1 Whatever happens we mustn't spend our energy on finding solutions.

2 Because Hitler's propaganda was bad and this propaganda is good.

3 The more this lie become reality, the happier I am that I live in a very small, geographically isolated (and heavily armed) community.

We are being swallowed whole by insanity.

4 I am inclined to wonder how many people thought FDR knew of Pearl Harbor before it happened.  And lets not get started on the JFK conspiracists.  Crazy people out there, all the time, every time.

5 "Americans are more likely than their elders..."  Huh?  Do our elders cease being Americans after they get elderly enough?  That sentence makes no sense.

6 Sickening. Delusional. Inability to process reality. Evil people exist and want to kill us. This is what happens with deeply feminized folks who want to feel not think. The Rosie Nation.

7

Truther Nation, indeed.

I want to see this poll cited (with the accompanying stats) at the next Democrat debate. Ask all the presidential hopefuls their beliefs on the question, then what their thoughts are on the Democrat base that thinks we let this happen.

Of course, want in one hand and s**t in the other...

8 Somehow this topic is giving me Mike nostalgia.

9 I am still shocked and astounded every time I see one of these pieces of journalism ass-hattery claiming more and more people believe it was all a setup.

There will always be conspiracy theorists and agitators inflating the numbers but I actually believe this particular strain of crazy is contagious.

10 Let's see if I'm a truther.

Is it likely that the gorvernment as a whole collected enough information to determine that an attack would take place? Probably.

Is it likely that any one person in the government saw enough data or enough analysis to determine that an attack would take place? Probably not. (failure to "connect the dots" due to Gorrelick's wall, etc).

It it possible that any person in the government (including Chimperor in Chief Shrub McBu$Hitlerbutron etc. etc. etc.) saw that an attack would take place, and then decided either to not act to stop it or to cancel plans in work to stop it? Definitely not.

Did Bush know? Nope.

11 The Dolchstoss myth that Hitler pushed is actually a good comparison to what the left is engaging in with Trutherism.

12 Is anybody getting worried that at some point the Left and the Right in this country will separate into such distinct versions of reality that a literal battle for the truth might develop?

13 I clicked on the link and couldn't find the question that was asked.

My suspicion is that the question was capable of alternate interpretations, especially given how quickly people think about and answer such poll questions.  People who believed Bush & Co. knew generally of coming Al Qaeda attack (i.e. August PDB, Condi's briefing, etc.) may have answered "Yes."  Others probably interpreted question as meaning Bush knew time, place and manner of attacks and answered "No."

Ace's spin, without any evidence to back it up, is that 35% of Dems believe Bush knew the specifics and simply looked the other way.  That's funny in that given the tons of liberals I know, I've yet to run across a single one that has expressed that point (and we liberals aren't shy about expressing our criticisms of Bush).  This post looks more like a desire - well, actually a need - Ace has to create some cartoon character impression of Dems to avoid debating them on their actual positions.

I can actually understand why, with the state of things under Bush's leadership, he needs to do this.

14 dri, some days, yeah, I really do. And I hope nobody here is stupid enough to cheer for that day either, those sorts of things are hell. The left in America has gone off the rails so badly, you wonder...

15

I clicked on the link and couldn't find the question that was asked.

HUH? 2 blue boxes right there on the upper left.

16 Its on there MacSwain, but don't let the facts get in the way of taking shots at Ace, of course.

17 Sin, what bothers me the most is that yes we can have political disagreements in this country, fine but why does the Left have to lie about everything? Just tell the truth. Is that so hard to do?

18

Macswain, you mean these questions?

Did the CIA Know About the 9/11 Attacks in Advance?

Yes

29%

No

41%

Not sure

30%

Did Bush Know About the 9/11 Attacks in Advance?

Yes

22%

No

55%

Not sure

22%

 

Yes.  Difficult to find these tricksy questions.  Good luck with that whole, alternative explanation thing.

19 I once asked a pastor friend of mine what the hardest part of writing sermons was. He told me that it could never be taken for granted that the people in the pews knew even the slightest thing about the Bible, so he had to always preach to the lowest common denominator.

We're getting to a level in our societal discourse, where we can't take the slightest amount of cognitive horsepower for granted anymore. And they're forming voting blocs. If you really want to lose it, realize that we have to come up with enough votes to offset at least 35% of the Dem voters just to break into the ones who have a few brain cells firing.

20

Sin, what bothers me the most is that yes we can have political disagreements in this country, fine but why does the Left have to lie about everything? Just tell the truth. Is that so hard to do?
The truth is whatever serves the party. I belive that's a paraphrase of Joe Stalin.

It's just as true today as it was in his day. A percentage of the left is really communist and subscribes to their ethics.

