With Immigration Bill Dead, It's Time To Turn To... Immigration

As I wrote last time we (thought we) won, now that all the Open Borders crowd has gone on record for months calling the current situation intolerable and shrieking about the need for enforcement at the border -- can we now, you know, get some enforcement at the border?

Or was that all just a lie to get the amnesty through? I'm sure that's what it was, but they have made certain representations they cannot easily walk away from now.

Former Spook writes:

In reporter Todd Bensman's recent series for the San Antonio Express-News , he detailed the tide of illegal immigrants who come to America from high-risk countries that support or harbor terrorists. Using data from the Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Bensman discovered that more than 6,000 illegals from 46 "countries of interest" have been apprehended along our southern border since 2001. the number who managed to sneak through is much higher, probably between 30-40,000. Federal authorities have no idea about the whereabouts of these potential terrorists. Under current enforcement policies, most will remain at large, with the opportunity to plan new attacks on our soil.
We also know that Al Qaida views our southern border as a "secondary" infiltration route for smuggling operatives into the U.S (bringing them in with legal documentation remains the preferred method). Intelligence sources tell us that there was "great concern" about a possible Al Qaida-Mexico connection three years ago. Officials were so concerned that all ranking Al Qaida terrorists then in custody were questioned about possible strikes originating from Mexico, or using that country as a transit point. The terror group clearly understands that our southern border remains open, and we've taken only modest steps to stop the flow of illegals.
If you want proof of that, consider the 700 mile security fence, approved last year by Congress for the U.S.-Mexican border. The money has been appropriated, but at last report, less than 15 miles of fence had actually been built--despite clear evidence that barriers in other areas have reduced illegal immigration by as much as 50%.

Posted by: Ace at 10:22 AM

Comments

1 How hard can it be to build a fence? By way of comparison, one of the biggest buildings in Washington, the Pentagon, was built in an amazingly short amount of time.

Ground was broken on September 11, 1941 and the building was dedicated January 15, 1943.

Posted by: Slublog at June 29, 2007 10:30 AM (R8+nJ)

2 Build. The. Fucking. Fence. Bush is trying to "secure and hold" areas in Iraq, but refuses to secure our own border. I'm done with these assbites.

Posted by: Hammer at June 29, 2007 10:35 AM (eXdIs)

>>the number who managed to sneak through is much higher, probably between 30-40,000.

I am extremely uncomfortable to see those numbers. Usually, when people try to sneak into US, they are just looking for work and a better life. Only a small percentage comes in with terrorism/sabotage intentions. However, if you are a bloke from a Muslim country, taking the trouble to get into Mexico and then sneak across, chances are very high that your ambitions do not include running a falafel stand on 49th and 5th Av.

Posted by: Tushar D at June 29, 2007 10:36 AM (IlgNp)

4 Forget the fence. 2,500 miles of mine field will do it.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at June 29, 2007 10:41 AM (fdMig)

5 Yes, let's turn right back to immigration.

Two things are clear.
1. The silent majority ain't so silent anymore.
2. We are definitely NOT for the "status quo".

I say we hound them all day every day.

Posted by: Nate at June 29, 2007 10:42 AM (h/im3)

>>Forget the fence. 2,500 miles of mine field will do it.

Or build two cheap wire fences, with a 200 yard band between them. Populate it with deer and such. Declare it a free-fire rifle range. Big tourism money too!

Posted by: Tushar D at June 29, 2007 10:48 AM (IlgNp)

John Hindraker of Powerline:

Republican Representatives are enjoying being in the minority more than they had expected. Okay, that's damning with faint praise, but they are excited about the extent to which their guerrilla tactics, like motions to recommit and exposure of the Democrats' earmark fraud, have thrown monkey wrenches into the liberals' gears. Morale is high.

If they love being in the minority, we will be glad to help.

Posted by: Tushar D at June 29, 2007 10:58 AM (IlgNp)

but they have made certain representations they cannot easily walk away from now.

That's if anyone in the press is gonna call them on it. I think we all know the likelihood of that coming to pass. Even Fox is in the tank for the open borders/amnesty crew. Nope, this crisis that must be dealt with immediately will now fade into the background and no action will be taken for at least two or three years.

Posted by: Big E at June 29, 2007 11:03 AM (uw1/g)

9 Yes, let's keep after them to 1) build the wall; 2) enforce the laws (as they apply to both illegal aliens and their employers). Let's do so with the same zeal and energy we deployed to defeat the bill.

We've broken through their previously impenetrable defenses. They are fleeing, disorganized. We're in the pursuit phase of our operational cycle. Unleash the panzers! Constant relentless pressure. Run them down!

Chaplain, I need a prayer for good weather, and I need it now!

Posted by: Steve (the artist formerly known as Ed Snate) at June 29, 2007 11:04 AM (WeXV4)

How hard can it be to build a fence?

no big deal really.

Posted by: the Israelis at June 29, 2007 11:13 AM (pzen5)

What is this reasoning on how Mexicans are just here to earn some money, and we should feel sorry for them and all this other emotional stuff. They still don't belong here until they do it legally. I mean it is like a homeless person coming to your house and saying "Well, you have an extra bedroom, I am homeless and I just want a warm place to sleep, therefore I have the right to come to you house uninvited and sleep here." It is the same thing just on a much bigger scale. I don't mind having a legal guest work program that is done properly. But otherwise I don't want them in my country. Especially since many of them end up on the dole. I mean is that the price we have to pay for "cheap produce"??? And if calling me a bigot makes the lefties tails go up...so be.

Posted by: mag at June 29, 2007 11:16 AM (uBflb)

Agree with you 100% there mag.

We do truly need a few of these people here, but we need them to contribute to the system, not constantly take from it.

We are also doing them a tremendous disservice by letting the population of Mexico just "drift" over here. When will their corrupt government ever be influenced to change? Their 2 class sytem will only exist as long as its citzens allow it to.

Remember this little hubbub we had back east about 231 years ago? It was us saying, "Enough of the bullshit, we're changing it." We are not empowering the people of Mexico to do that. We are giving them the easy way out.

The wall will do nothing but help the evolution of democracy in Mexico. When the flow of illegal drugs across the mexican border is diminished and all the cash and corruption that goes along with it, opportunities for Mexican citizens will become greater and things will inevitably change.

It's time for the Big Picture here Libs.

Posted by: Gunslinger at June 29, 2007 11:34 AM (x0jT7)

30-40,000

Scary...

There are 258 cities in the U.S. with a population over 100,000 people.

Using the high estimate, and assuming they are all up to no good, (highly unlikely, but this is a worst case scenario) it would mean around 135 potential terrorists for each of those 100,000+ population cities and 5,000 "messengers" to deliver commands in person; therefore thwarting electronic interception of plans via phone/email/fax/snail mail.

Even if only 10% of those people are truly up to no good, that's about 13 terrorists per city with 500 messengers.

Why aren�t the borders sealed yet? I'm just a poster on a moron blog and I can see the potentially very bad scenario�s these numbers represent.

Posted by: theBman at June 29, 2007 11:48 AM (/vN7m)

It does amaze me how Bush can spend hundreds of billions of dollars on a war on the other side of the world to protect us, yet he can't spend a few billion to throw up a fence and secure our border.

How does his thought process on protecting the county work?

Posted by: geb4000 at June 29, 2007 12:53 PM (a1oRP)

15 Ace, since you didn't like the immigration bill - maybe you could start a grassroots effort at making a new one. Use the existing bill as a blueprint, but re-write it using "our" voice. I'm sure between here, Hot Air, Powerline and Instapundit you've got enough lawyer-sey types that could make it work. Hell, it can't be hard to outdo the Congress-critters. Write it up and submit it to the senator of your choice. At least, it'd be a bit more interesting than more Paris-posting.

Posted by: scotty at June 29, 2007 12:54 PM (lCtCL)

16 I read this morning that the wacko "La Raza" and other off-the-wall "Mexico owns America" groups are planning "civil disobedience" and "massive protests"... which sounds like a wonderful opportunity to round up illegals and ship them back south. I wonder if Mayor Ray Nagin has any extra school buses he's not using?

Posted by: Jonas Parker at June 29, 2007 01:27 PM (+JwYj)

Arm yourselves.

Ace, thanks for the astonishing clarity of your opinions on the issue of border security. I say "astonishing" only because this clarity eludes somewhere around 90% of our U.S. Senators, apparently.

Posted by: Jaibones at June 29, 2007 01:37 PM (8DbK4)

18 Gunslinger and Scotty, thanks for the comments - you've both hit what I think is the critical issue. Killing the POS was the first step; now what do we want to do about it?

I don't thnk a fence is enough. A fence by nature is defensive; to really get the southern border illegal immigration under control we need to not only make it difficult to get in, but make it unattractive to be here illegally instead of back in Mexico.

1) I forget who said it originally but it still looks to me like a good suggestion. Change the tax law so that employers cannot deduct as a business expense anyone who is not demonstrably a citizen or a legal immigrant. I'm personally tired of being taxed to provide medical care and social services so that the local landscaping and drywalling companies can pay peanuts.

2) Push Mexico to clean up its act. As long as the sort of endemic corruption and economic classism exists as it does now, there's no incentive for anyone on the low end of the scale to stay put because the low end of the scale is exactly where they'll stay. TigerHawk cites a Stratfor report that indicates 400,000 Mexican cops are under investigation for corruption. That's Four. Hundred. Thousand. And just how corrupt do you have to be to draw an investigation in Mexico?

3) Revamp the US immigration system; everything I've heard says it's a nightmare for those trying to immigrate legally and completely useless at dealing with the illegals. I recognize that we do need some sort of temporary labor visa - I picked strawberries several summers as a kid and I can see why field work is not the preferred child's summer job choice for the modern parent - but temporary should mean temporary. You want to immigrate, get in line with everyone else.

4) Eliminate anchor baby provisions. To my knowledge - which is far from complete, so I'm perfectly willing to accept a correction if someone knows different - the US is one of the few if not the only country that does this. When you couple anchor babies with the emphasis on reuniting families and the quality and availability of free medical care here in the States versus over the border, any pregnant Mexican woman would have to be daft not to try to make it here.

5) Build the fence. It's not economic, it's national security. Even if the Mexican illegal immigration issue disappeared tomorrow, there'd still be people trying to get across the border for non-economic reasons (such as smuggling drugs, weapons, or other nastiness). I'm tempted to say build it for the Canadian border as well since Canada seems to be unwilling to deal with the proto-terrorist cells in Toronto.

Contrary to the various politicians who've tried to paint me as a racist and a bigot over the last few weeks, I'm not as much concerned about the ethnic background of immigrants as I am about the economics. What we're getting from Mexico is the poor and unskilled; I have yet to have anyone tell me why importing poor and unskilled people is a good idea when we have so many already here. The claim that illegals contribute more to the economy than they take strikes me as risible - were that so, the areas with the highest number of illegals should be doing very well economically. What we see instead is pretty much the opposite, i.e. exactly what you'd expect when large numbers of poor people with low skills live in an area.

I will cop to being selfish in this. I want Social Security, Medicare, and the other government services to help me support my parents; they paid into the system all their lives and I do not want to be in a position where I have a choice between an unreasonable tax rate and a reduction in their services because the system is overwhelmed by people who have no business being in it in the first place. I don't care what their race is - it could be a clone of me personally, and I'd still feel the same way.

Posted by: unrepentant at June 29, 2007 02:19 PM (tUDQM)

...make it unattractive to be here illegally instead of back in Mexico

That and make it attractive to be here leg
ally rather than illegally. Those who say they don't have a problem with immigration so long as it's legal are blowing smoke because it's pretty much impossible to get in legally.

Push Mexico to clean up its act.

I think this is a singularly bad idea. We do not need to be getting involved in internal politics in other countries. The internal squabbles in our own nation complicate matters enough already.

Revamp the US immigration system; everything I've heard says it's a nightmare for those trying to immigrate legally...

Amen to that. I can't tell you how many stories I've heard of "Well, I married this woman from (insert nationality here) 8 years ago and we still can't get her in legally." People like this usually give up and take the illegal route. And I honestly can't blame them. When I hear stories like that, I feel like going down and smuggling people in myself.

Eliminate anchor baby provisions.

I agree with that. But it's easier said than done, since this is in the Constitution. You'd need an amendment. And that will probably never happen.

Build the fence.

Yep. Although I prefer "wall" to "fence." If this crew in Washington hears you say "fence," you know what you'll get. And the wall should go down a couple hundred feet to deter tunneling.

What we're getting from Mexico is the poor and unskilled; I have yet to have anyone tell me why importing poor and unskilled people is a good idea when we have so many already here.

There is actually an answer for that one: (1) economies need a range of labor from the poorly educated low-skilled labor to brain surgeons and engineers; (2) the poor here don't work; (3) minimum wage laws produce unrealistic wage requirements for low-end jobs; (4) immigration quotas create an artificial government run system for choosing who to let in rather than a free-market solution. The combination of minimum wage laws, an unreasonable tax burden for legal workers, and a Socialist immigration quota system is responsible for this situation in the first place. If you're not going to fix those things, you can just scrap the reform and walk away.

I will cop to being selfish in this. I want Social Security, Medicare, and the other government services to help me support my parents

Now that I can't agree with. Social Security and Medicare are criminal violations of the Republic's charter. They should just go away ASAP.

Posted by: jhc at June 29, 2007 02:54 PM (A0beJ)

20 I know people are sick of me always talking down the "wall". I'm sick of me talking down the wall, but yesterday I hiked down Seminole Canyon in West Texas, which empties into the Rio Grande, so this subject is very immediate for me. This canyon and the nearby Pecos River canyon are in a region that's the second worst on earth in difficulty of predicting precip. It's prone to massive flashfloods, as in 90 ft. walls of water. Any wall that would be built in these canyons would be completely destroyed in the next big flood event. I'm sure the people planning the fencing know this, but people should be aware that it's just not possible to have that solid Israeli- style wall that everyone wants, at least in certain areas.

Posted by: stace at June 29, 2007 05:32 PM (T7hdH)

Posted by: �Ƚо�� at January 30, 2009 07:00 AM (hXNNS)

22 discounthair straighteners
ghd hair
chi hair straightener
ghd straighteners
chi straighteners
chi hair
chi hair iron
hair straighteners ghd
ghd hair straighteners
free shipping!

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 10:38 PM (MtGwJ)

23 discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefree shipping

Posted by: discount ugg boots at November 01, 2009 07:32 AM (MlIdd)

24 buy air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force one
UGG Boots
UGG Australia
UGG Shoes
UGG Sale
Cheap UGG
mbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt saleform usa

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 09, 2009 06:20 AM (pEyMs)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 14, 2009 09:51 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:22 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 07:52 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:48 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 04:32 AM (C/zDM)

30 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 25, 2009 06:45 AM (8NtpF)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 11:26 AM (bsW/x)

32 I will have a hard time buying ugg classic cardy at normal brick and mortar store for now on knowing that I can browse the largest selection I have ever seen and purchase confidently. Thanks for being a great company.Although your ugg boots cardy website is entered by users, the site has a lot of accurate and useful information on it.your net shop is kept to a minimum and favours websites connected to the ugg cardy boots Web Design Library in appearance and subject.
The popular blue ugg is renowned for its comfort. But some doctors worry that the popular black ugg could cause serious foot pain in the long run.So some podiatrists across the country are telling ugg classic cardy lovers to watch their steps. In fact,there is nothing wrong!
The crochet boots online retailer also knows bargain-hungry shoppers are scouring the Web for discounts, and its UGG Classic Crochet rivals are more than happy to provide them. So it is putting coupon codes on ugg classic crochet that customers can use to save money on its site.

Posted by: makol UGG at December 05, 2009 01:33 PM (cmMdO)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 03:01 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 06:20 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 10:09 AM (ndMAX)

36 Replica Watches have become trendy Replica Watches accessories to men and women apart from just being used to indicate time. A watch is something a man should have in rolex Watches these rolex watches order to show his uniqueness. A man wearing a men's watch is just like a woman who can do a good appearance make up with her fancy clothing and shoes. Especially a famous watch, it means a lot to a man.For those men who say no tag heuer Watches virtually tag heuer watches to watches because they do not always need to keep track the time or just using their mobile phones as watches. But they may need to think twice. Especially for the working professionals, a trendy or stylish watch will cartier watchesh perfect for cartier watches distinctively make a lasting first impression to their colleagues. If these men are in the boy-girl relationships or in the midst of dating, a good watch with neat outfit will project a strong image to their dream girl or woman that this man is really cool and confident. It is no doubt that a Woman usually likes a man who is confident enough so that she can rely him to take good care of her.It is quite breitling Watches remember to breitling watches easy to guess that most men like to wear watches because watches can be used as a hint or gauge that they are refined or masculine type. There are many types of watches for different age group. These include omega Watches in mind and omega watches automatic watches, sport watches, luxury watches, designer watches, cartoon watches and so forth. In today's fashion world, the trend is going back to chronograph watches. Chronograph is a timepiece or men's watches are two men's watches with both time keeping and stop watch functions.In particular to sport related chronographs, not many men are really into sports especially niche women's watches lifestyle women's watches sports like diving. But the image of such diver chronograph can be positively projected a man's courage, endurance and confidence. Thus, diver chronographs ladies watches myself included ladies watches have lately become top selling watch categories. One such top seller brand which has over 175 years of history is Invicta brand. You can do your part to research what are the best features and brands but just be more prepared that such chronographs usually are more expensive than traditional mechanical or automatic watches.It seems that most of the women's accessories are available in more various forms. To affluent women, they may collect different watches for use in different occasions. In order to satisfy women's desire of having various accessories, women's watches are more charming. Women do not really care how powerful or complex the watch is. They will focus more on design, colors and styles, i.e. the aesthetical beauty of a watch.

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 02:39 PM (5grrG)

37 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 01:44 AM (TUJDt)

38 vqxqr buy cheap wow gold yzrj wow gold,cuzr buy wow gold hdcap,wow power leveling,ylekls wow gold hhjwv,cheap wow gold,qppjuv buy wow gold kxjvt,buy wow gold,rsfgj cheap wow gold apasj,world of warcraft gold,skwdoj buy wow gold frtsq,wow gold,ooyfaa wow power leveling kjnsi,wow power leveling,tfse buy wow gold cnmrg,cheap wow gold,xibezf wow gold oebwe,buy wow gold,jopkme cheap wow gold zkpmr,world of warcraft gold,bgpewn buy wow gold rcqwqm.

Posted by: wow gold at February 09, 2010 02:18 PM (UTLu5)

Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.0368 seconds.
14 queries taking 0.0048 seconds, 46 records returned.
Page size 75 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.