Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Hillary! Takes A Stand: "No" on Drivers Licenses for Illegals

Glad she cleared that up.

I'm no campaign expert, but this appears to have been poorly handled, and by "poorly handled" I mean god damn what a fucking train wreck THAT was.

At some point they might want to consider a strategy other than "it's all George Bush's fault". I realize that can and does work, some of the time.

Not this time.

More... [Ace]: Seems like a big enough deal to warrant an excerpt:

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday came out against granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, after weeks of pressure in the presidential race to take a position on a now-failed ID plan from her home state governor.

Clinton has faced criticism from candidates in both parties for her noncommittal answers on New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's attempt to allow illegal immigrants in his state to receive driver's licenses. Spitzer abandoned the effort Wednesday.

"I support Governor Spitzer's decision today to withdraw his proposal," Clinton said in a statement. "As president, I will not support driver's licenses for undocumented people and will press for comprehensive immigration reform that deals with all of the issues around illegal immigration including border security and fixing our broken system."

So, after saying she supported it, then saying no maybe she didn't, she just supported the idea of it but maybe not so much, Spitzer then buckles under a tsunami of public opinion and Hillary! decides, "Oh yeah, that's right, I didn't support it at all. I forgot."

Leadership.

Too bad they can't have dumb college students moderate these debates. Then I bet she'd have all the answers.

But this doesn't save her, or the Democrats. This past summer immigration was a wedge issue for the GOP. Now it's a wedge issue for the Democrats -- their hardline liberal/open borders base wants amnesty and full citizenship for anyone who can sneak across the border, but the vast majority of Americans -- including half the Democratic party -- hate the idea.

This is, for the Democrat, a question with no right answer. Including, as Hillary attempted, answering it both ways and neither way at all.

Posted by: Dave In Texas at 05:57 PM



Comments

1 Wow, what a profile in courage. Way to take a stand and lead.

Posted by: Drew at November 14, 2007 06:03 PM (hlYel)

2

Yeah...what timing now that it's been dropped.

courage.

Posted by: Bosk at November 14, 2007 06:13 PM (+aNmG)

3 What choice did she have with Spitzer's backtracking?  His actions forced her hand.

Posted by: Ken at November 14, 2007 06:13 PM (Bsj5b)

4 That finger in the wind shit isn't quite so easy as slick willy made it look apparently.

Posted by: Eleven at November 14, 2007 06:15 PM (7DB+a)

5 She couldn't lead (I mean truly lead -- like getting people to do things they otherwise wouldn't) if her life, or ours, depended on it.  Rational people run away from her filthiness.  God help us if she somehow makes it the White House.

Posted by: Ken at November 14, 2007 06:15 PM (Bsj5b)

6 Now Obama and Edwards need to be drawn out on this.  Let's see one of them make a stand FOR these licenses.  A way to contrast with Hillary.  It's lose-lose for Dems on this.  Either they lose much of America or they insult (but maybe not lose) their immigrant vote.

Posted by: Mark in Portland at November 14, 2007 06:22 PM (+45yf)

7 She's an Idiot.

Posted by: MagicalPat at November 14, 2007 06:24 PM (woOKl)

8 Nuance baby, nuance...

Posted by: karl at November 14, 2007 06:26 PM (tafPN)

9

She was for it before she was against it.

 

That's a winning strategy.

Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 14, 2007 06:33 PM (pzen5)

10

Hillary! today announced a clear-cut position vis-a-vis victory or surrender in WWII:

"I am often asked this question by young people,and my position is clear: we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender!"

A college student at the back of the room then asked the tough question that is on everyone's lips... "How does it feel to be carrying the hopes and dreams of women everywhere on your shoulders?"

Posted by: sherlock at November 14, 2007 06:36 PM (ojW85)

11 Primates....Sex....Ovoid-Shaped, inflatable, pig-skin-covered object.

Posted by: franksalterego at November 14, 2007 06:40 PM (jqKZU)

12

What choice did she have with Spitzer's backtracking?  His actions forced her hand.

Yep. She gave the one retraction that could spare her an outright contradiction. her original answer was that she "supported governors' efforts to fix the problem." So, she supported a disatrous idea, and then when its proponent got kicked in the groin, well, gee, she supported that too! What a surprise.

It's bullshit, of course, but plausibly deniable bullshit, and it's not like the press'll call her on it.

Some damage has been done, thankfully, but this shit is just slick enough to possibly insulate her down the road.


 

Posted by: jdub at November 14, 2007 06:42 PM (0t6Ct)

13

course, hay can still be had on her hubby's record re: immigration. the what? 500% increase during his tenure? true, jorge arbusto tried to sell us even further down the river, but he's not running. and to the extent that she tries to deflect that criticism by yelling "george bush!" rudy can (whether he will is an open question) use it as an opportunity to distance himself from pedro the amnesty monkey and demand strict enforcement.

i don't know how sloppy the handling of all this was, actually. the way she handled the original question was awkward, but remember, she managed not to REALLY alienate anybody, which is the name of the game at this stage. now she's taken some hits, but she bought time to see which side of things spitzer and the rest of the country would come down on, and wouldn't you know it, she followed their lead! so yeah, she got smacked around a little for a week, but it bought her the luxury of not having to make a stand that might have damaged her chances more substantially.

pretty slick, actually.

remember, now that she's taken her oh-so-principled stand, the press will let her earlier nuance slide.

[puke]

 

Posted by: jdub at November 14, 2007 06:48 PM (0t6Ct)

14 "As president, I ......will press for comprehensive immigration reform........"

What the hell does that mean?

Didn't Bush "press for comprehensive immigration reform"?

And citizens rose up and cut him and Congress a new ass!

Posted by: GarandFan at November 14, 2007 06:57 PM (+tCxF)

15

Well, it's pretty easy to figure out why the NY governor decided to cancel the bill. It wasnt from the polls of the people of New York. He was already against them from the start. But, since the issue of illegals getting licenses in NY was still on the table, you could easily bet that Hillary would have to clarify her position. Now, with this issue suddenly taken off the table, Hillary no longer has to answer or clarify her position.

So, in point, Governor Spitzer took the license issue off the table, not because of the voters of NY, but because of Hillary having to further answer to this issue.

Posted by: SGT Bazz at November 14, 2007 07:01 PM (NZDRZ)

16 "So, in point, Governor Spitzer took the license issue off the table, not because of the voters of NY, but because of Hillary having to further answer to this issue."

The cynic in me tells me that there was most likely a back-room conversation between the hillary and spitzer camps and spitzer was promised something big from her should she win the White House.  Afterall, hasn't the clinton machine operated this way for decades?

Posted by: Ken at November 14, 2007 07:09 PM (Bsj5b)

17 She isn't against the original proposal.  She merely "support[s] Governor Spitzer's decision today to withdraw his proposal."  She, like Spitzer, can still tell half the country that she thinks the proposal was a good idea, or a reasonable thing for a governor to do in the face of federal unwillingness to "fix the issue," while telling the other half of the country that she supports the withdrawal of the proposal since, she will tell the first half yet again, as did Spitzer, there was no sense spending all that good-as-gold political capital on something that was doomed never to pass.  Easy, right?

Nuance.  Baby got nuance.

Posted by: Z as in Jersey at November 14, 2007 07:09 PM (kZT4X)

18 I am actually surprised that she said she didn't support it. I think her grand plan is or was to actually get them licenses on a national level so they would vote for her in term #2.  She is now on record as not supporting it, which would crush her if she actually instituted it in her first term.  Think "read my lips...."

Posted by: Judd at November 14, 2007 07:14 PM (JB0d8)

19

As president, I ......will press for comprehensive immigration reform........"
What the hell does that mean?
Didn't Bush "press for comprehensive immigration reform"?
And citizens rose up and cut him and Congress a new ass!

And yet McCain, Rudy and Huckabee still think it's a swell idea too.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 14, 2007 07:26 PM (plsiE)

20 "That finger in the wind shit isn't quite so easy as slick willy made it look apparently."

The trick is you have to be upwind from everyone else for it to work.

Hillary is doomed to be forever downwind, because she is a panderer, not a leader. And panderers have to hear what you want first, before they can stroke you properly.

This twat is doomed.

Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at November 14, 2007 07:26 PM (41Dd+)

21

Slightly off-topic because it`s about Spitzer, via

http://maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com/archives/6815-Weds.-Morning-links.html 

it seems the  fellow thinks he has found a way around Congress` decision to retain the non-collection of "internet" sales taxes  

http://www.nysun.com/article/66382 

by claiming that if a resident`s web site has a revenue[comission]-generating link to a vendor, that constitutes the "physical presence" allowing forcing said vendor to record/collect/forward taxes - even those on sales not made via the link.

 

Posted by: teqjack at November 14, 2007 08:04 PM (CEphM)

22 #16
"The cynic in me tells me that there was most likely a back-room conversation between the hillary and spitzer camps and spitzer was promised something big from her should she win the White House.  Afterall, hasn't the clinton machine operated this way for decades?"

Dude, you know it. There were definitely back room conversations with the two. She didn't want to embarrass herself anymore with half-ass answers to simple, easy yes-no questions. Maybe there were more than just conversations, probably threats from Hillary to the Governor. And, I'm sure you're probably dead on. Spitzer was probably promised a little something after she won. (Or maybe something even before she won, like Spitzer waking up to a severed horse head, or never even waking up at all again. I do think she is very capable of doing these horrible acts).

Posted by: SGT BAZZ at November 14, 2007 09:47 PM (J7W2z)

23

"Hillary! Takes A Stand"

OK let's see: I kind of think my buddy Eliot is right plus it's Bush's fault so I'm kind of in favor of it but most people seem to be against it so I guess I'm kind of against it and it really is Bush's fault. Boy this leadership stuff is tough - but being as I'm the smartest woman in America I'm going to have to take a courageous stand and say I'm against it because of that 80% disapproval thing, and oh by the way did I forget to mention its Bush's fault.     

