Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Democrats' Plan For Victory in 2010? Hopes for a Conservative Schism

All I can say is that as much as you might hate a RINO, there are more detestable creatures out there.

Democrats are hoping a growing conservative revolt within the GOP wreaks havoc on Republicans in the 2010 elections.

Republicans "are facing primaries from the right all over, and that's the only thing saving our asses," one Dem operative said of the push by fired-up fans of Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh to purge their party of moderates.

...

"This is a big problem for the Republicans," an insider said.

Some conservatives agreed. "The Democrats won not because they were brilliant but because Republicans were stupid," said presidential contender and ex-Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

I like primary challenges, myself. As long as the pieces are put back together afterwards, and everyone unites for a general, it's a win-win thing.

If not... Well. This is their plan. To just hope for disarray and anger in our caucus.

I may be a sell-out and not have integrity and whatever else but I desperately do not want strife after the primary challenges. From either side, the RINO side or the more conservative side. Fair is fair and a winner's a winner.

Posted by: Ace at 01:10 PM



Comments

1 We must keep our Party pure !! Moderates must be erradicated. We will go down in defeat, but go proudly.

Posted by: John ryan at November 05, 2009 01:13 PM (m0Q2u)

2 2ed!

Posted by: Mr. Crabington at November 05, 2009 01:13 PM (ia/06)

3

It is real simple: Both parties to the primary must agree that if they lose, they will support the winner. Sometimes this can be done. Sometimes it can not. The big key is that so called "party leaders" must agree to stay out of primaries and let the chips fall where they may. And the party organizations must pledge to fund the winners campaign.

I know, easier said than done. But, I am the enternal optimist.

Posted by: Mallamutt at November 05, 2009 01:15 PM (V9SYy)

4

The Phillies' plan for winning the WS was hoping for a major rift in the Yankees. It worked well.

Posted by: Mr. Crabington at November 05, 2009 01:15 PM (ia/06)

5

"Some conservatives agreed. "The Democrats won not because they were brilliant but because Republicans were stupid," said presidential contender and ex-Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee."

I hope Huck was referring to himself there. The stupid ones were voting for him and McCain in the primaries.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 05, 2009 01:15 PM (SqAkN)

6 Any article that describes Scozzafava as a "moderate" deserves to be used as liner.

That is simply ridiculous.  It -might- have been plausible before she turned around and endorsed Owens, but her endorsement should've proved the conservatives absolutely right that she was *not* a moderate.  If that doesn't, what the hell possibly *could*?  Or is it okay that the assumption is simply that conservatives cannot possibly be correct?

Qwinn

Posted by: Qwinn at November 05, 2009 01:16 PM (SxA2Q)

7

the push by fired-up fans of Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh to purge their party of moderates.

I do love this statement.  Its a demonstration of the media again that you need to point out Ace.  Its the attempt to push even more of a split by the media. While there are of course the more conservative activists wanting to purge moderates.  There are also moderate activists that are wanting to purge the more conservative members of the party.  The media won't bring this up though because they want to try and disenfranchise the moderates from the republican party and entice them into choosing the more "tolerant" democrats.

Posted by: buzzion at November 05, 2009 01:17 PM (opdYb)

8 Listen to the media, they have the best interests of the conservative movement at heart. Why else would they endorse McCain in the Republican primaries?

Posted by: Britt at November 05, 2009 01:17 PM (DcWbe)

9 that rift between christie and lonegan in the primary was awesome! gimme that happy talk

Posted by: eveythingsawesome at November 05, 2009 01:18 PM (bpgz7)

10 Did it take the media 6 hours to turn on McCain after he won the primaries or 6 seconds? My memory is kinda fuzzy.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 05, 2009 01:19 PM (SqAkN)

11 Huckabee can suck it.

He better so not be in contention in 2012.

Fuckin' shyster.

Posted by: Dave at November 05, 2009 01:21 PM (Xm1aB)

12 Yeah, look: The problem with Scozzer isn't that she was a moderate, but a full-on liberal, and that is not acceptable. A moderate is not ideal. A liberal is not acceptable.

Going forward, the worry is that the perfect will be the enemy of the good, and that the good will just be dismissed as not good at all.

But Perfect > Good > Tolerable > Intolerable > Catastrophically Bad.

Aim for the perfect, but be prepared, I hope, to accept the merely good.

Posted by: ace at November 05, 2009 01:21 PM (NtQzs)

13 Your enemies would never lie to you.

Posted by: oblig. at November 05, 2009 01:23 PM (BxbeY)

14 Folks, this sounds like libtards whistling past the graveyard. Just begging and scolding the GOP into behaving like Democrat Lite. It's what they always do. Have you ever seen the Demotards and their lapdog press warn Republicans that they were diluting their identity be becoming too "moderate?" Have you ever seen a Demotard pundit or leader advise his party to become more conservative? Bill Clinton post-1994 doesn't count. Why? Because if you recall, they spent all their time pondering the vocabulary of their message, not the message itself. Did the era of "big government" really end for Clinton when he drooled that phrase?

Nothing to see here, truly. Just a minor variation on "Republican = Extreme Right Wingnut, now and always."

Posted by: George Orwell at November 05, 2009 01:23 PM (/WLDq)

15 All I have to say about this, Which side of the Republican party is a turncoat?  Is it the social/fiscal side that switches parties and endorses Democrats when they don't get their way or the RINO/washington elite side of the party.

When the elites bitch about party unity, I switch to MSNBC and listen to Obama cry racism, its easier to digest than RINO whining.

Posted by: Just Another Poster at November 05, 2009 01:24 PM (NgoAe)

16 As we know from the business sector, competition encourages excellence and innovation.  Primaries are a good thing.

Posted by: bjjfiter at November 05, 2009 01:27 PM (TdgA9)

17

Another Newspaper article about conservatives. I throw the bullshit flag and refuse to let the MSM nominate our candidates.  Just look at their choices on the poll:

 

Do you think the Conservatives will tear apart the GOP?

- Yes, they stubbornly refuse to compromise.

- No, they're ultimately politicians and know they need the national party.

- I'm not sure.

 

How about we have a poll for the news media to do?

 

Do you think the news media are ALL nothing more than PR organizations for the Democraps and will lie, cheat, and steal, to see the chocolate Jesus win?

 

-Yes, they are worse than Pravda in its communist heyday

- No they are buisness to make money and if pushing communism causes them to fail they will seek a bailout

- I’m a dumb ass and don’t know

 

I hope none of the real Morons believe anything in this article.  You can judge the quality of this article by them calling the Huckleberry Klown a conservative.

Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2009 01:28 PM (CDUiN)

18 By the way, notice when some Republicans attempt to reassert basic conservative principles as party underpinnings, that constitutes a "purge." You know, with banging on the door at night and assassinations in basements.

But when leftards find Dems going astray from moonbat orthodoxy, like Lieberman on the war or socialized medicine, that is a betrayal of fundamental democratic norms and the people itself. Lamont vs. Lieberman... not that wasn't a purge.

Such silliness.

Posted by: George Orwell at November 05, 2009 01:28 PM (/WLDq)

19 Is this really their best hope, that we shoot ourselves in the foot? Then they are so screwed.

NY-23 was such an oddball situation, to hope that it is repeated enough to affect national results is ridiculous. Supporting Rubio over Crist in a regular primary does not equal NY-23, despite what the MSM (who only have our best interests at heart) may say.

But what if, should we be so lucky, that these folks actually do buy their own spin? It will be like shooting fish in a barrel, come 2010.

Posted by: Lee at November 05, 2009 01:28 PM (7y9kL)

20

Next up: a plea for returning civility to politics.

By Rahm Emanuel.

Also, floating bits of exploded ironymeters found in Saturn's orbit. Pix at 11!

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 05, 2009 01:29 PM (ERJIu)

21

"Is it the social/fiscal side that switches parties and endorses Democrats when they don't get their way or the RINO/washington elite side of the party."

Which side voted for Obama's "stimulus".

Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 05, 2009 01:29 PM (SqAkN)

22 I lived in one place that had rapes, riots, drug use, where my sister was almost beaten to death because of her race by people outside the ethnic neighborhood, etc. Such things were quite common.
I lived in another place that you could leave your doors unlocked and your friends and neighbors would walk in like family to say high, where different ethnic neighborhoods had block parties that had different, but great food. 

Whitch one was conservative and which one liberal?













Posted by: hous bin pharteen at November 05, 2009 01:29 PM (pU4D7)

23 Man, do I make a lot of typos today.

Posted by: George Orwell at November 05, 2009 01:30 PM (/WLDq)

24

The slide to LGF'dom continues.

Posted by: Pelvis at November 05, 2009 01:30 PM (LlaBi)

25 The GOP and the Tea Party both have trouble connecting with each other because of the incoherence of their message:

1. “Fiscal Conservatism”- the ones who scream this buzzword the loudest are the very ones who have the least idea of what it means; the Tea Party wants more and bigger wars, and war funding; yet tax reductions. No one has yet shown a way that this can be done, which is exactly why GWB had stupendous deficits. There is no such animal as a pro-war fiscal conservative.

2. “Limited Government”- again, the ones who chant this most feverishly, are the same ones who cheer on the Unitary Executive theory, giving nearly unlimited power to the Chief Executive. The same ones who saw fit to intervene in the Schiavo family’s affairs.

The GOP thinks that having a slick website and slinging cool urban slang like “what up” is the same as having a principled message; the Tea Party thinks that raw anger alone will produce an effective platform.

But when your two main arguments are mired in incoherence and illogic, you naturally have a hard time gaining traction with the educated professionals who themselves have to balance budgets, who read the papers and understand the connection between 1.4 Trillion in war funding and a 1.4 Trillion deficit.

Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 01:32 PM (ogXbt)

26

"party leaders" must agree to stay out of primaries and let the chips fall where they may. And the party organizations must pledge to fund the winners campaign.

Word.

Posted by: Johnathan E. at November 05, 2009 01:33 PM (dQdrY)

27 This isn't rocket science-
1) Ignore anything the media says about what we "need" to do.
2) Recruit men and women of good character.Do you damn due diligence RNC.
3)Local issues but tied to a national message ( Newts greatest moment).
4)the Litmus test is on fiscal issues- social issues do matter but there can be some, not much, variance.
5) If unsure on 2,3,4, , call Gov. McDonnell .
6) CLOSE THE PRIMARIES IN 2012= no outside sabotage. That this isn't obvious makes me want to construct a tin-foil hat.

Posted by: jjshaka at November 05, 2009 01:36 PM (Pu33u)

28

There is no such animal as a pro-war fiscal conservative.

I disagree. If we start keeping what we fight for, it could be very profitable.

Posted by: Johnathan E. at November 05, 2009 01:37 PM (dQdrY)

29

 Reason60 at November 05, 2009 01:32 PM (ogXbt)

Hey, ChipD's back. Hi ChipD!

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 05, 2009 01:37 PM (ERJIu)

30

I may be a sell-out and not have integrity and whatever else but I desperately do not want strife after the primary challenges. From either side, the RINO side or the more conservative side. Fair is fair and a winner's a winner.

Hell, I'm a maxi and I agree.  The primary is the way to see how conservative a district really is.

Posted by: Phelps at November 05, 2009 01:40 PM (HDIbi)

31
good catch, Max.

wow, thanks for shitty analysis and shitty advice, ChipD.

As usual, you demonstrate how clueless you moonbats are about the Republican party.

Oh, and if I want advice on how to lose elections, I'll ask Michael Steele, not you.

Posted by: Tweet beats dead horses at November 05, 2009 01:40 PM (z37MR)

32 "Democrats are hoping a growing conservative revolt within the GOP wreaks havoc on Republicans in the 2010 elections."

Yep, that's some strategy there. We're gonna win by...hoping that you have a misfire and blind yourself...get attacked by lions, tiger and bears...praying for another "maccaca" moment, etc. In truth, this is pathetic and shows that they don't know what the hell they're going to do to right the blue Titanic that Obama's agenda (and actions) have become.

Posted by: volfan at November 05, 2009 01:41 PM (lF49h)

33

Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 01:32 PM (ogXbt)


Oh look, someone from Reason magazine. You know why I left the Libertarian Party? Because no one there understood the simple fact that if the LP platform was popular then they would win elections. Turns out when you list people's priorities, drug legalization is not at the top of the list.

Republicans don't believe in the unitary executive you twat, Republicans believe that the Constitution applies to American citizens and legal residents, not violent terrorists or unlawful enemy combatants. I know everyone over at Reason strokes each other off everytime someone says Republicrat, but there are differences between the two parties. Total defense outlays account for 20% of total spending. Oppose foreign wars on philosophical grounds, don't sit there and tell me we're bankrupt because of a 1.4 trillion over 6 years and not because of the 2 trillion dollars annual spending on various forms of welfare.

Posted by: Britt at November 05, 2009 01:42 PM (DcWbe)

34

Oh, and if I want advice on how to lose elections, I'll ask Michael Steele, not you.

Oh, that's just mean!

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 05, 2009 01:43 PM (ERJIu)

35 ChipD is still stuck in 2005, apparently.

Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at November 05, 2009 01:43 PM (wgLRl)

36 The meme from the commies is, "You conservatives had better sit down and shut up or you'll end up with nothing!"  Why don't I buy that?  Consider the source.  The political reality is that the more fuss we make, the more we win.  The commie libs know that and they hate it.

Posted by: Chas at November 05, 2009 01:44 PM (yjDfo)

37

Ace, if you were looking for a good article with fair and balanced reporting and insightful commentary to advance your argument.....

 

This ain’t it.

Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2009 01:45 PM (CDUiN)

38 Amen,

Fight for the Conservative in the primary.  Fight for the Republican in the General.  Voting third party or staying home and pouting gets us where we are now.

Posted by: not neo just conservative at November 05, 2009 01:47 PM (01RS2)

39 And, of course, the Democrats will try to stir things up as much as they can.  Weren't there stories last year of Democrats who registered as Republicans, just so they could vote in the Republican primaries (or...maybe that was Republicans who registered as Democrats just so they could vote in the Democrat primary).

Posted by: sydneyjane at November 05, 2009 01:47 PM (5IbxJ)

40

But when your two main arguments are mired in incoherence and illogic, you naturally have a hard time gaining traction with the educated professionals who themselves have to balance budgets, who read the papers and understand the connection between 1.4 Trillion in war funding and a 1.4 Trillion deficit.

Of course, 1.4 trillion in Pork barrel socialist spending by the Obamunists gets nary a peep out of you.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at November 05, 2009 01:47 PM (ujg0T)

41

Pro tip: Anytime the Dems give advice on how the Republicans should act, do the opposite. 

They say tough primaries help them, it helps us.  They say SoCons can't win on issues, like gay marriage (only bare majorities in the deep south State of ME and CA!), we win gangbusters.  They say we need to moderate and reach out, it's time to veer right, kick ass, bust teeth, and forget the name-taking. 

Why would you take advice from your opponents?  Especially ones with such thoroughly demonstrated dishonesty as the Dems?

In related news, Cincinnati Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said this Sunday the Ravens defense should worry primarily about sportsmanship and avoid unnecessary partisan acts like stopping the run and sacking the quarterback.

Posted by: Shillelagh at November 05, 2009 01:48 PM (Oz4Bj)

42

...praying for another "maccaca" moment, et  al

 Think about this Morons, that Macaca bullshit only worked because spineless Republicans allowed it to work. There is no such word as Macaca and we should have told the Dems and the press to stick it up their ass.

Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2009 01:49 PM (CDUiN)

43

ChipD is still stuck in 2005, apparently.

Maybe he's a Daily Show writer?

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 05, 2009 01:51 PM (ERJIu)

44
Why are the Democrats (constantly) offering free advice to us when, according to them, what we're doing is clearly helping them win?

Posted by: Tweet beats dead horses at November 05, 2009 01:53 PM (z37MR)

45 I'm all for a primary process. I'd like to see them closed.

I think it's promising that at least one of the National Republican deep pocket Orgs is moving towards a hands-off approach during the primary.

I'll just say that winning a majority in '10 is not the goal in my mind. If we can earn back a bullet-proof filibuster block with firm Conservatives, then any races our squishes* lose remain an easier target for a run from the Right in all races in the future.

*My definition of squish may not apply to all.

Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2009 01:54 PM (mhdbo)

46 Here's a winning strategy for the Democrats in 2010. Put me on MSNBC and I'll give them this great slogan.

"Not all Democrats are Socialists but all Socialists, with the exception of Bernie Sanders, are Democrats. So vote for us!"

If only I was a "journalist" who could write bullshit articles telling the party I don't agree with how to win elections.

Posted by: Brenden at November 05, 2009 01:54 PM (54lqZ)

47 Yep, fight in the primaries, and not after.

Also, while there are some social cons who want big government otherwise, and some fiscal cons who want mandatory gay rapes in the 5th grade, and some 'moderate' Republicans who are concerned that Obama is too right-wing, most of us Republicans/Conservatives are where we are because we have lots of common ground, and some of the ones stirring up the fights are mobies.

Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at November 05, 2009 01:54 PM (+4UPl)

48 I may be a sell-out and not have integrity and whatever else but I desperately do not want strife after the primary challenges. From either side, the RINO side or the more conservative side. Fair is fair and a winner's a winner.

Just keep your heavy, big party, fingers off the scale till we get done weighing out the grain, then sure, I'll back the squish, so long as they're a fairly selected squish, not an anointed and ceremonially coronated squish the smokey back room boys happen to "like" for the seat.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 05, 2009 01:55 PM (0q2P7)

49 Also today, Grand Moff Tarkin suggested that the Rebel Alliance should attempt a frontal assault on the Death Star battlestation, and avoid lowering the level of political discourse by slipping snubfighters under the station's defenses and launching proton torpedoes at a 2-meter ray-shielded exhaust port. 

Posted by: Shillelagh at November 05, 2009 01:58 PM (Oz4Bj)

50 Limited Government”- again, the ones who chant this most feverishly, are the same ones who cheer on the Unitary Executive theory, giving nearly unlimited power to the Chief Executive.

You do not grok the unitary executive theory.

Unitary executive theory says the President is solely responsible for what happens in the Executive branch, including hiring, firing, and exercising himself all the powers of the Executive branch.

Its another theory that says that the Executive Branch has "unlimited power."

Someone could believe in the Unitary Executive theory AND in a limited executive.

Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at November 05, 2009 02:00 PM (+4UPl)

51

Where does everyoen get the idea I am arguing in favor of liberalism? I'm just saying the Tea Party isn't really serious about being conservative.

"Republicans don't believe in the unitary executive "

Dick Cheney and Obama have not gotten the memo; since they both appear to endorse the notion that the Chief Executive has nearly unlimited power to detain Americans without trial. (Reference Jose Padilla, and the Arar case, endorsed by Obama)

"Of course, 1.4 trillion in Pork barrel socialist spending by the Obamunists gets nary a peep out of you."

Actually, in this fiscal year, we spent less than 500Billion on all non-Defense, non-SocialSecurity/ Medicare programs. Show me what you mean by 1.4 T in pork, and we can talk.

Look, I am happy to argue numbers here:

I have posted a couple of times here the same question, and no one has an answer: What would a conservative budget look like?

Specifically-

We spend 2.1 Trillion on Medicare, SS and debt service;

Another 900 Billion on Defense;

500 Billion on every other thing the government does;

this adds up to 3.5 Trillion.

We only take in 2.1 Trilion in revenue;

So what would a conservative budget look like?

Do conservatives want to cut Social Security? Medicare? What?

Getting angry isn't really a good argument.

Show me a balanced budget that takes in 2.1 trillion in revenue and preserves almost half that for  Defense, and we can talk about it.

Until then, my point stands. the Tea Party isn't really serious about what they say.

Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 02:01 PM (ogXbt)

52 Posted by: Shillelagh at November 05, 2009 01:58 PM (Oz4Bj)

Your geeky mind-tricks have no power over me, nerd.

Posted by: krakatoa-the-hutt at November 05, 2009 02:02 PM (mhdbo)

53 BTW, unity after the primary does not mean enthusiastic support.  I pulled the lever for McCain, but I didn't pound the pavement.

Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at November 05, 2009 02:02 PM (+4UPl)

54

not an anointed and ceremonially coronated squish the smokey back room boys happen to "like" for the seat.

Hey, we gave ya a hot momma like DeDe Scozzafazool, an' youse bums ran her right offa da ticket! I aint seen a rack like that since the one on toppa my '65 Olds Vistacruiser! So she tapped us for near a million and then endorsed the Democrat, so what? Swell gal! We're tapping her to jump outta a cake at da next smoker! And den we're givin' the cake to some deservin' charity, like feedin' Sout' Africa or sumpin. We don't hear you teabag monkeys comin' up wid genius like dat!

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 05, 2009 02:05 PM (ERJIu)

55 Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 02:01 PM (ogXbt)

Dude, ignoring previous arguments doesn't mean they weren't answered. Short recap: You got to start somewhere. Fiscal Incrementalism to the right is preferable to that to the left or wholesale abdication of power by demanding that which is politically impossible.

What's your solution?

Posted by: krakatoa-the-hutt at November 05, 2009 02:06 PM (mhdbo)

56

Secondly-

I see Tea Partiers waving banneers that say "don't tread on me" and quoting Franklin's line about giving up freedom for security;

Great! I wish they actually meant it!

But does everyone here realize that the NSA/ CIA/ FBI has claimed for itself the right to tap any phone, read any email, rifle through any bank account, and all without court supervision or oversight? read this article if you want to feel the hair on the back of your neck stand up.

Does this sound like "limited government"? Does it sound like something the advocates of "liberty" would embrace?

Again- I am not arguing against limited government or fiscal conservatism- I just think few in the Tea Party really believe it.

Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 02:08 PM (ogXbt)

57

Ace, I agree with you, I think. There are some things I can compromise on, some I can't. But the candidate must, MUST, be fiscally conservative in order for me to vote for him/her. Period. I cannot and will not go along with any more of this spending ourselves into a third-tier country. Social issues I can deal with, but this continuous bullshit of creeping socialism and bail-outs must stop.

Posted by: mikeyslaw at November 05, 2009 02:09 PM (QMGr1)

58

I just think few in the Tea Party really believe it.

Hey, Chip, as long as the mind-reading act is going so well, I'm thinking something about you right now; see if you can guess what it is!

Hint: it involves a body part.

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 05, 2009 02:14 PM (ERJIu)

59

Krakatoa-

My main point is that war is the natural enemy of limited government;

War always, always, enlarges the power and scope and cost of the central government.

Conservatives believe that the government should be decentralized, that governors and mayors, being closer to the people, should hold the most power; but governors and mayors do not fight wars, Presidents do.

So when we go to war, it is the President who grows more powerful, not Congres, not the governors, and least of all, the People. Libeerty is reduced during wartime, never expanded. Ever.

Wars are inherently insanely expensive; no nation has ever fought any war without deficit spending. And we have settled into a pattern of nearly endless war, whether Cold or hot. No one reading this can remember a time when we did not have either a Cold War to fight, or a shooting war.

Which means that we have accepted a slow and steady enlargement of the central government, and steady growth of the power and reach of the President.

Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 02:14 PM (ogXbt)

60 I think I'm figuring out Reason60.

His problems aren't policy.

His beef is popularity. Tea-Partiers collect more signatures and get higher turnout in less than 12 months that Libertarians (as a political group) have managed in their entire existence.

Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2009 02:14 PM (mhdbo)

61 Oh. So you are a strict isolationist then?

Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2009 02:15 PM (mhdbo)

62 Hey reason take your "wiretap" shit and shove it up your ass.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 05, 2009 02:15 PM (SqAkN)

63 Yeah, that year-long, nasty, dirty Clinton-Obama fight sure destroyed Dem chances at the White House in 2008.

Posted by: Clark at November 05, 2009 02:16 PM (K+BbB)

64 I predict by 2010 the GOP will be flying the conservative flag high. We have some of the best community organizers on the planet. Isn't that what Obummer said was important, we took him up on it.

Posted by: bill-tb at November 05, 2009 02:17 PM (iiiMw)

65

What's most interesting about the article was the two Democratic insiders had the sense not to give their names, but Huck goes on and ratifies their argument. Now they would say Rubio shouldn't challenge Crist even though he was dead wrong on the stimulus, because. . .it shouldn't be done.

Posted by: ian cormac at November 05, 2009 02:19 PM (1kwr2)

66

I agree with the results of a primary but....they MUST be honest primaries. The last ones we had were not. (And neither were the Dems)

 

1. Close the GD primaries so that only registered Republicans can vote in them.

 

2. Arrange the order of the primaries by percentage of the State who voted Republican in the last election. Hardcore Blue States should not be rewarded by getting an huge say in who the Republican nominee is early in the process.

 

3. Eliminate winner take all. If the idea is to prevent an extended fight then after the first 3 states, eliminate the bottom 25% and so forth until you whittle it down to two candidates.

 

4. Totally eliminate “caucus” voting. These are a fraud

Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2009 02:23 PM (CDUiN)

67 Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2009 02:23 PM (CDUiN)

2. Or at least make it a lottery situation. Draw names out of a damn hat for all I care, but we must stop giving disproportionate influence to the leftest of the Right.

Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2009 02:29 PM (mhdbo)

68 Create GOP disarray.  Sounds like a good task for some eager beaver Organizing for America types.  Let the sabotage commence!

Posted by: rockhead at November 05, 2009 02:41 PM (RykTt)

69 Good luck to the Nationalist Socialist Democratic Party with their Hope Strategy.

Ours should be Maximalist in primary, Pragmatic in the General ™

The general will be a kick-butt, take-names all-out-war to save America.  Even if its for Crist and Fiorina.