21 Did Bush Know About the 9/11 Attacks in Advance?

So the question actually supports my suspicion.  If you believe its asking generally about the attack coming the answer is "Yes" and if you hear it as asking specifically about time, place and manner the answer is "No."

No surprise ... not even with Ace's spin.  I know in your fevered minds I'll never be able to convince you that the likely intent of those who answered "Yes" is actually not as nefarious as Ace - or Drunk In Texas - would like to have it.  In fact, this is the level and kind of analysis that has gotten so many righties in trouble with their predictions in Iraq.  Simplistic assumptions of who is good and who is bad.

Thankfully most Americans are now recognizing these silly rightwing projections for wkat they actually are.

22 Al-Qaeda: Just another silly rightwing projection.

23 Predicting a terrorist attack in the US was like predicting a major natural disaster somewhere on the planet in the next year -- pretty much a slam dunk certainty.

Exactly how, exactly where, and exactly when are the hard part.

24 I know in your fevered minds I'll never be able to convince you that the likely intent of those who answered "Yes" is actually not as nefarious as Ace - or Drunk In Texas - would like to have it.

So...you're suggesting that somewhat less than 35% of democratic voters are delusional crackpots.  Any guesses on the actual percentage?

25

If you believe its asking generally about the attack coming the answer is "Yes" and if you hear it as asking specifically about time, place and manner the answer is "No."

Are you familiar with a part of speech called the "definite article"?

Look into it, Einstein.

26 Of course, I shouldn't be laughing since, according to the same poll, Republicans only have a 7-1 edge sane vs insane.  I would have hoped for at least 12-1.

27 A few weeks back when Mark Cuban decided to distribute Loose Change, I somewhat jokingly predicted the Dallas Mavericks would lose in the playoffs because of this. Fast forward to now. For the first time in history an 8 seed eliminted a 1 seed. Google it. Coincidence? You decide. In other billionaire news: Richard Branson's Virgin Atlantic airline was showing Loose Change 2 on their inflight movie, UNTIL YESTERDAY! THE SAME DAY THE MAVS WERE ELIMINaTED! Another coincidence? This thing has Bush's fingerprints all over it.

28 Thank God for smug lefty trolls, always good for a laugh when they get owned (I refuse to use the p).

29 if you believe its asking generally about the attack coming the answer is "Yes" and if you hear it as asking specifically about time, place and manner the answer is "No."

Funny stuff.
Really man, thanks for spinning this to a) make yourself look like an absolute moron and b) redefining words to fit your political agenda.

30 Hey, if macswain wants to argue that Democrats are so fucking stupid they can't understand what "the 9/11 Attacks" actually means, I'm willing to consider his argument. 

31 Dave in Texas, touche!

Yes, when you hear:
My suspicion is that the question was capable of alternate interpretations,

it is usually a safe bet the issue involved makes the left look bad.

32 Toby,

A lot less than the righties who believed Saddam was connected to the 9/11 attacks and the Iraq war was justified as retribution for his involvement.

Drunk In Texas,

Thanks for making my point ... people taking a poll don't sit down and consult with Emily's Rules of Grammar before answering and this question is capable of being understood differently.  Did Bush know in advance about the 9/11 attack?  Sure, he had seen the August 2006 PDB warning of such an attack.  It's really simple to understand UNLESS you're trying to fit the answer in with a presupposed notion of the intent of Democrats.

33 So the question actually supports my suspicion.  If you believe its asking generally about the attack coming the answer is "Yes" and if you hear it as asking specifically about time, place and manner the answer is "No."

McSwain, why are fucking leftist morons always looking for hidden subtext in plainly worded sentences?  Are you all secretly Strausians?

The question was, Did Bush Know About the 9/11 Attacks in Advance?

It doesn't matter what you believe it's asking generally, it's asking flat out do you think he knew THE Attacks, not some unspecified, theoretical attack or some generalized threat of an attack but THE Attacks as we know now them.

Stop inserting some wishful thinking subtext in it. It was a simple, direct question and you fucking Democrats answered it in a way that proves a good portion of you are fools or mentally deficient. Take your pick

34 Sure, he had seen the August 2006 PDB warning of such an attack.

You are so full of shit, it is embarrassing.

Go ahead, and actually read it, clown.
Then get back to us.

Oh, and for reference, Clinton was getting the same intel.

35 he had seen the August 2006 PDB warning of such an attack.

No such attack was "warned of"

And you, illiterate boob, can't demonstrate otherwise.

and this question is capable of being understood differently.

Isn't it funny how you "smart" liberals can't read & comprehend basic sentences?

36

Dance, Macswain, dance. 

Twist real pretty for us now. 

Can you do a back flip with a double-twist and land on yer face?

Sure. 

Knew ya could.

 

.

37 Why does erg continue using different monikers?

As to the substance:
What is plainly true is that Democrats, according to McSwain, infra, were less capable of reading/hearing a sentence and extracting its plain meaning than were Republicans. It's almost as if Dems really do want their own facts and not just their own opinions.

38 I don't think this one is erg.  Macswain actually seems to know basic rules of grammar, punctuation and spelling. 

Doesn't make him less full of it, though.

39 Democrats in America are evenly divided on the question of whether George W. Bush knew about the 9/11 terrorist attacks in advance.

Disturbing. Disheartening. Sickening.

Until now I thought the truthers were few in number and on the fringe.

This is just shattering news. I can't think of anything funny to say.

40 Jay,

Go read the 9/11 report for a partial litany of all the advance warning the Bushies were getting of the attack including the August PDB entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" and add into that Condi's July briefing regarding the emenience of
such an attack.  Maybe Drunk In Texas can tell you what "in US" means.

I didn't expect any of you righties to actually accept a different and reasonable explanation of the question and answer.  You need to believe bad things about Democrats and liberals.   

Since there are so many of these Democrats who you believe think Bush knew the time, place and manner of the attack, it should be easy to post a list of them.  Get to it.

I know tons of liberals and Dems and don't know a one who thinks this ... maybe Cynthia McKinney.  But even then I'm not sure and we got rid of that nutter. 

We don't have people on stage raising their hands for stupid things ... like not believing in evolution.

41

This is just recreational cynicism.

Americans like to pose as skeptics because a) it's an intellectually easy way to assert how smart you are ("bastids can't fool me!"), and b) you can simultaneously pose as a victim ("they lied to me!", uncontrollable sobbing...).

If you ask the American people if a certain political leader did something wrong, most people will say "Hell yeah!", even if they don't have a clue, or even recognize the politician's name.

This is what the poll is showing. A large number of people being difficult cunts.

42 Go read the 9/11 report for a partial litany of all the advance warning the Bushies were getting of the attack including the August PDB entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US"

Uh, stupid, I linked to that PDB.

Again, I linked to the document. I don't need to "go read the 9/11 report" for anything.

Which is just a copout so you can remain ignorant about what the PDB actually said, versus what you're claiming it did.

As I said, go get a clue. Moron.

43 Tom,

Maybe but from the same story:

Republicans reject that view and, by a 7-to-1 margin, say the President did not know in advance about the attacks.

Are only Democrats 'difficult cunts'?  Naturally, I am open to that argument but your post was couched in terms of Americans, not just Democrats.

I hope you are right, I really do but I doubt it.

44 We don't have people on stage raising their hands for stupid things ... like not believing in evolution.

No, you have people not raising their hands when asked whether we're at war.

Personally, I'd rather have a party that believes Cthulhu or the Great Spaghetti Monster created the world than one who refuses to accept reality because it's politically inconvenient.

45 add into that Condi's July briefing regarding the emenience of such an attack

You know less about this than you do "the PDB"

In other words, there were no warnings about the 9/11 attack.

See stupid, you're trying to say because there were warnings "bin Laden wanted to strike" that's the same thing as being warned about the 9/11 attack.

But you're an intellectually dishonest and illiterate fraud.
So that's expected.

As I said, Clinton received the same warnings.
Read that again, clown.

Further, the very first sentece of "the PDB" talks about intel going back to 1997.

Yes, bin Laden was "determined to strike" since 1997. Yet you, in your ignorant assininity, pretend we were "warned" aobut it a month before.

Finally, you can't name a single thing Bush could have or should have done to prevent the attacks that you would have supported.

Not.
One.
Thing.

46

Are only Democrats 'difficult cunts'? 

They're disproportionately more likely to be.

47 A lot less than the righties who believed Saddam was connected to the 9/11 attacks and the Iraq war was justified as retribution for his involvement.

Link?

48 emenience of such an attack

Heh.

49

I think we need to be more sensitive and less judgmental.  We need to ask, why does George Bush hate us?

50

How ironic that al Qaeda's objective on 9/11 of 'humbling' the United States may yet succeed - not by force, but by dividing the country into 2 irreconcilable camps -  Camp A which perceives al Qaeda (and radical Islam) as the enemy, and Camp B which perceives Camp A as the enemy.

And given the the msm is the heart and soul of Camp B (except that they have no hearts and don't believe in souls) the end result may be civil war, with the msm fanning the flames at every step of the way.

51

If we thought Hussein was behind 9/11, then why did we go into Afghanistan first, and why was the Iraq war promoted as a "preemptive" (instead of retaliatory) war?

Come to think of it, if we thought Hussein was behind 9/11, then that would have been the only argument for war. Everybody would have agreed to it.

But nobody made that claim. It's a straw man argument (as you probably know).

52 Someone is in serious need of visiting Maddox's site on 9/11 morons. Macswain's been so "bukakked with stupid" that he's become a uke for the retarded. (Too lazy to give you the Wiki pages on those terms..look 'em up yourselves)

I don't think people bitching about evolution sceptics are aware of just how stupid they look when they turn around and swallow Truther propaganda. Makes them look they'll believe anything as long as it's full of crazy.

53 max lives in Camp C --- anyone who disagrees with max is the enemy.



Jay, like Bush, can't quite wrap his hands around "Bin Laden Determined to Strike In US" or Condi's nap

54 Huh.  When in doubt, repeat.

Nice tactic.

Ineffective, but nice.

55 Jay, like Bush, can't quite wrap his hands around "Bin Laden Determined to Strike In US

As I pointed out clown, Clinton received the same PDB.

So tell us, where was he determined to strike?
How?

And again, you can't name a single thing Bush could have or should have done to prevent the attacks that you would have supported.

Not.
One.
Thing.

56 Let's help Macswain out here:

"Mission accomplished"

"Chickenhawks"

"Bush lied, people died"

"Bush AWOL"

"Swift-boat"

I'm sure I've missed a few.

57 Macswain,

Since you refuse to provide any evidence for you claims or answer any direction questions, I am going to go right to the ad hominem attacks....

Have you always been this fucking dense or was there some sort of head trauma that led you to be such an ignorant ass?

58 We don't have people on stage raising their hands for stupid things ... like not believing in evolution.

Uh, there is no evidence for evolution of man as it didn't happen.

Feel free to prove me wrong.
Go ahead, please.

59 "Halliburton"

"Heckuva job, Brownie"

"Ken Lay"

"Enron"

60 Quiz:

Who received a PDB entitled " SUBJECT: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks"

Who indeed?

61 "Weeks or months, I doubt longer than that"

"The war will pay for itself"

"Saddam had ties to al Qaeda"

"Strategery"

"Newclear"

"Evil Doers"

62 Oh, this is one they love to throw around:

"PNAC!!"

63 "Cake Walk"

"Greeted as Liberators"

"WMD!"

"The War is Lost"

"I don't believe Petraus"
(sorry, I got confused with those last two)

64 Oh, I forgot my favorite:

"Cabal of Neo-cons"

65

Get to it.

Ah, no sweetie.

Your assertions.

Your homework.

 

 

 

and may I just add, on a personal note, thanks for the giggles.

66 There, Macswain.  Hope you're feeling the AoSHQ love.

Because we're all about the love here.

67 What an interesting story.

WASHINGTON, Aug. 16 - State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osama bin Laden's move to Afghanistan would give him an even more dangerous haven as he sought to expand radical Islam "well beyond the Middle East," but the government chose not to deter the move, newly declassified documents show.

In what would prove a prescient warning, the State Department intelligence analysts said in a top-secret assessment on Mr. bin Laden that summer that "his prolonged stay in Afghanistan - where hundreds of 'Arab mujahedeen' receive terrorist training and key extremist leaders often congregate - could prove more dangerous to U.S. interests in the long run than his three-year liaison with Khartoum," in Sudan.

The declassified documents, obtained by the conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act request and provided to The New York Times, shed light on a murky and controversial chapter in Mr. bin Laden's history: his relocation from Sudan to Afghanistan as the Clinton administration was striving to understand the threat he posed and explore ways of confronting him.

Before 1996, Mr. bin Laden was regarded more as a financier of terrorism than a mastermind. But the State Department assessment, which came a year before he publicly urged Muslims to attack the United States, indicated that officials suspected he was taking a more active role, including in the bombings in June 1996 that killed 19 members American soldiers at the Khobar Towers in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

68 "I'm certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled 'Bin Laden Determined To Attack Inside the United States' he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team."
Senator Hillary Clinton, 2006

SUBJECT: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks 1.

Reporting [—] suggests Bin Ladin and his allies are preparing for attacks in the US, including an aircraft hijacking to obtain the release of Shaykh ‘Umar ‘Abd al-Rahman, Ramzi Yousef, and Muhammad Sadiq ‘Awda. One source quoted a senior member of the Gama’at al-Islamiyya (IG) saying that, as of late October, the IG had completed planning for an operation in the US on behalf of Bin Ladin, but that the operation was on hold. A senior Bin Ladin operative from Saudi Arabia was to visit IG counterparts in the US soon thereafter to discuss options—perhaps including an aircraft hijacking.
Presidential Daily Briefing, December 1998

69 Drew,

Speaking of evidence ... how's that list coming of all them millions of Dems who believe Bush knew in advance the time, place and manner of the 9/11 attacks?

Or are you willing to admit you nutters all read a lil too much into this poll?

As to answering your questions ... I looked upsteam for yours and could only find one that you asked ... "Are only Democrats difficult cunts?"  I thought you were being rhetorical and not literal.  But since you demand an answer ... I would suggest that, given you're writings and your views, you probably do have a lot of difficulty with cunts.  You might try to shower and come up with a plan for a night of romance that involves more than your usual 2 minute and 35 second visit to The Hun.

70 Because we're all about the love here.

And the barbed cock of Satan. Don't forget that.

71 Can a good liberal please explain to me how this mass psychosis is any different, or any better, than Hitler's "stabbed in the back" propaganda justifying the hatred (and then murder) of internal political enemies? Yeah. No one's murdering internal political enemies this time.

Ok?

72
Speaking of evidence ... how's that list coming of all them millions of Dems who believe Bush knew in advance the time, place and manner of the 9/11 attacks?


Uh, didn't you say this?
the righties who believed Saddam was connected to the 9/11 attacks and the Iraq war was justified as retribution for his involvement.

How's that list coming, anyway?

73 Drunk In Texas,

Seems the grammar thing isn't working out for you.  Where did I assert millions of Dems think Bush knew in advance of the time, place and manner of the 9/11 attacks?

Or are you on beer no. 11 about now?

74 Hey, let me correct this for you:

max maxswain lives in Camp C an alternate reality created by Michael Moore, Truthers and the msm --- anyone who disagrees with max maxswain is the enemy speaking truth to msm power.

75 Osama bin Laden: Missed Opportunities

In 1993, the first World Trade Center bombing killed six people.

In 1998, the bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa killed 224.

Both were the work of al-Qaida and bin Laden, who in 1998 declared holy war on America, making him arguably the most wanted man in the world.

In 1998, President Clinton announced, “We will use all the means at our disposal to bring those responsible to justice, no matter what or how long it takes.”

NBC News has obtained, exclusively, extraordinary secret video, shot by the U.S. government.  It illustrates an enormous opportunity the Clinton administration had to kill or capture bin Laden. Critics call it a missed opportunity.

Two terrorist attacks and a PDB "during Clinton's watch?"

Wait for it...

BUSH KNEW!

76 When did this Macswain turd turn up on this blog - I recall he used to skulk around RWS' place at one time.   A little less hysterical than the average moonbat, but really no smarter.

77 Uh Jay ... just click above on the link with your name.

65% of righties are apparently Saddam/9/11 nutters.  OUCH!!!

78 I told you Macswain I am not asking questions but you aren't engaging guys like Jay and Slu who are providing all sorts of links and asking all sorts of questions that you are ignoring. They've got that covered, I am going to stick to the insults. It's a simple division of labor.

You're the one who is saying Bush did have warnings of some sort, thanks to that terribly insightful PDB and the briefing that Rice got.  You're the one who defended these fools, not on the grounds that don't exist but that they were answer a whole different question. Now you are saying they don't exist and you want me to provide a list of names.

Move the goal posts much, do ya?

Typical fucking troll.

79

Golly.  Ad hominem instead of dealing with the subject?

 

I'm shocked Macswain.  You were always so reasonable when you were picking on the blonde girl making your case.

You stud you.  Did you look up that whole "article" thing?  Or did you want to make the argument for an army of morons?

 

Go man!

80 Hey, let me correct this for you:

max maxcswain lives in Camp C an alternate reality created by Michael Moore, Truthers and the msm --- anyone who disagrees with max maxcswain is the enemy speaking truth to msm power

81 February 26, 1993 - a car full of explosives detonated in the basement of the World Trade Center.

Clinton's reaction.

He asked us "not to overreact," then went back to the all-important issue of gays in the military.

82 holdfast,

I came over because I get a kick putting the wood to 5 or 6 nutters at a time.  Like Drew said, you need a division of labor to take on me.

You can take  Drunk's place ... he's obviously at "one too many."

And I'm still waiting for the names of all those Dems popping off conspiracy theories about Bush looking the other way despite specific knowledge of the time, place and manner of the 9/11 attacks.

That's the original topic ... you gotta have something more than a goofy poll question easily the subject of different understandings.

83 I came over because I get a kick putting the wood to 5 or 6 nutters at a time.  Like Drew said, you need a division of labor to take on me.

Chris...Chris Klein?

Troll's got confidence, I'll give him that.

84 65% of righties are apparently Saddam/9/11 nutters.

Uh, stupid:
And I'm still waiting for the names of all those Dems popping off conspiracy theories about Bush looking the other way despite specific knowledge of the time, place and manner of the 9/11 attacks.

Yes, you're not bright enough to realize what a moron this makes you.

85 I came over because I get a kick putting the wood to 5 or 6 nutters at a time. Like Drew said, you need a division of labor to take on me.

Let's see:
False statements: check
Incoherence: check
Circular logic: check
Ignore facts that don't fit the worldview: double check

Yeah, you're really "putting the wood" (nice homoerotic reference by the way) clown.

86 Slu,

Yeah, Clinton did nothing on the 1993 attack just weeks into his term of office that killed 6 (I believe).

He just put all those involved in prison forever.  Just like Bush did for the Anthrax terrorist who killed 5?

Wait a second ... Bush has caught the Anthrax Killer(s) hasn't he?

87 Yes, he put them in prison.

That's the problem, isn't it?

88 And I'm still waiting for the names of all those Dems

And I'm still waiting for all these names:
65% of righties are apparently Saddam/9/11 nutters.

Go ahead, dupe.
Please provide them.

89 Jay,

I'm really not surprised that you would read that as homoerotic.

90 ou gotta have something more than a goofy poll question easily the subject of different understandings.

Isn't it funny "the nutters" didn't have much difficulty with it, but you do?

65% of righties are apparently Saddam/9/11 nutters.

That's because the poll questions were goofy, don't you see.

91 Like Drew said, you need a division of labor to take on me.

Eh, not so much grasshopper. Not need, I just don't want to be bothered fact checking a jackass like you. Especially when we have such quality troll bashers as Jay and Slu on it.

It's Friday, the Rangers' game is on, I am simply going to call you names. More fun, less work.

92 Dick Cheney

Richard Perle

Laurie Mylroie, etc.

93 Wait a second ... Bush has caught the Anthrax Killer(s) hasn't he?

First evolution, now the anthrax killers.

You do love changing the subject, don't you?

94 I'm really not surprised that you would read that as homoerotic.

Considering you're gay, how else should I read it?

95

*snigger*

you go boy!

96 Dick Cheney

Richard Perle

Laurie Mylroie,

Who are three people who have never been in my kitchen?

97 Dick Cheney

Richard Perle

Laurie Mylroie

Who are three people that make Macswain crap his drawers?

98

Dick Cheney

Richard Perle

Laurie Mylroie,

 

 

American Idol?

99 Dick Cheney

Richard Perle

Laurie Mylroie,

Sure sounds like 65% of all "righties" in America to me!

100 can't name a single thing Bush could have or should have done to prevent the attacks that you would have supported.

Piffle.  Bush could have declared Islam the national religion and nuked Israel into a glowing parking lot.  The lefties would be having multi-culti mass orgasms over that.

101 McSwain, why are fucking leftist morons always looking for hidden subtext in plainly worded sentences?  Are you all secretly Strausians?

Or Clintons?

I guess it all depends what the meaning of "The" is.


Even a 6th grader can tree-diagram parse this correctly:

Did Bush Know About the 9/11 Attacks in Advance?

Did-A interrogative word, requiring a affirmative or negative response.

Bush-As in George W Bush, President of the United States

Know-to have knowledge or information

About-in reference to

The 9/11 attacks-not attacks in general, not CIA eavesdropping on unspecified attacks, a specific DAY OF ATTACK, occurring on the 11th month of September (hopefully the polling audience is aware of the correct year, but you never know)

In Advance-Bush had precognative knowledge that an attack was specifically planned for THE SPECIFIC DATE of 9/11, that is, the 11th day of September of 2001.

Now, how else do you read this question? And what kind of fucking mushrooms are you consuming?

102 Now, how else do you read this question? And what kind of fucking mushrooms are you consuming?

Because you need to get a new dealer, McNugget.

103 Ok ok ok -- I call *bullshiite* on these polls.

They're sounding more and more like something concoted in the back room of Howeird Dean's mom's basement.

...or at a KGB sub-station deep under the rapidly deteriorating Arctic ice sheet. hmm....

104

If reality is too scary, make up a new reality.

Crazy people have been doing this for a long time. The Dems are just takin' it mainstream.

Layers, and all that...

105 Where is this McSwain person?  I need to sentence them?

106

Sure, he had seen the August 2006 PDB warning of such an attack.  It's really simple to understand UNLESS you're trying to fit the answer in with a presupposed notion of the intent of Democrats. -- MacSwain

Did Bush know in advance about the 9/11 attack?  Sure, he had seen the August 2006 PDB warning of such an attack. -- MacSwain

A minor point I know, but you are citing a report that would have come out almost 5 years after THE 9/11 Attacks.

MacSwain you just provided a perhaps unintentional DUH? moment, I'd call you an idiot but I'm sure idiots don't want to be associated with you either.  So I'll call you a hemorrhoid that no amount of Preparation H could lessen the discomfort you bring to others with your stray hair assholery.

107 This is what comes of letting Dean, Kos, and those other Leftards drive the Democrat Party bus. I hope the DSemocrats go down in flames in '08 for adopting all the extreme Truther crap just to score cheap political points off Dubya. Geez, have the DOnks even HAD a foreign policy for the past 6.5 years? I thought it was mindless knee-jerk opposition to whatever Chimpy McBushitler had going on a daily basis.

108

Sure, he had seen the August 2006 PDB warning of such an attack.  It's really simple to understand UNLESS you're trying to fit the answer in with a presupposed notion of the intent of Democrats. -- MacSwain

Did Bush know in advance about the 9/11 attack?  Sure, he had seen the August 2006 PDB warning of such an attack. -- MacSwain

Time to do some more grammer parseing for our latest moron know-it-all.

'The' is a definite article.

A definite article (English the) is used before singular and plural nouns that refer to a particular member of a group.

'A' and 'An' are indefinite articles.

An indefinite article (English a, an) is used before singular nouns that refer to any member of a group.

Therefor, to assert, as macmoron has done, that a warning of such "an attack" equals knowing about "the 9/11 attack" is to pretend that one of the most basic rules of grammatical construction doesn't exist.

But then, macmoron, like the left in general, is always twisting/altering/lying about reality to try to make it fit their hate-filled preconceptions.

109

Speaking of evidence ... how's that list coming of all them millions of Dems who believe Bush knew in advance the time, place and manner of the 9/11 attacks?

Uh, we're talking about the poll which pretty much does that, retard.  Did you get distracted by something shiny and lose your train of thought?  Or is the burden on us to now provide 27 polls which corroborate this one so you don't have to deal with the uncomfortable embarrassment of belonging to a mentally bankrupt cult of loons?

Of course, the alternative explanation for the poll results (one that makes sense, not the laughable self-serving horseshit you're shoveling here) is that Democrats are too stupid to comprehend direct, unambiguous questions.

So at least you've got an out.

110

Forgot to include the link to wikipedia which provides the definitions I cited above:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_%28grammar%29

111

If W had bothered to listen to the Remote Viewers who clearly had visions of impending terrorist attacks instead of Halliburton, who were encouraging increased airline traffic to disperse fluoridated chemtrails, he could have easily identified the Zionist markings on the remote-control aircraft flying into a Hollywood-designed set in the remote Nevada desert. 

(see, this is kind of like MadLibs--emphasis on Mad). 

West of the Rockies, go ahead. 

 

112

max, I cited Wikipedia for a weekly assignment in a grad economics class, and the professor threatened to give me an F for the entire term. 

OK, lets play MadLibs:

name a(n):

1.  AIRPORT

2.  ANOTHER WORD FOR "JEWS"

3.  TYPE OF AIRCRAFT

4.  ACTION VERB

5.  ACTION VERB ASSOCIATED WITH GEORGE W. BUSH

6.  WEAPON

7.  TYPE OF GAME

8.  BRAND OF CONDOM

9.  ADJECTIVE

10.  OBSCENITY

11.  FAMOUS HOMOSEXUAL

12.  CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRY

13.  ADVERB

14.  RELIGION.

 

OK, go ahead!       

113 Why is this even an issue?

OF COURSE Bush knew about the impending attacks. There was a memo about it on August 6, 2001.

Why are we even debating this?

114 discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefree shipping

115 buy air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force one
UGG Boots
UGG Australia
UGG Shoes
UGG Sale
Cheap UGG
mbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt saleform usa

116 buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes
cheap ugg
ugg rainier
buy ugg
ugg usa
discount ugg boots
ugg 5825
ugg shoes sale
ugg sundance
ugg shoes
cheap ugg boots
ugg 5815
ugg sale
ugg uk
ugg knightsbridge
womens ugg boots
ugg boots
ugg australia
ugg 5819free shipping

117 Fake Watches | Replica watches | soccer jersey supplier | Replica Watches | Fake Watches | Bell & Ross Replica Watch | Fake Gerald Genta | Oris Watch Replica | Daniel Roth Fake | Gucci Fake Watches | Fake Movado Watches | Replica Oris Watches | Seiko Watch Replica | Blancpain Replica | Patek Philippe Replica Watches

118 Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Cartier | Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Cheap Rolex | soccer jersey wholesale | Vacheron Watch | Replica Girard Perregaux | Replica Chanel Watches | Replica Hublot Watch | Hublot Watch Replica | Replica Baume & Mercier | Zenith Replica Watch | Replica Gerald Genta | Fake 2009 New Arrival | Zenith Watches Replica

119 Replica Breitling Watches | Replica watches | replica soccer jersey | Fake Watches | Replica watches | Fake Rolex | Audemars Piguet Replica | Cheap Zenith Watches | Cheap Movado Fake Watch | Replica Tag Heuer Watch | Alain Silberstein Wristwatch | Fake Technomari Watches | Rado Watch Replica | Cheap Breguet Watches | Frank Muller Watches Replica

120 soccer jersey supplier | Replica Breitling Watches | Fake Watches | Replica Omega | Fake Watches | Calvin Klein Watch Replica | Audemars Piguet Watches Replica | Benz Watches Replica | Louis Vuitton Wristwatch | Gucci Replica | Christian Dior Replica Watch | Ebel Replica | Breitling Replica | Replica Fendi Watches | Frank Muller Watches Replica

121 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

122 Fake Watches | Fake Watches | soccer jersey supplier | soccer jersey supplier | Fake Watches | Replica Cartier | Fake Watches | Replica Omega | replica watch | replica wristwatch | Luxury watches | replica wristwatch | watches brand | replica watch | watches brand | watches brand | replica watches | replica watches | watches brand | replica wristwatch | replica watches | watches brand | replica watches | replica watch | watches brand | Luxury watches | replica watch | best replica watches | watches brand | watches brand | best replica watches | replica watches | Luxury watches | replica watches | best replica watches | replica watch | replica watch | replica watch

123 I will have a hard time buying ugg classic cardy at normal brick and mortar store for now on knowing that I can browse the largest selection I have ever seen and purchase confidently. Thanks for being a great company.Although your ugg boots cardy website is entered by users, the site has a lot of accurate and useful information on it.your net shop is kept to a minimum and favours websites connected to the ugg cardy boots Web Design Library in appearance and subject.
The popular blue ugg is renowned for its comfort. But some doctors worry that the popular black ugg could cause serious foot pain in the long run.So some podiatrists across the country are telling ugg classic cardy lovers to watch their steps. In fact,there is nothing wrong!
The crochet boots online retailer also knows bargain-hungry shoppers are scouring the Web for discounts, and its UGG Classic Crochet rivals are more than happy to provide them. So it is putting coupon codes on ugg classic crochet that customers can use to save money on its site.

124 Plastic Bracelet Yiwu | Hermes Jewelry Wholesale | Carbon Cufflink Cheap | Wholesale Tungsten Jewelry Jewelry | Plating Rings Best | Wholesale Wood Bracelet Jewelry | Wholesal Tiffany Jewelry | Stamping Bangle Wholesale | Corrosion Bracelet Yiwu | Fashion bracelets Yiwu | Tiffany&Co Bangle Best | Laser Earring Best | Cutting Pendant Fashion | Key Rings Luxury | Rubber Pendant Cheap | Wholesal Zircon Bangles | Stamping Bangle | Key_Chain Wholesale | Zircon Earring Yiwu | Casting Rings Luxury

125 Replica Cartier Handbags | Luxury Longines handbags | Replica Chopard Handbags | Breitling Replica bags | Replica Fashion Jacques Lemans handbags | Replica Fashion IWC handbags | Replica Fashion Audemars Piguet handbags | Best Aigner bags | Replica Fashion Mont Blanc handbags | Replica Bvlgari Handbags | A. Lange & Sohne Replica bags | Replica Rolex Handbags | Breitling Replica bags | Replica Fashion Swiss Army handbags | Replica Hamilton Handbags | Luxury Tag Heuer handbags | Luxury Dolce & Gabbana handbags | Hublot Fake Handbags | Luxury Panerai handbags | Luxury Breitling handbags | Luxury Emporio Armani handbags | Blancpain Replica bags | Replica Fashion Gucci handbags | Luxury Boxs handbags | Luxury Seiko handbags

126 nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max
nike air max
womens air max
nike air max 360 shoes
air max
kids air max 90
kids air max classic BW
kids air max 360
kids air max 97
nike air max 180
nike air max 2009
nike air max 2010
nike air max 360 shoes
nike air max 87
nike air max 88
nike air max 89
nike air max 90
nike air max 91
nike air max 93
nike air max 95
nike air max classic BW
nike air max ltd
nike air max TN
womens air max 2007
womens air max 2009
womens air max 87
womens air max 90
womens air max 91
womens air max 95
womens air max 97
womens air max classic BW
womens air max ltd

127 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

128 jjwnl buy cheap wow gold ytxq wow gold,kpuq buy wow gold txzcr,wow power leveling,phoqzf wow gold jdgkh,cheap wow gold,kzrcbr buy wow gold avref,buy wow gold,yspth cheap wow gold ooplm,world of warcraft gold,pkpnrg buy wow gold igsio,wow gold,uqqsqj wow power leveling omuny,wow power leveling,nwad buy wow gold dsago,cheap wow gold,gbuzbs wow gold dmpgb,buy wow gold,kjccsa cheap wow gold vuanu,world of warcraft gold,yrszqq buy wow gold lozlcn.