Important Action Alert: Edwards Reverses, Bows To Nutroots, Keeps Mutants On Staff

I'm sure they had pretty vicious rants lined up had he fired them.

The New York Times does Edwards a solid by pretending that this was all about potty-language:

Some of their work contained profanity and vulgar language, which did offend some on the right and the left.

No mention of divine loads or abortions for the Virgin Mary, notice.

Nice. The New York Times is really good at this, huh?

Goldstein's Take: Is a hot, sticky load of analysis:

As I wrote yesterday, I don’t care one way or the other, personally, about whether or not Marcotte and McEwan are allowed to keep their josb. That’s Edwards’ call. And from a blogging perspective, I suppose Edwards’ decision is good news.
But let’s not confuse the effect with the rationale—which is both risible and insulting. Because were it really never Marcotte’s intent to malign anyone’s faith, she probably wouldn’t have dedicated so many hate-filled blog posts to, you know—maligning anyone’s faith.
Of course it was her intent. Just as it was McEwan’s intent. And worst of all, Edwards knows it. That he has pretended to take the two at their word, in an ostentatious gesture of “trust,” is precisley the kind of staged treacle that makes people doubt the sincerity of politicians; and that both Marcotte and McEwan have assured their own personal Patriarch that they’ll behave, now that he’s promoted them to the grownups’ table, is, to put it bluntly, one of the most pathetic public surrenderings of personal integrity I’ve ever seen.
Seriously. We should feel bad for them.
That is, were we to actually believe they meant any of it. Because how this plays out for the netroots is this way: either they are cheering on an ideological sellout, or they are knowingly and happily embracing an opportunistic liar. So. Congrats to them. Once again, they’ve covered themselves in white hot sticky glory!
Edwards and Marcotte deserve each other, as far as I’m concerned. A presidential candidate who tries to sell me on the fact that Marcotte and her group of shrieking ill-tempered character assassins had no intent of maligning anyone—all for a bump in the DailyKos straw poll—is a charlatan and a waffling opportunist.

LGF: puts it pithily:

Hey, Nutroots bloggers! Want to work on a big-time political campaign? All you have to do is publicly repudiate everything you’ve written for the past five years!

It's also amusing that Marcotte and McEwan resorted to that hoariest of lies -- "We were just being satirical."

Barnett: Doing that "Numbered List" thing he does to make himself sound all important and shit:

3) But won’t it be a great tragedy for Edwards if he loses the support of the Nutroots? After all, Chris Bowers of MyDD has pounded his virtual shoe on a virtual table threatening, “We will bury you!” if Edwards goes through with firing the angry blogresses.
There’s a lot that the Nutroots and the blogosphere don’t get, but this is the most important: In 2004, Howard Dean enjoyed the unified support of the Nutroots and angry “progressives” everywhere. What did it get him? A fourth place finish in Iowa. If a candidate is going to play to the blogosphere as his or her main constituency, that’s the ceiling on how well he or she will perform. Let’s not forget that Dean finished behind an unimpressive roster of Dick Gephardt, John Kerry and John Edwards. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are both a lot more formidable than any of those guys.
4) But won’t it look really bad if Edwards caves to the demands of knuckle-dragging wingnuts like you and cans Marcotte and what’s-her-name?
Oh lord. This is the biggest myth of this whole melodrama. I can’t think of a single right-wing blogger who has called for Marcotte’s termination. Read my commentary, read Allah’s, read Ace’s, read Glenn’s, read MKH’s – we don’t care whether Marcotte stays or goes. Really, take the challenge – find me a single prominent blogger who has said, “I demand Amanda Marcotte be fired.”
We do, however, care that Edwards be judged by the company he keeps. If a campaign hired Ann Coulter as a message massager or speech writer, no one on the left would be sympathetic to the defense that Ann’s incendiary past-writings have nothing to do with her ability to perform the functions that the campaign hired her to do. And make no mistake – while I have often found Ann’s writings to be needlessly juvenile and offensive, compared to Amanda Marcotte she is a national treasure.

Edwards Embraces The Nutroots-- Not Just The Mutants Marcotte and McEwan, But Their Twisted, Paranoid Worldview As Well: Edwards won't let himself be "distracted," Allah notes:

It wasn’t their intention to malign anyone’s faith? By referring to religious conservatives as “godbags” and “Christofascists”? Quote:

Q: What if Mary had taken Plan B after the Lord filled her with his hot, white, sticky Holy Spirit?
A: You’d have to justify your misogyny with another ancient mythology.
Either he’s a gullible moron or he takes us for gullible morons. Bad news either way. Here’s the big finish:

We’re beginning a great debate about the future of our country, and we can’t let it be hijacked. It will take discipline, focus, and courage to build the America we believe in.
That’s vintage nutroots newspeak, on the same paranoid continuum as questioning the timing, and I’m sure it won’t be lost on his target audience. Their answer to every right-wing challenge, policy or otherwise, is to look for an ulterior motive that we’re allegedly attempting to distract them from. Opposing abortion isn’t “about” protecting innocents; it’s about “controlling women’s bodies.” Opposing affirmative action isn’t “about” fairness and meritocracy; it’s about reinstituting Jim Crow. The Iraq war isn’t “about” trying to reduce the incentives towards terrorism by introducing democracy; it’s about oil, Israel, Halliburton, colonialism, or any/all of the above. And criticizing Edwards’s bloggers isn’t “about” the fact that they’re offensive wretches whose brand of discourse has now been mainstreamed; it’s about conservatives trying to hijack the debate about which of the two Americas Lionel Hutz purchased to accommodate his palace."

Yes, there's always a subtext, and the subtext is always a metanarrative about power relationships about race, class, gender, and sexuality.

They learned that in college. And that's pretty much all they learned in college.

The nutroots is taking this as vindication, that they've whipsawed the Democratic Party into finally "standing up and fighting for its principles."

Really?

These are your principles?

Duly noted.

The New Face Of The Edwards Campaign:

I'm comfortable with that.

The Shannon Elizabeth pic is there, by the way, apparently because some computer program supposedly analyzes your face and tells you which celebrity in its database you most closely resemble. This is posted on Marcotte's own photostream, inviting comparisons.

I haven't seen a computer go this beserker-nuts since WOPR in Wargames.

In related news, six Soviet ICBMs just hit McGill Air Force Base.

Would you like to play a nice game of chess?

Amanda, it's not so much as we'd like to control women's bodies, so much as we'd like to do a little policing of their Flickr accounts.

Posted by: Ace at 03:34 PM

Comments

1 Some of their work contained profanity and vulgar language, which did offend some on the right and the left.

I would like the name of one person on the left that was offended.

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 03:36 PM (omkIU)

John Edwards is... The Nutroots Candidate

Defiance: How To Stand Your Ground When You Make Really Stupid And Avoidable Mistakes

Posted by: Some Guy at February 08, 2007 03:38 PM (lPxkl)

3 I'm rather glad Edwards kept them on staff. It just about guarantees that he'll never be President (although it was a long shot anyway).

Posted by: Jason at February 08, 2007 03:39 PM (Y2Bw/)

4 John Edward's bloggers are the least of his problems. Pandering to the nutroots will be his undoing...just ask Ned Lamont how that all worked out for him.

Posted by: Johnny OMA at February 08, 2007 03:40 PM (j2vfb)

5 Not so sure this was such a dumb move for Edwards.

Its an awful move for politics in general as it legitimizes the worst fringes of left wing political "thought".

But that's what the Silky Pony expects to ride to the nomination, so, from his perspective? Not dumb. Not dumb at all.

Posted by: AFKAF at February 08, 2007 03:40 PM (ivbbD)

6 You can go fuck yourself Ace. I hope you get globs of Holy Spirit in your body cavities too.

I win and you loose.

Posted by: Amanda Marcotte at February 08, 2007 03:42 PM (+GRGs)

7 Has there ever been a faker, more full of shit candidate for president?

Posted by: RobG at February 08, 2007 03:43 PM (cHQuS)

8 I never realized that Amanda Marcotte was Jay in drag from "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back".

Fuckfuckfuckfuckfuckmothermotherfuckmothermotherfuckmotherfuckmotherfuck...fifteen bucks little man, put that shit in my hand!

Posted by: EC at February 08, 2007 03:45 PM (mAhn3)

9 So the election is a year and a half away, and election related issues have been in the news lately. Which begs the question, when will the MSM bring out Falwell? Don't fear, there he is on the front page of Yahoo news. Veritable breaking news that demands headlines:

"Falwell works to get conservatives in W. House, Supreme Court"

Posted by: corn at February 08, 2007 03:46 PM (Ly7ID)

10 I'll always have that picture of me with Prince.

Cya, I have to go fuck someone -- I't getting harder to find willing partners/victims.

Posted by: Amanda Marcotte at February 08, 2007 03:46 PM (DzeyU)

11 I would like the name of one person on the left that was offended.

St. Andrew? Wait. No, that's not right. He would never be offended by someone attacking Christians, no matter how gobsmackingly vile they might be.

Posted by: wiserbud at February 08, 2007 03:46 PM (1tlBF)

12 This is an interesting call from Edwards. I suppose if he remains low in the polls, this won't really be much of an issue. But, if he starts to move up in the polls (not the KOS polls, the real polls), I expect the other dem's running for the nomination to make hay out of this. Also, in the unlikely event he were to win the nomination - this is some great fodder for the general election.

Posted by: Great Banana at February 08, 2007 03:47 PM (JFj6P)

Funny, but the most troubling thing about this is the continued assertion that it's all about the potty-mouth language. Couldn't be farther from the truth. It's not even about the anti-religious comments, because, honestly, any of the faithful who are likely to be shaken by Marcotte's blathering aren't likely to be all that strong in their faith anyway. It's all about the airbrushing, and the preening of the left that they can now claim to own Silky Pony's ass.

One more thing - Marcotte is a petty, dour, shrieking, shrill, unhinged, unreadable, uninteresting twat, but I'm sure she at least knows how to spell "lose".

Posted by: Patton at February 08, 2007 03:49 PM (lpnu0)

14 "We were just being satirical."

Well, I guess that explains Hitler.

Never got to do the Godwin thing before, cool.

Posted by: mesablue at February 08, 2007 03:49 PM (DzeyU)

15 If Edwards were to take the nomination, it would indicate a fracturing of the Democratic party the likes of which we haven't seen since the '94 Congressional election. Marcotte and McEwen will only serve to make it funnier, because they won't be able to restrain themselves.

And my God, Amanda Marcotte must be far and away one of the least attractive women I've ever seen. It walks on its hind legs.

tmi3rd

Posted by: tmi3rd at February 08, 2007 03:51 PM (bNOlH)

16 Gephardt beat Dean in Iowa. Jeez, I'd forgotten about that.

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at February 08, 2007 03:51 PM (w0dpL)

17 No mention of divine loads . . .

Is not your load divine?

Posted by: at February 08, 2007 03:53 PM (LDivV)

18 gotta disagree with you AFKAF.

i don't think the nutroots are all that powerful a constituency. people who would give marcotte a "you go girl" on the disgusting things she writes are deaniacs, only a few years older.

i think edwards simply caved. but in long term analysis i would say that edwards is going to try to flank hillary! (running as a woman) and obama (running as a clean black man) by being the "young fresh" candidate.

"hey everybody, i know i'm not a minority or a disgusting harpy, but i got passion. i swear i'm not just a slimy stuffy lawyer"

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 03:55 PM (bTQVB)

19 This is great. It's like the movie Speed. At any moment, something could cause the bus to blow up. This makes the Edwards campaign so much more interesting.

Except that Sandra Bullock isn't as fugly as you-know-who.

Posted by: JayC at February 08, 2007 03:56 PM (mavLX)

20 Eh, Catholics weren't going to vote Edwards anyway.

Nutroots are all he's got.

Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at February 08, 2007 03:57 PM (zCH8F)

21 Also, a new buzz phrase for the AoS Lifestyle &tm:

Be nice to me or "I'll punish you with babies"

Posted by: JayC at February 08, 2007 04:00 PM (mavLX)

22 Enough of us are idiots, that this hateful, and anti-american, anti-democratic speak will be glossed over, and enough of us are stupid enough to think nothing of it.

I hate my generation.

Posted by: Wickedpinto at February 08, 2007 04:00 PM (QTv8u)

23 This is really interesting. The nutroots were baying for the Breck Girl's blood yesterday when it looked like he would let the two unreproductive uterii (sp?) go. And now, suddenly he is their hero. Their loyalties can turn on a dime. They do not have much principles... or any other positive trait whatsoever.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 04:01 PM (h76y6)

24 Nutroots are all he's got.

And pretty hair.

Posted by: sandy burger at February 08, 2007 04:01 PM (K2rlS)

25 NEWSFLAS!!!

William Hung Supports President Bush!!!

Posted by: Wickedpinto at February 08, 2007 04:02 PM (QTv8u)

26 One more thing - Marcotte is a petty, dour, shrieking, shrill, unhinged, unreadable, uninteresting twat, but I'm sure she at least knows how to spell "lose".

I was high when I did that post Patton. So excuse fucking me if I misspelled the word. Question me again fascist and I will come to your house and fuck you in the ass with a strap on. And then I will do the same to your dog, while you are watching.

And you will like it.

And I appologize in advance if anyone is offended by that.

Posted by: Amanda Marcotte at February 08, 2007 04:02 PM (+GRGs)

27 I was just testing.

Posted by: Wickedpinto at February 08, 2007 04:02 PM (QTv8u)

28 Clearly, if Barack Obama does not hire Oliver Willis as his Blogmaster, the rightwing racist godbag fascists have won.

Barack Obama - do the right thing.

Oliver Willis - Obama '08 Blogmaster.

-

Posted by: BumperStickerist at February 08, 2007 04:03 PM (INjrJ)

29 When has any Democrat ever fired or gotten rid of ANYONE for indecent behavior?? I can't think of one time. ANd that certaintly includes a President and a few Congressmen. Where there is no standard of moral behavior, there are no consequences.

This cannot surprise anyone.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle at February 08, 2007 04:05 PM (YdMYG)

I'm sure they had pretty vicious rants lined up had he fired them.

I'm sure they have pretty vicious rants lined up even though he didn't fire them, it's what they do.

Is that really Amanda in the above 3 comments? If so, I rest my case.

Posted by: Veeshir at February 08, 2007 04:05 PM (ThMnZ)

31 Edwards is making the Dean and Lamont mistake of thinking that the group making the most noise must be the biggest. He didn't learn that they are just the ones with the biggest mouthes.

Posted by: Steve L. at February 08, 2007 04:06 PM (hpZf2)

32 I am coming to your house too Veeshir. Don't count on me using any lube on you.

And I appologize in advance if anyone is offended by that.

Posted by: Amanda Marcotte at February 08, 2007 04:07 PM (+GRGs)

33 "I've talked to Amanda and Melissa; they have both assured me that it was never their intention to malign anyone's faith, and I take them at their word,"

If that's true then shouldn't they be fired for being bad writers since that's exactly what they did?

Posted by: Drew at February 08, 2007 04:09 PM (gNyUT)

34 true dat Steve L.

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 04:10 PM (bTQVB)

35 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! HA!

Shannon Elizabeth???????

You MUST be fucking kidding me?

ace, I would like to see a comparson of the moonbat blogger and Helen Thomas.

Separated at birth.

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 04:12 PM (omkIU)

Beware Veeshir! I think "she's" serious!

Only partially related, can you imagine what her boyfriend must be like? Yeesh, poor bastard's probably spent his entire life so far getting beat up and having sand kicked into his vagina.

Posted by: Patton at February 08, 2007 04:13 PM (lpnu0)

37 Separated at birth, indeed. Well, separated after birth, like two conjoined twins after a 40 hour surgery where one twin comes out looking pretty normal and the other one has three arms and also, for some reason, five o'clock shadow.

Posted by: ace at February 08, 2007 04:14 PM (+u1X0)

38 So its down to Hillary or Obama.....already?

Well, Edwards was the worst of the bunch. Good riddance to him.

Posted by: Kasper Hauser at February 08, 2007 04:14 PM (KeOQp)

39 when will women figure out that dyed hair and bangs is not hip? i'm so tired of these "women doing it for themselves" chicks complete with old school navy tatoos.

anybody with me? or am i a big faggard.

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 04:15 PM (bTQVB)

40 Time for the John Edwards:White, hot, sticky photoshops. Maybe a campaign slogan or two?

John Edwards: For a stickier America

Posted by: geoff at February 08, 2007 04:17 PM (RLGHA)

41 Good Lord, the vomiting that was induced by the picture of that hate-filled wench was offset at the last sec by the Shannon Elizabeth pic. Now I don't have to wash my eyes with bleach.

Posted by: corn at February 08, 2007 04:17 PM (Ly7ID)

42 when will women figure out that dyed hair and bangs is not hip?

Now wait just a cotton pickin' minute. Some of us look good like that....uh, um, I don't know anyone off hand that has that particular look. Let's just say I'm refusing to take this personal.

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:18 PM (+Aq+d)

43 Amanda looks like she needs a shave. And she looks more like Shannon Sharpe than Shannon Elizabeth.

Posted by: wiserbud at February 08, 2007 04:20 PM (1tlBF)

44 whoop...

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 04:20 PM (bTQVB)

45 Good Lord, she has five o'clock shadow. Couldn't she have shaved before taking this picture?

Posted by: CT at February 08, 2007 04:20 PM (KV/Mz)

46 From Jo-Jo the Dog Faced Girl's site:

Seeing as this photo is being linked to by hyperventilating pearl-clutchers all over, can I just point out the bleeding obvious: a face-matching program came up with this result from this photo. You can see the other results if you click on the "facespandagon" tag over there to the left.

I bet whoever designed that face-matching program has recently swallowed a shit load of pills.

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 04:21 PM (omkIU)

47 Hot. Very hot.

Posted by: Ed Gein at February 08, 2007 04:21 PM (HDpFt)

48 Amanda has Jihadis eyes

Posted by: spec at February 08, 2007 04:22 PM (tszxK)

49 Really Rosetta? Who came up with your face that I just saw on Faces from Ace's? hhhhmmmm?

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:22 PM (+Aq+d)

50 Dear God . . . the beer goggles do nothing!

Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at February 08, 2007 04:23 PM (zCH8F)

51 Separated at birth, indeed. Well, separated after birth

Did you mean after birth or afterbirth?

The movie Twins is coming to mind.

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 04:23 PM (omkIU)

52 Only partially related, can you imagine what her boyfriend must be like? Yeesh, poor bastard's probably spent his entire life so far getting beat up and having sand kicked into his vagina.

That's it Patton. You must have been talking to my partner. I am coming to get you. I have my diaper on, my strap on in hand, and I am getting in my car. I am going to wreck your bong hole.

Oh wait, I don't know where you live.

Posted by: Amanda Marcotte at February 08, 2007 04:23 PM (+GRGs)

53 That chick looks utterly crazy. I mean driving-with-diapers crazy. Edwards didn't dare get rid of her because he knew not even the Secret Service would keep her from ripping his face off with her twitching, clawed hands.

Posted by: Trimegistus at February 08, 2007 04:24 PM (FCUWh)

54 Go get him Amanda. Don't let him get away with this. I will have dinner ready for you when you get home.

Posted by: Andy Dick at February 08, 2007 04:25 PM (+GRGs)

55 Give her straight bleach blond hair and you've got "Angela" from The Office

Posted by: Dudley Smith at February 08, 2007 04:25 PM (0S8Xt)

56 I don't really like to bash someone solely for their god given appearance. Seems sort of the thing that the nutroots do.

I would point out though that I believe the disgust directed at the way she looks is directly proportional to the personality she presents, which is understandable.

Posted by: roc ingersol at February 08, 2007 04:27 PM (m2CN7)

57 Thanks to Vonage, Amanda can now stay in touch with her femininity for less.

Posted by: BumperStickerist at February 08, 2007 04:28 PM (INjrJ)

and also, for some reason, five o'clock shadow.

When I first saw the picture I had assumed you had altered it to look that way!!!

Hideous.

Posted by: Jay at February 08, 2007 04:29 PM (VZ0Yh)

59 Really Rosetta? Who came up with your face that I just saw on Faces from Ace's? hhhhmmmm?

That was me pre-op. I am now a big huge fat woman I swear.

Also, can you palm a basketball?

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 04:30 PM (omkIU)

60 Do not make fun of my woman Dudley.

Seriously, Angela is actually pretty hot, in a stuck up prissy Christianist way.

Posted by: Dwight Shrute at February 08, 2007 04:30 PM (+GRGs)

She's looks like Mary Ann from the Little Rascals, all grown up.

http://www.picking.com/og-maryann1.jpg

Posted by: Nice Deb at February 08, 2007 04:31 PM (ZRIwC)

62 wiserbud
"Shannon Sharp"
Heh, heh.

I agree with spec. Look at her eyes, man. there is madness lurking in those depths. You can almost see a vicious rant forming in them. Can an action alert be far behind?

Posted by: mikeyslaw at February 08, 2007 04:31 PM (yrptY)

63 Oh shit! George Harrison and Rupert Everett?!?!?!?

Go check out the other Flickr pages with the comparison.

Oh my...

Posted by: EC at February 08, 2007 04:32 PM (mAhn3)

Hey! Two new faces on "Faces from Ace's"

Welcome to the lineup, PJ Momma & Rosetta.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 04:33 PM (h76y6)

65 Also, can you palm a basketball?
Is that a referance to my man-hands? I seem to see a shiny cue-ball in the "R" section that I'm going to palm in a minute!!!

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:33 PM (+Aq+d)

66 THAT'S Amanda? No way that's a woman! "Amanda" is Emo Phillips without the sex-appeal.

Posted by: at February 08, 2007 04:33 PM (AVDP4)

67 Welcome to the lineup, PJ Momma & Rosetta.

good thing slu posted names or you wouldn't be able to tell the difference huh?

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:34 PM (+Aq+d)

68 amanda truly is mannish, but i think that would pretty much just go without much comment.

it's the damn shannon elizabeth PIP thing she's got going! what are we to deduce from that?

at best we can say amanda is a hollywood sycophant fucking infantile and probably did this face matching thing right after taking a cosmo quiz.

at worst she thinks there's something to this ingenious face matching program.

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 04:35 PM (bTQVB)

PJ Momma,

I could tell the difference. I have seen Rosetta's photo before. He posted it once in a desperate attempt to prove that he is not a woman. I still have it saved. It will be used against him.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 04:38 PM (h76y6)

70 Good Lord, I think I slept with her mother.

Posted by: will my shame never end? at February 08, 2007 04:38 PM (ATbKm)

71 This has Elizabeth Edwards fingerprints all over it. She is a leftist loon to the nth degree, she posts on DU and Kos. I guarantee that this is her hire, and she would never hire a cute woman, it goes against her feminist skin tone. I would bet she was in a little hot water yesterday, like "you got me into this, now get me out!" But I'm still backing him.

Edwards for President '08

Posted by: Judd at February 08, 2007 04:38 PM (kqewx)

72 I seem to see a shiny cue-ball in the "R" section that I'm going to palm in a minute!!!

BALDIST!!!

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 04:39 PM (omkIU)

73 Welcome to the lineup, PJ Momma & Rosetta.
Somehow Tushar, lineup is so, so appropriate.

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:40 PM (+Aq+d)

74 So THAT'S what a man-lesbian looks like.

He has a nice smile. It's the kind of smile that says "I like women. No, really, I'm not just making shit up".

PM, who's the midget with you?

Posted by: Dave in Texas at February 08, 2007 04:40 PM (pzen5)

75 That was nasty, Dave.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 04:41 PM (h76y6)

76 PM, who's the midget with you?

It's one of my minions.

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:41 PM (+Aq+d)

77 BALDIST!!!
Nonsense, it's more surface area for my man-hands

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:43 PM (+Aq+d)

78 All this is going to do is let historians know that way back in 2007 some white male anti-catholic lawyer with a big house ran for the democratic primary against Empress Hillary!

Its nice to know that the Democratic party is now officially anti-catholic.

Posted by: Iblis at February 08, 2007 04:43 PM (SacKO)

79 Rosie, dude, you got a little something ...a little something right here...no, no, on your chin there, no...other side.....yeah, right there. What is that, mousse?

Posted by: wiserbud at February 08, 2007 04:44 PM (1tlBF)

80 When John Edwards becomes President we are going to track you all down and have you killed. You subhuman scum. I have been picked on by your likes my whole life. You have no idea how much rage I have been holding in.

Posted by: Amanda Marcotte at February 08, 2007 04:44 PM (+GRGs)

81 The guy who had to hide his face under a breathing apparatus riffing the looks of someone else. Thats rich.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 04:45 PM (h76y6)

82 I don't know why this Marcotte fishwife is such a tout for contraceptives. Look at her: with that puss, she's got birth control covered.

Add that personality, and you've got on-line ED.

Cordially...

Posted by: Rick at February 08, 2007 04:46 PM (usS6D)

83 And from a blogging perspective, I suppose Edwards’ decision is good news.

Nah, I ain't buying it. It may be good from a liberal blogging perspective but there is no way this is gonna fly on the right side of the blogosphere. Amanda Marcotte Paisley Passey may get away with this but being a loud, obnoxious, vicious, man hatting twat is not news for liberals. It's a significant constituency of the left. The standards for taste and morality are just a tad higher on the right.

Posted by: JackStraw at February 08, 2007 04:47 PM (t+mja)

84 I don't know if anyone remembers this joke, but Amanda Marcotte looks like she suffers from "Ed Zhachary" desease.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 04:47 PM (h76y6)

85 The guy who had to hide his face under a breathing apparatus riffing the looks of someone else. Thats rich.

I do that out consideration for all of yours' self-esteem. As good-looking as I am (I have been compared to everyone from Bill Clinton to a young Gilbert Gottfried) I'm afraid that if I post my true visage, none of you would ever talk to me again, out of sheer personal humiliation.

Posted by: wiserbud at February 08, 2007 04:48 PM (1tlBF)

86 Wiserbut has been compared to Bill Clinton, and he is worried about other people's humiliation.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 04:49 PM (h76y6)

87 Thanks for the pictures, guys.

Rosetta kind of looks like the guy who plays Chloe's husband on "24."

Cute kid minion, PM.

Posted by: Slublog at February 08, 2007 04:50 PM (+rY9v)

88 sorry wiserbud. I did not mean to call you wiserbut. That was a typo.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 04:50 PM (h76y6)

89 Wiserbut *giggle*

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:52 PM (+Aq+d)

90 FLASH...MUST CREDIT TEH DODGEREPORT...

Deb Frisch now looking for job with Democratic campaign...

"If Marcotte can get paid for dis, so can I," said teh former decision-science professor.

DEVELOPING...

Posted by: DodgeReport at February 08, 2007 04:53 PM (AQj/2)

91 faces from aces?? !!

somehow i always knew i hanging out with old people. ..

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 04:53 PM (bTQVB)

Rosetta, you remind me of someone.....Mr. French?... Michael Savage?...Jesse Ventura?.....who?!

Help me out, people.

Posted by: Nice Deb at February 08, 2007 04:54 PM (ZRIwC)

93 somehow i always knew i hanging out with old people. ..

First the dyed hair and bang comment, now this? Oh, it's on...

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:57 PM (+Aq+d)

94 The guy who had to hide his face under a breathing apparatus riffing the looks of someone else. Thats rich.

HERE's a better picture of wiserbud.

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 04:59 PM (omkIU)

95 Carl Carlson, did you finish your homework? No internet unless you are done with homework.

Posted by: Carl Carlson's Mom at February 08, 2007 04:59 PM (h76y6)

96 Oh that is sad about Anna Nicole Smith especially because she has a brand new baby.

*puts Trimspa down*

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 04:59 PM (+Aq+d)

97 Rosetta, you remind me of someone.....Mr. French?... Michael Savage?...Jesse Ventura?.....who?!

Ru Paul.

Posted by: JackStraw at February 08, 2007 05:00 PM (t+mja)

98 All of the Fem power BS of the last 30 (maybe 40) years has finally been washed away by an 08' candidate. Who knew that a Dem would finally smack down previously uncontrolable and independently minded women. Whatever party or person responsible, I applaud you sir.

To think these orcs of the blog world, these candidates for the Special Olympics could be allowed for so many years to continue thinking and writting without any safegaurds, it's beyond me. Marcotte and McEwan, welcome back to reality. Women cannot think for themselves. Women cannot be allowed the freedoms of Men. Islam has it right.

I thank the 08' candidate and these, er, women for having the strength to admit that women are the weaker sex.

The Above is satire and I do not mean to insult a sex. Couldn't you tell it was Satire? Haters!!

Posted by: sunny at February 08, 2007 05:00 PM (Jbauo)

99 Ha Ha Ha! I can see the similarity with Bill Clinton. The same lustful expression.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 05:00 PM (h76y6)

100 Help me out, people.

I think he looks like Bruce Willis with a goatee.

Posted by: Not Rosetta at February 08, 2007 05:01 PM (omkIU)

101 HERE's a better picture of wiserbud.
That's just not cool Rosetta because I cannot control my urge to click the link.

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 05:01 PM (+Aq+d)

102 sorry wiserbud. I did not mean to call you wiserbut. That was a typo.

Hey, no problem. Happens all the time, you cock-smoking, heroin-addicted female impersonator.

Oooops, I mean Tushar. (typo, sorry.)

Posted by: wiserbud at February 08, 2007 05:02 PM (1tlBF)

103 How can you people be so shallow? How can you talk about Rosetta with Anna Nicole Smith dead? huh?

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 05:03 PM (+Aq+d)

104 Now carl carlson has been added.

Oh, the power.

Posted by: Slublog at February 08, 2007 05:04 PM (+rY9v)

105 THe picture is blurry because every time she used a clear one, it kept coming up as Jim Carrey.

Posted by: hobgoblin at February 08, 2007 05:04 PM (p1s9n)

106

wiserbud, I made a typo and used t instead of d. Now I wish I had used two t's.

WiserButt, SmartAss ... same difference.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 05:05 PM (h76y6)

107 tushar

you have coarsened the debate.
i sent a picture to slub. i really want to be in this club.

and pajama, i take back what i said about dyed hair...but not the bangs part.

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 05:05 PM (bTQVB)

108

Slublog, really???

That was a funny one!

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 05:06 PM (h76y6)

109 but not the bangs part.

No Bettie Page for you.

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 05:06 PM (+Aq+d)

110 And for the record, I added carl because there's finally someone on the site who looks younger than me.

Posted by: Slublog at February 08, 2007 05:07 PM (+rY9v)

111 I thought RobG's kid looked the youngest. But you come close.

Posted by: Tushar D at February 08, 2007 05:08 PM (h76y6)

112 carl, I have a toddler who looks older than you!

Posted by: Nice Deb at February 08, 2007 05:09 PM (ZRIwC)

113 you mean i wasn't added for my insightful commentary?

freaking age-ists.

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 05:09 PM (bTQVB)

114 Hey Amanda, just got off the phone with the pope. He's given you special dispensation to use as many contraceptives as you'd like. My German isn't very good, His Excellancy used the phrase "Hölle Fischeier". What's that mean?

Posted by: JohnO at February 08, 2007 05:11 PM (3gk5a)

115 pajama momma,

My link is safe to click, even for Tushar. You've already seen the close up of wiserbud.

Nice Deb accidentally pimped him the other day when she was trying to pimp me.

I'm glad I saved that puppy.

Slublog,

Thanks for giving us another dimension on which to mercilessly mock everyone.

I'm sure ace wouldn't mind but, until he submits an actual picture, will you use THIS?

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 05:13 PM (omkIU)

116 Carl, I just got a phone call saying you've missed the last 3 days of school.
You've been hanging out with the girl that has dyed hair and bangs again, haven't you?

Posted by: Carl's mom at February 08, 2007 05:13 PM (+Aq+d)

117 Rosetta, I would, but it's not quite as unshaven as the real thing.

Posted by: Slublog at February 08, 2007 05:15 PM (+rY9v)

118 I didn't know Ace worked for Wal-mart.

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 05:18 PM (+Aq+d)

119 WiserButt, SmartAss ... same difference.

Posted by: wiserbud at February 08, 2007 05:20 PM (1tlBF)

120 Heh,

Now we have two pictures of future High School graduates on Faces.

We just have to find out where Slublog got that baby.

Rosetta, the biker lesbian look really works for you.

Posted by: mesablue at February 08, 2007 05:20 PM (DzeyU)

121 I know, I know, that was reeealllly bad.

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 05:21 PM (+Aq+d)

122 I didn't know Ace worked for Wal-mart.

Now see, pj momma, that's funny! Good thing you've been taking lessons from me.

carl carlson,

Are you baked in that picture?

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 05:23 PM (omkIU)

123 Amanda looks like one of those Monty Python guys when they dress up in drag.

Posted by: Warden at February 08, 2007 05:25 PM (1KxUd)

124 Rosie, does your sugar daddy know that your are pretending to be him on the intertubes? I bet he gets really pissed off and kicks you out for a younger, less hairy and disease-ridden crack whore when he finds out.

Good luck on the streets.

Posted by: wiserbud at February 08, 2007 05:27 PM (1tlBF)

125 Hey, folks. If you're going to collapse on the fainting couch when you come across Marcotte's vulgarity, don't engage in vulgarity once your ass hits it. it's bad form.

Irony ain't dead.

Posted by: Kenneth Ashford at February 08, 2007 05:28 PM (mO+Pe)

126 Kenneth Ashford,

I loved the work you did with Valerie Simpson in the 70's and 80's.

Good stuff.

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 05:33 PM (omkIU)

127

Slublog,

You should just post a picture of that tank, for Ace on the Faces site.

Posted by: Nice Deb at February 08, 2007 05:34 PM (ZRIwC)

128 Irony ain't dead.

It's just in intensive care on the Edwards blog.

Tob

Posted by: Toby928 at February 08, 2007 05:36 PM (ATbKm)

129

Hey, folks. If you're going to collapse on the fainting couch when you come across Marcotte's vulgarity, don't engage in vulgarity once your ass hits it. it's bad form.

Who's fainting? We're laughing.

Do you think we would advocate having our more vulgar bloggers working for a presidential candidate?

Posted by: Nice Deb at February 08, 2007 05:38 PM (ZRIwC)

130 Shannon Elizabeth? My first thought was Andrew McCarthy!

Posted by: Jason at February 08, 2007 05:39 PM (u+5rb)

131 Slu, check your mail

Posted by: hobgoblin at February 08, 2007 05:43 PM (p1s9n)

132 You clowns are so precious. Obviously stung that all the hyperventilating has come to naught yet again, you begin this thread high-mindedly enough, only to have it devolve into a stream of fag jokes, those trusty AoS chestnuts. In the midst of which, Jack opines, with all apparent seriousness: "The standards for taste and morality are just a tad higher on the right." Man, that's irony so sharp you could shave Ace's back with it. Any volunteers?

Posted by: Dolf Fenster at February 08, 2007 05:44 PM (dFzC2)

133 Dolf,

Sometimes you're cogent, rational, and biting.

THis is not one of those times. No one HERE cared a bit for them getting fired, or anything much at all, outside the pretention of Bowers and the utter foulness of pandagon's writings.

No one at ace's is even ATTEMPTING to be anything BUT crass and vulgar.

Now, go to Hot Air and see how much moral preening is on display about the right and you'll see exactly what I mean.

Posted by: hobgoblin at February 08, 2007 05:47 PM (p1s9n)

134 She looks more like the girl in The World According to Garp who shot Robin Williams at the end of the movie. If she had been fired, I can actually imagine her walking up to John Edwards, shrieking "AAARRP!!" before unloading on him, metaphorically speaking that is.

Posted by: cjd at February 08, 2007 05:48 PM (3yKqT)

135 That photo is of the Marcotte chick? I thought that was a screenshot of Malcolm McDowell from A Clockwork Orange. Or Luke Wilson dressed as Rudy Guiliani in drag.

Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at February 08, 2007 05:49 PM (1rshc)

136 Man, that's irony so sharp you could shave Ace's back with it. Any volunteers?

Don't even try it, bitches!

Posted by: ace's back at February 08, 2007 05:51 PM (omkIU)

137 Sometimes you're cogent, rational, and biting.

I must have been out that day.

Posted by: Toby928 at February 08, 2007 05:51 PM (ATbKm)

138 Hey Dolf, let's make out.

Posted by: ace's ass at February 08, 2007 05:52 PM (omkIU)

139 Again, who cares. People use bad words all the time. Even the President and Vice President cuss.

Aren't there actual issues of national importance (like war, the economy, immigration?) that deserve more time than Pajamas Media's disingenuous crusade for proper etiquette?

Plus, I think it's crazy that you'd want an MSM stuffed shirt to replace an actual blogger. Bloggers tend to be a bit unvarnished. That's what they do. They are unfiltered. It's a good thing.

Posted by: DUh at February 08, 2007 05:52 PM (1WdUw)

140

Slublog,

You should just post a picture of that tank, for Ace on the Faces site.

Posted by: Nice Deb at February 08, 2007 05:34 PM (ZRIwC)

Nice Deb, that's the funniest, coolest, and most heartwarming thing I've read all day.

Why heartwarming? I dunno. But it makes life arguably worth living again.

Posted by: Some Democrat at February 08, 2007 05:52 PM (lPxkl)

141

Oops, forgot to change my nick.

And yeah, sorry for the formatting.

Posted by: Some Guy at February 08, 2007 05:54 PM (lPxkl)

142 Finally, someone speaking truth to POWER!!!

Dolf, these wingnut haters can't take another LOSS!!

Edwards will come out smelling like a rose! We'll that's not different than normal but you know what I'm saying.

These jackholes wouldn't know irony if they got hit in the back of the head with a vicious rant and then kicked in the ass with an Important Action Alert!!

Go Dolf! Let's fight the power together!!!!!

BUSH LIED!!!! ANNA NICOLE DIED!!!

Posted by: Guy who starts arguments over everything at February 08, 2007 05:56 PM (omkIU)

143 Again, who cares.

Truthfully, blatz, since Edwards is just an also-ran, I don't think anyone on this blog cares that much. Its just the continuing entertainment value that we appreciate.

Tob

Posted by: Toby928 at February 08, 2007 05:58 PM (ATbKm)

144 Dolf: you all wanted them fired.

Facts: no. We said we didn't care. Still don't.

DUh: They used bad words big deal.

The Point: Hey fathead, you missed me!

Posted by: Dave in Texas at February 08, 2007 05:58 PM (pzen5)

145 hobgoblin isn't as grotesque and disformed as I imagined him to be.

Posted by: Rosetta at February 08, 2007 06:05 PM (omkIU)

146 Rosetta, stop stealing my schtick or I will email Slu a photoshop of you punishing Amanda Marcotte with babies.

Posted by: Warden at February 08, 2007 06:05 PM (1KxUd)

147 No MS paint was harmed in the making of my photo, I promise.

Posted by: hobgoblin at February 08, 2007 06:09 PM (p1s9n)

148 I still want to see the uncropped version of bbeck's pic, damnit.

Posted by: hobgoblin at February 08, 2007 06:10 PM (p1s9n)

149 People use bad words all the time.

For fuck's sake, are you really this dense? Yes, everybody has used bad words at some point or another, and no, it's really not a big deal.

It's not her exact choice of words, it's the hateful disgusting message, not to mention the batshit crazy. Can you really read her posts and not see the crazy? Really? Have you just not bothered to look?

I'm not asking for Edwards to fire her, I'm just noticing that the fact that he chose her tells us something about what he does and does not consider to be reasonable. That's all. It's not hard to understand. I'm not sure if you're actually this dense, or just playing dumb because you think it helps your party. Either way, it's not flattering.

Sorry to come across as a jerk, but really, now. Come off it, man.

Posted by: sandy burger at February 08, 2007 06:12 PM (K2rlS)

150 don't tease carl .
he's such a nice boy

Posted by: carl carlson's mother's friends at February 08, 2007 06:17 PM (YaGFS)

151 Aren't there actual issues of national importance (like war, the economy, immigration?) that deserve more time than Pajamas Media's disingenuous crusade for proper etiquette?

What is it computer hour at the home?

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 06:18 PM (+Aq+d)

152 I just think it's retarded to try and get her fired.

Let her keep writing her stuff. Who cares?

a) Edwards is not a front runner.
b) She is a childless feminist with cats.
c) She writes like one.

Big deal. It seems like Pajamas Media got it in their heads that they want to punish this individual... and now that it didn't work out, they are having a temper tantrum. It's just a pet peeve of mine when people try to punish individuals over their politics. Just let their ideas speak for themselves.

This isn't the 1970s and you aren't radical feminists, so stop acting like the thought police.

Posted by: DUh at February 08, 2007 06:27 PM (1WdUw)

153 yeah mama!

stick it to the fogies. that's more like it

Posted by: carl carlson at February 08, 2007 06:33 PM (YaGFS)

154 Hobgoblin looks like Henry Waxman, there, I said it.

Posted by: Judd at February 08, 2007 06:34 PM (kqewx)

155 Rosetta, can you give me the south park casa bonita link again?

Posted by: pajama momma at February 08, 2007 06:46 PM (+Aq+d)

156 It's just a pet peeve of mine when people try to punish individuals over their politics.

DUh, no offense or anything, but nobody gives a wet shit about your pet peeves. The host of this blog hasn't demanded that Edwards fire the crazy bitch. Nor have I. I can't think offhand of any commenter here that did.

You're being purposefully obtuse trying desperately to make a point, and looking like a cat burying a turd on an ice covered pond. A three-legged cat.

If you feel the need to dump on PJM, why don't you uh, go dump on PJM?

Posted by: Dave in Texas at February 08, 2007 06:57 PM (pzen5)

157 I've been out all day, so what's with the pictures of Shannon Elizabeth and Crispin Glover?

Oh, what? That's not a dude? Wow, color me embarrassed.

Posted by: UGAdawg at February 08, 2007 07:12 PM (alGm/)

158 Henry Waxman

LOLs

The nose was a joke, and I have my own, real, unsurgically-implanted hair.

You can actually see some of my real cheeks and all of my hair (though I did expand the side-baldness a bit to conceal my horns)

Posted by: hobgoblin at February 08, 2007 08:15 PM (p1s9n)

159 Then why, Dave, is the blog post a bitchfest about how Edwards bowed to the "nutroots" by not firing her?

It implies that the editorial position of AoS is that she should have been fired.

Posted by: DUh at February 08, 2007 08:46 PM (vG/92)

160 Then why, Dave, is the blog post a bitchfest about how Edwards bowed to the "nutroots" by not firing her?

Um, how do I say this?

It's not pisswit.

Prove me wrong. Show me the dozens of comments here calling for her firing.

CLUEBAT: association of her stupidity to Edwards' poorly thought out hiring DON'T equal demands for her head on a pike.

God damn you're dumb.

Posted by: Dave in Texas at February 08, 2007 08:50 PM (G9607)

161 Plus, It's not that I "like" Marcotte. I HATE, HATE, HATE abortion. And that seems to be her priority. She's probably pretty below average as far as people go, but I think it is trivial to spend the last several days trying to wreck her personally.

Why not talk about abortion. Putting all of this attention on her, rather than policy just hides the real issues.

I say it is better that Edwards run on this evil platform than lie about it like Giuliani or Romney and dupe decent people into electing a closet baby butcher.

Posted by: DUh at February 08, 2007 08:51 PM (vG/92)

162 Why not talk about abortion. Putting all of this attention on her, rather than policy just hides the real issues.

You know what's funny about you twerps?

You are so easy to spot a moron like me can figure it out.

Fly doofus. Fly like the wind!

Posted by: Dave in Texas at February 08, 2007 09:01 PM (G9607)

163 The "editorial position," such as it is, is that it probably would have been in Edwards best interests to distance himself from someone who had made pretty outrageous and offensive claims about a lot of people. And yet, Edwards couldn't even stand up to the extreme members of his own party, when it comes to doing the right thing, so we can pretty much tell what sort of spine we could expect to see if he were playing in the big leagues, which is none.

It is also the "editorial position" that the hypocrisy of the netroots is made glaringly obvious by this episode, as they would have crucified (no pun intended) anyone on the right who had hired a person with the type of extreme and outlandish opinions that the lovely Ms. Marcotte holds.

Posted by: wiserbud at February 08, 2007 09:03 PM (56ssE)

164 Don't editorial positions concern you?

Posted by: Horatio Caine at February 08, 2007 09:07 PM (PD1tk)

165 Yessuh, dem tarbabies be sticky...

Look for marcotte quotes to be leaked by Hillary and Obama in every primary to come...

Posted by: richard mcenroe at February 08, 2007 09:39 PM (clI2H)

166 vicious rant! vicious rant!

Posted by: gail at February 08, 2007 09:42 PM (szQR4)

167 I'm not going to read through 166 comments to see if anyone has made the point before, and apoligies if someone has, but isn't it interesting that the Edwards camp took so much time in deciding how to respond to this? Say... just enough time for focus group polling?

I can't help but think that the slow response was due, at least in part, to their scrambling to understand how his response would 'play.'

Posted by: slackmac at February 08, 2007 09:59 PM (3bFaP)

168 I may be late to the party here but.... Izzn't that a uhh, erm.... guy?

Posted by: Claire at February 08, 2007 11:02 PM (l1oyw)

169 isn't she the one with the comment that no one's gonna stop her fucking and she'll do it all day and all night and no one's gonna stop her?

at the risk of being a sexist pig, i'd say that anyone who'd fuck her is too lazy to masturbate.

Posted by: semigoofy1 at February 08, 2007 11:05 PM (ZQnRG)

170 Ace,

They've "whip-sawed the Democrats"? Hardly. The Democrats have co-opted them. Now they can't say what they really think, deranged though it may be.

I could never work for a candidate. For example, I'd have to repudiate my claim that the Clintons killed Buddy the Dog because he knew too much. Never. I owe it to Buddy.

How 'bout this:

"Senator Fumblethorn, Senator Fumblethorn! What is your position on the barbed c*ck of Satan?"

Posted by: Noel at February 08, 2007 11:20 PM (UFNnW)

171 "at the risk of being a sexist pig, i'd say that anyone who'd fuck her is too lazy to masturbate."

Great - now I have coffee all over my monitor. You WILL pay for this.

Posted by: Former Lurker at February 09, 2007 07:42 AM (Xm4xl)

172 Rosetta, can you give me the south park casa bonita link again?

HERE you go. Damn I love that clip.

Posted by: Rosetta at February 09, 2007 11:28 AM (omkIU)

173 Rosetta, the biker lesbian look really works for you.

Chicks dig it, mesablue.

Rosetta, stop stealing my schtick

Warden, what the devil are you talking about man?

Posted by: Rosetta at February 09, 2007 01:30 PM (omkIU)

174 Late, late, late to the party, but I think it's a photo of Tiny Tim in drag as a man.

Or perhaps it's that Tiny Tim is what you get if you put Marcotte and Rosetta in a blender.

Posted by: max at February 09, 2007 03:18 PM (SO3B1)

175 Q: What if Mary had taken Plan B after the Lord filled her with his hot, white, sticky Holy Spirit?

A: You’d have to justify your misogyny with another ancient mythology.

I don't care who you are, that's funny right there.

Posted by: MegaTroopX at February 09, 2007 04:39 PM (v5fbO)

176 MOV Converter for Mac becomes one of the best conversion software currently. The MOV Converter Mac not only can convert video formats from one to another perfectly and quickly on Mac OS X, but also can convet MOV to iPod touch, iPod classic, iPod nano, iPhone, Apple TV, PSP, Creative Zen, iRiver PMP, Archos, various video mobile phones and many other digital video and audio players.MOV Converter Mac,iPod Converter for Mac,AVI to DVD Mac,Mac DVD Ripper,DVD Ripper for Mac

Posted by: fdgdfddf at March 12, 2009 10:04 PM (CZ75W)

178

Posted by: Frank at May 28, 2010 07:19 AM (8lK17)

179 Protein Table Eat Healthier Foods Supplements Fitness Vagetable Table Fruit Table Vitamin Table FAQ about Foods Recipes Quick Tips Costsaving Tips Foods

Posted by: Frank at May 29, 2010 07:08 PM (ulbwV)

Posted by: herbena1james at July 20, 2010 11:40 PM (m/WV0)

Posted by: jewelry necklaces at July 24, 2010 03:41 AM (yzxpQ)

Posted by: ed hardy at July 30, 2010 09:30 PM (mbeig)

183

vibram, vibram shoes, vibram five finger speed, vibram five fingers, five fingers 60%-70% off!Fast Free Shipping for vibram fivefingers!

Posted by: vibram at August 04, 2010 04:49 AM (lG99B)

184

cheap nike , nike dunks, nike sb dunks, 40%-75% off!Fast Free Shipping for Nike Dunks!

http://www.sportnikeband.com

Posted by: nike at August 04, 2010 06:20 AM (lG99B)

185 chanel
gucci
hermes
louis vuitton
designer handbags
vertu phones
designer handbags reviews
replica handbags
replica phones
vertu replica
tag heuer phone
mobiado
cartier-phones
goldvish
rolex mobile
porsche phone
replica blackberry
iphone replica

Posted by: sfsdf at August 11, 2010 05:11 AM (6P4HF)

186

Yabancilar birbirini nasil goturuyor, iste en carpici sikis izle kahvede oynanan oyunlarin hepsini internete getirdik kahve oyunlari ingilizcenizi gelistirmek icin makale ariyorsaniz en guzel english articles cocuk oyunlari sue oyunlari ve en kral oyun butun oyunlarin toplandigi tek site oyunlar hepsi birbirinden yaramaz kizlar hepsi sikis videolari online izlemek icin tek adres sikis izle online sikis

Posted by: danke at August 16, 2010 05:07 PM (IdDbF)

Posted by: authentic jordan website at August 20, 2010 02:01 AM (J0tf4)

188 to pick and choose the items according to their own personal tastes rolex prices While they are choosing a watch most people search for something to suit them panerai watch replica something theyll be pride of wearing replica vacheron constantin fake audemars piguet Perhaps it should be something that could stand out distinctively a little however not too much Its a wonderful watch line to walk however best swiss rolex that watches patek philippe s what people in the fashion industry do each single day ferrari prices And that omega s what timepieces are usually up for sale Ne

Posted by: replica watches at August 20, 2010 08:43 PM (nW1RU)

Posted by: replica watches at August 21, 2010 07:15 AM (pZTyO)

190 designer Louis Vuitton handbags Jimmy Choo handbag Prada handbag Marc Jacobs is doing something quirky and cool with his spring bag collection and we are loving it! Last night I posted on our Twitter and Facebook asking people what handbag they have passed up recently and regret it men's Louis Vuitton handbags While I could think of a few I had this nagging image in the back of my mind replica handbags of a totally off-the-wall Marc Jacobs bag that somehow is speaking to me Gucci men's Louis Vuitton handbags designer Louis Vuitton bags Prada handbag designer lv bags designer Chanel bag designer Louis Vuitton bag

Posted by: Chanel handbags at August 24, 2010 06:28 AM (7qGNV)

191 I really gucci sneakers like gucci shoes for men the fresh perpective you did on the issue. Really was not expecting louis vuitton shoes that when I started off studying. Your concepts gucci shoes were easy to understand that I wondered why I never looked at it before. Glad to know that there’s an individual out there that definitely understands what he’s discussing. Great job

Posted by: louis vuitton shoes at August 24, 2010 10:29 PM (DFMmZ)

192 ÔÇÊ ÌÏå ÓÚæÏí ßÇã ÔÇÊ ÞáÈ ÔÇÊ ÊÚÈ ÞáÈí ÔÇÊ ÇáÑíÇÖ ÔÇÊ ÇáÔÑÞíå games ÔÇÊ ÞØÑ ÔÇÊ ÇáÔáå ãäÊÏíÇÊ æÑæÏ æÑæÏ

Posted by: salman at August 31, 2010 04:22 PM (A2Pw6)

Processing 0.12, elapsed 0.1268 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0079 seconds, 201 records returned.
Page size 194 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.