Posted by: Go MP at November 05, 2009 02:42 PM (DIYmd)

70

Krakatoa-

I think nation-building is foolish; I would withdraw our troops from Germany and Japan, and close as many of the 1,000 military bases we have around the world.

But even if you feel our military adventurism is necessary; even if you feel that building a civil government in Afghanistan is vitally important; at least accept the logical consequence that doing that takes money- trillions and trillions of dollars more than we take in in revenue.

So there is no way to do all that, and balance the budget, until the wars are over.

And the wars are expected to last about another decade, or so. So even if we have a President Palin in 2012 with a Tea Party Congress, we will have massive deficit spending until 2019.

Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 02:42 PM (ogXbt)

71 Reason60,

Nation building may be foolish.  Isolationism is triply so.

Posted by: not neo just conservative at November 05, 2009 02:49 PM (01RS2)

72 I fully accept the cost Reason60, although I disagree that the cost thus far has had no tangible benefit (economic or otherwise) offsetting it.

My solution includes an agreed upon timeframe after clearing out a hostile government and overseeing new elections for "changing hearts & minds".

If that succeeds, great, and I'll chalk up our financial losses to saving lives.

If it fails, our fallback plan is complete withdrawal with ironclad assurances that future aggression will be met be carpetbombing until morale improves.

I'm all for helping those that will help themselves, and hurting those that would hurt me & mine. It is a simple calculus predicated on a firm belief that our Values objectively are better than theirs.

Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2009 02:52 PM (mhdbo)

73

Some conservatives agreed. "The Democrats won not because they were brilliant but because Republicans were stupid," said presidential contender and ex-Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

The Republicans were stupid. But you'd have to be overdosing on LSD to say that they were stupid in the sense of being too darn conservative, or of running too many conservative candidates.

(Not that Huckabee is saying that here.)

Posted by: flenser at November 05, 2009 02:58 PM (wLFc1)

74 The republicans were stupid, lost their way, funny now how I wished we only had $500 billion deficits.

Posted by: Go MP at November 05, 2009 03:00 PM (DIYmd)

75 the Tea Party wants more and bigger wars, and war funding;

“Limited Government”- again, the ones who chant this most feverishly, are the same ones who cheer on the Unitary Executive theory

You know as much about the Tea Parties as you do about concept of the unitary executive. Find out what the hell you're talking about, and not from the Daily Kos this time.

Posted by: flenser at November 05, 2009 03:02 PM (wLFc1)

76 Reason (The new assigned troll? You need to include "honest" and "non partisan" in your name somehow to get any credibility BTW)

I'm sure many of the Tea Party folkes like my self share some common beliefs. I know some of them do because I held signs with them talked with them and they agree. I know, I know, you have done the same and they are all stupid slack jawed contradictory apes, but we'll settle that my experience shows the following.

1. We got attacked, we had to address that, it costs money, temporarily. That's unfortunate but a legitimate purpose of government. We need to get the force we need, where we need it, to end this as quickly as possible so we can stop spending money on it. Some folks thought bombing Iran might be necessary in the future, I guess that you can call that advocating for more war which would cost more money, but I just think about how much nuclear detonations inside the US' largest cities are going to cost. So which camp are you? The "Mullahs would never bomb us if we just play nice and support their dominance of the region" type or the "We can convince them with home made cookies to stop perusing the most powerful weapons man can make" type?

2. Bush was not a fiscal conservative. Many of us were unhappy, told him so, but he insisted on being bipartisan and extending a hand across the aisle. But we all feel that Gore/Kerry would have made Bush program increases look small.

3. Cheney is not a libertarian, many of us did not like him and told him so. Many of us did not like parts of the Patriot Act and executive actions that infringed on the rights of the people. We said so, we even got media coverage back then (Conservatives turn against Bush makes a great headline) remember that low approval Bush had? That you flung in Republican's faces every two seconds? He got that because a lot of conservative/libertarian Republicans did not like parts of the Bush/Cheney administration.

4. Detention of terrorists. Hard subject, if the UN would get off it's chicken ass and make a decent international treaty that we could use as policy to replace the old sovereign law we might have something we could do, and a way we could resolve their status. But right now they fall into the "enemy of humanity" (hostis humani generis) category under the old international law which suggests their access to civil rights is very limited. This is not just "our" problem, it is the whole of the civilized world, who seem content just to criticize whatever decisions we make as either being reckless or cruel/unfair depending which side of the line we are on. Most people I have talked to are for the military tribunal with a more liberal set of evidence rules in place. And no one I talked to supported detaining Americans without trial indefinitely. NOT ONE.

So because we backed a squishy big government neo-con Bush, over frighteningly socialist alternatives should not give you the impression we aren't SERIOUS about theses things in our platform. It's just the only alternatives to "moderate" republicans, seem to be hard left democrats. A problem we are trying to rectify, and we just blew a race in NY to make that point! That we are tired of the Neo-con squish.

So what's your plan genius? stop all foreign opps, scale down military operations to pre WWII levels (What happened when we did that the first time, OH that's right WWII) and tax the bejesus out of every marginally successful wage and money earner in the country to support your entitlement society? What does a conservative budget look like? Yeah you always want us to say those magic words don't you troll? "Sure we need to cut. . ." pick your favorite entitlement so that those votes you bought with those programs will come flooding back. Entitlement budgets need to be cut, yes. We need to conclude our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and get defense spending back under control yes. However, we cannot do so ignoring real threats to the US. Unless you think we can benefit by some more uncontrolled building demolitions. A conservative budget is very simple.
You bring in
2.1 trillion.
You only spend 2.1 trillion or less and pay off the debt.
If you borrow money to conduct a temporary operation like a war,
you should be restructuring your entitlements and other services to pay it back when the need for funds subsides. But when my tax burden is on par with gross tax rates of feudal times you can't convince me that taxing more is the solution to our fiscal woes. It will just choke the economy and role back income taxes. Which get raised to compensate which chokes the economy more, and before you know it, it's the Carter admin again with 75% upper marginal rates, and still huge deficits.


Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 05, 2009 03:10 PM (0q2P7)

77 Spending hundreds of billions, even trillions, on dead terrorists and rubble pays a dividend of international miscreants cowering in their caves and pissing their pants.

The scariest phrase on the planet should be "The Americans are coming...and they're pissed."

Cheap at twice the price.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 05, 2009 03:14 PM (r8/Km)

78 The only "civil war" I see in the Republican Party is between the professional consultant class (i.e. Mark McKinnon, Steve Schmidt) and the rank-and-file.

These consultants seem to be trying to defend their hold on Republican "tier 1" campaign activities .. for the same reason that Woodward and Bernstein belittled every political scandal that came after Watergate .. so as not to diminish their position .. in this case, vis-à-vis the next campaign.

Posted by: Neo at November 05, 2009 03:15 PM (tE8FB)

79 Keep fucking that schism, libs.

Posted by: libbyt at November 05, 2009 03:16 PM (NKMZD)

80 It could happen! The Paulites tried to take over our local party, disappeared after the caucus, and are now forming a separate conservative group. This is going on all over.
 
If they run Republican candidates, great.   But if they go 3rd, we're fooked.


Posted by: cassandra at November 05, 2009 03:19 PM (GdalM)

81 There is no such animal as a pro-war fiscal conservative.

Sure there is.  They used to be called "imperialists" or "colonial occupiers" back when it was teh cool to plunder conquered lands and such and send fleets of gold and booty laden ships back to the motherland.

See, the USA fucked up somewhere along the line and never quite got the concept right -- when we put a beating on someone or plant the flag somewhere, the gold laden ships head in the wrong direction.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2009 03:26 PM (HLug1)

82

Krakatoa-

You believe the wars are justified and necessary, and are willing to accept deficits to pay for them. We agree to disagree, but you are being honest and forthright in accepting that they are expensive.

Mike-

Lets take your points one by one-

1. " We got attacked..." Ok, so you believe that we should continue the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistand, and widen it to include a war with Iran.

Like I said to Karkatoa, we can disagree on whether that is a wise strategy- but at least accpet it will cost much more than the near-Trillion we are spending now every year.

2. "Bush was not a conservative" On this we agree!

3. "Cheney is not a libertarian..." Again, we agree!

4. "Detention of terrorists..." Actually, I was not talking about terrorists detained overseas; I was talking about an American citizen who was arrested in Chicago, and held in prison for 6 years without a trial or even charges. This could easily be a "rightwing terrorist" next time. I don't believe advocates of limited government should embrace this.

 "A conservative budget is very simple.
You bring in
2.1 trillion.
You only spend 2.1 trillion or less and pay off the debt.
If you borrow money to conduct a temporary operation like a war,
you should be restructuring your entitlements and other services to pay it back when the need for funds subsides. "

OK, a good plan. But we currently owe something like 10 Trillion dollars; each year, even without Obama, we are adding about 1/2  Trillion to that.

So how to reconcile the difference?

If we don't want to cut defense spending; and don't want to increase taxes; then thre is no where else to cut except Medicare and Social Security.

But no one wants to openly say that; no one wants to say "we are going to cut off Granny's Social Security check and cancel her Medicare". And honestly? America will never elect someone who says that, not in the reddest of red states.

In my diary over at RedState I offered a few commonsense solutions based on shared sacrifice and compromise. These included raising the age of eligibility for SS and Medicare; reductions in foreign entanglements; closing of tax loopholes; and yes, a modest increase in tax rates. I am currently thinking of Bruce Bartlett's notion of a VAT, but haven't decided yet.

The point is, there ARE ways to achieve a balanced budget; but it involves painful choices, a recognition that government cannot do everything, everywhere, and we must pay in taxes for the services we get.

And THAT is the essense of conservatism.

Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 03:31 PM (ogXbt)

83 And THAT is the essense of conservatism.

As defined by you. Raising taxes has no part of my Conservatism.

I'm glad you can agree to disagree, but I reject your claim that we spend a trillion a year on "wars". Seriously, where does that come from?

You ignore the concept of reducing taxes to spur economic growth, which has the neat effect of closing the gap between revenues and expenditures. Granted, maybe not perfectly, and maybe not tomorrow.

We're all on board with limiting expenditures. The extent of that can have a multiplier effect on revenue growth to close the deficit.

Limit spending, increase revenues, and let us work towards fiscal responsibility with a politically viable strategy.

Seriously, you could simply place a limit on the sum of all spending increases to be some point below quarterly growth, and you will, at some point, achieve a balanced budget.

But let's get off the false choice arguments you try to impose on everyone.


Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2009 03:45 PM (mhdbo)

84

Don't be so sure the Dems aren't whistling past the graveyard here with a bit of projection to boot -- Lieberman in '06 was, imho, a bit of a trial balloon, and they didn't do too well with that, did they?  The Dems have their own "civil war" going on -- they want to purge the moderate ones from the party, or get them in line with the new party line, and they still want to win elections.  If the Republicans can fix their image (it wouldn'be be hard IF they are smart about it and serious about it) and manage to control the fissures within their party, the Dems won't be able to purge and still win (and if they don't purge, they are sitting on top of a leftist bubble -- those leftists will eventually break away and form their own party if the Dems don't cater to them).

If the Republicans don't stay on message (and it can be a big tent message IF they look at it the right way -- which is forget the special interest junk -- let the state's handle it as they see fit and let people have a bit more freedom to choose on their own what they want to do with themselves, get a core message of fiscal resposiblity, strong defense of the people, job creation, no more tax and spend irresponsiblity, and getting the government out of people's lives -- they would pick up votes with this; no more pandering, just a simple, straight message and don't try to pick up the core base of the Dems).

Posted by: unknown jane at November 05, 2009 03:45 PM (5/yRG)

85

"I reject your claim that we spend a trillion a year on "wars". Seriously, where does that come from?"

It comes from here. Wallstats is a great website that has the entire federal budget laid out in graphic form. We spend 680 Billion on Defense and more besides on Homeland Security. Altogether our wars cost us about almost a Trillion per year, if you account for the future and continuing cost of veterans benefits and VA health care.

"You ignore the concept of reducing taxes to spur economic growth..."

Reducing taxes to raise revenue is a hotly debated issue; I am agreeing with Bruce Bartlett who was one of the original architects of supply side economics, who now believes there are no more revenue increase possible by any further cuts in taxes; he belives and I agree, that supply side may have worked in 1980, but our taxes are so low now, no more benefit will happen by cutting.

The notion that we must pay for what we get is pure Reagan logic; I think he even put it exactly those words, which is why I was such a strong believer in him. I worked eagerly on his campaign as a college student.

It is liberalism that likes the idea of getting services without paying for them. They were always advocating that if we pump money into the economy, the resulting rise in prosperity will bring in enough revenue to pay off the debt- sound familiar?

Posted by: Reason60 at November 05, 2009 03:58 PM (ogXbt)

86 All this whistling is getting annoying.

Posted by: the graveyard at November 05, 2009 04:12 PM (PD1tk)

87 Link directly to your numbers please. I'm not interested in searching that site.

But you seem to suggest that you are including the costs of maintaining our military readiness into the cost of prosecuting the war.

I do not.

There are plenty of taxes that can be cut that will spur economic growth (e.g., the Death tax, SS taxes, Sin taxes), and once Bush's cuts sunset next year, there will be plenty more. I prefer some sort of fair tax/flat tax that cuts most loopholes and renders the IRS overstaffed and ripe for cutting its staff & budget by at least half.

And there are plenty of other ways to promote economic growth and reduce spending that include neither taxing nor explicit changes in spending.

You dismiss a lot in proclaiming your way is the best and only way. I'm frankly not convinced enough by what you've posted here that you are actually interested in other viewpoints, nor am I convinced that you have a superior strategy towards fiscal responsibility.

Good luck convincing others, but I think our conversation is done.

Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2009 04:25 PM (mhdbo)

88 Keep fucking that schism, libs.

I laughed out loud.

Posted by: toby928 at November 05, 2009 04:26 PM (PD1tk)

89 You can't much more RINO than McCain, and I put his sign on my lawn.  With his name still on it.

Posted by: RTH615 at November 05, 2009 06:35 PM (0KuJp)

Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 03:36 AM (wYEI1)

91 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 10:50 AM (QhfLM)

92 Need to know before buying Lace Wig Our lace wigs are made of human hairs classified lace human hair wigs on our web. 100% Indian/Chinese remy human hair and best quality Swiss/French lace are used in lace human hair wigs. Lace human hair wig is thin, your scalp can get good breath, so you can feel comfortable just like real hair. You may find hundreds of units and almost 150+ styles of lace front wigs in our store. By using our web searcher, you may locate just the cosplay wigs you want without bitter searches. Also, you may customise full lace wigs here, all you need to do is just to follow our custom options or leave your specials in the "comments". A custom wig can be completed within 25 workdays generally. Thanks for Paypal and our Co-work World Wide Ship corporations, we can ship wigs to all over the world! Show your beauty, show your individuality, experience our wonderful service and dress you up right now!

Posted by: jason at November 08, 2009 10:02 PM (vErvF)

Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 03:05 AM (ly6Oi)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 04:29 AM (IeIJx)

95 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing


business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 03:26 AM (APB+g)

96 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 06:45 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 07:36 AM (f9Cxq)

98 If you are looking for buying a quality pair of warm sheepskin boots you really need to try the ugg classic tall boots. The quality of the it means that they will last 4 or 5 times as long as the cheaper copies and the level of comfort they provide to the wearer is much higher.So when it comes to you finding a pair of ugg boots that will match up to any outfit in your wardrobe then it is worth considering investing money in a pair of Ugg classic tall this

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 17, 2009 10:59 AM (CsraQ)

99 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 18, 2009 12:27 PM (WPYlQ)

Posted by: mm at November 21, 2009 10:19 PM (QKqJD)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 06:18 AM (bNNim)

Posted by: sdsd at November 25, 2009 01:29 PM (ASMPf)

103 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 04:54 AM (xUZwC)

Posted by: 53f3qfb at December 03, 2009 01:30 AM (NFB6/)

105 Everything dynamic and very positively!
Ugg Classic Cardy,discount, free shipping!

Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 03, 2009 07:14 AM (ftu8y)

106 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what،¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 09:58 AM (OKj2x)

107

توبيكات ، أناشيد طيور الجنه ،قصائد كتابيه ، قصائد مسموعه ، خواطر ، قصص روايات ،أزياء ، فساتين  ، مكياج ، خلطات ، تسريحات ، ديكور ، ديكورات ، حلويات ، معجنات ، نادي الهلال ، نادي النصر ، نادي الاتحاد ، سيارات ، موديلات سيارات ،أزياء ادم ، إنمي ،أفلام انمي ، صور طبيعيه ، سينما ، افلام ، مسلسلات رمضانيه ، صور فنانين ، صور ممثلين ، صور مطربين ، مسلسل عاصي ، زفات ، اغاني بدون موسيقى ، كلمات اغاني  ، ماسنجر ، سكربتات ، ثيمات ماسنجر ، برامج للماسنجر ، صور ماسنجر ، صور بنات للماسنجر ، صور شباب للماسنجر  ، توبيك ، نكات ، توبيكات اغاني ، توبيكات كرتونيه ، توبيكات ملونه ، برامج فوتوشوب ، خلفيات للتصميم ، صور للتصميم ، خامات ، فلاتر ، اكشن ،فلاتر ، سكرابز ، خطوط ، باترن ، فرش ، جلتر ، سويتش ، فلاش ، ملفات مفتوحه ، ملف مفتوح  ، جوال ، برامج جوال ، ثيمات جوال ، العاب جوال ، بلوتوث ، نغمات جوال ، يوتيوب ، رسائل ،mms ، sms ، مسجات ، وسائط اغاني ، برامج كمبيوتر ، العاب كمبيوتر ، العاب بنات ، منتدى ، منتديات ، وتلومني فيك ، شبكة وتلومني فيك

كلمات أغاني خالد عبدالرحمن كلمات البوم خالد عبدالرحمن كلمات البوم روح روحي
ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن قلبك كبير أغاني ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن قلبك كبير كلمات أغاني ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن قلبك كبير
ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن فرحة لقانا أغاني ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن فرحة لقانا كلمات ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن فرحة لقانا
ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن عقد وسوار أغاني ألبوم خالد عبد الرحمن عقد وسوار كلمات ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن عقد وسوار
ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن البوم خالد عبدالرحمن سامريات - من يسد بمكانه كلمات أغاني البوم سامريات - من يسد بمكانه
ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن البوم خالد عبدالرحمن بقايا جروح كلمات أغاني البوم بقايا جروح
ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن صفحة جديدة أغاني ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن صفحة جديدة كلمات ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن صفحة جديدة
ألبوم خالد عبدالرحمن البوم خالد عبدالرحمن إفراق كلمات أغاني البوم خالد عبدالرحم إفراق
كلمات أغنية شلونك حبيبي ، تحميل أغنية شلونك حبيبي ، شلونك حبيبي ، كلمات اغاني البوم ماجد مهندس 2009
كلمات البوم الوسمي 2009 كلمات أغاني البوم مالك حل 2009
كلمات اغنية الفنانه سميه الخشاب عايزاك كده كلمات اغنية سميه الخشاب عايزاك كده 2009
كلمات اغاني راشد الماجد 2009 كلمات جديد راشد الماجد 2009 جميع اغاني راشد الماجد كلمات اغاني راشد 2009
كلمات اغاني الفنان عبد المجيد عبدالله كلمات اغاني البوم روحي تحبك كلمات اغنية روحي تحبك كلمات اغنية مسموح كلمات اغنية عين كلمات اغنية من اول افرح كلمات اغنية حبايبنا
أغنية عاد عيدك حبيبي ، تحميل أغنية عاد عيدك ، كلمات أغنية عاد عيدك حبيبي ، أغاني راشد الماجد
أغنية ياشرطي ، تحميل أغنية ياشرطي ، كلمات أغنية ياشرطي ، ياشرطي كلم حبيبي
زفات ديانا حداد بدون موسيقى ، زفات ديانا حداد ، زفات أغاني ديانا حداد 2009
كلمات أغنية انا انسانه كلمات أغاني البوم يارا 2009 تحميل أغنية أنا انسانه
زفة أغنية خلي عينك تناظر ، زفة خلي عينك تناظر ، زفات عرايس ، زفات عروس ، زفات 2009
كلمات أغاني أروى 2009 كلمات البوم غصب عنك 2009 البوم اروى غصب عنك 2009
أغنية منت رايق بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية منت رايق بدون موسيقى
زفة مذهله ، زفة أغنية مذهله ، زفة أغاني محمد عبده 2009 ، زفة مذهله محمد عبده
أغنية ياغداره ، كلمات أغنية ياغداره ، تحميل أغنية ياغداره ، ياغداره ، أغاني راشد الماجد 2009
أغنية اعذريني بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية اعذريني بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغاني بدون موسيقى
أغنية أسافر عنك بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية أسافر عنك بدون موسيقى
اغاني بدون موسيقى ، عزه ياقلبي من الهم ، اغنية عزه بدون موسيقى ، اغاني راشد الفارس بدون موسيقى
زفة طل القمر ، زفة أغنية طل القمر ، زفة طل القمر 2009 ، زفة أغنية طل القمر 2009
رفة أغنية المشكله أغنية المشكله بدون موسيقى أغنية المشكله بصوت موضي أغاني بصوت موضي
أغنية غاب صوتك بدون موسيقى ، تحميل اغنية غاب صوتك بدون موسيقى ، أغاني فارس مهدي بدون موسيقى
زفة ياقمر سلم ، زفات إسلاميه ، زفات خليجيه ، زفات أغنية اقمر سلم ، زفات بدون موسيقى
اسرار العيون . محمد عبده . بدون موسيقى زفه روعه
زفة أغلى عروس ، زفة أغنية أغلى عروس ، زفات عرايس ، زفات زواج
كلمات البوم الفنانه يارا 2009 لالى خليجيه كلمات اغنية انا انسانه كلمات اغنية بكل شي تجذب كلمات اغنية تذكر يوم كلمات اغنية راغبه مني كلمات اغنية سكر زياده كلمات اغنية سلمولي كلمات اغنية مارو
كلمات اغنية راشد الفارس شي ثاني ، كلمات اغنية شي ثاني ، كلمات البوم, راشد الفارس شي ثاني
أغنية وين احب الليله بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية وين احب الليله ، أغاني محمد عبده 2010
أغنية تقوى الهجر بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية تقوى الهجر بدون موسيقى
زفة نور الشمس ، زفة أغنية نور الشمس ، زفات للعرايس
أغنية مشتاق قالولي بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية مشتاق قالولي بدون موسيقى ، أغاني بدون موسيقى
زفة لا تقولون ، زفة أغنية لا تقولون ، زفات أغاني محمد عبده ، زفات محمد عبده
أغاني ماجد مهندس بدون موسيقى أغنية ست الحبايب بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية ست الحبايب بدون موسيقى
أغاني ماجد مهندس أغنية فوق الشوق بدون موسيقى تحميل أغنية فوق الشوق بدون موسيقى
اغنية اكثر من اول بدون موسيقى اغنية احلام بدون موسيقى اغنية اكثر من اول
أغنية حبيبي اسف ازعجتك بدون موسيقى ، أغاني خالد عبدالرحمن بدون موسيقى
زفة قمر واحلى زفات روعه زفة بصوت عيسى الماجد زفه باسم ساره
زفة الله ياحلوه ، زفة الأميره ساره ، زفات إسلاميه ، زفة الله ياحلوه بدون موسيقى
اغنية دلوعتي بدون موسيقى زفة اغنية دلوعتي بدون موسيقى اغنية الفنان راشد الماجد زفه حلوه
أغنية روح وروح بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية روح وروح بدون موسيقى ، أغاني أصاله بدون موسيقى
اغنية خاينه بصوت هند البلوشي بدون موسيقى
زغاريد زغروطه زغروته زغروته طويله زغروته قصيره
اغنية جيبه يعني اجيبه لو كان تحت الحراسه بدون موسيقى
أغنية أنا حبيبي بدون موسيقى ، أغاني فارس مهدي بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية أنا حبيبي بدون موسيقى
اغنية لايق عليك الورد زفة لايق عليك الورد اغنية لايق عليك الورد بدون موسيقى زفة لايق عليك الورد للعرايس
ويلاه ضاق الصدر وما ذكر يسأل علي بدون موسيقى
أغنية جنه جنه بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية جنه جنه ، تحميل أغنية جنه جنه بدون موسيقى
زفات أغاني محمد عبده 2009 ، زفة عذبة الأطباع ، زفات محمد عبده ، زفة عذبة الاطباع 2009
زفة أموت بحبك ، أغنية أموت بحبك بدون موسيقى ، زفات عبدالمجيد عبدالله 2009 ، زفات أغاني عبدالمجيد عبدالله 2009 ، زفة أغنية أموت بحبك 2009
أغنية تعب قلبي بدون موسيقى ، أغاني نوال الكويتي بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية تعب قلبي
اغاني الجسمي بدون موسيقى ، اغنية فقدك بدون موسيقى ، اغاني الجسمي فقدك بدون موسيقى
اغنية اجيك يسلم راسك وشلون ماجيك بدون موسيقى
القوس قوسك والسهام سهامك بصوت طقاقه بدون موسيقى اغنيه جديده اغنيه 2009
اغنية صدفه ليارا بدون موسيقى اغنية صدفه ومن بين كل الناس حبيتك بالدف
أغاني أحلام بدون موسيقى ، أغاني البومات أحلام ، أغاني احلام بدون موسيقى 2009 ، أغاني بدون موسيقى
أغنية يالي على البال بصوت موضي ، زفة ياللي على البال بدون موسيقى ، أغاني موضي الشمري بدون موسيقى
اغنية انت طيب بدون موسيقى اغنية نوال بدون موسيقى اغنية انت طيب اغنية نوال الكويتيه انت طيب
أغنية يعجبني الزعل بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية يعجبني الزعل بدون موسيقى ، أغاني نوال الكويتيه بدون موسيقى
أغنية بين أيدي بدون موسيقى ، أغنية بين ايديا بدون موسيقى ، أغاني ماجد مهندس بدون موسيقى
أغنية ليلي الم بدون موسيقى ، أغنية ليلي ألم بدون موسيقى
زفة احلى عروس راشد الماجد بدون موسيقى
أغنية قول أمين بدون موسيقى ، زفة قول امين بدون موسيقى ، زفات عبدالمجيد عبدالله ، زفة قول امين
أغنية ياقلبي بدون موسيقى تحميل أغنية ياقلبي بدون موسيقى أغاني ماجد مهندس بدون موسيقى
اغنيه مرتاح ولا يتصنع قلبك الراحه بدون موسيقى ، تحميل اغنيه مرتاح ولا يتصنع قلبك الراحه بدون موسيقى ، أغاني أحلام 2009
زفة أحلى من القمر ، زفة أغنية أحلى من القمر ، زفة أغاني راشد الفارس ، زفات أغاني راشد الفارس
أغنية انا وخلي بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية انا وخلي بدون موسيقى
أغنية الا يامطوله صبري بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية الا يامطوله صبري بدون موسيقى
أغنية لو يقولون انتي حلوه بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية إنتي حلوه ، أغاني رابح صقر بدون موسيقى
أغنية أجمل إنسانه ، أغنية أجمل إنسانه بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية أجمل إنسانه بدون موسيقى
زفة السندريلا ، زفة أغنية السندريلا ، زفات إسلاميه ، زفات عرايس
أغنية ناويلك على نيه ، زفات أحلام ، زفات أغاني أحلام بدون موسيقى ، زفات أفراح
أغنية هلي لا تحرموني منه بدون موسيقى ، أغاني راشد الماجد 2009 بدون موسيقى ، أغنية هلي لا تحرموني منه
أغنية أبي حبك معي يكبر بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية أبي حبك معي يكبر بدون موسيقى ، أغاني بدون موسيقى 2009
أغنية انت منت انسان أكثر بدون موسيقى ، تحميل انت منت انسان أكثر بدون موسيقى ، أغاني عبدالمجيد بدون موسيقى
اغنية العنب العنب أغاني عبير التركي أغنية العنب بصوت عبير التركي أغاني طقاقات
أغنية تحس فيني بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية تحس فيني بدون موسيقى ، أغاني أحلام بدون موسيقى ، أغنية تحس فيني أحلام بدون موسيقى
أغاني أحلام بدون موسيقى ، أغاني البومات أحلام ، أغاني احلام بدون موسيقى 2009 ، أغاني بدون موسيقى
أغنية والله واحشني موت بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية والله واحشني موت بدون موسيقى ، أغاني ماجد مهندس بدون موسيقى
زفة دقو المزاهر، زفات مصريه ، زفة أغنية دقو المزاهر ، زفات أغاني مصريه
اغنية غنو لحبيبي بدون موسيقى اغنية عبد المجيد عبدالله بدون موسيقى اغنية غنو لحبيبي
أغنية اليوم طالع قمر ، زفة اليوم طالع قمر ، زفات عبدالمجيد عبدالله ، زفة اليوم طالع قمر بدون موسيقى ، زفات عبدالمجيد عبدالله بدون موسيقى
أغنية نور عيني بدون موسيقى أغنية حبنا يا نور عيني لا يضيع أغاني راشد الماجد بدون موسيقى
زفات طقاقات بدون موسيقى 2009 ، زفات طق بدون موسيقى 2009 ، تحميل طقاقات 2009 ، تحميل طقاقات بدون موسيقى 2009
زفات جديده زفه بصوت روعه زفه كامله زفات 2009
زفات أغاني راشد الماجد زفات بالاسماء زفات أغاني راشد الماجد بالاسماء زفات راشد 2009
أغنية روح وروح بدون موسيقى ، أغاني أصاله بدون موسيقى ، أغنية روح وروح ، أغاني بدون موسيقى
كلمات اغاني البوم هيفاء وهبي الجديد بابا فين 2010 كلمات اغاني هيفاء وهبي الجديده بابا فين ولما تغيب الشمس
أغنية الحكايه بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية الحكايه بدون موسيقى
اغنية إندماج الارواح بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية إندماج الارواح ، أغنية إندماج الارواح ، أغاني فارس بدون موسيقى
أغنية عزاه بدون موسيقى تحميل أغنية عزاه بدون موسيقى تحميل أغاني راشد الفارس بدون موسيقى
اغنية عسى دايم نكون احباب اغنية عبد المجيد عبد الله اغنيه بدون موسيقى
اغنية رقصهم وشعللهم ، اغنية رقصهم وشعللهم بدون موسيقى ، رقصهم وشعللهم على المسرح شويه شويه
اغنية من يقول اني لغيرك اغنية راشد الماجد اغنيه بدون موسيقى اغنيه حلوه
أغنية لا تخاف من الزمان بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية لا تخاف من الزمان ، أغاني أصاله بدون موسيقى
اغنية رنيت لك رنه بدون موسيقى ، تنزيل اغنية رنيت لك رنه بدون موسيقى ، اغنيه رنيت لك رنه
اغنية في منتهى الرقه بدون موسيقى ,كلمات اغنية في منتهى الرقه بدون موسيقى ,اغنية رابح صقر بمنتهى الرقه بدون موسيقى
اغنية والله احبك بدون موسيقى ,كلمات اغنية والله احبك ,اغنية والله احبك بصوت اشواق ,اغنية والله احبك بدون موسيقى ,اغنية الفنان يوسف العماني والله احبك
أغنية صدفه بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية صدفه بدون موسيقى ، أغاني يارا بدون موسيقى
زفة احلى نهار ، زفة خطوة خجل ، زفات راشد الماجد 2009 زفة أغنية أحلى نهار ، زفة أغنية خطوة خجل
أغنية الأماكن بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية الأماكن بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغاني محمد عبده بدون موسيقى
أغاني محمد عبده بدون موسيقى ، أغنية إختلفنا بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية إختلفنا
زفات حسين الجسمي زفات الجسمي زفات حسين الجسمي بدون موسيقى
زفة رشو الورود ، زفات سوريه ، زفات أغاني سوريا ، زفة أغنية رشو الورود
أغنية تكفون بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية تكفون بدون موسيقى أغاني بدون موسيقى
أغنية خاينه وما تنصفي بدون موسيقى تحميل اغنية خاينه وما تنصفي أغاني مغربيه بدون موسيقى
أغنية الحب خالد بدون موسيقى ، أغاني بدون موسيقى ، أغنية الحب خالد
اغنية انكسرت الشيشه بدون موسيقى ، انكسرت الشيشه بدون موسيقى ، انكسرت الشيشه
اغنية اميرة الورد بدون موسيقى زفة اميرة الورد بدون موسيقى اغنية الفنان محمد عبده زفه رائعه
اغنية قوم ودرج لي وارقص قدامي بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية قوم ودرج لي وارقص قدامي بدون موسيقى ، أغاني الطقاقه العنود بدن موسيقى
أغاني اليازيه محمد بدون موسيقى ، أغنية برق لمع بدون موسيقى ، أغنية متغير علي بدون موسيقى ، أغنية تهددني بدون موسيقى
أغنية انا صاحي لهم بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية أنا صاحي لهم ، أغاني راشد الماجد صوتيه بدون موسيقى
أغنية يلوموني حبيبي فيك بدون موسيقى أغاني راشد الماجد بدون موسيقى2009 البوم نور عيني بدون موسيقى أغاني بدون موسيقى
زفات العروس 2009 ، زفات للعروس 2009 ، زفات خليجية للعروس 2009 ، زفة عروس 2009
أغنية طالعه من بيت أبوها بدون موسيقى ، أغنية طالعه من بيت ابوها بصوت ماجد مهندس ، أغاني بدون موسيقى
أغنية معجبه بدون موسيقى ، أغاني بدون موسيقى ، أغنية معجبه 2009 بدون موسيقى
اغنية وش جاه بدون موسيقى ، تحميل اغنية وش جاه بدون موسيقى ، اغاني البوم نور عيني بدون موسيقى
زفة غنت الاشعار زفات 2009 زفه كامله زفه جديده
أغنية عشان الحب بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية عشان الحب ، تحميل أغنية عشان الحب ، اغاني راشد الماجد بدون موسيقى
أغاني صوتيه بدون موسيقى ، أغنية مشكلتي اهواه بدون موسيقى ، أغاني زيد الزايد بدون موسيقى
زفات عرائس زفة أميرة الورد تحميل زفة أميرة الورد تحميل زفات إسلاميه
زفه شعريه زفه بصوت روعه زفات شعريه زفه بصوت عبدالله السعدي
زفات كويتيه ، زفات مصريه ، زفات هنديه ، زفات اسلاميه ، زفات تركيه ، زفات انجليزيه ، زفات بحرينيه ، زفات سعوديه
زفة اقبلت احلى البنات حسين الجسمي زفه روعه
أغنية لقيت غيرك بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية لقيت غيرك ، أغاني تامر حسني بدون موسيقى ، أغاني بدون موسيقى
أغنية سواها قلبي يا حبيبي وحبك بدون موسيقى ، تحميل اغنية سواها قلبي يا حبيبي وحبك ، اغاني بدون موسيقى
زفه البدر لراشد الماجد بدون موسيقى
مؤثرات صوتيه ، زغاريط ، زغاريط افراح ، زغاريط للزفات ، زغاريط بدون موسيقى ، زغرطه
أغاني البوم روح روحي بدون موسيقى ، أغنية خلص حنانك بدون موسيقى ، أغاني عبدالمجيد عبدالله بدون موسيقى
اغنية الحب خالد بدون موسيقى ,اغنية راشد الماجد بدون موسيقى ,اغنيه الحب خالد بدون موسيقى
زفات حسين الجسمي ، زفات أغاني حسين الجسمي ، زفة حلوة واموره للجسمي ، زفات أغاني حسين الجسمي بدون موسيقى
اغنية مليون خاطر بدون موسيقى ,كلمات اغنية مليون خاطر ,اغنية عبد المجيد عبد الله مليون خاطر , تحميل اغنية مليون خاطر بدون موسيقى
أغنية القوس قوسك بدون موسيقى تحميل أغنية القوس قوسك بدون موسيقى أغاني عبدالمجيد عبدالله بدون موسيقى
اغنية ياحبني لك بدون موسيقى ,كلمات اغنية ياحبني لك بدون موسيقى ,اغنية ماجد المهندس ياحبني لك بدون موسيقى ,تحميل اغنية ياحبني لك بدون موسيقى
أغنية يغار قلبي بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية يغار قلبي بدون موسيقى ، أغاني راشد الماجد بدون موسيقى ، أغنية يغار قلبي راشد الماجد
أغنية الدنيا حلوه بدون موسيقى ، أغاني نانسي عجرم بدون موسيقى ، كلمات أغنية نانسي عجرم
أغاني بدون موسيقى تحميل اغنيه يعشقني بدون موسيقى اغنيه يعشقني
أغاني الطقاقه العنود ، أغاني زواج بدون موسيقى ، أغاني الطقاقه العنود بدون موسيقى ، اغاني أعراس بدون موسيقى
اغنية مابنكسر صابر بدون موسيقى ، أغنية مابنكسر صابر بصوت ماجد بدون موسيقى ، مابنكسر صابر بدون موسيقى
اغنية ياحظ عينك بدون موسيقى ، كلمات اغنية ياحظ عينك ، أغاني عبدالمجيد عبدالله بدون موسيقى
اغاني بدون موسيقه اغنية المهلي مايولي اغاني محمد الزيلعي اغنيه بدون مسيقى
أغنية تلفت الناس لامريت بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية تلفت الناس لامريت بدون موسيقى
زفة خذها امانه ، أغنية خذها أمانه بدون موسيقى ، زفات بدون موسيقى ، زفة خذها أمانه بدون موسيقى
أغنية الي لقى احبابه بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية الي لقى احبابه بدون موسيقى
أغنية الريش بدون موسيقى ، اغاني راشد الماجد 2009 بدون موسيقى ، أغاني البوم نور عيني بدون موسيقى
اكبر مجموعة اغاني بدون موسيقى 2009 ، اغاني بدون موسيقى لجميع الفنانين ، اغاني بدون موسيقى للتحميل
اغنية اليوم طالع قمر اغنيه بدون موسيقى اغنيه حلوه
أغنية على كثر السنين بدون موسيقى أغاني راشد الماجد 2009 بدون موسيقى تحميل أغنية على كثر السنين
اغنية والله واحشني زمانك بدون موسيقى ، كلمات اغنية والله واحشني زمانك ، والله واحشني زمانك بدون موسيقى
أغاني نوال الكويتيه بدون موسيقى أغنية من البدايه بدون موسيقى ، أغنية ليش أزعل عليك بدون موسيقى ، أغنية سامحتك بدون موسيقى
زفة ممشاها حرير ، زفة أغنية ممشاها حرير ، زفات أغاني حسين الجسمي 2009 ، زفات الجسمي للعرايس
زفه روعه زفات جديده زفه بصوت سلوم السلوم
أغنية ساعات بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية ساعات بدون موسيقى ، أغاني راشد الماجد بدون موسيقى
أغاني البوم نور عيني بدون موسيقى أغنية ويلاه بدون موسيقى تحميل أغنية ويلاه بدون موسيقى
أغنية ياسلام عليكم يالسعوديه ، أغاني راشد الماجد بدون موسيقى ، أغنية ياسلام عليكم ياسعوديه بدون موسيقى
أغاني بدون موسيقى أغنية مرحبا بقدوم خلي بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية مرحبا بقدوم خلي بدون موسيقى
أغنية اه منك منقهر ، تحميل أغنية اه منك منقهر ، كلمات أغنية اه منك منقهر ، جديد أغاني راشد الماجد
أغنية أنا حبيبي بدون موسيقى ، أغاني فارس مهدي بدون موسيقى ، تحميل أغنية أنا حبيبي بدون موسيقى
أغنية بلا حب بلا وجع قلب بدون موسيقى ، كلمات بلا حب بلا وجع قلب ، أغاني راشد الماجد 2009 بدون موسيقى
كلمات اغنية انا من حقي اغير للفنان راشد الماجد 2010 كلمات البوم راشد الماجد 2010 كلمات اغاني الفنان راشد الماجد 2010
كلمات اغنية البيت مايسوى بدونك سعد الفهد 2010 ، اغنية البيت مايسوى بدونك 2010
اغاني بدون موسيقى ، اغاني زفات بدون موسيقى ، اغاني طقاقات بدون موسيقى ، اغاني فنانيين بدون موسيقى ، تحميل اغاني بدون موسيقى
زفات عرايس ، أغاني زفات ، زفات للأفراح ، زفات أغاني إسلاميه ، زفات 2010
اغنية لبيه يالحد الجنوبي ، كلمات اغنية راشد الماجد لبيه يالحد الجنوبي ، كلمات اغنية لبيه يالحد الجنوبي
مؤثرات صوتيه للزفات ، اصوات طبيعيه للزفات ، اصوات بشريه للزفات ، اصوات منوعه للزفات

البوم مني امرشا سنة اولي حب 2010 , اغنية اي شوق , اغنية بدالك الف , اغنية تبي تقنعني , اغنية حلم او علم

اغنية الموعد الضايع ، كلمات اغنية الموعد الضايع ، تحميل اغنية الموعد الضايع ، الموعد الضايع راشد الماجد ويارا ، اغنية الموعد الضايع راشد الماجد ويارا

اغنية غرقان لراشدالماجد،اغنية راشدالماجدوحسين الجسمي،اغنية غرقان،غرقان2010

Posted by: aseel at December 05, 2009 10:03 AM (LaHfW)

Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 11:10 AM (Cooh2)

109 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 04:46 PM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 12:23 AM (/3s/N)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 07:38 PM (1dySH)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:07 PM (qzq48)

Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 05:09 PM (9oETl)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:42 AM (JOSIc)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 04:00 PM (3vSvS)

116 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 07:45 AM (CPNio)

117 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 12:50 PM (TUJDt)

118 Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 03:08 PM (fa8ya)






Processing 0.1, elapsed 0.1009 seconds.
14 queries taking 0.0077 seconds, 126 records returned.
Page size 182 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat