scouring the Web for discounts, and its UGG Classic Crochet rivals are more than happy to provide them. So it is putting coupon codes on ugg classic crochet that customers can use to save money on its site.

Posted by: makol UGG at December 05, 2009 03:48 PM (cmMdO)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 18, 2009 05:30 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: replica watches at December 19, 2009 07:20 AM (wd3Wb)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 02:29 PM (1dySH)

33 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 01:13 PM (TUJDt)

Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0271 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0073 seconds, 42 records returned.
Page size 58 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.