 

Posted by: adk46er at November 15, 2007 10:27 AM (3ndkl)

Posted by: aswkin at July 17, 2008 12:34 PM (Gyixh)

Posted by: 家出少女 at January 30, 2009 10:04 AM (hXNNS)

Posted by: google排名 at August 19, 2009 09:03 PM (4P9QF)

Posted by: dfsasfsaf at October 18, 2009 09:47 AM (GQ3Y4)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 10:13 AM (9oMrs)

Posted by: NBA SHOES at October 24, 2009 04:15 PM (/6617)

Posted by: nike air max at October 26, 2009 01:56 AM (sqkfE)

Posted by: NIKE AIR MAX at October 27, 2009 12:55 PM (sS5lD)

Posted by: discount ugg boots at October 30, 2009 03:14 AM (mBGLP)

Posted by: ugg boots at October 30, 2009 05:42 AM (3iF2y)

Posted by: uggsdream at November 03, 2009 02:12 AM (Uc43O)

Posted by: shoesshoe at November 03, 2009 08:58 PM (LHCCE)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 14, 2009 04:58 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 04:34 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 12:27 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 01:11 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 03:47 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 08:51 PM (C/zDM)

42 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 24, 2009 11:31 PM (fd1jz)

43 As you consider the many famous brand names mbt shoes, don't just consider the price tag. Consider the health of your feet , as they are your main guide to life and will likely endure more physical trauma on a daily basis than any other part of your body. mbt shoes-Your best choice .

Posted by: meruu at November 25, 2009 02:20 AM (1aNEH)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 11:50 AM (bsW/x)

45 I will have a hard time buying ugg classic cardy at normal brick and mortar store for now on knowing that I can browse the largest selection I have ever seen and purchase confidently. Thanks for being a great company.Although your ugg boots cardy website is entered by users, the site has a lot of accurate and useful information on it.your net shop is kept to a minimum and favours websites connected to the ugg cardy boots Web Design Library in appearance and subject.
The popular blue ugg is renowned for its comfort. But some doctors worry that the popular black ugg could cause serious foot pain in the long run.So some podiatrists across the country are telling ugg classic cardy lovers to watch their steps. In fact,there is nothing wrong!
The crochet boots online retailer also knows bargain-hungry shoppers are scouring the Web for discounts, and its UGG Classic Crochet rivals are more than happy to provide them. So it is putting coupon codes on ugg classic crochet that customers can use to save money on its site.

Posted by: makol UGG at December 05, 2009 06:37 AM (cmMdO)

46 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots at December 08, 2009 03:58 PM (JOSIc)

47 The womens mbtchallenges the hard to reach
muscles in your legs, but also works the abdominal, back, buttock, and thigh muscles.
With every stride, the instability activates the whole body in concert and tones as it
stimulates different areas.mbt
footwear
have a curved pivot sole that copies walking on soft moss. The sole of
href=http://www.mbtshoesbuy.com/products_new.html>new mbt
turns even, flat ground
into uneven terrain. The mbt anti shoes challenges the muscles to work harder with
every step you take. The unique curved sole works by providing instability and makes
the muscles of your body more engaged and also helps burn more calories.
The mbt shoes walking shoes have been
highlighted for its ability to cushion your feet while challenging your muscles.
Clinical studies suggest that regular use improves balance, posture and circulation.
mbt lami shoes re-establish
the natural conditions for standing and walking.You will get more results out of your
workouts ? MBT shoes have technology in the sole design that make your working more
efficient and burn more calories. With every step, the instability activates your
muscles and the whole body is stimulated as your walk more and more.Free Shipping
1Week on Select Styles Of discount
mbt
Walking Shoes Reviews !

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at December 09, 2009 02:00 PM (B0M1x)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 15, 2009 04:26 PM (5o+JZ)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 18, 2009 10:33 PM (1dySH)

Posted by: replica watches at December 19, 2009 05:26 AM (wd3Wb)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 11:19 PM (1dySH)

52 i just want to say,the article you write is great,today is my first visit here,and i'll come again to read your new blog.in our website,we sell all kind of nike air max,like nike air max 360 shoes and so on,the womens air max is so popular that you can view them and purchase.(air max)
http://www.my-nikeshoes.com/

Posted by: womens air max at December 22, 2009 04:07 PM (xnxK1)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 06:25 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: airmaxshoes at January 06, 2010 03:09 AM (fLwxV)

Posted by: nike air max at January 20, 2010 02:06 PM (CZv6h)

56 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 11:18 PM (TUJDt)

57 ibibw replica watches kyanhl replica watches,nxjggr louis vuitton aeg replica watches,qmjfe replica rolex bwxsmv replica watches,ndfhor watches replica lach replica watches replica watches,uiiupit louis vuitton veiluh replica watches,iafaw replica watches louis vuitton,fxnp louis vuitton,seleah watches kcuion louis vuitton replica mlob watches ztlqdp,louis vuitton,jqazxkw louis vuitton pongns louis vuitton,omcehoo replica louis vuitton cjjqsm,louis vuitton,pgbcp louis vuitton oefb replica watches aodllx.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 11:30 AM (UTLu5)






Processing 0.06, elapsed 0.0535 seconds.
14 queries taking 0.0068 seconds, 65 records returned.
Page size 93 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat